Pages:
Author

Topic: Can a default trust member (Lauda) arbitrary destroy other people's reputation?? - page 4. (Read 5939 times)

full member
Activity: 139
Merit: 107
Wow.

Instead of apologizing and accepting that there has been wrongdoing, crypto-rainbow and his supporters go on and attack those who are contributing to the very foundations of law and order here on Bitcointalk. They don't know what they're doing. Attacking Lauda means biting your own tail.

Posts like these are causing ever vicious counter-attacks:

Take the times of feedbacks all arrive same times. It's well organized attacks from the same boss.

Seriously, why do you post crap like this? There has never been any attack against you in the first place. Accept the forum rules like everyone else. You're not special, crypto-rainbow. We all have to behave.

If there are scam accusations against you it is your duty as the coin's spokesperson to address these accusations adequately and openly. Censoring from your thread or attacking others is not a solution, but your end. I hope you know that.


let's make some true rebuttal posts in the arguing with this person.
Good luck

copper member
Activity: 686
Merit: 603
Electricity is really just organized lightning
I am not getting involved in the ongoing mess here, however I have neg rated crypto-rainbow for blatant misuse of the trust system; farming trust. Lets not get into the trust abuse (which I fully expect to be hit with judging by previous ratings left..).

Trust farming is against forum rules, and it is clearly evident this has happened when you see 20-30 ratings left for this user within the space of a few days, with some of them using the exact same note, word for word.

Proof of the trust farming? He got many positive trusts is because when the community learned that Lauda posted negative trust on him, they felt it is unjustified and posted support to him. It's a big community, just look at the thread. It can not be done with a few fake accounts. Ask the mod to check. Please don't make false accusations, give the proof and let everyone judge.


Please see the reference in my rating.

I am not saying that the user has gained trust through fake accounts. I am saying that there is evidence of farming trust via legitimate users on his trust page. The reference also shows both the user and another account advocating people to leave trust for him; which is, once again, farming trust.

That single user wished to "cancel" out the rating left by DogeMajestic, which is perfectly fine. However asking for everyone else to do the same is not.


If you're asking for trust to be posted to your account then that is trust farming. You are seeking trust for an inconsequential action or for no reason at all. If they didn't deserve the negative before, they sure do now.

Precisely.
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
Proof of the trust farming?
Read the references.

He got many positive trusts is because when the community learned that Lauda posted negative trust on him, they felt it is unjustified and posted support to him.
So... trust farming.

It can not be done with a few fake accounts. Ask the mod to check. Please don't make false accusations, give the proof and let everyone judge.
Irrelevant. Still trust farming.



If you're asking for trust to be posted to your account then that is trust farming. You are seeking trust for an inconsequential action or for no reason at all. If they didn't deserve the negative before, they sure do now.
full member
Activity: 172
Merit: 100
Relax guys, here's a fun video to enjoy. Make sure you turn on the subtitle (lower bar, left corner, after start on the lower right corner)  Grin

http://www.captiongenerator.com/632602/Fuding-from-the-bunker



Yes this is one of the best  Cool
full member
Activity: 172
Merit: 100
I am not getting involved in the ongoing mess here, however I have neg rated crypto-rainbow for blatant misuse of the trust system; farming trust. Lets not get into the trust abuse (which I fully expect to be hit with judging by previous ratings left..).

Trust farming is against forum rules, and it is clearly evident this has happened when you see 20-30 ratings left for this user within the space of a few days, with some of them using the exact same note, word for word.

Proof of the trust farming? He got many positive trusts is because when the community learned that Lauda posted negative trust on him, they felt it is unjustified and posted support to him. It's a big community, just look at the thread. It can not be done with a few fake accounts. Ask the mod to check. Please don't make false accusations, give the proof and let everyone judge.
copper member
Activity: 686
Merit: 603
Electricity is really just organized lightning
I am not getting involved in the ongoing mess here, however I have neg rated crypto-rainbow for blatant misuse of the trust system; farming trust. Lets not get into the trust abuse (which I fully expect to be hit with judging by previous ratings left..).

Trust farming is against forum rules, and it is clearly evident this has happened when you see 20-30 ratings left for this user within the space of a few days, with some of them using the exact same note, word for word.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3000
Terminated.
Note how every single butthurt individual here is supportive of deepcoin. Roll Eyes
And is part of their signature campaign, err I mean "airdrop" *cough*. Roll Eyes

If not for the retaliatory rating, the whole trust farming thing is extremely shady and deserves a negative. Which I'll add. Hopefully, I'll get some feedback 'interest' and my negative will multiply into 5 from the shills!
Another one:
I put ~Lauda in my trust system. I won't waste more time here. You can't talk in a civilized way to a person who don't respect others. I have a feeling that I am talking to a gangster here, he has completely different logic, so let's ignore him.


Not surprising, is it? I wonder how many accounts the developer controls. Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 605
I put ~Lauda in my trust system. I won't waste more time here. You can't talk in a civilized way to a person who don't respect others. I have a feeling that I am talking to a gangster here, he has completely different logic, so let's ignore him.
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
Note how every single butthurt individual here is supportive of deepcoin. Roll Eyes
If not for the retaliatory rating, the whole trust farming thing is extremely shady and deserves a negative. Which I'll add. Hopefully, I'll get some feedback 'interest' and my negative will multiply into 5 from the shills!
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3000
Terminated.
so Lauda only cares himself
How exactly does this benefit me? I get a bunch of whining people spamming me publicly and privately. Roll Eyes

he can do anything without a reason, anything he wants.
Every single of those ratings is reinforced with a reference link, is warranted and rational.

I also request other trust members to think to revoke Lauda's position in the default trust group, because it is ridiculous to have such a person in it, which makes this whole trust system absurd.
I wonder how many shills from this shitcoin will come up here and make similar requests? Roll Eyes

Fresh smell of trust farming in the morning:
full member
Activity: 172
Merit: 100
so Lauda only cares himself, he can do anything without a reason, anything he wants.

I also request other trust members to think to revoke Lauda's position in the default trust group, because it is ridiculous to have such a person in it, which makes this whole trust system absurd.

BTW, I put "~Lauda" in my trust system...
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3000
Terminated.
What I think may not matter, but what many people think do matter.
People who have had nothing to do with the forum, reputation section, scam accusations or have not made any other substantial contributions, i.e. have only been spamming for money and shilling? No.

Look at the way you replied, you pretend to be god??
Pretend to be god?1 I have had my, unfortunately great, share of mistakes. The only god around here is Vod. Wink

Don't think that you belong to default trust group that you can do anything, without rules, without standard, without reason.
Stating the obvious? Roll Eyes

I strongly request this kind of person be removed from the default trust group, because we have zero trust on him.
Again, it does not matter who you trust.

1 - I must be pretending to be:

hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 605
(snip)

I saw many people complained about Lauda's behaviors before. Here is one example:
Every single time some butthurt fools complained, I was proven right and they often got more negative ratings.

My question is this: does he has the right to do so?
Absolutely.

Do these people have the right to destroy other people's reputation at will, and in a hostile way?
Absolutely if the rating is warranted, which it is in this case.

I think he abused his rights, and I request forum mods to investigate this matter. Thanks.
The fun part is that what you think doesn't matter. You wouldn't be asking some of these trivial questions if you were involved enough in the forum to actually be able to provide a constructive opinion on the matter.

Ironically, I was proven right shortly after leaving the negative rating to the fool that started that shitcoin. Keep it up; I'm always lurking.


What I think may not matter, but what many people think do matter. Look at the way you replied, you pretend to be god?? Don't think that you belong to default trust group that you can do anything, without rules, without standard, without reason.

I strongly request this kind of person be removed from the default trust group, because we have zero trust on him.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 541
1/2. 2/2 yet a few more posts after them, very classic. I don't know why they're so worried about the credibility of the dev? apparently he has so many

Fans, look all the community members love the guy and trust him so why do you care if he has red trust? @Lauda could you give Satoshi 50 negative

Feed back to see what happens? I'll bet Bitcoin market will crash, the negative is there to inform people. you think if that dev is the real deal any ratings

Matters? if you guys love your dev so much and you are the said community members then nothing is lost here, I believe your dev is still a virgin.
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 306
Was going to ask what shitcoin Lauda was a part of, because I never heard
of one.  Seems that's a lie, so there you have it. 

Lauda didn't destroy anyone's reputation.   It takes more than one cat's feedback
to do that, even if thay cat is on DT.  So take it with a grain of salt.  Just because
the dev's account shows red doesn't really change much for DO's supporters,
does it? 
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3000
Terminated.
Go fuck yourself Lauda

Disgusting piece of shit
Kiss

Easy Bros. This's almost like insulting a police or lawyer for doing his/her job.
When you don't prevent something bad from occurring you get blamed. When you do, you get blamed for doing it. Likewise, the same goes with tagging or not tagging untrustworthy people. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I think someone gave a pretty convincing review against Deeponion Altcoin here on  Bitcointalk,  I will post the link if I find it. 
They have.

My only advice to Lauda and other great Admins is to clearly state the reason why members were penalized with proofs attached Plus reference to the rules they broke.
I have attached a reference to all three ratings left on the developer.

This I think will help easy off tensions. Everybody will be very satisfied knowing they were really treated fairly.
Nothing will ease off, as these people are:
1) Shilling in a sense that they are inclined to support the project due to the airdrop and whatnot.
2) Financially invested in it, thus also inclined to not listen to reason and write whatever nonsense they can in order to defend the developer.
3) Both.
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
Easy Bros. This's almost like insulting a police or lawyer for doing his/her job. It's never easy policing a forum with hundreds of members not to talk of one with thousands.

I think someone gave a pretty convincing review against Deeponion Altcoin here on  Bitcointalk,  I will post the link if I find it.  Maybe Moderator acted on that review or plus other similar reviews.

This forum great success is largely due to their efforts to see that things are done the right way. I owned a Group on Telegram with little over 80 members... I couldn't handle the negativity, I had to abandoned it last month and ran away...   I haven't visited the group since lol..
Admins need some respect.. This people are doing some extraordinary job here and the job isn't easy atall. I was penalized by them but took it in good faith.

My only advice to Lauda and other great Admins is to clearly state the reason why members were penalized with proofs attached Plus reference to the rules they broke. This I think will help easy off tensions. Everybody will be very satisfied knowing they were really treated fairly.
Do enjoy your day.
full member
Activity: 294
Merit: 100
Go fuck yourself Lauda

Disgusting piece of shit


EDIT:
You know. Nothing you have written here has made me re-evaluate my opinion.

I am out of this discussion.


legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3000
Terminated.
Ok, thank you.!
You're welcome.

Trust is a difficult think and you might have your reasons to trust/untrust anyone. The tone of your messages however indicate this is a "personal" attack, and i see no objectivity in the claims you make in your trust ratings.
Personal attack? For this to be a personal attack, this coin would actually have to be good enough for me to care about it. In case that you still didn't get the memo, I don't care about shitcoins.

Don't do untrustworthy things, and you won't receive negative ratings. It's simple as 2+2, but apparently that is beyond the capability of plenty of members here. Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1080
Merit: 1055
DEV of DeepOnion community pool
what does this do excactly?
It doesn't do anything besides trying to mask the reality. You won't see my ratings as default anymore, but everyone else who doesn't modify their list does.

Ok, thank you.!

Trust is a difficult think and you might have your reasons to trust/untrust anyone. The tone of your messages however indicate this is a "personal" attack, and i see no objectivity in the claims you make in your trust ratings.

But hey, that's my opinion.  Tongue
Pages:
Jump to: