Topic: [BTE] The Bytecoin Information Thread - page 10. (Read 79034 times)
True but you have to have a large bank roll. They're greedy, once they finish you out, they're gone. They have no loyalty.
I would like to discuss the flow of new blocks through the network, and through the software, and the interface between the reference software and miners. If anyone is up to speed on that software, I'd like to know.
For various values of "up to speed," I am available.
I propose this version for the discussion, as it is the most recent public bytecoin repository.
[email protected]:ahmedbodi/Bytecoin-MM.git
commit fdc7831cdf931dbe394803c4a32e6a5e7436aea0
Merge: 4de078d 9448beb
Author: ahmedbodi <[email protected]>
Date: Sun Jul 21 16:43:29 2013 -0700
I would like to discuss the flow of new blocks through the network, and through the software, and the interface between the reference software and miners. If anyone is up to speed on that software, I'd like to know.
Many blocks found in the past few hours.
How many exactly?
Many blocks found in the past few hours.
These three addresses were submitted and found on the previous blockchain:
Code:
8cjdcPw3JHVE8rRAKuUoQ2dwVARDatyc3S
8FcDgSQprNhrCKLPyhNfie853xYRJ3fGeF
8Lm61kdTJPAenpV3s6L3d88yStiuk9Y6Rd
8FcDgSQprNhrCKLPyhNfie853xYRJ3fGeF
8Lm61kdTJPAenpV3s6L3d88yStiuk9Y6Rd
You may still submit a previously mined address if you wish.
In the event that I mine BTE block 58115, I might pay some to a previous miner.
You can submit a previously mined address for consideration at https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1ZA9a38yBlsQaN5HjaPo5idegVO85m-RqCoFuGTWNjXo
--- clarification 2017-12-20 ---
For example, one of the submissions begins 8Qmq. This address does not show up in my database of coinbase transactions. Again, any submissions should be for addresses that have previously been paid by mining, e.g., the transaction is in transaction 0 of the block.
I have
You can submit a previously mined address for consideration at https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1ZA9a38yBlsQaN5HjaPo5idegVO85m-RqCoFuGTWNjXo
--- clarification 2017-12-20 ---
For example, one of the submissions begins 8Qmq. This address does not show up in my database of coinbase transactions. Again, any submissions should be for addresses that have previously been paid by mining, e.g., the transaction is in transaction 0 of the block.
I have
| height | address | earnings |
| 7189 | 8QmQTRcwoq6PFw2Qm3pAXdrXMegPDzzQ97 | 50.00000000 |
| 8438 | 8QmQ6nfi6uHRKF05ayyFrJZK4hq2KNY14n | 50.00000000 |
These three addresses were submitted and found on the previous blockchain:
Code:
8cjdcPw3JHVE8rRAKuUoQ2dwVARDatyc3S
8FcDgSQprNhrCKLPyhNfie853xYRJ3fGeF
8Lm61kdTJPAenpV3s6L3d88yStiuk9Y6Rd
8FcDgSQprNhrCKLPyhNfie853xYRJ3fGeF
8Lm61kdTJPAenpV3s6L3d88yStiuk9Y6Rd
bytecoin would likely go the bitcoin core way. when i wanted to update bytecoin to fix 1/2 the bugs and atleast make it atleast usable everyone was completely against it, so seeing as i was the only dev willing to work on it, i dropped it.
Is a block explorer going to be made available?
This coin is not compatible with blockexplorers, sorry.
It should be able to have a block explorer being a BTC clone shouldn't it?
I am always grateful to people who create branches here not just to talk about some things ,but branches are really useful.thanks to author! given that in the last month bitcoin has fallen quite low. resources about this cryptocurrency are useful and popular.
I do not understan. Can you elaborate a little more?
I am always grateful to people who create branches here not just to talk about some things ,but branches are really useful.thanks to author! given that in the last month bitcoin has fallen quite low. resources about this cryptocurrency are useful and popular.
A search of this thread reveals several that were up and running during the early days of BTE.
This coin is not compatible with blockexplorers, sorry.
Is a block explorer going to be made available?
This coin is not compatible with blockexplorers, sorry.
Is a block explorer going to be made available?
This coin is not compatible with blockexplorers, sorry.
yes the one which might be turning into PPS bte.crypto-expert.com (if we go ahead with the move to PPS it will be reallocated to pool.bytecoin.biz everyone will have 1 weeks notice and any unclaimed funds will be moved over to the new pool with their account (passwords will be invalidated then so will need to be reset
It looks like it has possibilities except that almost half the coins are in one wallet. Most people pass on monopoly coins.
Is a block explorer going to be made available?
Okay, it would be great to get this up and running again as proof of resilience.
Technically, it is up an running now. Blocks are being processed, transactions get confirmed.
Okay, it would be great to get this up and running again as proof of resilience.
I'm down for a while. OS update taking longer than expected.
Prof, how far away are we for next difficulty adjustment?
At the current mining rate, more than a year.
Can you share your calculations?
At the rate of 2 blocks per day it looks like the retarget is sooner than "more than a year"
I grabbed some data.
Code:
block 58250, timestamp 1529219483
block 58150, timestamp 1523062269
61,572 sec / block, or 17.1 hr/block
29 * 2016 - 58250 = 214 block to retarget
214 * 17.1 = 3,660 hours to retarget
--> 152 days.
block 58150, timestamp 1523062269
61,572 sec / block, or 17.1 hr/block
29 * 2016 - 58250 = 214 block to retarget
214 * 17.1 = 3,660 hours to retarget
--> 152 days.
Now we are talking Prof! Excellent
I'm down for a while. OS update taking longer than expected.
Prof, how far away are we for next difficulty adjustment?
At the current mining rate, more than a year.
Can you share your calculations?
At the rate of 2 blocks per day it looks like the retarget is sooner than "more than a year"
I grabbed some data.
Code:
block 58250, timestamp 1529219483
block 58150, timestamp 1523062269
61,572 sec / block, or 17.1 hr/block
29 * 2016 - 58250 = 214 block to retarget
214 * 17.1 = 3,660 hours to retarget
--> 152 days.
block 58150, timestamp 1523062269
61,572 sec / block, or 17.1 hr/block
29 * 2016 - 58250 = 214 block to retarget
214 * 17.1 = 3,660 hours to retarget
--> 152 days.
Jump to: