We looked at the crypto currency market in September 2023 when the price of Bitcoin was around $25,000 and if you bought 1 Bitcoin it would be twice (2x) what it is today. This clearly shows that this is not a long-term investment but an example of a short-term investment. If you were to invest in the DCA method at the same price at the same time let's say you would have invested $100 per week or month. Then the amount of your invested bitcoins would be 6 x 100 dollars in 6 months i.e. 600 dollars.
So if you have more amount of money then invest more amount of bitcoins and you will be able to earn more profit even if it is a short term investment.
It is short term if you decide to sell. Bitcoin can be whatever you like, and if you sell too much too soon, you might have wished that you had treated your investment into bitcoin as long term instead of short term.
Let's take a longer term example. Let's say that someone came into bitcoin in 2014 and spent a couple of years accumulating bitcoin, so maybe he accumulated around 50 BTC at around $500 each. So his total investment is $25k. So when the BTC price shot up to $2,000, he could not resist, and he sold all of his BTC, and so he ended up selling them for $100k, and so he has around $75k in profits... that is pretty good, right? He is still not doing as good as the longer term investor who still has the 50 BTC, and maybe the longer term investor has more BTC and his average cost per BTC is more than $500 per BTC.. we can imagine a lot of scenarios, and bitcoin has tended to be a good investment to hold onto for the long term, even if you might get enough BTC and you might want to shave off some profits along the way, you can still consider your investment as something that you mostly hold onto rather than converting into dollars and then ending up with dollars or some other inferior investment or maybe consumption good that you would be better off to have more BTC at a later price, even if your cost per BTC might end up being much higher.
That is not true. With DCA you might end up spending way more on your bitcoin and even paying way more per coin, but with DCA you are likely able to accumulate way more BTC over a longer period of time than you would have been able to if you had tried to lump sum or even to try to strategize by waiting to buy. So DCA helps you to potentially invest into BTC more aggressively over a longer period of time, and even if it might cost you more, you still may end up with more options, especially if you might front load your investment or you might be able to allow for the passage of several cycles.
I see short-term investors as those looking for daily bread, while long-term investors are those with goals , targets, and financial visions. They can quit any form of enjoyment and merriment and bag lots of bitcoin because they believe that in the future they will be financially free when inflation and purchasing power catch up with those stacking fiat.
Is a long-term investor wrong for seeing a short-term dip as an especially good buying opportunity?
If a long-term investor has $100k cash to invest from say, selling a boat, and we're where we are now, will that investor be better off DCA'ing 5k every month for 20 months, or is that person better off buying $100k over a shorter time period?
The person has discretion how to do it, and surely could divide it into 3 parts of DCA, lump sum and buying on dip, and of course, he might allocate more to the lump sum portion. Most people do not have lump sums available like that, but if they do, then they should at least consider the three categories, and they may well end up front loading their investment in times like this, but they still might want to hold some back for DCA and buying on dip, in the event that they do not have other cashflow in order to buy in case the BTC price turns against them after buying at these current prices.