Topic: Can a default trust member (Lauda) arbitrary destroy other people's reputation?? (Read 5897 times)

byteball is a dag not a crypto and its fully centralised Obyte is a DAG based cryptocurrency network. DAG stands for Directed Acyclic Graph — it’s a technology that makes Obyte fully decentralized, free of domination, free of censorship, and accessible to all.

It's not a blockchain. Blockchains were a big step to decentralization. However, they fall short of full decentralization as their block producers are still big power centers. A small number of them control most block production and can collude to (or be coerced to) censor certain transactions. Obyte makes another leap forward by getting rid of those big power centers and middlemen.

I've got one for you too:

You and people like you are part of the reason for which shitcoins exist and for which people get scammed. Just FYI.
[/quote]

From what I have read about you lauda the following phrase comes to mind, bearing in mind I will probably end up with a cildish driven negative trust feedback

"People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones"

No, that's not how intelligent beings work and do not generalize.

If we measured the value of this project in bytes, as in space that it would occupy, it would take up 0 bytes.

Facts != character assassination.

Pretty sure that I am neither? Poker face as always.

You and people like you are part of the reason for which shitcoins exist and for which people get scammed. Just FYI.

Isn't cheese supposed to be Rotten and Rotting ??
Can't be 100% because i don't care for it, so I simply ignore it 

Don't care much for this negativity either as I got no time for it.
But One last thing before I take my own advice and clear the space in my mind that these Negative attitudes are taking up.

If your a cheese lover and you don't like onions...  Bit of a dilemna when someone gives you cheese & onion crisps 

Actually, some people care about others and try to warn them of potentially dangerous situations.

OK you don't like cheese, you say? But what if a certain cheese is actually going bad and turning poisonous? You'd just "mellow" and let others eat it?

Confused here  

Where I come from, if you don't give a damn about something, you ignore it.  It shouldn't be taking up any space in your mind

I really don't see the need for the character assassination of a developer who has a coin that you don't care about ??

Why get yourself all annoyed and worked up ??

you don't like the coin ??   So what---- I don't like cheese..  

But I don't go around chastising everyone who eats the stuff..  

But I Do Like ONIONS 

Take a chill pill @Lauda... life's too short dude  

most likely both, idiots + something worse

 Probably...

  I got my posts deleted in the ANN for asking that question, along with asking, "if they thought Mossad and co. were actually our friends?"

 To me, it's either kids (idiots) having a go at getting rich quick, or it is something worse.

But, but, my precious onions??? This coin is 100% anonymous!!

---

Just wait till they come swarming in here and attacking you; wouldn't be surprising given what they've been doing recently.

I don't know Lauda, nor have I read all of this thread, but something smells well fishy about DeepOnion.

 The other day, after discovering that the 'Tor based token` wallet did not work in Linux, I asked the OP of the ANN (Crypto Rainbow),

 "after downloading and extracting the 'wallet' file for Linux v1.1 from the DeepOnion website, which application is required to open, deeponiond?"...

 ...to which he replied, "YES"...  

    Wtf?

 so, to be clear 'DeepOnion' is a token to 'give you absolute privacy and anonymity', which only has wallets in Windows and Mac?


 Yeah right..............

       AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      


        SCAM!!!!!!!!

 

Why is this thread important again? Went through so much shit forgot the topic 

My personal experience with this coin is very positivie. Everything develops as promised till now, and they are very helpfull engaged and it is obvious that they are very skilled. So this FUD negative feedback just shows me how frightend are some by this project. Cheers

That's an objective assessment of the reality behind some of the top "currencies" (minus 1). Surely the usage of the word "scam" may be argued about, but that's often very subjective anyways. If you are too stupid to figure out the reasoning behind those statements and/or are unable to do the required research to come to the same conclusions, then I can only tell you "good luck with your life, you're going to need it". In addition to this, you're trying to insinuate that my involvement with BSD has something to do with this thread, your deeponion shitcoin or those statements. This only makes you look like an idiot. My opinions on those altcoins have been consistent (note: Some required certain events in the past to happen, thus opinion may not be the same since day one) long before I started managing the BSD campaign; the negative ratings were all warranted and backed up with references.

Something similar happened when someone exposed alts from the Turkish local board. A lot of them came running as true shills to back each other up, disgusting to say the least.

Kitty 'members.

very well said, couldn't have said it better myself. people butt heads over their opinions on here all the time; presenting your opinion with reasons as to why x is a bad idea / scam as to dissuade others from dumping their money and time is more often than not met with shills and sockpuppets here of all places. sure lauda could've been less crass in how he put it in the quoted comment, but it stands there's reasoning behind it, and not at all just a personal attack. I've personally had zero negative interactions with lauda and have no reason to believe he would throw around his opinions without being able to back them up.

Your point I assume is that he chides someone for investing in what he thinks is trash, and promotes a coin that you think is trash? One mans trash is another mans treasure, I don't think that point stands. Or were you pointing out that he called someone an idiot for investing in something he doesn't like, and that that somehow means he was working against their well-being? I think the opposite is true, if the opinion is genuine then I think it's fine to point out that he thinks it's a bad decision, and certainly is in their well-being. Arguably he could have put it "nicer", but it gets the point across well, and I got a laugh at the way the opinion was delivered. It doesn't seem to be a personal attack.

I can't believe I've spent so much time reading all of this thread and replying, but it's fun to delve into forum nonsense once in a while. My opinion that no one asked for is *drumroll* ... Lauda did a minor thing that they had every right to do, and shills responded in force. I've been following DeepOnion for a few days, even going so far as to create an account on their forum, asked some questions, I have a DeepOnion wallet. I think it's an interesting coin, but I also disagree (yet find amusing) how some have been incensed, and organised themselves into action over this. It's a disgusting side of internet culture (culture in general really), but fascinating. I just had to watch

If you endure so much trouble for people's well-being what is this ? Really, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bsd-bitsend-signature-avatar-campaign-closed-1850924

You make progress appearing here without magical shit and shill. Like 
I advise you to rethink the concept trust farming. This is what you do here. In its pure form.
Does not require feedback.

It is not an ICO. It is an "airdrop" where you have to wear an signature (and/or avatar?) and where your funds get locked up for a long period of time.

---

Does getting an escrow magically delete the trust farming?

So 325 pages and a 5-page thread later, the ICO finally has an escrow?

---

Hindsight is 20/20