A question to all the donators: have you ever received the sp mod 4 for lbry?
no
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 562. (Read 2347641 times)
no
Yes, sure : wattmeter measurement.
My config :
only 1 GPU (GTX 1070)
2 DDR3 RAM (4 + 2 GO, not "L")
HDD 3,5" (Windows 10)
CPU "T" (who is mining on 2 cores with a CPU miner)
1 ventilateur 120 mm
Power unit : 600 W 80+ bronze
Total consumption : 134/140 W.
My config :
only 1 GPU (GTX 1070)
2 DDR3 RAM (4 + 2 GO, not "L")
HDD 3,5" (Windows 10)
CPU "T" (who is mining on 2 cores with a CPU miner)
1 ventilateur 120 mm
Power unit : 600 W 80+ bronze
Total consumption : 134/140 W.
It cannot be true, gtx1070 + cpu under load. Check your wattmeter
I am getting average 317 on a 1070. Not using sp version either.
Ifyou don't write the power consumption, yours numbers are totaly useless...I am getting 288 MHs on a simple kfa2 EX 1070 at 100 W (wattmeter) with ccminer 1.8.2.
Bonsoir de Paris.
@SP_ : tu es français ?
100w for 288 is impressive i'm at 120w with the same, what are your settings?
Temperature limit : 74°C
Core Clock : 1974 MHz (+ 153)
Memory clock : 4100 MHz (+298)
1012 mv
68/69 °C
I think I can increase the memory clock, but not sure it'll be increase the hashrate.
that's strange i have 70% power limit and -502 memory and i'm consuming more than you, are you sure about your consumption seems too low to me
My config :
only 1 GPU (GTX 1070)
2 DDR3 RAM (4 + 2 GO, not "L")
HDD 3,5" (Windows 10)
CPU "T" (who is mining on 2 cores with a CPU miner)
1 ventilateur 120 mm
Power unit : 600 W 80+ bronze
Total consumption : 134/140 W.
mmh i think it has to do with the pcb of the kfa2 which is smaller than the g1 gaming, and has 1 less fan
I am getting average 317 on a 1070. Not using sp version either.
Ifyou don't write the power consumption, yours numbers are totaly useless...I am getting 288 MHs on a simple kfa2 EX 1070 at 100 W (wattmeter) with ccminer 1.8.2.
Bonsoir de Paris.
@SP_ : tu es français ?
100w for 288 is impressive i'm at 120w with the same, what are your settings?
Temperature limit : 74°C
Core Clock : 1974 MHz (+ 153)
Memory clock : 4100 MHz (+298)
1012 mv
68/69 °C
I think I can increase the memory clock, but not sure it'll be increase the hashrate.
that's strange i have 70% power limit and -502 memory and i'm consuming more than you, are you sure about your consumption seems too low to me
My config :
only 1 GPU (GTX 1070)
2 DDR3 RAM (4 + 2 GO, not "L")
HDD 3,5" (Windows 10)
CPU "T" (who is mining on 2 cores with a CPU miner)
1 ventilateur 120 mm
Power unit : 600 W 80+ bronze
Total consumption : 134/140 W.
well then i picked the wrong brand for this series, if there are 1070 that can perform so well
A question to all the donators: have you ever received the sp mod 4 for lbry?
no
yep, also, i remember two MSI 960 Gaming (one is still running since i own it) with the same bios and different hash rates / oc ability.. (the slower one was resold)
but i was talking about the different brands/models
but i was talking about the different brands/models
Yeah, you're not going to get a exact same comparison between chips and power numbers. Some people just win the silicon lottery. You can have the exact same card as someone else and the power consumption can be different.
Chips aren't all the same. When they come out of the foundries they'll require a different amount of voltage due to defects in the process itself.
While you can't compare power consumption between different cards, you can compare frequency. Which is why you ask what frequency someone is running at. You wont be able to reduce your power consumption without reducing frequency as well all else being equal.
Chips aren't all the same. When they come out of the foundries they'll require a different amount of voltage due to defects in the process itself.
While you can't compare power consumption between different cards, you can compare frequency. Which is why you ask what frequency someone is running at. You wont be able to reduce your power consumption without reducing frequency as well all else being equal.
I am getting average 317 on a 1070. Not using sp version either.
Ifyou don't write the power consumption, yours numbers are totaly useless...I am getting 288 MHs on a simple kfa2 EX 1070 at 100 W (wattmeter) with ccminer 1.8.2.
Bonsoir de Paris.
@SP_ : tu es français ?
100w for 288 is impressive i'm at 120w with the same, what are your settings?
Temperature limit : 74°C
Core Clock : 1974 MHz (+ 153)
Memory clock : 4100 MHz (+298)
1012 mv
68/69 °C
I think I can increase the memory clock, but not sure it'll be increase the hashrate.
that's strange i have 70% power limit and -502 memory and i'm consuming more than you, are you sure about your consumption seems too low to me
The comparisons should be done with the same platforms, watt-meters and testing methodology.
Be cautious with the ram, gddr5 aren't so sturdy as you may think.
About pascal variations, I can confirm it; in a single platform with the same models of vga's, they can behave differently in frequency and avg hashrates - especially up to 5/6 VGA in a single platform.
Such variations could lead to hard resets due system instability, with different algos. Lbry it seems much more tolerant than many others, especially with high frequencies. Probably it could be due a lower RAM usage
most cards are different about that, especially pascal ones which have crazy differences
I am getting average 317 on a 1070. Not using sp version either.
Ifyou don't write the power consumption, yours numbers are totaly useless...I am getting 288 MHs on a simple kfa2 EX 1070 at 100 W (wattmeter) with ccminer 1.8.2.
Bonsoir de Paris.
@SP_ : tu es français ?
100w for 288 is impressive i'm at 120w with the same, what are your settings?
Temperature limit : 74°C
Core Clock : 1974 MHz (+ 153)
Memory clock : 4100 MHz (+298)
1012 mv
68/69 °C
I think I can increase the memory clock, but not sure it'll be increase the hashrate.
that's strange i have 70% power limit and -502 memory and i'm consuming more than you, are you sure about your consumption seems too low to me
A question to all the donators: have you ever received the sp mod 4 for lbry?
Nope , It is not ready yet , SP_ said that we need some more time. After that Alexis nailed the miner with his tweaking the Epsylon's open source...And now I suppose SP_ need more time again to trike back...
A question to all the donators: have you ever received the sp mod 4 for lbry?
I am getting average 317 on a 1070. Not using sp version either.
Ifyou don't write the power consumption, yours numbers are totaly useless...I am getting 288 MHs on a simple kfa2 EX 1070 at 100 W (wattmeter) with ccminer 1.8.2.
Bonsoir de Paris.
@SP_ : tu es français ?
100w for 288 is impressive i'm at 120w with the same, what are your settings?
Temperature limit : 74°C
Core Clock : 1974 MHz (+ 153)
Memory clock : 4100 MHz (+298)
1012 mv
68/69 °C
I think I can increase the memory clock, but not sure it'll be increase the hashrate.
I am getting average 317 on a 1070. Not using sp version either.
Ifyou don't write the power consumption, yours numbers are totaly useless...I am getting 288 MHs on a simple kfa2 EX 1070 at 100 W (wattmeter) with ccminer 1.8.2.
Bonsoir de Paris.
@SP_ : tu es français ?
100w for 288 is impressive i'm at 120w with the same, what are your settings?
I am getting average 317 on a 1070. Not using sp version either.
Ifyou don't write the power consumption, yours numbers are totaly useless...I am getting 288 MHs on a simple kfa2 EX 1070 at 100 W (wattmeter) with ccminer 1.8.2.
Bonsoir de Paris.
@SP_ : tu es français ?
Does anyone know the default intensities on the 970 gtx and 980ti on windows 8.1 on 1.8.2 plz...... thx
Is there away to find these with a command?
Is there away to find these with a command?
SP-mod4 already released??
_sp, has released version 4?
..with the descent profit of miner #3...
SP-mod4 already released??
_sp, has released version 4?
..with the descent profit of miner #3...
SP-mod4 already released??
_sp, has released version 4?
Jump to: