No one has said that the threads should be deleted, not allowed, etc. We're talking about not labeling them "lending" and stickying them. Sheesh!
Your last remark convinces me that you're not the naive defender I initially took you for; you seem to be complicit in the fraud.
The first sentence from the OP:
Where is there any suggestion for an individual to use his own judgement, that the decision belongs to the individual? The above is not an objective stance. The majority of team Ponzi posts make unequivocal claims that are unverifiable from either direction, and proceed to tell people what to do with their own assets. Apparently, there's no such thing as buyer beware in their collective vernacular.
The whole concern about changing the tags appears to be secondary to the crusade, especially when considering the repetitious and emotionally-charged assertions devoid of proof. That's colloquially known as a witch hunt or smear campaign. Team Ponzi is more fraudulent and inciteful than any of the accused as far as I'm concerned.
Yes, in a sense I am "complicit" in some of the investments listed - shock of shocks: I'm invested in a few of them. Why? Because the risk/reward is not dictated by baseless accusations from short-sighted individuals whom have demonstrated their inability and/or unwillingness to explore alternative possibilities that are fully viable in the unregulated Bitcoin environment.
If they can't agree to disagree in the face of logic and lack of evidence, then there's an apparent lack of emotional and intellectual maturity on their part.