Dear Jameson over-the-counter,
It has come to my attention over the past few months that you severely dislike CANN. While you do provide some interesting points about the potential "bad" of this coin you consistently fail to mention where it goes right. Yes I understand that you can hold firm to your conspiracy, have love sessions with your twin (If he's identical it's just masturbation right?) and flame this board. In the end, however, you do very little to discourage this community because CANN stands basically alone in the field of bitcoin copypasta that runs on the same system of speculation pump-and-dumps with no real reason to adopt other than a security or algorithm tweak. CANN is a commodity based coin, and not an intangible or otherwise out of touch commodity based coin like URO. (I can find 10000x more potheads and MMJ patients in a day than I can farmers) I understand that people you know and like have put a lot of effort into developing CNN, but it's a failure of a coin because it brought absolutely nothing new to the market. I looked at CNN, POT and CANN before I started mining and the only one who had a differing core principle and wasn't essentially a direct copy of bitcoin in methodology and economic implementation was CANN.
From an investment standpoint I look at CANN as Apple in the early 2000's. It's struggling to get a market share in an over-saturated market of consumer electronics and personal computers that are all essentially doing the exact same thing under different brands, but at the core they are a Microsoft OS computer with a different case. Suddenly Apple brings something new to the market. A new approach in electronics and personal computing. It's a hardware-centric company that works with its own operating system and focuses on customer experience and usability not just numbers and power. Alongside with its PC hardware development it also put heavy focus into hardware development and design for personal gadgets and brought us something called the iPod. Looking at iMac and iPod by themselves they are nothing new, just a computer and an mp3 player, but the idea behind them was different also the implementation and marketing were different and it paid off.
So if you really feel like continuing to flame this board look at where you're coming from, a party of uninspired imitators who do little or nothing to improve or develop crytocurrency other than think of a clever name and cool logo. CANN is one of few who are managing to push the envelope on what a crytocurrency CANN do.
With love,
Blandy
Edited for a minor grammar error.
It has come to my attention over the past few months that you severely dislike CANN. While you do provide some interesting points about the potential "bad" of this coin you consistently fail to mention where it goes right. Yes I understand that you can hold firm to your conspiracy, have love sessions with your twin (If he's identical it's just masturbation right?) and flame this board. In the end, however, you do very little to discourage this community because CANN stands basically alone in the field of bitcoin copypasta that runs on the same system of speculation pump-and-dumps with no real reason to adopt other than a security or algorithm tweak. CANN is a commodity based coin, and not an intangible or otherwise out of touch commodity based coin like URO. (I can find 10000x more potheads and MMJ patients in a day than I can farmers) I understand that people you know and like have put a lot of effort into developing CNN, but it's a failure of a coin because it brought absolutely nothing new to the market. I looked at CNN, POT and CANN before I started mining and the only one who had a differing core principle and wasn't essentially a direct copy of bitcoin in methodology and economic implementation was CANN.
From an investment standpoint I look at CANN as Apple in the early 2000's. It's struggling to get a market share in an over-saturated market of consumer electronics and personal computers that are all essentially doing the exact same thing under different brands, but at the core they are a Microsoft OS computer with a different case. Suddenly Apple brings something new to the market. A new approach in electronics and personal computing. It's a hardware-centric company that works with its own operating system and focuses on customer experience and usability not just numbers and power. Alongside with its PC hardware development it also put heavy focus into hardware development and design for personal gadgets and brought us something called the iPod. Looking at iMac and iPod by themselves they are nothing new, just a computer and an mp3 player, but the idea behind them was different also the implementation and marketing were different and it paid off.
So if you really feel like continuing to flame this board look at where you're coming from, a party of uninspired imitators who do little or nothing to improve or develop crytocurrency other than think of a clever name and cool logo. CANN is one of few who are managing to push the envelope on what a crytocurrency CANN do.
With love,
Blandy
Edited for a minor grammar error.
Very well put.
I give so much respect to D9 for growing cannabis for CANN. He's risking jail time. CCN is good too though. Once more rules are in place, I'm sure CCN will have growers. The coin that sucks is PotCoin.
