If youn want to prevent the dumping you can mine with a coins adress instead if the btc adress
. Then the trade will be off the exchange. A good way to collect coins you believe in
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 1147. (Read 2347601 times)
I might write pool software as well in c#. A ccminer friendly multipool with all the most profitable algos.
Payouts in darkcoins only.payouts will be darksended to preserve anonymity.
It will produce the same results ..the coins will drop in price..but with your pool maybe get a little more before all coins are unmineable thats where were headed...make the mutipool owner rich on our hash. Thats how come I was asking for more quark because before yaamp came out with quark I was getting 2.5 Ltc a day 60mh/s..now .5ltc a day 60mh/s so yaamp is stealing my ltc 2 a day free. Payouts in darkcoins only.payouts will be darksended to preserve anonymity.
I'm thinking its time to give up mining. its a chinese mining world anyhow and btc at $260 to them it looks like $10,000 a btc. Multipools keeps the coins on the exchanges because they generate trading. A coin wich is taken off the exchange is more dead.
Coin dumping makes itnpossible for traders and robots to make a profit.
Has anyone found a solution for windows 8.1 to fix the launch config issues with nvidia cards?
eg. launch config for memory allocation needs to be lower in win 8.1 compared to win 7 (no clue why).
sp mentioned the issue as well, afaik.
(eg. crypotnight and scrypt-jane algos lose 10-20% performance).
A launch config of -l t64x1 (scrypt-jane) does work flawlessly on win 7 but you wont be able to start it with win 8.1.
No, linux is not a solution for me
, maybe win 10 works?
Win 7 is not a solution either cuz it sucks for mining burst
.
eg. launch config for memory allocation needs to be lower in win 8.1 compared to win 7 (no clue why).
sp mentioned the issue as well, afaik.
(eg. crypotnight and scrypt-jane algos lose 10-20% performance).
A launch config of -l t64x1 (scrypt-jane) does work flawlessly on win 7 but you wont be able to start it with win 8.1.
No, linux is not a solution for me
, maybe win 10 works?Win 7 is not a solution either cuz it sucks for mining burst
.also amd cards have the same issue, in win 7 they work straight away but win 8.1 has issues allocating high amounts of gpu ram
but it's fixable with GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
Has anyone found a solution for windows 8.1 to fix the launch config issues with nvidia cards?
eg. launch config for memory allocation needs to be lower in win 8.1 compared to win 7 (no clue why).
sp mentioned the issue as well, afaik.
(eg. crypotnight and scrypt-jane algos lose 10-20% performance).
A launch config of -l t64x1 (scrypt-jane) does work flawlessly on win 7 but you wont be able to start it with win 8.1.
No, linux is not a solution for me , maybe win 10 works?
Win 7 is not a solution either cuz it sucks for mining burst .
eg. launch config for memory allocation needs to be lower in win 8.1 compared to win 7 (no clue why).
sp mentioned the issue as well, afaik.
(eg. crypotnight and scrypt-jane algos lose 10-20% performance).
A launch config of -l t64x1 (scrypt-jane) does work flawlessly on win 7 but you wont be able to start it with win 8.1.
No, linux is not a solution for me
, maybe win 10 works?Win 7 is not a solution either cuz it sucks for mining burst
.
see - this proves my point exactly ...
to use another application - with all the good intentions and functionality it may have - only to get further into compilation issues and limitations - when all this type info 'should' be built into ccminer itself from the beginning ...
it would be a grand day that ccminer could do all this ITSELF without having external apps to do simplistic things like reasonably good stats output ( yes - once again - like sgminer ) ...
this is not just about aesthetics - its about functionality and stats accessibility ( not just readability ) ...
nice app though ... now to test and see if it compiles and runs under linux ...
#crysx
to use another application - with all the good intentions and functionality it may have - only to get further into compilation issues and limitations - when all this type info 'should' be built into ccminer itself from the beginning ...
it would be a grand day that ccminer could do all this ITSELF without having external apps to do simplistic things like reasonably good stats output ( yes - once again - like sgminer ) ...
this is not just about aesthetics - its about functionality and stats accessibility ( not just readability ) ...
nice app though ... now to test and see if it compiles and runs under linux ...
#crysx
If I remember correctly then it won't run under linux which is why it wasn't made it into ccminer. I'm perfectly happy with ccminer as it is though.
And don't forget that - however selfish it might sound but - ease of use (be it miners/wallets/pools) is inversely proportional to profitability.
I might write pool software as well in c#. A ccminer friendly multipool with all the most profitable algos.
Payouts in darkcoins only.payouts will be darksended to preserve anonymity.
It will produce the same results ..the coins will drop in price..but with your pool maybe get a little more before all coins are unmineable thats where were headed...make the mutipool owner rich on our hash. Thats how come I was asking for more quark because before yaamp came out with quark I was getting 2.5 Ltc a day 60mh/s..now .5ltc a day 60mh/s so yaamp is stealing my ltc 2 a day free. Payouts in darkcoins only.payouts will be darksended to preserve anonymity.
I'm thinking its time to give up mining. its a chinese mining world anyhow and btc at $260 to them it looks like $10,000 a btc. Multipools keeps the coins on the exchanges because they generate trading. A coin wich is taken off the exchange is more dead.
Coin dumping makes itnpossible for traders and robots to make a profit.
i dont doubt that wolf ... but the stats that sgminer gives is far superior to the rolling list that ccminer provides ...
im NOT saying one is 'better' than the other ... what im stating is that as a user - and owner of a reasonable farm - that the outuput that sgminer provides is HUGELY more informative than ccminer ...
ccminer spits data out as it receives it ... if it had a way of controlling that data and presenting it in an informative way ( yes - like sgminer does ) then ccminer would be in a class of its own ...
id commission that as a project if there were the devs interested in such a thing ...
i understand where YOU are coming from on a technical level ... you - as i am - are technically based and ccminer may have the superior hand there ... but like beta versus vhs and hddvd versus bluray - its all about the presentation and functionality - NOT JUST the technical superiority ...
why couldnt there be a meld of the 'features' of the two miners to make ccminer far more than what it is? ... make ccminer THE standard than just one standard ... make ccminer be able to cater for nvidia AND catalyst? ...
why? ... money and time and interest ... thats why
...
id like ONE miner to do all that - and id pay for it too ...
#crysx
im NOT saying one is 'better' than the other ... what im stating is that as a user - and owner of a reasonable farm - that the outuput that sgminer provides is HUGELY more informative than ccminer ...
ccminer spits data out as it receives it ... if it had a way of controlling that data and presenting it in an informative way ( yes - like sgminer does ) then ccminer would be in a class of its own ...
id commission that as a project if there were the devs interested in such a thing ...
i understand where YOU are coming from on a technical level ... you - as i am - are technically based and ccminer may have the superior hand there ... but like beta versus vhs and hddvd versus bluray - its all about the presentation and functionality - NOT JUST the technical superiority ...
why couldnt there be a meld of the 'features' of the two miners to make ccminer far more than what it is? ... make ccminer THE standard than just one standard ... make ccminer be able to cater for nvidia AND catalyst? ...
why? ... money and time and interest ... thats why
...id like ONE miner to do all that - and id pay for it too ...
#crysx
I'm still using zelante's splitscreen miner interface which looks like this:
https://i.imgur.com/7x0Gu9Q.png
You do however need to recompile ccminer yourself with changing the "kH/s" text output to "khash/s" or do the opposite in splitscreen miner and compile it (I couldn't compile it though) and you need to run ccminer with --no-color.
I also have a setup that shows a screen area of each rig in windows gadgets (example: https://i.imgur.com/e3vCuKX.png) so I can see if a card trips.
On another note, Ethereum is supposed to launch today (new algo, EtHash, supposedly memory-intensive). Is anyone following it? They supposed to provide a GPU miner but I'd guess that's only for AMDs and they might not even have it on launch.
This is supposedly their IPO address: https://blockchain.info/address/36PrZ1KHYMpqSyAQXSG8VwbUiq2EogxLo2 which is pretty crazy.
see - this proves my point exactly ...
to use another application - with all the good intentions and functionality it may have - only to get further into compilation issues and limitations - when all this type info 'should' be built into ccminer itself from the beginning ...
it would be a grand day that ccminer could do all this ITSELF without having external apps to do simplistic things like reasonably good stats output ( yes - once again - like sgminer ) ...
this is not just about aesthetics - its about functionality and stats accessibility ( not just readability ) ...
nice app though ... now to test and see if it compiles and runs under linux ...
#crysx
On another note, Ethereum is supposed to launch today (new algo, EtHash, supposedly memory-intensive). Is anyone following it? They supposed to provide a GPU miner but I'd guess that's only for AMDs and they might not even have it on launch.
ethash_cl_miner_kernel.clI might write pool software as well in c#. A ccminer friendly multipool with all the most profitable algos.
Payouts in darkcoins only.payouts will be darksended to preserve anonymity.
It will produce the same results ..the coins will drop in price..but with your pool maybe get a little more before all coins are unmineable thats where were headed...make the mutipool owner rich on our hash. Thats how come I was asking for more quark because before yaamp came out with quark I was getting 2.5 Ltc a day 60mh/s..now .5ltc a day 60mh/s so yaamp is stealing my ltc 2 a day free. Payouts in darkcoins only.payouts will be darksended to preserve anonymity.
I'm thinking its time to give up mining. its a chinese mining world anyhow and btc at $260 to them it looks like $10,000 a btc. i dont doubt that wolf ... but the stats that sgminer gives is far superior to the rolling list that ccminer provides ...
im NOT saying one is 'better' than the other ... what im stating is that as a user - and owner of a reasonable farm - that the outuput that sgminer provides is HUGELY more informative than ccminer ...
ccminer spits data out as it receives it ... if it had a way of controlling that data and presenting it in an informative way ( yes - like sgminer does ) then ccminer would be in a class of its own ...
id commission that as a project if there were the devs interested in such a thing ...
i understand where YOU are coming from on a technical level ... you - as i am - are technically based and ccminer may have the superior hand there ... but like beta versus vhs and hddvd versus bluray - its all about the presentation and functionality - NOT JUST the technical superiority ...
why couldnt there be a meld of the 'features' of the two miners to make ccminer far more than what it is? ... make ccminer THE standard than just one standard ... make ccminer be able to cater for nvidia AND catalyst? ...
why? ... money and time and interest ... thats why ...
id like ONE miner to do all that - and id pay for it too ...
#crysx
im NOT saying one is 'better' than the other ... what im stating is that as a user - and owner of a reasonable farm - that the outuput that sgminer provides is HUGELY more informative than ccminer ...
ccminer spits data out as it receives it ... if it had a way of controlling that data and presenting it in an informative way ( yes - like sgminer does ) then ccminer would be in a class of its own ...
id commission that as a project if there were the devs interested in such a thing ...
i understand where YOU are coming from on a technical level ... you - as i am - are technically based and ccminer may have the superior hand there ... but like beta versus vhs and hddvd versus bluray - its all about the presentation and functionality - NOT JUST the technical superiority ...
why couldnt there be a meld of the 'features' of the two miners to make ccminer far more than what it is? ... make ccminer THE standard than just one standard ... make ccminer be able to cater for nvidia AND catalyst? ...
why? ... money and time and interest ... thats why
...id like ONE miner to do all that - and id pay for it too ...
#crysx
I'm still using zelante's splitscreen miner interface which looks like this:
https://i.imgur.com/7x0Gu9Q.png
You do however need to recompile ccminer yourself with changing the "kH/s" text output to "khash/s" or do the opposite in splitscreen miner and compile it (I couldn't compile it though) and you need to run ccminer with --no-color.
I also have a setup that shows a screen area of each rig in windows gadgets (example: https://i.imgur.com/e3vCuKX.png) so I can see if a card trips.
On another note, Ethereum is supposed to launch today (new algo, EtHash, supposedly memory-intensive). Is anyone following it? They supposed to provide a GPU miner but I'd guess that's only for AMDs and they might not even have it on launch.
This is supposedly their IPO address: https://blockchain.info/address/36PrZ1KHYMpqSyAQXSG8VwbUiq2EogxLo2 which is pretty crazy.
Your shit should do ONE THING WELL. That's one reason SGMiner sucks so badly.
A Unix philosopher, and a successful business model!
But it needs to be able to link together. That's why we need more API control ^^" Epsylon/tpruvot already did a good deal on an API which can read stats, still needs miner control through that API though :p
+1 ...
#crysx
I might write pool software as well in c#. A ccminer friendly multipool with all the most profitable algos.
Payouts in darkcoins only.payouts will be darksended to preserve anonymity.
Payouts in darkcoins only.payouts will be darksended to preserve anonymity.
Pool software? Wouldn't it be easier, in C#, if you'd just write client software that would switch locally?
Would be even more fun if ccminer itself could switch through API, flawlessly and multi-algo. Even loadbalancing against % chance of a coin being the most profitable.
Coin A has 80% chance, and most would just mine that. But it would make sense to also loadbalance 20% to the second most probable profitable coin. Or maybe even more
it would great if all switching / load balance / failover was done within ccminer as it does with sgminer ... and autosensing / autoswitching multi-algo - now that would be a time saver
...most profitable though? ... damn ... maybe thats a project that would have to go to a few devs - not just one ...
sounds like an awesome plan though ...
#crysx
Your shit should do ONE THING WELL. That's one reason SGMiner sucks so badly.
technically - probably ...
but the way sgminer shows stats and mines and displays ( as well as HAS ) control over the miners ... that beats the crap out of the lists that ccminer bring up ...
so a technical backend of ccminer with the 'prettiness' of the stats of sgminer ...
thats what i like to see ...
#crysx
Well, you want to know why ccminer has really active devs, and SGMiner doesn't? Nobody wants to touch SGMiner. Being a disaster on a technical level hurts the users, too.
i dont doubt that wolf ... but the stats that sgminer gives is far superior to the rolling list that ccminer provides ...
im NOT saying one is 'better' than the other ... what im stating is that as a user - and owner of a reasonable farm - that the outuput that sgminer provides is HUGELY more informative than ccminer ...
ccminer spits data out as it receives it ... if it had a way of controlling that data and presenting it in an informative way ( yes - like sgminer does ) then ccminer would be in a class of its own ...
id commission that as a project if there were the devs interested in such a thing ...
i understand where YOU are coming from on a technical level ... you - as i am - are technically based and ccminer may have the superior hand there ... but like beta versus vhs and hddvd versus bluray - its all about the presentation and functionality - NOT JUST the technical superiority ...
why couldnt there be a meld of the 'features' of the two miners to make ccminer far more than what it is? ... make ccminer THE standard than just one standard ... make ccminer be able to cater for nvidia AND catalyst? ...
why? ... money and time and interest ... thats why
...id like ONE miner to do all that - and id pay for it too ...
#crysx
Yes a proxy wich uses the difficulty in blockchain of the coins and the exchangerate to swap the coins that gives the best profit.
that sounds good ... complex - but good ...
#crysx
Your shit should do ONE THING WELL. That's one reason SGMiner sucks so badly.
A Unix philosopher, and a successful business model!
But it needs to be able to link together. That's why we need more API control ^^" Epsylon/tpruvot already did a good deal on an API which can read stats, still needs miner control through that API though :p
Your shit should do ONE THING WELL. That's one reason SGMiner sucks so badly.
A Unix philosopher, and a successful business model!
Yes a proxy wich uses the difficulty in blockchain of the coins and the exchangerate to swap the coins that gives the best profit.
Perhaps rewrite miner control to solomine. For mediummsized farms like my own, i donreally need a pool. But
i need a.way to connect.the.miners and mine the most profitable
Still in thailand.
i need a.way to connect.the.miners and mine the most profitable
Still in thailand.
a proxy of sorts - like stratehm maybe? ...
ps - nice holiday
#crysx
I might write pool software as well in c#. A ccminer friendly multipool with all the most profitable algos.
Payouts in darkcoins only.payouts will be darksended to preserve anonymity.
Payouts in darkcoins only.payouts will be darksended to preserve anonymity.
Pool software? Wouldn't it be easier, in C#, if you'd just write client software that would switch locally?
Would be even more fun if ccminer itself could switch through API, flawlessly and multi-algo. Even loadbalancing against % chance of a coin being the most profitable.
Coin A has 80% chance, and most would just mine that. But it would make sense to also loadbalance 20% to the second most probable profitable coin. Or maybe even more
it would great if all switching / load balance / failover was done within ccminer as it does with sgminer ... and autosensing / autoswitching multi-algo - now that would be a time saver
...most profitable though? ... damn ... maybe thats a project that would have to go to a few devs - not just one ...
sounds like an awesome plan though ...
#crysx
Your shit should do ONE THING WELL. That's one reason SGMiner sucks so badly.
technically - probably ...
but the way sgminer shows stats and mines and displays ( as well as HAS ) control over the miners ... that beats the crap out of the lists that ccminer bring up ...
so a technical backend of ccminer with the 'prettiness' of the stats of sgminer ...
thats what i like to see ...
#crysx
Perhaps rewrite miner control to solomine. For mediummsized farms like my own, i donreally need a pool. But
i need a.way to connect.the.miners and mine the most profitable
Still in thailand.
i need a.way to connect.the.miners and mine the most profitable
Still in thailand.
I might write pool software as well in c#. A ccminer friendly multipool with all the most profitable algos.
Payouts in darkcoins only.payouts will be darksended to preserve anonymity.
Payouts in darkcoins only.payouts will be darksended to preserve anonymity.
Pool software? Wouldn't it be easier, in C#, if you'd just write client software that would switch locally?
Would be even more fun if ccminer itself could switch through API, flawlessly and multi-algo. Even loadbalancing against % chance of a coin being the most profitable.
Coin A has 80% chance, and most would just mine that. But it would make sense to also loadbalance 20% to the second most probable profitable coin. Or maybe even more
it would great if all switching / load balance / failover was done within ccminer as it does with sgminer ... and autosensing / autoswitching multi-algo - now that would be a time saver
...most profitable though? ... damn ... maybe thats a project that would have to go to a few devs - not just one ...
sounds like an awesome plan though ...
#crysx
I wouldn't do the profit switching inside ccminer itself. That's a great field for C#, and should be done API-wise. That's where ccminer needs an update
A separate C# tool could grab prices and profits like my profitcalc does, and switch the miner through a simple API command.
I know now things that I should implement/improve in the profitcalc (like PoS stealing blocks from PoW etc), but too busy with other stuff ATM ^^" *damn guis*
hehehe ... i know what you mean ... always busy ...
im going to be taking this 'crypto thing' full time very shortly ... so there will be time for me to sort things out ...
there have been some improvements in the backend of granitecoin ( pool / mining and setup of 'other' parts of the project ) and that is what has taken a great deal of my spare time ...
but when everything is consolidated and tested - then its full time ... which means there maybe a situation where 'funding' of projects that enhance such things as mining and profit making via 'fair' pools MAY come into play ...
lots of plans ahead ... lets get them on the table ...
#crysx
Jump to: