The interesting discussion is not "capitalism" vs "communism". Both of them, in the variants that have really existed, are strongly authoritarian economic models. In Communism there is a state bureaucracy which hinders innovation, while in the "really-existing" Capitalism there are strong lobby groups composed by economic and state powers that do the same.
That's why I'm more interested in "libertarian" vs. "authoritarian" models, because every authoritarian model is a danger for innovation. There are "capitalist" and "communist" libertarian models. I don't know which are better because there was never a real intent to implement really libertarian and anti-authoritarian policies (only in some small communities, probably the biggest being some Spanish cities in the 1930s).
Topic: Capitalism, why does it ignore the farmer? - page 7. (Read 3077 times)
People should promote local products and be proud, it would a good way to have economic progress for any country. Stopping capitalism will help to balance the socio-economic hierarchy.
What do you understand by "capitalism"?Market economy?
What system can replace the market?
Your english is very poor and i don`t understand what exactly are you trying to say in your thread.
How can we stop capitalism?
People should promote local products and be proud, it would a good way to have economic progress for any country. Stopping capitalism will help to balance the socio-economic hierarchy.
Yes communism is good than capitalism, local products will be out of competition due to multinational brand in capitalism and there will be devaluation of local currency. Promoting local products also insure jobs to locals as well as this can also promote export, which will make local fiat stronger. People should promote local products and be proud, it would a good way to have economic progress for any country. Stopping capitalism will help to balance the socio-economic hierarchy.
Capitalism has demonstrated that it is the only successful economic theory, with its competitors collapsing by the roadside over the last 100 years. Even China, which at one point was incorruptibly communist, has moved on. I think it is a bit too late to be talking about 'stopping capitalism'.
I agree with you, Capitalism is not perfect but has proven to be the best among all the economic theory, competition brings out the best in people just look at the rate of growth in tech companies in the past 15years, you can't get that if it is government controlled communism
People should promote local products and be proud, it would a good way to have economic progress for any country. Stopping capitalism will help to balance the socio-economic hierarchy.
Capitalism has demonstrated that it is the only successful economic theory, with its competitors collapsing by the roadside over the last 100 years. Even China, which at one point was incorruptibly communist, has moved on. I think it is a bit too late to be talking about 'stopping capitalism'.
I agree with you, Capitalism is not perfect but has proven to be the best among all the economic theory, competition brings out the best in people just look at the rate of growth in tech companies in the past 15years, you can't get that if it is government controlled communism
People should promote local products and be proud, it would a good way to have economic progress for any country. Stopping capitalism will help to balance the socio-economic hierarchy.
Capitalism has demonstrated that it is the only successful economic theory, with its competitors collapsing by the roadside over the last 100 years. Even China, which at one point was incorruptibly communist, has moved on. I think it is a bit too late to be talking about 'stopping capitalism'.
People should promote local products and be proud, it would a good way to have economic progress for any country. Stopping capitalism will help to balance the socio-economic hierarchy. I believe that if people at the base level are given enough incentive, then those above them will reap greater rewards, and which will in turn trickle down back to those who built the entire system.
Why does capitalism so often neglect the backs upon which it's built? How does this system manage to thrive for so long, when the masses are receiving the least benefit?
Why does capitalism so often neglect the backs upon which it's built? How does this system manage to thrive for so long, when the masses are receiving the least benefit?
Jump to: