If they have an option to not disclose their personal identity, why they need to publicize it to everyone else?
When you want to open a banks account, the banks' employees will ask you to submit your ID card and other personal information, do you ask their identity? I bet you not.
I think it's a stupid question, if you don't comfortable or don't like to submit KYC without know the owner's identity, don't gamble on that casino.
This is an example that doesn't make any sense for the following reasons:
1 - ) in all banks in my country for example and I believe this happens in banks in other countries, bank employees are easily identifiable people, they show their face, their full name at the counter when they ask for ID of people, perhaps you may not have paid close attention when you went to open a bank account, but if you didn't pay that attention, try going to one of the banks in your country to ask for information and you will see that the bank employees are showing their faces and there is a very visible document on their neck showing their name, this is so that when a customer has a complaint about the way they were treated during service they can complain to the central bank
2 - ) in every country in the world, companies are duly registered, and all anyone needs to do is research the company to find out who the owners of the company are and in the case of banks, it is even easier to know who the owner of the bank is, because Banks are very regulated, they are very serious institutions, so the owners are not anonymous. In the same way as most physical companies, all owners have a name and face, see the case of physical casinos, they have owners who show faces and the reason is very simple: the owners do not need to hide because they are regulated, they have a license and all other documents. and when I talk about leave, I'm talking about respectable parental leave where the law works well
In the past I asked a lot of questions like this, because people had to do kyc on sites where the owners are anonymous, it was and continues to be something that I can't understand because it doesn't make any sense. If someone uses a money laundering argument, it doesn't make sense that only customers would launder money and the creator of the casino would not use the casino to launder money. but as arguing about this wouldn't get me anywhere, so I gave up, because this is the fault of the governments that imposed kyc without first creating fair laws