PALLAS, WHAT IS NEEDED TO COMPILE FROM YOUR GITHUB? --
I have a CUDA 8.0rc environment in Lubuntu 14.04, and the compile does not complete. I've tried modifying the Makefile.am, but can't quite get it righght from the hints in this thread. Is there a missing file? --scryptr?
Topic: CCminer M7 (XCN) by djm34, fixed + optimized for cuda 8 and new cards by PALLAS - page 14. (Read 52620 times)
September 15, 2016, 03:28:56 AM
September 15, 2016, 01:01:39 AM
i have only 15700 kh/s in my gtx 1070 
The current opensource miner does too many memory writes and the 1070 seems to be affected more than the 980ti.
September 14, 2016, 08:48:50 PM
i have only 15700 kh/s in my gtx 1070
September 11, 2016, 09:44:23 AM
Ok guys let's make a briefing.
I've worked on this project many hours and received less than 0.1 BTC in donations.
Instead, what I've received plenty, are criticisms because I didn't make a windows binary.
Now, I've worked a lot more on this and I could publish the new code, for a >20% improvement.
What do you think I should do?
I've worked on this project many hours and received less than 0.1 BTC in donations.
Instead, what I've received plenty, are criticisms because I didn't make a windows binary.
Now, I've worked a lot more on this and I could publish the new code, for a >20% improvement.
What do you think I should do?
Missed that... but as I've mentioned numerous times, almost all miners are on Windows. Not releasing Windows binaries is basically shooting yourself in both feet at the same time and cutting off your hands. You may hate SP, but there is a reason he, Wolf, and Claymore release windows binaries first and foremost. There isn't a market for nix, despite what the vocal minority that tells you how horrible windows is and that nix is the master race, they're probably like .1% of the population.
If you care about money, building windows binaries probably should be first and foremost on your plate. People aren't going to donate for nix versions they can't build, let alone use because they're on Windows.
This completely puts aside the free market and that people wont donate (or buy) a miner that is earning less then other algos.
@bensam1231 - you hit the nail on the head! I have multiple rigs and would have enjoyed mining M7 - however no windows binaries means, no mining. No mining means no donation for Pallas. I am sure I am not the only one that feels this way. I tried to compile with whatever means I could find online but at the end of the day it wouldn't work - i moved on.
September 11, 2016, 06:17:30 AM
Still no windows build.
I think Pallas is doing this on purpose because he hates windows and windows users and has anti-windows code installed in the source designed to destroy windows builds. ~_~
I think Pallas is doing this on purpose because he hates windows and windows users and has anti-windows code installed in the source designed to destroy windows builds. ~_~
funniest post so far
thanks for confirming that the community doesn't deserve my work for free.
+1
As always.
September 11, 2016, 03:56:36 AM
Ok guys let's make a briefing.
I've worked on this project many hours and received less than 0.1 BTC in donations.
Instead, what I've received plenty, are criticisms because I didn't make a windows binary.
Now, I've worked a lot more on this and I could publish the new code, for a >20% improvement.
What do you think I should do?
I've worked on this project many hours and received less than 0.1 BTC in donations.
Instead, what I've received plenty, are criticisms because I didn't make a windows binary.
Now, I've worked a lot more on this and I could publish the new code, for a >20% improvement.
What do you think I should do?
Missed that... but as I've mentioned numerous times, almost all miners are on Windows. Not releasing Windows binaries is basically shooting yourself in both feet at the same time and cutting off your hands. You may hate SP, but there is a reason he, Wolf, and Claymore release windows binaries first and foremost. There isn't a market for nix, despite what the vocal minority that tells you how horrible windows is and that nix is the master race, they're probably like .1% of the population.
If you care about money, building windows binaries probably should be first and foremost on your plate. People aren't going to donate for nix versions they can't build, let alone use because they're on Windows.
This completely puts aside the free market and that people wont donate (or buy) a miner that is earning less then other algos.
September 11, 2016, 03:56:04 AM
Ok guys let's make a briefing.
I've worked on this project many hours and received less than 0.1 BTC in donations.
Instead, what I've received plenty, are criticisms because I didn't make a windows binary.
Now, I've worked a lot more on this and I could publish the new code, for a >20% improvement.
What do you think I should do?
I've worked on this project many hours and received less than 0.1 BTC in donations.
Instead, what I've received plenty, are criticisms because I didn't make a windows binary.
Now, I've worked a lot more on this and I could publish the new code, for a >20% improvement.
What do you think I should do?
0.1 BTC is ok for guys with 18+ GPUs, but it's a lot of little miners with 2-4-6 GPU rig
In my eyes it will be better to make private miner with 1-2% dev fee
So everyones can pay according their hashrates.
And it will be no any problem with a coin rate etc. (if like - just use - and pay)
P.S. it can be a say 20% less hash free miner to hold a GNU spirit (but i'm not 100% sure, case i'm never saw food market, working under GNU)
you can't add 18 gpu to this, or the diff will skyrocket
current hash around 3000MH, one 1070 = 30MH, 18 of those would be 540 added already, then add another couple of gpu from other members and you will kill the profit
I have no 18+ GPUs, so it will be no problem from my side ;-)
September 11, 2016, 12:44:48 AM
Ok guys let's make a briefing.
I've worked on this project many hours and received less than 0.1 BTC in donations.
Instead, what I've received plenty, are criticisms because I didn't make a windows binary.
Now, I've worked a lot more on this and I could publish the new code, for a >20% improvement.
What do you think I should do?
I've worked on this project many hours and received less than 0.1 BTC in donations.
Instead, what I've received plenty, are criticisms because I didn't make a windows binary.
Now, I've worked a lot more on this and I could publish the new code, for a >20% improvement.
What do you think I should do?
0.1 BTC is ok for guys with 18+ GPUs, but it's a lot of little miners with 2-4-6 GPU rig
In my eyes it will be better to make private miner with 1-2% dev fee
So everyones can pay according their hashrates.
And it will be no any problem with a coin rate etc. (if like - just use - and pay)
P.S. it can be a say 20% less hash free miner to hold a GNU spirit (but i'm not 100% sure, case i'm never saw food market, working under GNU)
you can't add 18 gpu to this, or the diff will skyrocket
current hash around 3000MH, one 1070 = 30MH, 18 of those would be 540 added already, then add another couple of gpu from other members and you will kill the profit
September 10, 2016, 07:28:58 PM
Ok guys let's make a briefing.
I've worked on this project many hours and received less than 0.1 BTC in donations.
Instead, what I've received plenty, are criticisms because I didn't make a windows binary.
Now, I've worked a lot more on this and I could publish the new code, for a >20% improvement.
What do you think I should do?
I've worked on this project many hours and received less than 0.1 BTC in donations.
Instead, what I've received plenty, are criticisms because I didn't make a windows binary.
Now, I've worked a lot more on this and I could publish the new code, for a >20% improvement.
What do you think I should do?
Spent hours writing, scouring over, and editing code...only to receive minimal reward and a plethora of complaints?
What you should be doing is celebrating - you've made it to professional developer land
September 10, 2016, 07:17:58 PM
Ok guys let's make a briefing.
I've worked on this project many hours and received less than 0.1 BTC in donations.
Instead, what I've received plenty, are criticisms because I didn't make a windows binary.
Now, I've worked a lot more on this and I could publish the new code, for a >20% improvement.
What do you think I should do?
I've worked on this project many hours and received less than 0.1 BTC in donations.
Instead, what I've received plenty, are criticisms because I didn't make a windows binary.
Now, I've worked a lot more on this and I could publish the new code, for a >20% improvement.
What do you think I should do?
0.1 BTC is ok for guys with 18+ GPUs, but it's a lot of little miners with 2-4-6 GPU rig
In my eyes it will be better to make private miner with 1-2% dev fee
So everyones can pay according their hashrates.
And it will be no any problem with a coin rate etc. (if like - just use - and pay)
P.S. it can be a say 20% less hash free miner to hold a GNU spirit (but i'm not 100% sure, case i'm never saw food market, working under GNU)
September 09, 2016, 01:32:29 PM
PROMISED TO TRY PALLAS' CCMINER FOR XCN--
But when I finally got around to checking it out, the Windows version is no longer available (link is dead), and the Linux version won't compile correctly. I tried editing the makefile, but no luck so far. Any clues here? I've read the entire thread, I think I neeed a vbetter clue.
I upgraded my 5x GTX 960 Linux rig to Lubuntu 14.04 with CUDA 8.0 just to try the CCminer. --scryptr
But when I finally got around to checking it out, the Windows version is no longer available (link is dead), and the Linux version won't compile correctly. I tried editing the makefile, but no luck so far. Any clues here? I've read the entire thread, I think I neeed a vbetter clue.
I upgraded my 5x GTX 960 Linux rig to Lubuntu 14.04 with CUDA 8.0 just to try the CCminer. --scryptr
September 09, 2016, 08:35:27 AM
Still no windows build.
I think Pallas is doing this on purpose because he hates windows and windows users and has anti-windows code installed in the source designed to destroy windows builds. ~_~
I think Pallas is doing this on purpose because he hates windows and windows users and has anti-windows code installed in the source designed to destroy windows builds. ~_~
funniest post so far
thanks for confirming that the community doesn't deserve my work for free.
XD
Only nix users do... >: P
September 09, 2016, 06:05:31 AM
Have you merged your work into 1.8.1? I see colors.
No, just improved the current logging functions, besides other non-cuda works.
September 09, 2016, 05:58:57 AM
Have you merged your work into 1.8.1? I see colors.
September 09, 2016, 05:49:05 AM
Still no windows build.
I think Pallas is doing this on purpose because he hates windows and windows users and has anti-windows code installed in the source designed to destroy windows builds. ~_~
I think Pallas is doing this on purpose because he hates windows and windows users and has anti-windows code installed in the source designed to destroy windows builds. ~_~
funniest post so far
thanks for confirming that the community doesn't deserve my work for free.
September 09, 2016, 05:42:19 AM
Still no windows build.
I think Pallas is doing this on purpose because he hates windows and windows users and has anti-windows code installed in the source designed to destroy windows builds. ~_~
I think Pallas is doing this on purpose because he hates windows and windows users and has anti-windows code installed in the source designed to destroy windows builds. ~_~
September 08, 2016, 12:56:58 PM
Anybody got an online block explorer? My compiled wallet crashes every so often.
September 08, 2016, 06:02:36 AM
Well on Windows it would be sweet yeah. hehe I'd hope to get it also compiled on my Yakkety :-D
I will install ubuntu 16.04LTs later even tho Yakkety is released soon.
Or pallas could you give me the binary? Its also okay if you give me the binary of offical git :-D just to see what my GTx1080 can do under Linux
I will install ubuntu 16.04LTs later even tho Yakkety is released soon.
Or pallas could you give me the binary? Its also okay if you give me the binary of offical git :-D just to see what my GTx1080 can do under Linux
September 08, 2016, 06:01:07 AM
better losing those 2-3MH and running it at 125w then
of course.
probably 100 is even better, but it's not supported by the huge amp extreme.
September 08, 2016, 05:59:55 AM
better losing those 2-3MH and running it at 125w then
Jump to: