Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 1148. (Read 2347601 times)

hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
I might write pool software as well  in c#. A ccminer friendly multipool with all the most profitable algos.
Payouts in darkcoins only.payouts will be  darksended to preserve anonymity.

Pool software? Wouldn't it be easier, in C#, if you'd just write client software that would switch locally?
Would be even more fun if ccminer itself could switch through API, flawlessly and multi-algo. Even loadbalancing against % chance of a coin being the most profitable.
Coin A has 80% chance, and most would just mine that. But it would make sense to also loadbalance 20% to the second most probable profitable coin. Or maybe even more Wink

it would great if all switching / load balance / failover was done within ccminer as it does with sgminer ... and autosensing / autoswitching multi-algo - now that would be a time saver Wink ...

most profitable though? ... damn ... maybe thats a project that would have to go to a few devs - not just one ...

sounds like an awesome plan though ...

#crysx

I wouldn't do the profit switching inside ccminer itself. That's a great field for C#, and should be done API-wise. That's where ccminer needs an update Wink
A separate C# tool could grab prices and profits like my profitcalc does, and switch the miner through a simple API command.
I know now things that I should implement/improve in the profitcalc (like PoS stealing blocks from PoW etc), but too busy with other stuff ATM ^^" *damn guis*
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
I might write pool software as well  in c#. A ccminer friendly multipool with all the most profitable algos.
Payouts in darkcoins only.payouts will be  darksended to preserve anonymity.

Pool software? Wouldn't it be easier, in C#, if you'd just write client software that would switch locally?
Would be even more fun if ccminer itself could switch through API, flawlessly and multi-algo. Even loadbalancing against % chance of a coin being the most profitable.
Coin A has 80% chance, and most would just mine that. But it would make sense to also loadbalance 20% to the second most probable profitable coin. Or maybe even more Wink

it would great if all switching / load balance / failover was done within ccminer as it does with sgminer ... and autosensing / autoswitching multi-algo - now that would be a time saver Wink ...

most profitable though? ... damn ... maybe thats a project that would have to go to a few devs - not just one ...

sounds like an awesome plan though ...

#crysx
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
I might write pool software as well  in c#. A ccminer friendly multipool with all the most profitable algos.
Payouts in darkcoins only.payouts will be  darksended to preserve anonymity.

Pool software? Wouldn't it be easier, in C#, if you'd just write client software that would switch locally?
Would be even more fun if ccminer itself could switch through API, flawlessly and multi-algo. Even loadbalancing against % chance of a coin being the most profitable.
Coin A has 80% chance, and most would just mine that. But it would make sense to also loadbalance 20% to the second most probable profitable coin. Or maybe even more Wink
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
Yaamp is a good.pool. but it miss some functonality. I want a graph of each workers performance over time.
More algorithms added( whirlpolx, anime, myriad groestl )
 Etc etc.

im with you on that sp ...

if there is infrastructure you need for testing ( servers - miners - etc ) just let me know ...

btw - are you now back from your holi-ummm-break ? ...

Wink ...

ps - a multipool server of sorts would be a great 'backend' plugin for mpos ...

#crysx
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Yaamp is a good.pool. but it miss some functonality. I want a graph of each workers performance over time.
More algorithms added( whirlpolx, anime, myriad groestl )
 Etc etc.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
Banned: For Your Protection
I might write pool software as well  in c#. A ccminer friendly multipool with all the most profitable algos.
Payouts in darkcoins only.payouts will be  darksended to preserve anonymity.

I am certain that your multipool would soar in popularity if it were more profitable than the other big-name multipools (eg: yaamp).

Yes, I would definitely use it, if it outperformed the competition. Here's hoping you decide to do it, and that you have a great success with it!  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
I might write pool software as well  in c#. A ccminer friendly multipool with all the most profitable algos.
Payouts in darkcoins only.payouts will be  darksended to preserve anonymity.

I am certain that your multipool would soar in popularity if it were more profitable than the other big-name multipools (eg: yaamp).
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
I might write pool software as well  in c#. A ccminer friendly multipool with all the most profitable algos.
Payouts in darkcoins only.payouts will be  darksended to preserve anonymity.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Yaamp is a coin killer and only pays 1/3 of what you could make if you mine the coin directly  Angry
nothing new in that... multipools are for lazy people, so it is ok rip them off  Grin
Yup.Lazy and stupid. I was making 2.5 LTC a day with 60 mh/s quark...do the math people  Now nothing.Go ahead and get ripped off by yaamp pool and kill the coins.
There's a coin that pays out exponentially djm and a mutipool like that kills it for me during the high payout cycle. It switches to that high payout cycle  and I get very few blocks. Then it switches to another coin.

If someone finds out a solution for this I am willing to join. 50 mh/s.
not using a multipool seems like a pretty good solution to me
I agree djm..the main problem with a multipool is again they dump the coin for the going rate..auto sell.

but thats the point im trying to make ...

why not create a multipool that DOESNT do that ... one that actually takes CARE of the miners ... and trades also ...

#crysx

You need to make a fully open source multipool, that can be transparent in its algorithm. People would use that one, because they know it's not ripping them off, and it would be more profitable to run that than to scam.

The issue with this is, a switching algorithm that everyone is using is ineffective...

true i always mine when no one else is and make more profit, look spread i couldnt mine 1 block per day 1.5 month ago with 8 gpus, but than few days back at low nethashrate and difficulty i mined 10 blocks with only 2 gpu, i always get more profit mining less profitable coins at right time and selling them at right time if i mine monero i will not sell it for 0.2$ that is when i start mining monero, that is when nethash become lower and i get more coins and wait until is at 0.4$ to sell bc monero goes from 0.2 to 04/5$ and back constantly in last 5 months
etc etc...
Thats exactly the way I mine...without exception.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
Yaamp is a coin killer and only pays 1/3 of what you could make if you mine the coin directly  Angry
nothing new in that... multipools are for lazy people, so it is ok rip them off  Grin
Yup.Lazy and stupid. I was making 2.5 LTC a day with 60 mh/s quark...do the math people  Now nothing.Go ahead and get ripped off by yaamp pool and kill the coins.
There's a coin that pays out exponentially djm and a mutipool like that kills it for me during the high payout cycle. It switches to that high payout cycle  and I get very few blocks. Then it switches to another coin.

If someone finds out a solution for this I am willing to join. 50 mh/s.
not using a multipool seems like a pretty good solution to me
I agree djm..the main problem with a multipool is again they dump the coin for the going rate..auto sell.

but thats the point im trying to make ...

why not create a multipool that DOESNT do that ... one that actually takes CARE of the miners ... and trades also ...

#crysx

You need to make a fully open source multipool, that can be transparent in its algorithm. People would use that one, because they know it's not ripping them off, and it would be more profitable to run that than to scam.

The issue with this is, a switching algorithm that everyone is using is ineffective...

ture ...

though i would think that if ANYONE has the skill set of doing such a thing would mean that they will be willing to provide MUCH more than 'just' a multipool with an awesome switching algorithm ...

the pool itself needs to have something more than just providing a mining portal - which 8is why the trading effort would need to be incorporated somehow ...

in fact - if anything - the pool would only be the backend of something much bigger and more involved in coins / trading / exchanging ... this would make the whole transparency of algo almost moot - as it would be basically only ONE part of a combined service collective ...
hmm... would tend to think that it is where the scam begin... (or rather the low profit)
pool and exchange should be kept independent in my opinion.

Beside that, that would cost a huge amount of money to run, to code etc... meaning high fee to just keep the pool afloat... and a pool operator obligated to dump his fee for low profit to pay the bills...

There was already a pool/exchange, (CoinEx I think, link doesn't work anymore...) used to run my small usb asic, it was clearly unprofitable and a constant dump fest on the exchange part as people were just getting rid of their coin as soon they were mined)

well - that is not what i am talking about ... but i do follow you ...

just because 'there was' doesnt mean that is what will happen or plan for a pool that does the 'right thing' ...

i will concede though - it WILL cost a hefty sum ... both in fiat - crypto - work - coding ...

#crysx
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Yaamp is a coin killer and only pays 1/3 of what you could make if you mine the coin directly  Angry
nothing new in that... multipools are for lazy people, so it is ok rip them off  Grin
Yup.Lazy and stupid. I was making 2.5 LTC a day with 60 mh/s quark...do the math people  Now nothing.Go ahead and get ripped off by yaamp pool and kill the coins.
There's a coin that pays out exponentially djm and a mutipool like that kills it for me during the high payout cycle. It switches to that high payout cycle  and I get very few blocks. Then it switches to another coin.

If someone finds out a solution for this I am willing to join. 50 mh/s.
not using a multipool seems like a pretty good solution to me
I agree djm..the main problem with a multipool is again they dump the coin for the going rate..auto sell.

but thats the point im trying to make ...

why not create a multipool that DOESNT do that ... one that actually takes CARE of the miners ... and trades also ...

#crysx

You need to make a fully open source multipool, that can be transparent in its algorithm. People would use that one, because they know it's not ripping them off, and it would be more profitable to run that than to scam.

The issue with this is, a switching algorithm that everyone is using is ineffective...

true i always mine when no one else is and make more profit, look spread i couldnt mine 1 block per day 1.5 month ago with 8 gpus, but than few days back at low nethashrate and difficulty i mined 10 blocks with only 2 gpu, i always get more profit mining less profitable coins at right time and selling them at right time if i mine monero i will not sell it for 0.2$ that is when i start mining monero, that is when nethash become lower and i get more coins and wait until is at 0.4$ to sell bc monero goes from 0.2 to 04/5$ and back constantly in last 5 months
etc etc...
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
Yaamp is a coin killer and only pays 1/3 of what you could make if you mine the coin directly  Angry
nothing new in that... multipools are for lazy people, so it is ok rip them off  Grin
Yup.Lazy and stupid. I was making 2.5 LTC a day with 60 mh/s quark...do the math people  Now nothing.Go ahead and get ripped off by yaamp pool and kill the coins.
There's a coin that pays out exponentially djm and a mutipool like that kills it for me during the high payout cycle. It switches to that high payout cycle  and I get very few blocks. Then it switches to another coin.

If someone finds out a solution for this I am willing to join. 50 mh/s.
not using a multipool seems like a pretty good solution to me
I agree djm..the main problem with a multipool is again they dump the coin for the going rate..auto sell.

but thats the point im trying to make ...

why not create a multipool that DOESNT do that ... one that actually takes CARE of the miners ... and trades also ...

#crysx

You need to make a fully open source multipool, that can be transparent in its algorithm. People would use that one, because they know it's not ripping them off, and it would be more profitable to run that than to scam.

The issue with this is, a switching algorithm that everyone is using is ineffective...

ture ...

though i would think that if ANYONE has the skill set of doing such a thing would mean that they will be willing to provide MUCH more than 'just' a multipool with an awesome switching algorithm ...

the pool itself needs to have something more than just providing a mining portal - which 8is why the trading effort would need to be incorporated somehow ...

in fact - if anything - the pool would only be the backend of something much bigger and more involved in coins / trading / exchanging ... this would make the whole transparency of algo almost moot - as it would be basically only ONE part of a combined service collective ...
hmm... would tend to think that it is where the scam begin... (or rather the low profit)
pool and exchange should be kept independent in my opinion.

Beside that, that would cost a huge amount of money to run, to code etc... meaning high fee to just keep the pool afloat... and a pool operator obligated to dump his fee for low profit to pay the bills...

There was already a pool/exchange, (CoinEx I think, link doesn't work anymore...) used to run my small usb asic, it was clearly unprofitable and a constant dump fest on the exchange part as people were just getting rid of their coin as soon they were mined)
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
Yaamp is a coin killer and only pays 1/3 of what you could make if you mine the coin directly  Angry
nothing new in that... multipools are for lazy people, so it is ok rip them off  Grin
Yup.Lazy and stupid. I was making 2.5 LTC a day with 60 mh/s quark...do the math people  Now nothing.Go ahead and get ripped off by yaamp pool and kill the coins.
There's a coin that pays out exponentially djm and a mutipool like that kills it for me during the high payout cycle. It switches to that high payout cycle  and I get very few blocks. Then it switches to another coin.

If someone finds out a solution for this I am willing to join. 50 mh/s.
not using a multipool seems like a pretty good solution to me
I agree djm..the main problem with a multipool is again they dump the coin for the going rate..auto sell.

but thats the point im trying to make ...

why not create a multipool that DOESNT do that ... one that actually takes CARE of the miners ... and trades also ...

#crysx

You need to make a fully open source multipool, that can be transparent in its algorithm. People would use that one, because they know it's not ripping them off, and it would be more profitable to run that than to scam.

The issue with this is, a switching algorithm that everyone is using is ineffective...

true ...

though i would think that if ANYONE has the skill set of doing such a thing would mean that they will be willing to provide MUCH more than 'just' a multipool with an awesome switching algorithm ...

the pool itself needs to have something more than just providing a mining portal - which 8is why the trading effort would need to be incorporated somehow ...

ccminer / sgminer could possibly be incorporated as one of the cloud mining exercises ...

in fact - if anything - the pool would only be the backend of something much bigger and more involved in coins / trading / exchanging ... this would make the whole transparency of algo almost moot - as it would be basically only ONE part of a combined service collective ...

would be nice to at least have a transparent and honest pool / site working FOR the community ...

just ideas being thrown around - food for thought ...

#crysx
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
Yaamp is a coin killer and only pays 1/3 of what you could make if you mine the coin directly  Angry
nothing new in that... multipools are for lazy people, so it is ok rip them off  Grin
Yup.Lazy and stupid. I was making 2.5 LTC a day with 60 mh/s quark...do the math people  Now nothing.Go ahead and get ripped off by yaamp pool and kill the coins.
There's a coin that pays out exponentially djm and a mutipool like that kills it for me during the high payout cycle. It switches to that high payout cycle  and I get very few blocks. Then it switches to another coin.

If someone finds out a solution for this I am willing to join. 50 mh/s.
not using a multipool seems like a pretty good solution to me
I agree djm..the main problem with a multipool is again they dump the coin for the going rate..auto sell.

but thats the point im trying to make ...

why not create a multipool that DOESNT do that ... one that actually takes CARE of the miners ... and trades also ...

#crysx

CLUB CUDA--

It might be possible to do it if cuda miners formed a mining pool with strategic trading.  It would be more of a members-only thing.

There would be a bothersome wait on return...       --scryptr


cc using ccminer ... club cuda using clubcudaminer ...

me likey Wink ...

of course we couldnt just keep it at that - all miners should be welcome ...

bothersome? ... well what the hell are we all doing with the trading anyway? Smiley ...

we are going to mine the stuff anyway - why not at our discretion with little fees and FOR the miner - not the pool ...

obviously keeping the pool alive would be the priority - but once established and members are seeing good returns - why wouldnt we all keep it running? ...

#crysx
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
Yaamp is a coin killer and only pays 1/3 of what you could make if you mine the coin directly  Angry
nothing new in that... multipools are for lazy people, so it is ok rip them off  Grin
Yup.Lazy and stupid. I was making 2.5 LTC a day with 60 mh/s quark...do the math people  Now nothing.Go ahead and get ripped off by yaamp pool and kill the coins.
There's a coin that pays out exponentially djm and a mutipool like that kills it for me during the high payout cycle. It switches to that high payout cycle  and I get very few blocks. Then it switches to another coin.

If someone finds out a solution for this I am willing to join. 50 mh/s.
not using a multipool seems like a pretty good solution to me
I agree djm..the main problem with a multipool is again they dump the coin for the going rate..auto sell.

but thats the point im trying to make ...

why not create a multipool that DOESNT do that ... one that actually takes CARE of the miners ... and trades also ...

#crysx

CLUB CUDA--

It might be possible to do it if cuda miners formed a mining pool with strategic trading.  It would be more of a members-only thing.

There would be a bothersome wait on return...       --scryptr
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
Yaamp is a coin killer and only pays 1/3 of what you could make if you mine the coin directly  Angry
nothing new in that... multipools are for lazy people, so it is ok rip them off  Grin
Yup.Lazy and stupid. I was making 2.5 LTC a day with 60 mh/s quark...do the math people  Now nothing.Go ahead and get ripped off by yaamp pool and kill the coins.
There's a coin that pays out exponentially djm and a mutipool like that kills it for me during the high payout cycle. It switches to that high payout cycle  and I get very few blocks. Then it switches to another coin.

If someone finds out a solution for this I am willing to join. 50 mh/s.
not using a multipool seems like a pretty good solution to me
I agree djm..the main problem with a multipool is again they dump the coin for the going rate..auto sell.

but thats the point im trying to make ...

why not create a multipool that DOESNT do that ... one that actually takes CARE of the miners ... and trades also ...

#crysx
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Yaamp is a coin killer and only pays 1/3 of what you could make if you mine the coin directly  Angry
nothing new in that... multipools are for lazy people, so it is ok rip them off  Grin
Yup.Lazy and stupid. I was making 2.5 LTC a day with 60 mh/s quark...do the math people  Now nothing.Go ahead and get ripped off by yaamp pool and kill the coins.
There's a coin that pays out exponentially djm and a mutipool like that kills it for me during the high payout cycle. It switches to that high payout cycle  and I get very few blocks. Then it switches to another coin.

If someone finds out a solution for this I am willing to join. 50 mh/s.
not using a multipool seems like a pretty good solution to me
I agree djm..the main problem with a multipool is again they dump the coin for the going rate..auto sell.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
not using a multipool seems like a pretty good solution to me

I know, fighting against 2000 with 50 in a short time window is just so frustrating sometimes...
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
An idea that had floated on the cudaminer thread long time ago, was to have a cuda-only pool of sorts, with fees going to the (now) ccminer developers. If it was possible to couple an official cuda pool along with optimized/locked miner versions, I'd be all over it (with my massive 2x750TI rig!)  Grin

Would be really awesome if someone pulled this off.
I have no technical skills to contribute much, but I can be the coffee guy.  Cool

was thinking of such a thing - but that would mean restriction in miners ...

something that no pool really should do ...

but it would decrease the support tickets quite dramatically i would think Wink ...

im up for it ...

btw - i started with a 2 card amd system ... so massive miner it is Wink ...

#crysx
legendary
Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001
An idea that had floated on the cudaminer thread long time ago, was to have a cuda-only pool of sorts, with fees going to the (now) ccminer developers. If it was possible to couple an official cuda pool along with optimized/locked miner versions, I'd be all over it (with my massive 2x750TI rig!)  Grin

Would be really awesome if someone pulled this off.
I have no technical skills to contribute much, but I can be the coffee guy.  Cool
Jump to: