CCminer M7 (XCN) by djm34, fixed + optimized for cuda 8 and new cards by PALLAS - page 15.

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Quote from: Amph on September 08, 2016, 05:23:49 AM

Quote from: pallas on September 08, 2016, 04:17:28 AM

I've worked on it a lot more. Plenty hours of coding. Rewritten some parts from scratch (a lot of assembly code) and improved others. The whole structure was overhauled.
Now the 1070 is faster than the 980Ti and can do well over 30 Mh/s.

30MH seriously? can you post screen? i'm ready to donate for a windows build

card 4 is at 210W, the others at 125W:

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: pallas on September 08, 2016, 04:17:28 AM

I've worked on it a lot more. Plenty hours of coding. Rewritten some parts from scratch (a lot of assembly code) and improved others. The whole structure was overhauled.
Now the 1070 is faster than the 980Ti and can do well over 30 Mh/s.

30MH seriously? can you post screen? i'm ready to donate for a windows build

ioglnx

sr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 250

Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum

with 7.5 and 8 i tried both

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Quote from: rednoW on September 08, 2016, 04:21:04 AM

Quote from: pallas on September 08, 2016, 04:17:28 AM

I've worked on it a lot more. Plenty hours of coding. Rewritten some parts from scratch (a lot of assembly code) and improved others. The whole structure was overhauled.
Now the 1070 is faster than the 980Ti and can do well over 30 Mh/s.

still not on github? ))

I don't think I'll push it, not now at least.

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Quote from: ioglnx on September 08, 2016, 04:20:29 AM

Well I got the error in some heavy.cu is ; expected but missing error while compiling.

which cuda version?

rednoW

legendary

Activity: 1510

Merit: 1003

Quote from: pallas on September 08, 2016, 04:17:28 AM

I've worked on it a lot more. Plenty hours of coding. Rewritten some parts from scratch (a lot of assembly code) and improved others. The whole structure was overhauled.
Now the 1070 is faster than the 980Ti and can do well over 30 Mh/s.

still not on github? ))

ioglnx

sr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 250

Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum

Well I got the error in some heavy.cu is ; expected but missing error while compiling.

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

I've worked on it a lot more. Plenty hours of coding. Rewritten some parts from scratch (a lot of assembly code) and improved others. The whole structure was overhauled.
Now the 1070 is faster than the 980Ti and can do well over 30 Mh/s.

ioglnx

sr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 250

Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum

Sure I will check later atm no access to linux :-D
I'm curious if it works or not :-D Thx for your help

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Quote from: ioglnx on September 07, 2016, 07:18:41 AM

Well since I'm not so dep into it its not easy.
So yes i install the nvidia patch for newer GCC but it didn't help.

So if you have adapted already your buildcould you please provide a diff or tarball?

It's all in git.
I just added the --compiler-bindir /usr/bin/gcc-4.9 flag into Makefile.am.
You can remove or change it.

ioglnx

sr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 250

Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum

Well since I'm not so dep into it its not easy.
So yes i install the nvidia patch for newer GCC but it didn't help.

So if you have adapted already your buildcould you please provide a diff or tarball?

krnlx

full member

Activity: 243

Merit: 105

Quote from: ioglnx on September 07, 2016, 04:37:22 AM

Well yeah okay it reported GCC above version 5.2 not support somewhere but at least 5.2 :-D
I will give it a 2nd try later :-D

Cuda works well with gcc 5.4, just edit Makefile. CUDA 8 comes with patch to support new compilers. CUDA 7.5 work well to, after editing header files and removing error about compiler.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

the problem with this coin, is that it need only 10 additional rig, to destroy completely the profit, so if many user start to run the optimized version, this will be pointless no matter the improvement

it's really a small coin for few people....

ioglnx

sr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 250

Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum

Well as old Gentoo user i was used to bleeding edge stuff :-)
But yeah sometimes I stumbled upon that bleeding edge.

I will give it a try to install that toolchain for yakkety :-D Hope they sstill have it

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Quote from: ioglnx on September 07, 2016, 04:37:22 AM

Well yeah okay it reported GCC above version 5.2 not support somewhere but at least 5.2 :-D
I will give it a 2nd try later :-D

I used 4.9 because it's compatible with cuda 6.5, 7.5 and 8.

ioglnx

sr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 250

Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum

Well yeah okay it reported GCC above version 5.2 not support somewhere but at least 5.2 :-D
I will give it a 2nd try later :-D

gerando

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

pallas, any decisions about distribution model of your improved miner?

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Quote from: ioglnx on September 06, 2016, 06:37:40 PM

So am I forced to use a 4year old gcc version..wow..hardcoded ..mehhh

Cuda needs old gcc versions, not my fault.

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Quote from: ioglnx on September 06, 2016, 05:05:38 PM

Try to build it in ubuntu but i get error over error.
If i fix one stone the next popping up..

e512.o -c heavy/cuda_blake512.cu
/usr/bin/gcc-4.9: No such file or directory
Makefile:1772: die Regel für Ziel „heavy/cuda_blake512.o“ scheiterte
make[2]: *** [heavy/cuda_blake512.o] Fe

hm why hardcoded gcc-4.9? is there a away to tell him to use the current one?

You can change it in Makefile.am
then run autogen.sh and configure

calculatorduck

member

Activity: 93

Merit: 10

Add a dev fee of 1% or so and let people pay that way. People are reluctant to outright pay but many will happily pay the dev fee if it's making money for them too.

Topic: CCminer M7 (XCN) by djm34, fixed + optimized for cuda 8 and new cards by PALLAS - page 15. (Read 52620 times)