(I adapted the text slightly thus it will make sense inside the translation.)
It's nice to read books, to watch quality movies and go to theater. Especially if you are a journalist and - isn't this right? - you should know about the world around you, since you write and talk about it. Same as it's a must to know to use a computer and, as much as possible, know your own language.
Science and technology as well are part nowadays of general knowledge and, in case of journalists, they are also part of their professional culture.
Do you think that a newscaster should know the weight of a locomotive? Certainly not, especially thinking that there are many types of them. How about the size? I'm asking this because once we were told on TV that a train derailed once and a very powerful crane was needed for lifting the 1000 tons locomotive. Very powerful, indeed... Someone slipped an extra zero there, but how could the poor newscaster know, since he has no idea about size?
A while back I was thrilled to hear about a hug underground lake whose depth was 7000km. This was pretty impressive, since it was beyond the Earth radius...
Another time we were informed that an athlete run the distance of 1500m in 12 minutes and 100 seconds.
And not only the numbers are an issue for some, but the words as well. As a consequence, we are being told on the news that a citizen made an accident "for" the excessive speed or - rarely, indeed - that a child was happy "because" of the gift he received.
The truth is that such way of phrasing is inevitable if you read only one book...