Topic: Casinos team identity - page 3. (Read 566 times)

You have a point there, mate. That's probably one of the things they consider in keeping their privacy. They may not make it public, but they are not hiding their real identity. If asked, they will not deny that they own or work in a casino. Besides, most gamblers now are doing it online, and for sure, they have a system that is running and cannot be manipulated by people within. These individuals threatening the lives of the owners can't do much, as casino owners are often wealthy, have security measures in place, and know that the law is on their side. So, it's just not very relevant to question why they don't make their names public; it's just the nature of how casinos operate.

In what way? and how would they do that? Employees have different functions, and them messing up the system to make crimes will put them in jail. The casino securities are now sophisticated, remember that we are in the computer era now, everything has a trace so it can be trace.

That is sure relying on past glory may be tricky and deadly to all and the best way to deal with the issue of trust, and it potental affect is to constant get in touch and checking everything that needs to be checked to be sure at all time that things gave change with the team, because sometimes, there are changes and reorganization that affects the trust of the team, let say a previous team may be reputable and trusted but once the business changes hand, you as a user if you do not take time to notice that, you may belief that the casino is still under the previous trusted team but in reality, the new team may not value that trust or reputation and act in the shadiest manners.
Putting a mechanism to check the team's skills and effectiveness may help, and that is what the review site could have achieved but due to the high right of corruption, in the system, they have failed in that aspect and in the end given misleading information about those teams because they are bought already, but if we have an independent tool to check those team, it will be far better for us.

I think casinos protect the privacy of their employees, so that they are safe from intimidation, bribes and also the target for players anger, when they lose money.

Let's also not forget about all the beggars and gambling addicts out there, they would make the lives of these employees a living hell, if they were doxed.  

There are also a lot of criminal syndicates that will target these employees to launder or steal money.

I have thought of this too but from what I've got from my pondering about this is that it's a matter of privacy for the team behind the casinos, I did consider too that with the revelation of their identity then we will be assured that we're in safe hands because they've trusted the players enough to reveal their identity but then it came back to me, physical business don't have to do this too so I assume that they're like that too and when they do a reveal of the team, it's out of their own volition. As to why they don't reveal their identity, the only reason I can think of is privacy for themselves but if you think about it, don't the people at least know who the hell founded the organization?

Casinos want their transparency we should not think negatively about everything. The casino keeps the team anonymous to maintain their security. Owners and employees may keep everything confidential to customer service to maintain risk after various times of risk. My main task is to think things through calmly before participating. If you maintain your own security you will face less problems.

While it's true some casino folks stay under the radar, it's not always about hiding from angry gamblers like in that crazy casino arson story you mentioned. Sure, there's always a chance some sore loser might go off the rails, but casinos usually have top-notch security to keep everyone safe. Anonymity might be an extra layer of protection, but it's not the whole story. The casino world is full of rules and licenses, and keeping things anonymous can simplify things for owners who operate across different countries. Plus, the financial side of things can get complex, and anonymity can help keep things under wraps, not necessarily because they're shady, but just because it's complicated.

In my opinion, knowing who developed or owns a casino gives everyone information about the company that owns the facility. Additionally, as customers, this openness can assist us in making well-informed decisions about whether or not to do business with that specific casino. Because it naturally increases our trust in the establishment if the developer or owner has a track record of moral behavior and satisfied customers. Right?
Also, we can speak with the person in charge directly if there are any problems or concerns with the casino that they have been operating. We can also make sure the casino is functioning within the law and regulations by knowing the ownership structure. In regards to their privacy, I believe it's critical to strike a balance between openness and the right to privacy. They must respect the laws they are required to follow, thus it is none of our business to judge if they truly want people to acknowledge them or they just wanted themselves  to operate anonymously.

The kind of money that goes into the gambling industry and the kind of anger most gamblers do have for some certain casino are enough reasons for most of them to hide their identities. 
 
If many casino owners are known to the public, I believe most of them will definitely get some privacy breach or threat from some of their angry customers whom their business might have offended without even knowing.
 
Most gamblers, if they don't get certified with the result of their case, go ahead and pass some form of threat out of anger, and if they are to know and have access to the owners of the casino, you never can tell what kind of action they are going to take against them.

Those Scam Accusation threads do catch the obvious bad guys, but let's be real, negativity can sometimes be weaponized, and not everything gets the attention it deserves. Plus, they might focus on big scams, not the sneakier stuff. Sure, having trusted folks run campaigns rocks, but even the best buds can miss things. Relying solely on past good experiences can make us overlook potential problems. Plus, "reputation" can be tricky – it's all about perspective and limited interactions. Connections are cool, but gotta go deeper than just knowing someone. We need a system to check out these coins, like looking at the team's skills, their plan, how they talk to people, and if they're open about their finances.

I think it's very simple: casino owners, casino websites, or even in the gambling aspect, everything that has been done by a company will never ever state the identity of their developers, maybe the heads, the president, or something like that, which will most likely be the face of the team or the company. Imagine this being a developer, or the ones that have made the casino website through programming, etc. You don't want, as an owner, to flag your developers identities because they might be targeted and ordered to do something bad in order to sabotage things, and it is also very confidential for a company to show the identity of their staff, especially if the employee doesn't want to be known or flagged. Privacy, that's what it is. Being anonymous as a developer is one of the few rules on a casino website, as it is complex stuff.

It's like that, just as you say it , but the Identity for a casino or in a project that is valid and that has a future does have to leave its KYC, and that was one of the things that happened in projects on privacy currencies, because in one of 2017 one of the causes of his failure was not complying with Saying or giving the identity of his devs and that was Enough to not Include him in a level 1A exchange , then at that time the topic was not so active of KYC or were not so stressful, and even so that was one of the reasons for failure of a project that looked very promising, in this order of ideas it can be thought that privacy and anonymity cannot be one of the reasons for the which a person can actually fight, because it is a right that is Skewed , it is something that does not resist, it is something that has nothing to do with it, and if so, then it is a Shame because as time goes by, it will be more and more Unless there are things that can be done regarding our privacy, it will become a big problem.

If we don't think about that time when there wasn't so much drama with the KYC, well things were different, what everyone was most worried about was the issue of adoption, and that was what was most sought after, that the people willEnter projects or at least know bitcoin, but one thing that has been achieved is, the governments realized that there was money there, that they did not have access, but how can they be and become part of this? Regulations are easily invented with the "excuse" that they are only going to protect against scams, theft, among other things, and the worst thing is that there are many people who believe them.

I know that there have been Scammers , I know that there have been failed projects, but that is something that happens in any ecosystem that has to do with money, with fiat money is where many more problems and more cases of scams have Arisen , so we have to Understand what the origin of all this is.

It's not about double standard but if you're a casino operator are you comfortable posting your profile on your casino homepage, I know of someone in our place who run a horse racing betting station, he uses a dummy to run the operation, and the reasons are he don't want people looking at him when he goes to church, he doesn't parents cursing his name because their husbands lose their money in his betting station.
The casino can be considered a legit and licensed business but it's different from a traditional business, you will not be so proud to admit that you are running a gambling station.

I assume this is due to the legality of cryptocasinos in the jurisdiction in which they are located. And also with tax evasion. Legally, casino owners may be front men, while the real owner may remain in the shadows. I think this is also due to the fact that there are no legal regulations forcing cryptocasinos to disclose information about "of their team, owners, employers and responsibles of the casino". In fact, in my opinion, cryptocasinos are in a legal gray area. This entire current situation allows cryptocasinos to organize exit-scams and casino owners disappear with impunity with gambler's money. This escape route is a good incentive not to reveal the casino team.

There is a clear imbalance: the casino demands KYC from you, while they themselves remain “invisible” to the gamblers. Although, in fact, gamblers are at greater risk than casinos. Gamblers won’t run away with casino money in an unknown direction, right?

I think this way: if a casino demands KYC from me, then let it first provide information about the team so that I can be confident in their reliability. But as we all know, this is not and will not happen.

       -     And whatever that reason is, I don't think it's that important to know that, right? Because the important thing is the services, and there are no issues happening on their platform from their users, who often play gambling on their platform.

Is that a big deal to you, mate? But you know that it has a good reputation in the field of crypto gambling, and you have been making it play in their casino for several years. Of course you will be complacent about that because you trust the casino, right?

When a casino applies for a license, they have to submit all the necessary requirements. This includes the names of the casino owners, their officers, and all other vital information for the operation. I'm not sure about the specific requirements that a license provider demands, but all the information I mentioned is typically considered basic and necessary for the approval process.

It might not be known to them, but when the authorities do find out, they can request information from the license providers to check if this casino has any complaints to address. Therefore, it's not a problem if their names are not known as long as their casino maintains a good reputation.

All we know is that the owner of the stake.com casino is already known and exposed by several media because he is famous for the progress of his casino but for other casinos I have never seen that process.

There is a reason behind all that why the identity of the casino owner does not carry out the process publicly, but to get a casino license will not the owner give it? Here we understand that the authority has pocketed their KYC proof after registering the casino for licensing.

But it also makes sense that even if the identity of their team is not known to their customers, they still run a good casino? Even if they are having problems, it is the authorities who can reveal this and we will never know what is behind it all.

You seem to be misrepresenting what information is being shared and with who. Owners of a casino are often identifiable through company records which are often shared publicly in many countries, in order to aid transparency. The other employees of a casino have just as much right to privacy in their place of work as any other job, the most you might hope to see broadcast is their first name on a badge if they are in front of house positions. All employees will be vetted by the company, to make sure that they follow all necessary employment and right to work laws in their country, which can be validated by the government on request. Beyond that, your personal details are not broadcast for all to see, so I'm not sure why you would expect employees to have theirs shared like that either. You are not forced to play at these gambling sites, don't act like you are.

As you mentioned the issue of presenting information about casino managers to the public, I think that there are two points that we must consider, which are the positives and negatives.

-Positives :
 -Gain the confidence of the players more and make them play more comfortably.
-Make the casino more transparent and receive more players.
-Negatives:
-Casino managers put themselves in danger because players obtaining information about them makes them vulnerable to blackmail and threats, for example, if one of them loses his money.
-Even families, friends and relatives will be at risk.
-They will always be under pressure because everyone will try to reach them personally if they want help.
-Some will try to delve into the details of the information for nefarious purposes such as hacking and sabotaging the casino.

As you see there's risks and negative things than positive things soI think hiding their personal information is the right thing to do.

Casinos usually keep their team members' identities on the down-low maybe to keep things secure and avoid any unwanted attention. It's like a safety thing because this way owners and employees can do their thing without exposing themselves to potential risks. While being open about certain aspects is good like fair play and rules, they often choose to play it cool when it comes to personal details like striking a balance between transparency and keeping everything on the hush for a smooth gaming experience

I didn't think about it because it was their secret. We are also the same when we choose a casino where we also have to check each casino and make sure it is the casino we want. We won't know who the casino owners are because they don't say it either and we probably only know their representatives on these forums. If it is a trusted casino, we don't need to think about this and just use the casino to gamble. We as users will also find it difficult to find out the casino owner's or team's identity unless we contact the regulator to ask who they are, but the regulator will not want to say who they are.