SP-mod4 already released??
_sp, has released version 4?
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 563. (Read 2347641 times)
_sp, has released version 4?
SP-mod4 already released??
_sp, has released version 4?
SP-mod4 already released??
sp_, please check your PMs (or PM me if you can't find it), I'd like to make a donation, thanks.
30k for a miner... up for it sp?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/zec-zcash-all-coins-are-created-equal-discussion-thread-unofficial-1626185
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/zec-zcash-all-coins-are-created-equal-discussion-thread-unofficial-1626185
That's not a watt meter. Also whats the point of taking a screen shot of only one miner? In order to use that as 'evidence' you'd need to take a screen shot of the same settings mining with Eth+Sia and then one with Lbry and do a side by side.
Most people don't suffer from trying to throw a miner in a case, that's your fault and only applies to you.
Also 'efficiency' applies to everything. If you're trying to throw PSU efficiency in there you probably took a look what I said and are trying to reallllly make what you said work... But you know... 10w more for eth+sia... 8% efficiency... so another .8w for a grand total of 10.8w. Good for you.
Most people don't suffer from trying to throw a miner in a case, that's your fault and only applies to you.
Also 'efficiency' applies to everything. If you're trying to throw PSU efficiency in there you probably took a look what I said and are trying to reallllly make what you said work... But you know... 10w more for eth+sia... 8% efficiency... so another .8w for a grand total of 10.8w. Good for you.
that is 100% accurate i've already done the proof with the wattmeter, you don't need a wattmeter anymroe in 2016
i already done the test with eth-sia and it is 150w, the fact that you don't trust me about this, it does not matter
efficiency i know it's apply to everything, it was a way to say what is the actual cosumption of the system, which would be in any case greater with eth-sia, i've already tried it
Saying 'proof' is not proof, nor is saying the date as if measuring with a device between a power source and what's consuming it is antiquated. I'm assuming that's power management software for a stupid expensive PSU. As I mentioned before, use a wattmeter. You could also use a multimeter with a clamp, but that's approximate +/-5% depending on how good your multimeter is.
There is a reason we go on card by card basis, because you can try and 'inflate' numbers by skewing stats. No one cares how much your system consumes besides you. One card applies to me, it applies to you, and it applies to the megafarm that has 400 some 1070s.
It doesn't matter if I trust you or not, it does matter if you're wrong and misinforming others.
This is based off of 24hr average difficulty and profitability for a 1070, the energy use isn't accurate.
wrong and misinformed about what? i posted a screen that is saying clearly that lbry is consuming less this is a proof, other thing are bullshit
you can not consume less than 150w for eth-sia no matter what you do, stop saying crap like that
i'm now making basically the same amount between eth and lbry, 0.03 per day, and in fact your screen do not prove anything, this is mine
once again you only prove how ridiculous are your claims, and i was right when i said that i was making the same before even putting value on whattomine
What proof did you post? What 'is proof'? You post ONE screenshot, showing Lbry usage... You don't post a comparative screenshot showing Eth+SIA mining. How is that proof? You can't compare both unless you have a data point on each side.
And then you posted Whattomine, what is that supposed to mean to me? I have no idea what those numbers are for or supposed to represent. I already said my screenshot is of a 1070. Doing 32Mhs on Ethereum and 270Mh on Lbry. If that's for six 1070s, you typed something in wrong. My 1070s run at 1975Mhz, which is quite obtainable, for Ethereum memory is running +800mhz, also obtainable.
I also didn't say you can consume 150w less on Eth+Sia, I said there is virtually no difference between the two. Read up a bit.
i don't need to post the proof about eth+sia, it is already know by anybody here that the consumption is 150w, just check other guy with 1070 mining eth+sia
and yes there is a difference between 120w and 150w, it's 30w per card more, which is 200w for 6 card, which is around 80 euro less on the bills for me, so it's huge in my case
instead you posted zero proof just useless talk, so take your shit elswhere
'Common knowledge' isn't proof dumbass. Don't waste my time by saying something like 'proof', then not only not offering any when you say you have some, but then go on to say it's just 'common knowledge'.
The whole reason this is a argument right now is because you're making a statement that is uninformed, which I've said multiple times, I'm correcting it with informed information and you're going on to say 'no ur rung', but offering nothing to back it up.
10w is not 30w. You have posted no screenshots offering any sort of difference to this. You don't own a watt meter, you wont even post photos of your expensive PSU's control panel for both mining methods (only one because obviously we have the same exact setup as you and can accurately replicate your conditions and know exactly how much wattage shows up while mining eth+sia).
My guess is you've never even mined with Eth+Sia and are just making shit up based on what you've read on the forums from other users. That is beyond lazy and on top of it you go on to correct someone who actually has what they're talking about in hand and with experience with it, once again based off of random forum posts.
Remember when you were telling me 'Windows 8 is in the past, upgrade to 10 to get with the times' because at the time Ethereum was not mining properly on any versions of Windows? Then you told me a update would only be available to W10 later that month and it came out two months later, as well as a driver update for W7/8 that also fixed Ethereum on those machines?
Oh yeah... Amph talking out his ass again... Yay...
Lets revisit this Whattomine thing again. Obviously we're both visiting the same website. What do you have typed in for Lbry and Ethereum? I have 32Mhs for Ethereum and 270Mhs for Lbry.
Also the whole reason we don't talk about 'how much something costs on my power bills' is because it's different for everyone. If you talk about percents and wattage, that's universal, if you say 'oh this is going to cost me 80 euros this month' that means exactly jack shit to everyone else because they all have different power rates, machine setups (why do you even have your miner in a case if running fans in there are so damn expensive?), and numbers of cards.
For instance, your '30w x 6 devices' for me comes out to 180w X $.1 Kwh(average rate in the US), you end up at $.43 per day or $12.10 per month. Now I know the dollar is stronger then the euro here, but something seems rather fishy...
That's not a watt meter. Also whats the point of taking a screen shot of only one miner? In order to use that as 'evidence' you'd need to take a screen shot of the same settings mining with Eth+Sia and then one with Lbry and do a side by side.
Most people don't suffer from trying to throw a miner in a case, that's your fault and only applies to you.
Also 'efficiency' applies to everything. If you're trying to throw PSU efficiency in there you probably took a look what I said and are trying to reallllly make what you said work... But you know... 10w more for eth+sia... 8% efficiency... so another .8w for a grand total of 10.8w. Good for you.
Most people don't suffer from trying to throw a miner in a case, that's your fault and only applies to you.
Also 'efficiency' applies to everything. If you're trying to throw PSU efficiency in there you probably took a look what I said and are trying to reallllly make what you said work... But you know... 10w more for eth+sia... 8% efficiency... so another .8w for a grand total of 10.8w. Good for you.
that is 100% accurate i've already done the proof with the wattmeter, you don't need a wattmeter anymroe in 2016
i already done the test with eth-sia and it is 150w, the fact that you don't trust me about this, it does not matter
efficiency i know it's apply to everything, it was a way to say what is the actual cosumption of the system, which would be in any case greater with eth-sia, i've already tried it
Saying 'proof' is not proof, nor is saying the date as if measuring with a device between a power source and what's consuming it is antiquated. I'm assuming that's power management software for a stupid expensive PSU. As I mentioned before, use a wattmeter. You could also use a multimeter with a clamp, but that's approximate +/-5% depending on how good your multimeter is.
There is a reason we go on card by card basis, because you can try and 'inflate' numbers by skewing stats. No one cares how much your system consumes besides you. One card applies to me, it applies to you, and it applies to the megafarm that has 400 some 1070s.
It doesn't matter if I trust you or not, it does matter if you're wrong and misinforming others.
This is based off of 24hr average difficulty and profitability for a 1070, the energy use isn't accurate.
wrong and misinformed about what? i posted a screen that is saying clearly that lbry is consuming less this is a proof, other thing are bullshit
you can not consume less than 150w for eth-sia no matter what you do, stop saying crap like that
i'm now making basically the same amount between eth and lbry, 0.03 per day, and in fact your screen do not prove anything, this is mine
once again you only prove how ridiculous are your claims, and i was right when i said that i was making the same before even putting value on whattomine
What proof did you post? What 'is proof'? You post ONE screenshot, showing Lbry usage... You don't post a comparative screenshot showing Eth+SIA mining. How is that proof? You can't compare both unless you have a data point on each side.
And then you posted Whattomine, what is that supposed to mean to me? I have no idea what those numbers are for or supposed to represent. I already said my screenshot is of a 1070. Doing 32Mhs on Ethereum and 270Mh on Lbry. If that's for six 1070s, you typed something in wrong. My 1070s run at 1975Mhz, which is quite obtainable, for Ethereum memory is running +800mhz, also obtainable.
I also didn't say you can consume 150w less on Eth+Sia, I said there is virtually no difference between the two. Read up a bit.
i don't need to post the proof about eth+sia, it is already known by anybody here that the consumption is 150w, just check other guy with 1070 mining eth+sia
and yes there is a difference between 120w and 150w, it's 30w per card more, which is 200w for 6 card, which is around 80 euro less on the bills for me, so it's huge in my case
instead you posted zero proof just useless talk, so take your shit elswhere
Donations have increased after the release of 1.8.2 (around 5% of the lbry net hash is sp-moded)
LBRY Sp-mod #3 vs 1.8.2
Gtx 750ti sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 1080 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Salut from paris.
LBRY Sp-mod #3 vs 1.8.2
Gtx 750ti sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 1080 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Salut from paris.
Please send me Sp-mod #4
Donations have increased after the release of 1.8.2 (around 5% of the lbry net hash is sp-moded)
LBRY Sp-mod #3 vs 1.8.2
Gtx 750ti sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 950 sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 960 sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 980 sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 980ti sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 1060 3gb sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 1060 6gb sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 1070 same speed
Gtx 1080 sp-mod is the fastest
Sp-mod #4 vs 1.8.2
Gtx 750ti sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 950 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 960 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 980 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 980ti sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 1060 3gb sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 1060 6gb sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 1070 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 1080 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Salut from paris.
LBRY Sp-mod #3 vs 1.8.2
Gtx 750ti sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 950 sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 960 sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 980 sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 980ti sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 1060 3gb sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 1060 6gb sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 1070 same speed
Gtx 1080 sp-mod is the fastest
Sp-mod #4 vs 1.8.2
Gtx 750ti sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 950 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 960 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 980 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 980ti sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 1060 3gb sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 1060 6gb sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 1070 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 1080 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Salut from paris.
Please send me Sp-mod #4
What proof did you post? What 'is proof'? You post ONE screenshot, showing Lbry usage... You don't post a comparative screenshot showing Eth+SIA mining. How is that proof? You can't compare both unless you have a data point on each side.
And then you posted Whattomine, what is that supposed to mean to me? I have no idea what those numbers are for or supposed to represent. I already said my screenshot is of a 1070. Doing 32Mhs on Ethereum and 270Mh on Lbry. If that's for six 1070s, you typed something in wrong. My 1070s run at 1975Mhz, which is quite obtainable, for Ethereum memory is running +800mhz, also obtainable.
I also didn't say you can consume 150w less on Eth+Sia, I said there is virtually no difference between the two. Read up a bit.
You're talking with amph, don't forget it. He thinks that he has more knowledge than the egyptian god toth.
Don't waste your time.
he mining with 1 card otherwise hashrate would be lower
Is that taking into account the hashrate "lost" to fees? 
Side note: Interesting that so many people seem to be observing something different.
Side note: Interesting that so many people seem to be observing something different.
Rease #4 is faster on all cards more than 3.3%
Release #5 will hash at 5mhash per watt. On the gtx 1060 (pascal)
I'm still waiting the #4 to compare with 1.8.2 on all the 6cards rigs. You've said you need more time , and now you are talking about #5...
Which model is that , rednoW ?
the same as yours - SJS ))Nice, best model for mining ever. Mine are at 50 C degrees right now...
That's not a watt meter. Also whats the point of taking a screen shot of only one miner? In order to use that as 'evidence' you'd need to take a screen shot of the same settings mining with Eth+Sia and then one with Lbry and do a side by side.
Most people don't suffer from trying to throw a miner in a case, that's your fault and only applies to you.
Also 'efficiency' applies to everything. If you're trying to throw PSU efficiency in there you probably took a look what I said and are trying to reallllly make what you said work... But you know... 10w more for eth+sia... 8% efficiency... so another .8w for a grand total of 10.8w. Good for you.
Most people don't suffer from trying to throw a miner in a case, that's your fault and only applies to you.
Also 'efficiency' applies to everything. If you're trying to throw PSU efficiency in there you probably took a look what I said and are trying to reallllly make what you said work... But you know... 10w more for eth+sia... 8% efficiency... so another .8w for a grand total of 10.8w. Good for you.
that is 100% accurate i've already done the proof with the wattmeter, you don't need a wattmeter anymroe in 2016
i already done the test with eth-sia and it is 150w, the fact that you don't trust me about this, it does not matter
efficiency i know it's apply to everything, it was a way to say what is the actual cosumption of the system, which would be in any case greater with eth-sia, i've already tried it
Saying 'proof' is not proof, nor is saying the date as if measuring with a device between a power source and what's consuming it is antiquated. I'm assuming that's power management software for a stupid expensive PSU. As I mentioned before, use a wattmeter. You could also use a multimeter with a clamp, but that's approximate +/-5% depending on how good your multimeter is.
There is a reason we go on card by card basis, because you can try and 'inflate' numbers by skewing stats. No one cares how much your system consumes besides you. One card applies to me, it applies to you, and it applies to the megafarm that has 400 some 1070s.
It doesn't matter if I trust you or not, it does matter if you're wrong and misinforming others.
This is based off of 24hr average difficulty and profitability for a 1070, the energy use isn't accurate.
wrong and misinformed about what? i posted a screen that is saying clearly that lbry is consuming less this is a proof, other thing are bullshit
you can not consume less than 150w for eth-sia no matter what you do, stop saying crap like that
i'm now making basically the same amount between eth and lbry, 0.03 per day, and in fact your screen do not prove anything, this is mine
once again you only prove how ridiculous are your claims, and i was right when i said that i was making the same before even putting value on whattomine
What proof did you post? What 'is proof'? You post ONE screenshot, showing Lbry usage... You don't post a comparative screenshot showing Eth+SIA mining. How is that proof? You can't compare both unless you have a data point on each side.
And then you posted Whattomine, what is that supposed to mean to me? I have no idea what those numbers are for or supposed to represent. I already said my screenshot is of a 1070. Doing 32Mhs on Ethereum and 270Mh on Lbry. If that's for six 1070s, you typed something in wrong. My 1070s run at 1975Mhz, which is quite obtainable, for Ethereum memory is running +800mhz, also obtainable.
I also didn't say you can consume 150w less on Eth+Sia, I said there is virtually no difference between the two. Read up a bit.
ROUND 2
1.8.1 vs sp#370% 120% tdp, strix 970 vs strix 970, intensity 25, windows 7x64 368.81
Cards are sitting next to each other in that very same rig hashing together. Left with opensource right with sp #3. Same card, same memory, same bios, same asic quality, same default voltage. 1x8-pin power connector.
For this test tdp is set to 120% which means 196 watts which is max what these cards can do without bios mod.
Let's get ready to rumble!
-edit- well it looks like left wasn't steady at 1486 but you get the idea.
1.8.1 vs sp#3
Cards are sitting next to each other in that very same rig hashing together. Left with opensource right with sp #3. Same card, same memory, same bios, same asic quality, same default voltage. 1x8-pin power connector.
For this test tdp is set to 120% which means 196 watts which is max what these cards can do without bios mod.
Let's get ready to rumble!
-edit- well it looks like left wasn't steady at 1486 but you get the idea.
Looks like opensource got some steroids so it is time for...
ROUND 3
1.8.2 vs sp#3 120% tdp, 2xstrix 970 vs 2xstrix 970, intensity 25, windows 7x64 368.81
Cards are sitting next to each other in that very same rig hashing together. Left with opensource right with sp #3. Same card, same memory, same bios, same asic quality, same default voltage. 1x8-pin power connector.
For this test tdp is set to 120% which means 196 watts which is max what these cards can do without bios mod.
To the final round!
So who won? I don't know, maybe nethash?
I am getting average 317 on a 1070. Not using sp version either.
But 5% of the LBRY hashers are not using the gtx 1070. I get 322Mhash with sp-mod #3
I am getting average 317 on a 1070. Not using sp version either.
Is that taking into account the hashrate "lost" to fees?
Side note: Interesting that so many people seem to be observing something different.
Side note: Interesting that so many people seem to be observing something different.
Rease #4 is faster on all cards more than 3.3%
Release #5 will hash at 5mhash per watt. On the gtx 1060 (pascal)
Donations hasve increased after the release of 1.8.2
LBRY Sp-mod #3 vs 1.8.2
Gtx 750ti sp-mod #3 is the fastest
[... keyboard stuck ...]
Sp-mod #4 vs 1.8.2
Gtx 750ti sp-mod #3 is the fastest
[... keyboard stuck , and don't you mean #4?...]
Salut from paris.
LBRY Sp-mod #3 vs 1.8.2
Gtx 750ti sp-mod #3 is the fastest
[... keyboard stuck ...]
Sp-mod #4 vs 1.8.2
Gtx 750ti sp-mod #3 is the fastest
[... keyboard stuck , and don't you mean #4?...]
Salut from paris.
Is that taking into account the hashrate "lost" to fees?
Side note: Interesting that so many people seem to be observing something different.
Donations have increased after the release of 1.8.2 (around 5% of the lbry net hash is sp-moded)
LBRY Sp-mod #3 vs 1.8.2
Gtx 750ti sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 950 sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 960 sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 980 sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 980ti sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 1060 3gb sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 1060 6gb sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 1070 same speed
Gtx 1080 sp-mod is the fastest
Sp-mod #4 vs 1.8.2
Gtx 750ti sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 950 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 960 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 980 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 980ti sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 1060 3gb sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 1060 6gb sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 1070 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 1080 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Salut from paris.
LBRY Sp-mod #3 vs 1.8.2
Gtx 750ti sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 950 sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 960 sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 980 sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 980ti sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 1060 3gb sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 1060 6gb sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 1070 same speed
Gtx 1080 sp-mod is the fastest
Sp-mod #4 vs 1.8.2
Gtx 750ti sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 950 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 960 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 980 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 980ti sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 1060 3gb sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 1060 6gb sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 1070 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 1080 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Salut from paris.
Jump to: