Topic: Can the world be without poverty - page 11. (Read 10039 times)

If we look back when our ancestors still lived a nomadic life. their social status is equal. no one is rich and no one is poor. each individual does work by the expertise to get food (survival) and each result is divided fairly according to their respective needs.

If today every country and government has a fair lifestyle, I believe there will be no more poverty.

Although poverty is said to be the state of the mind. Working on ones inner self and self worth is the first prerequisite to conquer poverty of the first before the outward result of wealth begins. Although most influential category tries to limit the masses and also enjoys seeing the poor suffer.

Individuals should know what the want from life first then go for it no matter what it would cost them. Life has never been fair from the onset. We only set a path we wish to follow for ourselves

In my opinion, human nature is so arranged, that it cannot do something without struggle, domination and humiliation. Culture helps us to pacify the animal inside human. But there will always be poverty, because the main resources will always in hands people, who smarter, brazen, savvy and faster.

The world without poverty is more like the world without social stratification. What a better world it would have been but sadly, this is never going to be a reality. There are a lot that could hinder this and it doesn't end just with the rich doing there best to ensure things stay the way it is, for the poor to remain poor while the rich grow richer but then, the ideas of a person is already a limitation that encourages these divisions in status to exist.

Not to even talk of the fact that, its justifiable by some religion. Where the poor once in the society is encouraged to serve the rich and be poor on earth for there wealth is on the rise in the spirit realm or with there maker. So, poverty is a part of human existence, the best way to fight it is individually and being contented.

Are you saying that if there are no poor people in the world, that is, if everyone is rich, then the balance of the world economy will be right?  I think the balance of the economy will be right if everyone does their own thing.  If one is not dependent on anyone then there will be no class of rich poor.  Everyone will be able to live shoulder to shoulder in the world if everyone's mindset is helpful.

I understand your point. The age of technology gives us endless opportunities to get out of being poor and instead of blaming the government or the billionaires, we should start working and finding chances that can make us wealthier

In the last 2 decades, we have witessed the high number of new self-made millionaires and billionaires who work hard and dedicate to their idealism. The belief and the efforts make them become a monster in our world

Thats why its not possible to happen because everything should be balance.

If everyone is rich who will be the workers? No one will step down to work if they're capable to live a better life, thus if you're not rich and below average just keep striving.

Its not your fault to be born as poor, but its already your fault if you die poor because you can do something to lift your life and that is by working hard.

this is a very difficult challenge faced by many countries today.
In fact, if we see that today there are so many intelligent people from all over the world and they should have made a breakthrough so that the world is free from poverty.
but if this happens the world will become unstable because if everyone becomes rich, of course no one in this world wants to work and no one wants to be someone's subordinate because he has become rich. Besides that the government also cannot control the stability of the country if everyone gets rich so it will be chaotic I think.
Therefore, in order for the ruling and ruling hierarchy to remain stable, poverty will not be resolved at any time because the rich and the rulers will still need the poor as messengers.

You fantasize a little. In fact, the reality is that everyone will not be rich, because most of the population is lazy and cowardly enough to create their own business! Most are not ready to work 20 hours a day, suffering losses and learning from their mistakes, sometimes sitting in debt for years but going towards the goal, realizing that there are no guarantees! Many people find it easier to go to work, being "behind" the owner, where the owner will be guaranteed to pay you some rate, depending on your competence - from a room cleaner to an executive director. But there are no risks and no particular difficulties! Therefore, there will never be 100% rich in the world. wealth is a very difficult path with a non-guaranteed result!
An example from life. We, like in any other country, have "homeless people". It would seem that there is no housing, no income ... Around my house, after it was put into operation, there was construction waste, and it was necessary to clean up the adjacent territory. Well, I think - now I will solve two problems - I will help put things in order around, and give people (homeless people) the opportunity to earn money. Do you know what these "unfortunate unemployed" responded to me? "F..k you ! I will not work, even for money. Just give me money, you have a lot of it!"
There is a concept - "genetic poverty" and "genetic laziness". This is another argument towards the stratification of society.

We really don't have to embrace these avoidable sad reality because if people just have the initiative to do what hasn't been done before, many people will follow suit. I admire Gates because he did an initiative to gather billionaires but to no avail because almost all of them are greedy and power hungry bastards. If only these people are altruistic egotistic then we could probably save the world.

Sad realities but we do embrace that for the longest years and years to come, I get your point, there are people who are not really aiming to go at the top, they are content having enough foods in their tables and if they've got some extra they are happy using it to have some fun.

Those wealthy people indeed will still have enough spares even they'll share their wealth to everyone, come to think of Musk and Gates entire wealth, Even just a half of those   wealth divided to every poor families poverty is easily resolved. Billions of dollars from Musk and Gates against the 7.9 billion people of the world.

That's a toxic way of thinking because not everyone wants to be rich, a lot of people are content that they have a daily bread and have a little surplus, it's not like everyone is trying to get to the top, some are happy to be somewhere where they don't have to sleep off the hunger. Isn't that too much too ask? If they continue with this mindset, we are going to not see a lot of advancement in different fields because somewhere out there, some of the people that had a potential to change the world has died of hunger.

The billionaires will not want that whole world to become rich. If everyone has the money, then the rich will have no value. There will be no one willing to do small jobs. The world system is running because there are few rich people and few poor people. If all of the people become rich, it will be difficult to live in the world.

I do believe that the world can be without a poverty because billionaires all over the world have enough money to solve the problem itself and the only asking price is about a small percentage of their wealth but considering how humans are inanely selfish,I don't think that we are going to solve poverty, not to mention that we keep putting incompetent, power hungry and senile leaders in our government, we won't be seeing a world without poverty.

government has the same program .
it help many poor people but it didnt made the whole nation rich because of lazy people that choose to live the life they want but it was thier problem anymore  . there are countries that lack of funding for this project .
 if we are going to be succesful soon in cryptocurrency we can help the government that ineed and we can also run our own program in our own place .

Yeah some people failed to hold their assets even after making them due to their poor financial management skills so these things are not possible over night, it need to be taught from their childhood and may take two or three generation to pass the knowledge they gathered from their experiences and make no people living in the poverty anymore.

These situations create and lead to atrocities and crimes as well as illnesses and other unwanted side effects at a higher rate. The huge disparity between rich and poor in these countries is that those who become rich in this region are in the minority it can lead rich people and their families to more goals and isolation for violence a weak economy and people combined with national problems and issues and the lack of institutions give rise to a lot of tension and strife between the ultimate poor and rich people. The country may not always have the resources it needs to pull itself out of poverty into the middle ground.

It depends on how you classify "poor" people. Obviously there are people whose financial condition can be classified as "lower class" in rich countries such as Japan and Switzerland. But the irony is that the living condition of these people may be much better than the "middle class" who live in countries such as India and Indonesia. I guess the global cutoff for extreme poverty is $2 per day. In North America and Europe, I don't think that there'll be anyone who earns less than this amount (child benefits alone amount to $250 per month in the US).

besides that everyone has their own thoughts. therefore I don't think there are lazy people who are rich, while lazy people must be in life. On the other hand, of course there are people who have an unfortunate fate in terms of the economy, so that even in developed countries there must be poor people, even though the number may be pressured by the government.