Pages:
Author

Topic: Can a default trust member (Lauda) arbitrary destroy other people's reputation?? - page 5. (Read 5912 times)

legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
ZEIT shitcoin shill, AztekPhoenix, comes to defend another shitcoin. Quite ironic, isn't it? There's a lot more that needs to be done regarding this DeepOnion garbage. A single negative rating is the least that can be done.

what does this do excactly?
It doesn't do anything besides trying to mask the reality. You won't see my ratings as default anymore, but everyone else who doesn't modify their list does.

Lauda has overplayed her hand here.
I have not. Shilling is nice, ain't it? Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1080
Merit: 1055
DEV of DeepOnion community pool
If you want to improve the situation, then do it.
Follow PROFILE>Trust>Trust settings>Add text below>Save
Text
Quote
crypto-rainbow
~Lauda

what does this do excactly? I don't want to mess around with settings I don't understand. Something this important (trust) should not be so hard to use/understand/unfair. Any help is welcome.

Lauda has overplayed her hand here.
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
@trannamtan

There is really no point to arguing with Lauda.

Theymos has set her and the staff as prison guards over everyone that uses this piece of bitcoin core propaganda called btctalk.
They get off on their pretense of power and morality, when in fact many of them have been accurately accused of extortion and child molestation.
That is what passes for staff here, immoral corrupt people that will never self regulate, but pretend to be moral while they slander others on their whims.

Your best option is to find another forum or slack and use it instead of this one.
Theymos has no intention of fixing it, which shows his morals.


╥Aztek

 
Quote
child molestation
It's disgusting. Is there a proof  Huh


If you are looking for proof, I suggest you google search vod and ripoff report, then scan his posts and see he excessively uses the word child, in the majority of his posts.
He even goes as far trying to deflect what he is, by labeling others as child molesters to cover up his personal demons, search his post history if you want proof.
He denies it, but there is no doubt it is true.


╥Aztek
This is a serious suspicion. Thank you for your research and feedback.
The reverse side of freedom maims the soul.
Remember that your freedom ends where the freedom of another person begins  Cool
full member
Activity: 294
Merit: 100
So getting a negative rep from Lauda actually means you're doing a hell of a good job.
- Using a 4chan troll face in a David Thorne chart, shows his childish (no pun intended) way of communicating
- claiming negative trusts from others are false, orly?
- claiming his given trusts to others are to be read, meaning "read how I rate others and see my 100% credibilty", Sure

I am not even going into/ or searching for vod/ rip off anymore.
Clear as water.
Anyone doubting about rainbow and deeponion project... hopeless

Jesus H. Christ...

hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 500
@trannamtan

There is really no point to arguing with Lauda.

Theymos has set her and the staff as prison guards over everyone that uses this piece of bitcoin core propaganda called btctalk.
They get off on their pretense of power and morality, when in fact many of them have been accurately accused of extortion and child molestation.
That is what passes for staff here, immoral corrupt people that will never self regulate, but pretend to be moral while they slander others on their whims.

Your best option is to find another forum or slack and use it instead of this one.
Theymos has no intention of fixing it, which shows his morals.


╥Aztek

 

Yes thank you Bro for great advice  Cool
We are here all for the development of DEEP Onion.

And thanks again.
In #DeepOnion we trust! #OwnYourStake.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 500
I think LAUDA is too worried for us !?  Huh Thanks. Roll Eyes

Remember: when you participate in any project, you also think about the benefits that the project brings and most importantly you do not have to take any risks.
Yes, exactly ! That's DEEP Onion  Smiley

And everything I get from Dep @crypto_Rainbo . I'm very happy and love it, that's also what people are involved in the project (including me)

  Very proud of DEEP Onion !!!

In #DeepOnion we trust! #OwnYourStake.
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
@trannamtan

There is really no point to arguing with Lauda.

Theymos has set her and the staff as prison guards over everyone that uses this piece of bitcoin core propaganda called btctalk.
They get off on their pretense of power and morality, when in fact many of them have been accurately accused of extortion and child molestation.
That is what passes for staff here, immoral corrupt people that will never self regulate, but pretend to be moral while they slander others on their whims.

Your best option is to find another forum or slack and use it instead of this one.
Theymos has no intention of fixing it, which shows his morals.


╥Aztek

 
Quote
child molestation
It's disgusting. Is there a proof  Huh
sr. member
Activity: 770
Merit: 250
Genesis Team™
Deep Onion is doing fantastically well and it's bound to attract negative attention due to this.

Most people see that Onion is a legit, open project with an honest and competent dev team doing things in an ethical manner. I haven't seen anyone who is genuinely complaining about the airdrop, it's fantastic.

The address with high coin counts have been explained and everybody understands what they are for.

The ability to impact an individual's trust in such a manner needs to be fixed. I personally talk to the Deep Onion dev team often (I am not officially part of their team) and have been extremely impressed with their open nature and professionalism. They solve problems in a timely manner, interact with the community and haven't missed any of their promises.

People trying to FUD the project are obviously invested in other altcoins, it's very clear to see. Instead of FUDing other coins just keep it to you own thread?

Deep Onion is doing great, it's here to stay and those that bother to follow and read the dev comments know that the project is already a roaring success. Long live Onion! In 37 week's time it's going to be funny seeing all the FUDers crying Smiley
full member
Activity: 294
Merit: 100
Quote
accurately accused of extortion and child molestation.

I have no more words.

What fucking rabbit hole is this?
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
As for Lauda then this is a clinical case. Too much self-importance.
Be more modest  Grin
Which is your opinion, and which has nothing to do with the actual state of things. Judging people that you know nothing about, on a whim, classic.

Where have I seen that before? What's next a 6 legged spider?
You'd be surprised.

Dude, you have some serious issues. Wishing you wisdom might not even help. Good luck with that karma of yours; I feel I can't help you.

Selling paypal accounts? Saving dox of people you trade with?

Are you stupid? Roll Eyes There isn't a single valid, negative, trust rating on me. Are you sure that you're not reading the feedback that I've sent to other people? I have never sold PayPal accounts, nor do I have anyone's DOX.
full member
Activity: 294
Merit: 100
Fucks to give chart.
Where have I seen that before? What's next a 6 legged spider?

Lauda; I was just going through your trust (yeah i know: zero fucks given).

Dude, you have some serious issues. Wishing you wisdom might not even help. Good luck with that karma of yours; I feel I can't help you.

Selling paypal accounts? Saving dox of people you trade with?


wow. just wow.
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
Quote
Byteball dev leaves 1% for himself and there's very big development going on with the code, releases etc, just to compare.
Many people said that 1% is incommensurably small and offered to increase.
10% look quite legitimate.
As for Lauda then this is a clinical case. Too much self-importance.
Be more modest  Grin
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
I disagree with your action, don't like your character and display of attitude but wish you much wisdom nonetheless.


When you want to evaluate someone , We have to see him / her,Has caused you some risk or has deceived you !!!
No, that's not how the trust system works. I don't need to have any interaction with the person that I am leaving the feedback to.

-snip-
The "airdrop" from that shitcoin is everything but a real airdrop. If you want to take a look at what an real airdrop is, take a look at Byteball.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 500
Hello Lauda

When you want to evaluate someone , We have to see him / her,Has caused you some risk or has deceived you !!!

But here, we see Dev @ Crypto-rainbow

- Is the developper of the DeepOnion project. He has shown delicate attention to his members and is growing the community with outstanding ingenuity and innovative approach.

The project is a type of Airdrop (with a comitment to participate in the community), which means NO ICO, NO USERS MONEY involved. The project has not yet reached the exchange (still no money involved)

The coins will be delivered within 40 weeks (40 rounds of distributions).

I have reasons to believe that this person is trustworthy given the time and effort put to grow his project.
Regarding DeepOnion, no money has been involved and the premined coins should be distributed by January through the airdrop rounds. This has led me to believe that the scam allegations are nonsense and no real base can be found for it.

 And  "Lauda, who never posted a single comment on the DeepOnion thread, and without any contact and discussion with the dev or the community, posted two negative trust on the dev of DeepOnion. Since he's from the default trust group, the negative trusts was displayed to everyone while other trust feedback are hidden. This seriously impacted the dev credibility of the DeepOnion."

Hope to help clarify !!!
full member
Activity: 294
Merit: 100
@ lauda: Whatever rocks your boat.

I disagree with your action, don't like your character and display of attitude but wish you much wisdom nonetheless.
hero member
Activity: 1568
Merit: 544
My question is this: does he has the right to do so?

Trust ratings can be given without any rules by anyone for all reasons.
My latest trust rating was isoneguy   2017-07-28   0.00000000      your mom in a bathing suit


Regarding LAUDA, I find it concerning that it is that easy to have the DeepOnion dev downvoted.

This can be done by all the higher DT members., It also can be counter rated by that same group of DT members.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
Well, after some research, I might agree with Lauda.
Even if you ignore the initial rating, you can take a look at the follow up ratings. They are both warranted.

Nah. You gave neg rep.
So you do give a damn.
No. I don't need to care about something to give it a negative rating. What I exactly meant is that I couldn't care about the specifications/features/et. al. of that shitcoin.
full member
Activity: 294
Merit: 100
Quote
I couldn't give a single damn about shitcoin.

Nah. You gave neg rep.
So you do give a damn. By saying you don't give a damn you are giving yourself the "look at me, I am a cool guy" image.

But you DO care.

Can't we just go on. Live and let live and so on.

full member
Activity: 180
Merit: 100
Well, after some research, I might agree with Lauda. Deep Onion dev is not very transparent, 20% for promotion is too much, way too much. 10% for dev is also very very big amount.

Byteball dev leaves 1% for himself and there's very big development going on with the code, releases etc, just to compare.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
-snip-
Biased as always and now endorsing trust farming? No surprise.

it turns out that lauda is a dev of a competing coin..
Spreading lies now, are we? I am not a developer of any coin, at least not as far as the public is concerned. Furthermore, I couldn't give a single damn about shitcoin.

I saw many people complained about Lauda's behaviors before. Here is one example:
Every single time some butthurt fools complained, I was proven right and they often got more negative ratings.

My question is this: does he has the right to do so?
Absolutely.

Do these people have the right to destroy other people's reputation at will, and in a hostile way?
Absolutely if the rating is warranted, which it is in this case.

I think he abused his rights, and I request forum mods to investigate this matter. Thanks.
The fun part is that what you think doesn't matter. You wouldn't be asking some of these trivial questions if you were involved enough in the forum to actually be able to provide a constructive opinion on the matter.

Ironically, I was proven right shortly after leaving the negative rating to the fool that started that shitcoin. Keep it up; I'm always lurking.

Pages:
Jump to: