CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 1194.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: squadbox on January 05, 2015, 02:57:43 PM

Quote from: chrysophylax on January 05, 2015, 01:29:41 AM

Quote from: squadbox on January 05, 2015, 12:44:05 AM

I was only getting about 8 Mh/s effective hashrate at the pool with r24 as opposed to 10.5 Mh/s with r23. I'll be sticking with r23 for now.

those hashrates are superb ... but as sp works on the miner and optimizations - there is bound to be some mishaps along the way ...

im still runing the latest git pull - and will stay on it for now - to test stability also ...

i too have issues with extranonce2 errors though ... westhash is the main one ... yaamp is down at the moment - but was not getting too many errors there ...

have you overclocked the cards to get those hashrates? ... if so - how? ... assuming you are using linux too as per your post ...

tanx ...

#crysx

Those hashrates are for two 750Ti's.. sorry if I wasn't clear about that!
10.5M/2 = 5250 khash/s effective at the pool (YAAMP) for quark. I get about 5550 +/- 50 khash/s reported from the miner itself.

Yaamp takes 3.9% in fee and the rest is rejects or?

squadbox

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

Quote from: chrysophylax on January 05, 2015, 01:29:41 AM

Quote from: squadbox on January 05, 2015, 12:44:05 AM

I was only getting about 8 Mh/s effective hashrate at the pool with r24 as opposed to 10.5 Mh/s with r23. I'll be sticking with r23 for now.

those hashrates are superb ... but as sp works on the miner and optimizations - there is bound to be some mishaps along the way ...

im still runing the latest git pull - and will stay on it for now - to test stability also ...

i too have issues with extranonce2 errors though ... westhash is the main one ... yaamp is down at the moment - but was not getting too many errors there ...

have you overclocked the cards to get those hashrates? ... if so - how? ... assuming you are using linux too as per your post ...

tanx ...

#crysx

Those hashrates are for two 750Ti's.. sorry if I wasn't clear about that!
10.5M/2 = 5250 khash/s effective at the pool (YAAMP) for quark. I get about 5550 +/- 50 khash/s reported from the miner itself.

Handofmidas

member

Activity: 61

Merit: 10

Tested Coinotron with release24. Unfortunately there are no graphs there, but logged in regularly and the hashrate was always between 14 and 15 MH, instead of the anticipated 16.7 MH. AFAIK Coinotron does not have vardiff, in contrast to coinmine, so I'm getting shares quite frequently there.

PVmining

sr. member

Activity: 330

Merit: 252

Quote from: sp_ on January 05, 2015, 08:23:50 AM

This is correct for some algorithms. Didn't expect the price to go below $300 / BTC

with the current BTC price and 180 750ti you will make $60 a day when mining quarkcoins/clones.
Power consumption will be below 7WATT per MHASH (around 5000KWh a month)

income per month: 1830$ (6.1BTC)
Power cost per month (?): (@0.1$ per KWh) 500$

Profit: $1330

...and you will need 25months to return your hardware investments, which means "never ever" in the crypto game Tongue

I'm a crypto beliver, but the energy costs are that high at my place that I will shut down some of my rigs too as many of you.

sp_ thanks for your efforts... I mined other algos, but I liked to see your great miner performance upgrades.

go6ooo1212

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1000

quarkchain.io

Nice calculation , I like it

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: jpouza on January 05, 2015, 08:17:56 AM

With BTC price = trash, nothing is profitable anymore.

This is correct

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

They say that GPU mining is dead, but as long as you get more than the electic bill, and you have enough capital your farm can grow and grow.

jpouza

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1116

Quote from: sp_ on January 05, 2015, 08:14:04 AM

There are many profitable quark coins f.ex:

BitQuark
MonetaryUnit
Securecoin
DimeCoin
Quarkcoin

with the latest miner (release 24), 2-3 more profitable than mining x11.

Above 0,2 BTC per day for 1 gigahash.

you only need 60 980 cards (10 rigs), or 180 750TI Cards(30 rigs) to reach 1 gigahash.

$)

heheh just a few cards hum?

With BTC price = trash, nothing is profitable anymore.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Above 0,2 BTC per day for 1 gigahash.

you only need 60 980 cards (10 rigs), or 180 750TI Cards(30 rigs) to reach 1 gigahash.

$)

chrysophylax

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1091

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

Quote from: sp_ on January 05, 2015, 06:49:04 AM

Try the -r parameter.

d, --devices gives a comma separated list of CUDA device IDs
to operate on. Device IDs start counting from 0!
Alternatively give string names of your card like
gtx780ti or gt640#2 (matching 2nd gt640 in the PC).

-i, --intensity GPU threads per call 8-31 (default: 0=auto)
Decimals are allowed for fine tuning
-f, --diff Divide difficulty by this factor (std is 1)
-v, --vote Heavycoin block vote (default: 512)
-o, --url=URL URL of mining server
-O, --userpass=U:P username:password pair for mining server
-u, --user=USERNAME username for mining server
-p, --pass=PASSWORD password for mining server
--cert=FILE certificate for mining server using SSL
-x, --proxy=[PROTOCOL://]HOST[:PORT] connect through a proxy
-t, --threads=N number of miner threads (default: number of nVidia GPUs in your system)
-r, --retries=N number of times to retry if a network call fails
(default: retry indefinitely)
-R, --retry-pause=N time to pause between retries, in seconds (default: 15)
-T, --timeout=N network timeout, in seconds (default: 270)
-s, --scantime=N upper bound on time spent scanning current work when
long polling is unavailable, in seconds (default: 5)
--no-longpoll disable X-Long-Polling support
--no-stratum disable X-Stratum support
-q, --quiet disable per-thread hashmeter output
-D, --debug enable debug output
-P, --protocol-dump verbose dump of protocol-level activities
-b, --api-bind IP/Port for the miner API (default: 127.0.0.1:4068)
--benchmark run in offline benchmark mode
--cputest debug hashes from cpu algorithms
-c, --config=FILE load a JSON-format configuration file
--no-color disable colored console output
-V, --version display version information and exit
-h, --help display this help text and exit

this actually shows what im asking ... if there is no entry / parameter - then it should retry indefinitely ... but it doesnt ...

i see your responses below also - i will try and work this - but will have to be tomorrow ( for me - its very late now ) ...

tanx sp ...

btw - what other quark pool can i point the miners to if you know of any good ones ... yaamp seems to be the only multipool that pays out in btc ... the other pools dont have quark ...

ive tested the other algorithms ...

tanx again ...

#crysx

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: Handofmidas on January 05, 2015, 05:05:52 AM

Hi there, just tested release24 and it started off well and pool reported good hashrate, but after a short while it dropped down again. Hash should be around 16.7 MH. Pool is still drk.coinmine.pl, just the lazout changed. Will test another pool for comparison soon.

I will mine with my testrig on this pool to find out what's wrong. Do you have a logfile I can look at? Normally the logfile is in the same folder as the exe file.

Other pools seems to work fine. I have tested 3-4 pools. f.ex Nicehash or yaamp.com

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

You can also create a script similar to this:

-r 100 meens that the miner will try to reconnect 100 times.
-R 10 meens that the miner sleeps for 10 seconds for every disconnect.

:loop
C:\ccminersp-mod\ccminer.exe -r 100 -R 10
C:\ccminersp-mod\ccminer.exe -r 100 -R 10 failover pool 1
C:\ccminersp-mod\ccminer.exe -r 100 -R 10 failover pool 2
goto loop

this was made for wiondows, but should be easy to make a similar script for linux:

chmod +RWX on the text file, change the paths.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Try the -r parameter.

d, --devices gives a comma separated list of CUDA device IDs
to operate on. Device IDs start counting from 0!
Alternatively give string names of your card like
gtx780ti or gt640#2 (matching 2nd gt640 in the PC).

-i, --intensity GPU threads per call 8-31 (default: 0=auto)
Decimals are allowed for fine tuning
-f, --diff Divide difficulty by this factor (std is 1)
-v, --vote Heavycoin block vote (default: 512)
-o, --url=URL URL of mining server
-O, --userpass=U:P username:password pair for mining server
-u, --user=USERNAME username for mining server
-p, --pass=PASSWORD password for mining server
--cert=FILE certificate for mining server using SSL
-x, --proxy=[PROTOCOL://]HOST[:PORT] connect through a proxy
-t, --threads=N number of miner threads (default: number of nVidia GPUs in your system)
-r, --retries=N number of times to retry if a network call fails
(default: retry indefinitely)
-R, --retry-pause=N time to pause between retries, in seconds (default: 15)
-T, --timeout=N network timeout, in seconds (default: 270)
-s, --scantime=N upper bound on time spent scanning current work when
long polling is unavailable, in seconds (default: 5)
--no-longpoll disable X-Long-Polling support
--no-stratum disable X-Stratum support
-q, --quiet disable per-thread hashmeter output
-D, --debug enable debug output
-P, --protocol-dump verbose dump of protocol-level activities
-b, --api-bind IP/Port for the miner API (default: 127.0.0.1:4068)
--benchmark run in offline benchmark mode
--cputest debug hashes from cpu algorithms
-c, --config=FILE load a JSON-format configuration file
--no-color disable colored console output
-V, --version display version information and exit
-h, --help display this help text and exit

chrysophylax

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1091

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

Quote from: sp_ on January 05, 2015, 04:32:05 AM

Quote from: squadbox on January 05, 2015, 12:44:05 AM

I've had very poor performance with r24 built from git on linux. Lots of low difficulty shares and nonce issues concerning already being sent.

[2015-01-05 00:20:18] nonce 6537ae00 was already sent 2 seconds ago
[2015-01-05 00:20:26] nonce 47dd5f01 was already sent 2 seconds ago
I was only getting about 8 Mh/s effective hashrate at the pool with r24 as opposed to 10.5 Mh/s with r23. I'll be sticking with r23 for now.

Some days ago I added 2 nonce sending in quark, but it had some bugs (double sending) and I reverted the changeset.
Make sure that you build from the github version that is tagged with the "release 24" changeset. Commits before the tagged release could have sideeffects. And commits after are not tested properly and could have errors.
Yesterday I fixed a bug when running benchmarkmode (Run the benchmark for a while and it starts to print 100 times as much text to the commandline). Seems to work, but untested on the pool.

sp - i was mining on yaamp earlier and the site went down ... it is still down as far as i can see as the proxy wont reconnect to it ...

one thing i noticed was that ccminer retries for only 3 or 4 attempts then exits ... can this be changed? ...

i ask this due to teh many times a pool may disconnect for a few minutes at a time then reconnect ... if the miner is still trying ( which happens with much of the very earlyr versions ) then it would continue to mine ... but as it stands - if yaamp were to come back on only 3 minutes after it disconnects - then ccminer has already exited and wont reconnect ...

a setting? or an inherent thing programmed into ccminer? can i change it? ...

tanx mate ...

#crysx

tbearhere

legendary

Activity: 3164

Merit: 1003

Quote from: tbearhere on January 03, 2015, 03:06:25 PM

Quote from: sp_ on January 03, 2015, 12:40:50 PM

Quote from: bathrobehero on January 03, 2015, 11:22:53 AM

Quote from: sp_ on January 02, 2015, 03:49:08 PM

Quote from: Amph on January 02, 2015, 10:41:33 AM

Quote from: adaseb on December 30, 2014, 05:08:10 PM

Yes its a nice speed but honestly Its not even worth running anymore. Nothing is profitable anymore.

too bad this miner comes soo late, it should have come in jackpot era at the very least

Still possible to make a profit if you know how to use the software...

Not without ridiculously cheap electricity as far as I can tell.

Donate some beers, and I will tell you how to double your profit.

750ti just broke 6mh/s QUARK ALGO with #24 and my oc is still the same.

I forgot, #24 about 2 watts less per card.

Handofmidas

member

Activity: 61

Merit: 10

Hi there, just tested release24 and it started off well and pool reported good hashrate, but after a short while it dropped down again. Hash should be around 16.7 MH. Pool is still drk.coinmine.pl, just the lazout changed. Will test another pool for comparison soon.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: squadbox on January 05, 2015, 12:44:05 AM

I've had very poor performance with r24 built from git on linux. Lots of low difficulty shares and nonce issues concerning already being sent.

[2015-01-05 00:20:18] nonce 6537ae00 was already sent 2 seconds ago
[2015-01-05 00:20:26] nonce 47dd5f01 was already sent 2 seconds ago
I was only getting about 8 Mh/s effective hashrate at the pool with r24 as opposed to 10.5 Mh/s with r23. I'll be sticking with r23 for now.

Some days ago I added 2 nonce sending in quark, but it had some bugs (double sending) and I reverted the changeset.
Make sure that you build from the github version that is tagged with the "release 24" changeset. Commits before the tagged release could have sideeffects. And commits after are not tested properly and could have errors.
Yesterday I fixed a bug when running benchmarkmode (Run the benchmark for a while and it starts to print 100 times as much text to the commandline). Seems to work, but untested on the pool.

chrysophylax

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1091

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

Quote from: squadbox on January 05, 2015, 12:44:05 AM

Quote from: sp_ on January 03, 2015, 12:37:17 PM

- Fixed some of the random crashes.(ctrl-c exit and network disconnects)
- Blake rewrite to uint2. Faster x11,x13,x14,x15,x17,nist5,quark etc (around 40khash on the 980(x11))
- fixed dropping hashrate on some pools
- less gputhreads,more speed (1 watt less powerusage 750ti)

My 6card rig on the attic is using 207 watt total. (750ti).
This is including cpu and harddrive.(mining quark) 32MHASH base clocks.

(Temperature in the room is around 4 degrees celsius. )

The 24th public beta(windows executable) is available here: (03-jan-2015)

http://www.filedropper.com/release24

The sourcecode is available here:

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer

Post your stats here. Card name/gpu clock/memclock

I've had very poor performance with r24 built from git on linux. Lots of low difficulty shares and nonce issues concerning already being sent.

Code:

[2015-01-05 00:20:18] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5568 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:18] nonce 6537ae00 was already sent 2 seconds ago
[2015-01-05 00:20:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5462 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:18] stratum connection reset
[2015-01-05 00:20:18] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5508 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5686 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:19] Stratum difficulty set to 0.01
[2015-01-05 00:20:19] us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 quark block 701747
[2015-01-05 00:20:20] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5595 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:20] accepted: 917/985 (93.10%), 11173 khash/s booooo
[2015-01-05 00:20:20] reject reason: Low difficulty share
[2015-01-05 00:20:22] us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 quark block 633570
[2015-01-05 00:20:22] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5516 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:22] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5601 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:24] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5686 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:24] accepted: 918/986 (93.10%), 11171 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:20:26] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5542 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:26] accepted: 919/987 (93.11%), 11172 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:20:26] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5651 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:26] nonce 47dd5f01 was already sent 2 seconds ago
[2015-01-05 00:20:26] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5535 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:28] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5644 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:28] nonce 47dd5f01 was already sent 4 seconds ago
[2015-01-05 00:20:28] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5546 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:28] nonce 47dd5f01 was already sent 4 seconds ago
[2015-01-05 00:20:30] stratum connection reset
[2015-01-05 00:20:30] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5552 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:30] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5582 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:30] Stratum difficulty set to 0.01
[2015-01-05 00:20:30] us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 quark block 701747
[2015-01-05 00:20:32] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5526 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:32] accepted: 919/988 (93.02%), 11175 khash/s booooo
[2015-01-05 00:20:32] reject reason: Low difficulty share
[2015-01-05 00:20:33] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5660 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:33] accepted: 920/989 (93.02%), 11178 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:20:35] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5643 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:35] nonce 7747bf01 was already sent 2 seconds ago
[2015-01-05 00:20:35] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5532 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:36] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5693 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:36] accepted: 921/990 (93.03%), 11180 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:20:36] stratum connection reset

as opposed to r23 which has no issues.

Code:

[2015-01-05 00:24:52] us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 quark block 633582
[2015-01-05 00:24:52] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5518 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:24:52] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5629 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:24:55] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5643 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:24:55] accepted: 13/13 (100.00%), 11177 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:24:59] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5527 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:24:59] accepted: 14/14 (100.00%), 11175 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:25:03] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5614 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:03] accepted: 15/15 (100.00%), 11173 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:25:05] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5525 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:05] accepted: 16/16 (100.00%), 11172 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:25:12] us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 quark block 633582
[2015-01-05 00:25:12] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5613 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:12] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5526 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:21] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5521 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:21] accepted: 17/17 (100.00%), 11167 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:25:22] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5540 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:22] accepted: 18/18 (100.00%), 11167 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:25:30] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5517 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:30] accepted: 19/19 (100.00%), 11166 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:25:42] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5614 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:44] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5626 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:44] accepted: 20/20 (100.00%), 11165 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:25:49] us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 quark block 633583
[2015-01-05 00:25:49] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5634 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:49] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5515 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:51] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5541 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:51] accepted: 21/21 (100.00%), 11164 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:25:51] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5555 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:52] accepted: 22/22 (100.00%), 11165 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:25:53] us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 quark block 830338
[2015-01-05 00:25:53] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5505 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:53] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5611 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:26:01] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5606 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:26:01] accepted: 23/23 (100.00%), 11161 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:26:04] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5653 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:26:04] accepted: 24/24 (100.00%), 11163 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:26:04] us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 quark block 365008
[2015-01-05 00:26:04] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5521 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:26:05] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5541 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:26:05] accepted: 25/25 (100.00%), 11162 khash/s yay!!!

I was only getting about 8 Mh/s effective hashrate at the pool with r24 as opposed to 10.5 Mh/s with r23. I'll be sticking with r23 for now.

those hashrates are superb ... but as sp works on the miner and optimizations - there is bound to be some mishaps along the way ...

im still runing the latest git pull - and will stay on it for now - to test stability also ...

i too have issues with extranonce2 errors though ... westhash is the main one ... yaamp is down at the moment - but was not getting too many errors there ...

have you overclocked the cards to get those hashrates? ... if so - how? ... assuming you are using linux too as per your post ...

tanx ...

#crysx

squadbox

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

Quote from: sp_ on January 03, 2015, 12:37:17 PM

- Fixed some of the random crashes.(ctrl-c exit and network disconnects)
- Blake rewrite to uint2. Faster x11,x13,x14,x15,x17,nist5,quark etc (around 40khash on the 980(x11))
- fixed dropping hashrate on some pools
- less gputhreads,more speed (1 watt less powerusage 750ti)

My 6card rig on the attic is using 207 watt total. (750ti).
This is including cpu and harddrive.(mining quark) 32MHASH base clocks.

(Temperature in the room is around 4 degrees celsius. )

The 24th public beta(windows executable) is available here: (03-jan-2015)

http://www.filedropper.com/release24

The sourcecode is available here:

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer

Post your stats here. Card name/gpu clock/memclock

I've had very poor performance with r24 built from git on linux. Lots of low difficulty shares and nonce issues concerning already being sent.

Code:

[2015-01-05 00:20:18] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5568 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:18] nonce 6537ae00 was already sent 2 seconds ago
[2015-01-05 00:20:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5462 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:18] stratum connection reset
[2015-01-05 00:20:18] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5508 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5686 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:19] Stratum difficulty set to 0.01
[2015-01-05 00:20:19] us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 quark block 701747
[2015-01-05 00:20:20] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5595 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:20] accepted: 917/985 (93.10%), 11173 khash/s booooo
[2015-01-05 00:20:20] reject reason: Low difficulty share
[2015-01-05 00:20:22] us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 quark block 633570
[2015-01-05 00:20:22] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5516 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:22] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5601 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:24] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5686 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:24] accepted: 918/986 (93.10%), 11171 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:20:26] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5542 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:26] accepted: 919/987 (93.11%), 11172 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:20:26] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5651 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:26] nonce 47dd5f01 was already sent 2 seconds ago
[2015-01-05 00:20:26] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5535 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:28] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5644 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:28] nonce 47dd5f01 was already sent 4 seconds ago
[2015-01-05 00:20:28] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5546 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:28] nonce 47dd5f01 was already sent 4 seconds ago
[2015-01-05 00:20:30] stratum connection reset
[2015-01-05 00:20:30] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5552 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:30] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5582 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:30] Stratum difficulty set to 0.01
[2015-01-05 00:20:30] us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 quark block 701747
[2015-01-05 00:20:32] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5526 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:32] accepted: 919/988 (93.02%), 11175 khash/s booooo
[2015-01-05 00:20:32] reject reason: Low difficulty share
[2015-01-05 00:20:33] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5660 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:33] accepted: 920/989 (93.02%), 11178 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:20:35] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5643 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:35] nonce 7747bf01 was already sent 2 seconds ago
[2015-01-05 00:20:35] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5532 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:36] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5693 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:20:36] accepted: 921/990 (93.03%), 11180 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:20:36] stratum connection reset

as opposed to r23 which has no issues.

Code:

[2015-01-05 00:24:52] us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 quark block 633582
[2015-01-05 00:24:52] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5518 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:24:52] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5629 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:24:55] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5643 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:24:55] accepted: 13/13 (100.00%), 11177 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:24:59] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5527 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:24:59] accepted: 14/14 (100.00%), 11175 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:25:03] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5614 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:03] accepted: 15/15 (100.00%), 11173 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:25:05] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5525 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:05] accepted: 16/16 (100.00%), 11172 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:25:12] us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 quark block 633582
[2015-01-05 00:25:12] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5613 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:12] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5526 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:21] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5521 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:21] accepted: 17/17 (100.00%), 11167 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:25:22] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5540 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:22] accepted: 18/18 (100.00%), 11167 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:25:30] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5517 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:30] accepted: 19/19 (100.00%), 11166 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:25:42] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5614 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:44] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5626 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:44] accepted: 20/20 (100.00%), 11165 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:25:49] us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 quark block 633583
[2015-01-05 00:25:49] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5634 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:49] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5515 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:51] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5541 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:51] accepted: 21/21 (100.00%), 11164 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:25:51] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5555 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:52] accepted: 22/22 (100.00%), 11165 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:25:53] us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 quark block 830338
[2015-01-05 00:25:53] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5505 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:25:53] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5611 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:26:01] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5606 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:26:01] accepted: 23/23 (100.00%), 11161 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:26:04] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5653 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:26:04] accepted: 24/24 (100.00%), 11163 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-05 00:26:04] us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 quark block 365008
[2015-01-05 00:26:04] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5521 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:26:05] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5541 kH/s
[2015-01-05 00:26:05] accepted: 25/25 (100.00%), 11162 khash/s yay!!!

I was only getting about 8 Mh/s effective hashrate at the pool with r24 as opposed to 10.5 Mh/s with r23. I'll be sticking with r23 for now.

squadbox

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

SP,

I saw in git that you made a commit (9d20be0) updating version numbers in cpuminer-config.h, but I noticed that it wasn't reflected in ccminer once I built it myself (Ubuntu 14.04). I did some searching and saw that the version number should be updated in configure.ac on line 1 and in cpu-miner.c on line 1536.

All this lead me to another question. Does including cpuminer-config.h in the repo have any purpose? Running ./configure.sh overwrites it anyway.

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 1194. (Read 2347597 times)