Something like that (for real use cases of data on ranks): Where receivers received merits from, and meriters sents merits to. I moved further and complicated things from your data and DdmrDdmr's Merit Dashboard. From the results, I think we have interesting overview, but such things should be played around yearly (if we do).
But for userrank, DdmrDdmr has it already so if it costs your time, and some the other things, it is not worth to pay some kinda of resources on it. I agree.
Topic: [BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action] - page 44. (Read 21752 times)
January 08, 2020, 01:28:51 PM
January 08, 2020, 12:56:48 PM
"What if we can observe data on DT 1/2 members over months and see how long as well as how consistent they maintain their positions as DT1/2 members. I know with the algorithm to automatically include and exclude DT members each month from theymos, it seems to be difficult that someone can maintain DT member positions for many months.
theymos updates his trust list each month so if you can, please dump that data monthly.
I more or less kept track of this since May 2019 in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings. For DT1, I'm still planning to make my dtview-viewer, but I ran into some dificulties and never got to finish it.theymos updates his trust list each month so if you can, please dump that data monthly.
This should not be difficult to implement.
It's doable indeed, but I don't really want to add more "categories" to my data collecting. And I can't think of a use for a list of usernames and ranks. Piggy made something like it in Open scraped data of all the users - SQL Lite DB - 2.481.270 users, but it's not being updated.
January 08, 2020, 09:55:15 AM
But this time, it is for ranks
Do you mean for only DT1 and DT2 users, or for all users? The former is easy to do, the latter will have outdated information because 2.7 million profiles aren't instantly updated on BPIP.Code:
userid: userrank
January 08, 2020, 09:07:18 AM
But this time, it is for ranks
Do you mean for only DT1 and DT2 users, or for all users? The former is easy to do, the latter will have outdated information because 2.7 million profiles aren't instantly updated on BPIP.Code:
userid: userrank
From your comments, it raises one thing that you can dump such data easily. I have the idea like that:
"What if we can observe data on DT 1/2 members over months and see how long as well as how consistent they maintain their positions as DT1/2 members. I know with the algorithm to automatically include and exclude DT members each month from theymos, it seems to be difficult that someone can maintain DT member positions for many months.
theymos updates his trust list each month so if you can, please dump that data monthly.
January 08, 2020, 06:50:09 AM
But this time, it is for ranks
Do you mean for only DT1 and DT2 users, or for all users? The former is easy to do, the latter will have outdated information because 2.7 million profiles aren't instantly updated on BPIP. Code:
userid: userrank
January 07, 2020, 06:40:25 PM
I am showing as DT2, but I am on DT1. :/
Could you consider to add a raw results in the format loyce.club use, please.Like that one, for username: loyce.club/usernames/usernames.txt
Code:
userid: username
Code:
userid: userrank
January 07, 2020, 10:33:26 AM
I am showing as DT2, but I am on DT1. :/
Yes, I thought I had this corrected the other day but it came back.
I have a feeling the DT2 procedure is somehow overriding DT1 when it runs, not really sure yet.(this is what I was referring to when I said my first attempt at including the DT2 strength under the DT1 procedure failed... I thought it had created this bug. I undid the changes made and corrected the DB entries, and it seemed to be fine after it re-ran the DT1/2 procedures, but yes, it seems to have come back.)
UPDATE: OK! DT1/2 displays should be better now..
January 07, 2020, 10:28:13 AM
I am showing as DT2, but I am on DT1. :/
January 07, 2020, 09:38:53 AM
This is an amazing project, I really like it. I am glad the website is back. Congrats.
Thank you. I noticed a few small glitches. I don't know if anyone noticed them yet, but I am pointing them out...
Looks like the search procedure needs some updating... the profile procedure had been updated in the past to work with numerous back-end changes which have happened to the DB structure, so we just need to get that search procedure updated to reflect those changes. The most accurate numbers are going to be on the profile page itself at the moment.I can't see DT2 in my profile as well, but I saw in some other users.
I don't believe you are on DT2 at the moment... maybe the recent DT1 selections knocked you off?
UPDATE: Search procedure has been updated, these numbers should now match the profile page.
January 07, 2020, 07:29:00 AM
Hello,
This is an amazing project, I really like it. I am glad the website is back. Congrats.
I noticed a few small glitches. I don't know if anyone noticed them yet, but I am pointing them out...
Even though I have a green trust, it still shows as 0-0-0 in BPIP.
I noticed that in this page my total activity is also different from the profile in bpip (518 against 714).
Those problems may be affecting more users.
I can't see DT2 in my profile as well, but I saw in some other users.
This is an amazing project, I really like it. I am glad the website is back. Congrats.
I noticed a few small glitches. I don't know if anyone noticed them yet, but I am pointing them out...
Even though I have a green trust, it still shows as 0-0-0 in BPIP.
I noticed that in this page my total activity is also different from the profile in bpip (518 against 714).
Those problems may be affecting more users.
I can't see DT2 in my profile as well, but I saw in some other users.
January 05, 2020, 09:32:00 AM
That shows how DT1-blacklisting would influence their DT-strength.
DT1 strength or DT2 strength? .. Now I'm confused lol .. 
I'm thinking about this scenario, in which a "downvoted" DT1 member would end up on DT2 if he gets excluded from DT1.
To quote my Mobile:
This means it is possible that a DT1-exclusion leads to a member being on DT2 which wouldn't happen without blacklisting. This is probably caused by the fact that excluded DT1-members can vote against other DT1-members, but they can't vote against DT2-members.
January 04, 2020, 04:28:40 PM
I'm confused already: where's dt1strength?
Well, why not just "Strongest DT1 Eligibility" (r=dt1eligibility?). 
That shows how DT1-blacklisting would influence their DT-strength.
DT1 strength or DT2 strength? .. Now I'm confused lol .. My first attempt at showing the DT2 strength for DT1 failed, but I now know why, I just need to look into this a bit more to make sure it won't hurt other procedures before implementing.. need to devote some time to a few other things first.. but if suchmoon doesn't have any animosity towards the idea, it'll be on the todo list.
January 03, 2020, 03:56:11 PM
Also, is it helpful or confusing to include DT1 members in the DT2 strength report?
It currently shows:Quote
https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=dtstrength ---> Strongest DT1 Position
https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=dt2strength ---> Strongest DT2 Position
I'm confused already: where's dt1strength?https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=dt2strength ---> Strongest DT2 Position
As for your question: it might be useful to show DT1 and DT2 strengths for DT1 users together. That shows how DT1-blacklisting would influence their DT-strength.
January 03, 2020, 03:21:42 PM
There's a bug with unbanned accounts, it looks like the account status doesn't change from Autobanned to Active, and it remains Archived.
That resulted in many Meta Log entries instead of just one:
This should be corrected now (as of ~2 days ago), prior profile records that didn't get their account status updated upon waking up or being unbanned should self-correct on their next parsed post (otherwise, they would need to be manually updated - which I can't do at the moment)That resulted in many Meta Log entries instead of just one:
A small bug report in case you were unaware: Looks like some of the Reports are still broken, namely https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostmerit which doesn't load at all, and https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=dt2strength which lists everyone as joint 1st place.
I cleared the error on mostmerit shortly after your post, but strength calculations for dt1/2 took a bit more time.. and still may need some work. The duplication isn't happening anymore but I'm not quite sure yet why the rank skips numbers (on both reports). I believe the values should be accurate though, but let us know if something seems off. Also, is it helpful or confusing to include DT1 members in the DT2 strength report?
January 01, 2020, 05:52:04 PM
There's a bug with unbanned accounts, it looks like the account status doesn't change from Autobanned to Active, and it remains Archived.
Bug Confirmed.
I wonder why is this member unbanned again?!
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=pirate%20hunter
Multiple Ban Evasion, plagiarism and cheating...
January 01, 2020, 05:43:00 AM
I also just recently updated the OP to include a notable change I forgot, which is that profile.aspx can now handle ID's, so this could be a way to access this particular profile directly, by using: https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=2347750
There's a bug with unbanned accounts, it looks like the account status doesn't change from Autobanned to Active, and it remains Archived.That resulted in many Meta Log entries instead of just one:
Code:
12/31/2019 9:38:44 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:38:31 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:38:19 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:38:06 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:37:55 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:37:42 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:37:29 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:37:17 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:37:04 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:36:50 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:36:38 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:36:26 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:36:13 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:36:00 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:35:47 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:35:35 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:35:22 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:35:11 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:34:01 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:33:49 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:33:36 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:33:23 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:33:11 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:32:59 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:32:47 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:32:29 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:32:16 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:32:03 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:31:50 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:31:37 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:31:25 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:31:12 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:31:00 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:30:48 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:30:35 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:30:23 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:30:10 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:29:57 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:29:45 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:29:32 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:29:19 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:29:06 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:28:55 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:28:42 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:28:30 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:28:17 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:27:50 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:27:38 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:27:25 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:27:13 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:27:00 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:26:48 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:26:35 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:26:23 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:26:10 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:25:58 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:25:46 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:25:34 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:25:21 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:25:08 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:24:55 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:24:42 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:24:30 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:24:17 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:24:03 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:23:50 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:23:38 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:23:25 PM Profile unbanned New post
12/31/2019 9:23:13 PM Profile unbanned New post
January 01, 2020, 03:48:20 AM
Glad to see BPIP back online, great job guys!
December 31, 2019, 12:01:10 PM
...
I have a feeling that's 100 instances of having received merit - probably 100 X 4 merits??
I have noticed that the "password changed" information isn't showing up at all.
December 31, 2019, 11:59:17 AM
Nice to see this service online again.
Follow this thread.
It seems the merit count does not work well.
Follow this thread.
I am happy BPIP is back again.
Thanks everyone who is a part of the project.
Is this a bug?
If yes, please consider fixing this too.
..
Total merit and earned merit are 400 and 100 respectively. ( I know numbers should be updated. I am not talking about this)
Both ranks shown under total merits and earned merits are based on earned merits.
Thanks everyone who is a part of the project.
Is this a bug?
If yes, please consider fixing this too.
..
Total merit and earned merit are 400 and 100 respectively. ( I know numbers should be updated. I am not talking about this)
Both ranks shown under total merits and earned merits are based on earned merits.
It seems the merit count does not work well.
December 31, 2019, 11:46:16 AM
I am happy BPIP is back again.
Thanks everyone who is a part of the project.
Is this a bug?
If yes, please consider fixing this too.
Total merit and earned merit are 400 and 100 respectively. ( I know numbers should be updated. I am not talking about this)
Both ranks shown under total merits and earned merits are based on earned merits.
Thanks everyone who is a part of the project.
Is this a bug?
If yes, please consider fixing this too.
Total merit and earned merit are 400 and 100 respectively. ( I know numbers should be updated. I am not talking about this)
Both ranks shown under total merits and earned merits are based on earned merits.
Jump to: