No, unfortunately not.
Yes there is. Actually "there is a way" is not a correct statement as it infers that by default they are not responsible but they are.
Don't take my word it, here is an example: There is a web service called freehostingnoads, sounds like a great service, doesn't it, so many people would make websites on that platform, sure. What happens is that some respectable web nanny services block any website hosted on this platform and they spit out the reason: "this host has been known to be the source of fraudulent services". So one guy sets up a website on their platform, scams people, now what happens: the whole platform is banned most likely for life without parole.
I give you another example: do you really imaging yourself going to a shopping center and setting up shop to scam people and then close and get away with it? what does it do to the reputation of the shopping centre? Do you really think you will not be on the noose of a lynch mob sent by the shopping centre management within 1 week?
If any of these farts used fiat then there is a noose with their real names on it. Btc-e or whatever crap "exchange" cannot say we did not know about money laundering, and in fact we all know when we opened accounts with them that was a clear clause. Btc-e management will all be in jail for a long time if they don't lay the information in golden plates on a red carpet. That is why probably actual arbitrage never happened, the digits are still in BTC in their wallet and will be moved around and then converted to fiat. That is why they returned $
What people should ask for in Arbitrage, now that we paid for the lesson, is proof of work (buys/sells) from the days before with links to the blockchain. The scammers of btc-arbs can dream about their next one in jail.
If you want to catch them you most certainly can. BTC has been classified as property and he stole our property. He did not file for bankruptcy. He is a thief and thieves belong in jail.
They are not! Read this: http://www.out-law.com/page-488 Otherwise one could sue google as well, for listing fraudulent activities etc.
I don't think you actually read that article. It talks about ISPs being treated as mere conduit if ... and if ... and provided they do not host the information.
freehostingnoads DOES host the websites on its servers!