I have micron ram and no BIOS fix yet so I can't do anything above 400MHZ+ on GTX1070.
Are you talking about Gigabyte G1?
Zotac I only own Zotac products :-D
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 489. (Read 2347659 times)
Are you talking about Gigabyte G1?
Zotac I only own Zotac products :-D
Claymore just released 300H/s on stock 390X.
I have micron ram and no BIOS fix yet so I can't do anything above 400MHZ+ on GTX1070.
Are you talking about Gigabyte G1?
253 SOl/s on the 980ti
But nicehash is only paying 0.012 /KHASH. 253sol/s gives 0,003036BTC/day ($2,2 per day)
Mining zcash directly will give you ($2.69 (coinwarz.com)) with 253 sol/s
So a faster miner, but with 20%-30% lower payouts
If you mine @ 210sol/s and your payouts is 30% lower, it's the same as mining with 147Sol/s
What is the situation if the payment is in ZCash directly? 253 sols/s with eqm_v1.0.2a on a 980 Ti @1400/4000
good work
good work
But nicehash is only paying 0.012 /KHASH. 253sol/s gives 0,003036BTC/day ($2,2 per day)
Mining zcash directly will give you ($2.69 (coinwarz.com)) with 253 sol/s
So a faster miner, but with 20%-30% lower payouts
If you mine @ 210sol/s and your payouts is 30% lower, it's the same as mining with 147Sol/s
I have micron ram and no BIOS fix yet so I can't do anything above 400MHZ+ on GTX1070.
253 SOl/s on the 980ti
But nicehash is only paying 0.012 /KHASH. 253sol/s gives 0,003036BTC/day ($2,2 per day)
Mining zcash directly will give you ($2.69 (coinwarz.com)) with 253 sol/s
So a faster miner, but with 20%-30% lower payouts
If you mine @ 210sol/s and your payouts is 30% lower, it's the same as mining with 147Sol/s
253 sols/s with eqm_v1.0.2a on a 980 Ti @1400/4000
good work
good work
But nicehash is only paying 0.012 /KHASH. 253sol/s gives 0,003036BTC/day ($2,2 per day)
Mining zcash directly will give you ($2.69 (coinwarz.com)) with 253 sol/s
So a faster miner, but with 20%-30% lower payouts
If you mine @ 210sol/s and your payouts is 30% lower, it's the same as mining with 147Sol/s
yeah it's pointless, that's why i prefer to mine zcash directly with a slower miner, like the one from zawawa, 125 sol or 130 with mem oc which i don't like too much
With SA I have 135Sol/s on GTX1070 and 115-120Sol/s on a GTX1080.
With the build form here:
https://github.com/maztheman/nheqminer/commit/511ed791d93943b5338c491312fba8cc5aa61403
The GTX1080 faster than the GTX070s :-D need a merge of KRNLX and this one. SP_ can you merge it?
With the build form here:
https://github.com/maztheman/nheqminer/commit/511ed791d93943b5338c491312fba8cc5aa61403
The GTX1080 faster than the GTX070s :-D need a merge of KRNLX and this one. SP_ can you merge it?
135 sol with +800 mem or something like that right?
The next release will do around 170 on the gtx 1070. I just need time to complete it.
Pls find time soon
.
Really...okay didn't noticed usually I see when it is same or similar.
o.O
o.O
With SA I have 135Sol/s on GTX1070 and 115-120Sol/s on a GTX1080.
With the build form here:
https://github.com/maztheman/nheqminer/commit/511ed791d93943b5338c491312fba8cc5aa61403
The GTX1080 faster than the GTX070s :-D need a merge of KRNLX and this one. SP_ can you merge it?
With the build form here:
https://github.com/maztheman/nheqminer/commit/511ed791d93943b5338c491312fba8cc5aa61403
The GTX1080 faster than the GTX070s :-D need a merge of KRNLX and this one. SP_ can you merge it?
It is the same code ;O
With SA I have 135Sol/s on GTX1070 and 115-120Sol/s on a GTX1080.
With the build form here:
https://github.com/maztheman/nheqminer/commit/511ed791d93943b5338c491312fba8cc5aa61403
The GTX1080 faster than the GTX070s :-D need a merge of KRNLX and this one. SP_ can you merge it?
With the build form here:
https://github.com/maztheman/nheqminer/commit/511ed791d93943b5338c491312fba8cc5aa61403
The GTX1080 faster than the GTX070s :-D need a merge of KRNLX and this one. SP_ can you merge it?
The next release will do around 170 on the gtx 1070. I just need time to complete it.
Yeah 980ti has a 384bit memory bus compared to 256 normally.
Here we go what it means to have monoply on certain thing. I went back using silentarmy and mine at the pool I want where I get more even with less hash power due to SA.
Uhhh... How? I'm getting only 80 hash with SA, 120ish with SPs.
253 SOl/s on the 980ti
But nicehash is only paying 0.012 /KHASH. 253sol/s gives 0,003036BTC/day ($2,2 per day)
Mining zcash directly will give you ($2.69 (coinwarz.com)) with 253 sol/s
253 sols/s with eqm_v1.0.2a on a 980 Ti @1400/4000
good work
good work
But nicehash is only paying 0.012 /KHASH. 253sol/s gives 0,003036BTC/day ($2,2 per day)
Mining zcash directly will give you ($2.69 (coinwarz.com)) with 253 sol/s
Here we go what it means to have monoply on certain thing. I went back using silentarmy and mine at the pool I want where I get more even with less hash power due to SA.
Uhhh... How? I'm getting only 80 hash with SA, 120ish with SPs.
253 SOl/s on the 980ti
But nicehash is only paying 0.012 /KHASH. 253sol/s gives 0,003036BTC/day ($2,2 per day)
Mining zcash directly will give you ($2.69 (coinwarz.com)) with 253 sol/s
253 sols/s with eqm_v1.0.2a on a 980 Ti @1400/4000
good work
good work
But nicehash is only paying 0.012 /KHASH. 253sol/s gives 0,003036BTC/day ($2,2 per day)
Mining zcash directly will give you ($2.69 (coinwarz.com)) with 253 sol/s
Here we go what it means to have monoply on certain thing. I went back using silentarmy and mine at the pool I want where I get more even with less hash power due to SA.
Here also something interesting for GTX1080.. https://github.com/maztheman/nheqminer/commit/511ed791d93943b5338c491312fba8cc5aa61403
253 SOl/s on the 980ti
But nicehash is only paying 0.012 /KHASH. 253sol/s gives 0,003036BTC/day ($2,2 per day)
Mining zcash directly will give you ($2.69 (coinwarz.com)) with 253 sol/s
So a faster miner, but with 20%-30% lower payouts
If you mine @ 210sol/s and your payouts is 30% lower, it's the same as mining with 147Sol/s
253 sols/s with eqm_v1.0.2a on a 980 Ti @1400/4000
good work
good work
But nicehash is only paying 0.012 /KHASH. 253sol/s gives 0,003036BTC/day ($2,2 per day)
Mining zcash directly will give you ($2.69 (coinwarz.com)) with 253 sol/s
So a faster miner, but with 20%-30% lower payouts
If you mine @ 210sol/s and your payouts is 30% lower, it's the same as mining with 147Sol/s
Yeah, I'm getting 210 with a memory OC. I think some of the people saying they don't have one are misreporting. One guy in the Nicehash thread was reporting -500 memory and 210sols.
i can reach 1200 sol with 6 gpu with oc on the mem +550 and +100 on core, otherwise 180 sol as you, for 216 it seems that you need crazy mem oc as usual like ethereum
I'm not getting the 200+ people are talking about. I get 180 per 1070 and 130 per 970. No memory OC.
Couple things that might be causing it. My processors don't support AVX and I'm on Windows 8.1 x64. Anyone have either of these things and getting 200+? Windows 7 would be in the same boat as W8.1.
Couple things that might be causing it. My processors don't support AVX and I'm on Windows 8.1 x64. Anyone have either of these things and getting 200+? Windows 7 would be in the same boat as W8.1.
As always, use that sofware/ hardware combo that works best for you.
Free bump for sp_, wherever you are. You have remote access to your rigs?
Free bump for sp_, wherever you are. You have remote access to your rigs?
Yup seems the longer you run the miner, more often you run into 'job not found' or 'invalid nonce size'. About 10% of my shares are stale or rejected.
dual Zotac 980ti AMP! Extreme rig is hashing at 400Sols/s. --scryptr
scryptr, windows or linux?
Try to limit power if you can, amazing results. 970 doing 140 s/s power limit slider all the way to the left on W7.
That folktale made me laugh, sent you some dust ))
MY NVIDIA RIGS ARE NOW WIN 7--
The only way to get good performance was to change the Operating System (OS). I left enough unallocated space on each disk for a Lubuntu 16.04 install, so that I will have dual-boot rigs.
The rigs are at stock clocks and power just now. They have been stable, maybe I should tune them some. --scryptr
There is no need to stick to Win 7 the performance is also sometimes a bit better on Windows 10.
I believe scryptr went through the same path as me.
I am running running w7, 10 and linux. If I had to choose only one it would be a hard choice between linux and w7.
I didn't had any issue with Windows 10 1607 the problems I had hit Win 7 and linux and sofar the system runs stable with 6 NV cards
and any oc i give them ..*knocks on the table* I wouldn't change back ..
Jump to: