I found a way to squeeze more LBRY hash out of my pascal chip. 1070. +6%
Will release tonight. Sp-mod #3
Will release tonight. Sp-mod #3
You test gtx 1060 with 3gb ? .
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 587. (Read 2347641 times)
You test gtx 1060 with 3gb ? .
I found a way to squeeze more LBRY hash out of my pascal chip. 1070. +6%
Will release tonight. Sp-mod #3
Will release tonight. Sp-mod #3
What sort of speeds can you get with a 1070 with micron memory? And how much of an increase is this over the free software?
Monero:
sp-mod private #1 does around 500h with oc on the gtx 970 and 300 on the 750ti
sp-mod private #1 does around 500h with oc on the gtx 970 and 300 on the 750ti
All togheter .
See monero ?
0.024 btc , no new good miner for nvidia pascal ? .
.
See monero ?
0.024 btc , no new good miner for nvidia pascal ? .
.
Usually didn't follow that monero. What are the Maxwells capable of there ?
All togheter .
See monero ?
0.024 btc , no new good miner for nvidia pascal ? .
.
See monero ?
0.024 btc , no new good miner for nvidia pascal ? .
.
well no reason to upgrade if there is no hash improvement of bug fix, i'll wait for the next release or maybe if epsylon want to fix it
Amph change driver with 372.70 they are better .
they fix lyura2v2 problem about cpu does not validate?
No , but i have minor heat , and more stability , on my 2 gigabyte gtx 1070 .
klaus said me no... that affect all miner variants on pascal. Didnt dig for this problem
Else i seen no improvements in the 372.x (only new problems, like no more explorer task bar on install), tried the 3 versions, 372.54 60 and 70.
Only the 2 last ones had this explorer bug, but the 3 for lyra v1 and v2
Else i seen no improvements in the 372.x (only new problems, like no more explorer task bar on install), tried the 3 versions, 372.54 60 and 70.
Only the 2 last ones had this explorer bug, but the 3 for lyra v1 and v2
Amph change driver with 372.70 they are better .
they fix lyura2v2 problem about cpu does not validate?
Amph change driver with 372.70 they are better .
There is no 'maximum' we should all be doing the same speed on the same kernels at the same clocks as long as we aren't limited by TDP. This is why your logic is bat shit insane, you don't even have any idea how mining actually works. There is no way for someone to do faster with the same hardware unless their clocks/tdp/drivers/OS are different and in weird cases memory types (such as with Ethereum). Most cases Windows 7/8 are all the same, occasionally W10, but usually it's just slower.
Which is why on the last page rednow corrected himself and fell inline with speeds everyone else is getting. The only other thing that could possible effect it is intensity, but default intensity is almost always spot on.
This completely puts aside that you're comparing apples to oranges. rednoW isn't magically going to get the same speed as another guy on the other page running at 290Mhs, nor is it magically going to be 5% higher unless everything I posted above is the same, but it isn't... Mentioning hashrate without clocks or other information is dumb... even more so when people try to 'pad' their scores.
i know that you actually shot crap on purpose just to talk with someone, but you are again wrong on everything, if someone can do 290 with heavy oc, this must be considered as example, and the % or boost should be added on top of that
not on the lowest possible, that would be dumb like your post, so please go ahead and stop with this bullshit propaganda that you are doing
My test card is this one:
http://www.inno3d.com/products_detail.php?refid=248
The opensource does 245MHASH on the default clock wich is around 1830
In the latest mod I have increased that to 260 MHASH on the same clock, but then the card start to trottle and the speed decline. Normally overvolting / increase TDP will fix this, but the single 8 pin connector on the card is the bottleneck. The pascal kernel is still in development. New hardware, new possibilities.
http://www.inno3d.com/products_detail.php?refid=248
The opensource does 245MHASH on the default clock wich is around 1830
In the latest mod I have increased that to 260 MHASH on the same clock, but then the card start to trottle and the speed decline. Normally overvolting / increase TDP will fix this, but the single 8 pin connector on the card is the bottleneck. The pascal kernel is still in development. New hardware, new possibilities.
Looking forward to it, thank you
@bensam: indeed, but regarding profitability, as you can see tonight it's a real pain to guarantee something. Good for us
@amph: I've got 30 of them so I can talk due facts, and statistics. On average 265 it's even an high standard for an overclocked 1070
Proof (Open source 1.8.1 from tpruvot)
it does not amtter how many you have, you just need one to test, and my g1 gaming 1070 can easily do 276, i can post a screen if you want
so saying that 265 is the base value is plain wrong
and i'm not even using your core
I don't know if anyone is interested but 970 to do 150MH I need to limit power to 120 watts (70% tdp), 160MH needs 140 watts (82% tdp).
Max these 8-pin cards can consume is 196 watts at 120% tdp.
Max these 8-pin cards can consume is 196 watts at 120% tdp.
This is interesting.
Yeah, you have to act remotely intelligent to get respect, Amph acts intelligent and then just posts something you instantly corrected him on. That was what he 'regurgitated' from the guy a couple pages back posting his 280Mh/s 'normal' hashrates for Lbry, which all of us know is complete bullshit. If I could get 280Mh/s per card, I'd love that. Only way you get that is with a 2070Mhz overclock... which is extremely rare. Even my high end cards don't get that if I want to remain stable for 8+ hours.
That's incorrect, I have two cards that run at 2063 doing 276Mhs... They have a TDP of 120 and never hit it to start throttling.
I'm curious why everyone is quoting really high GPU speeds? Something say like 1950 is much more common. Fast overclocks are fast, almost no one will be able to hit them though.
calm down - amph has put some good posts and stats in this thread, whether you agree with them or not.
Im using opensource 1.8.1 and a pair of strix gaming 1070 cards (not the OC version). one gets 265MHz and the other has 285Mhz. both are overclocked with the specs tat suit them best in order to keep temps around 65C and fans around 65-70%. (i posted exact specs a few pages back, but they are running round 1990-2030MHz core and mem is -500 on each.
while id love an sp_ software that can give me 300MHz+ (and expect the 285Mhz card would get there), the 0.1BTC cost is the killer since i only have two cards. to re-coup that cost (and the extra mining fee) would add significant time to my ROI and just doesn't make sense.
Here is my GTX1080 and a XEON E5 1650V3 at mining lbry :-D
how to get the inline picture?
how to get the inline picture?
your account needs to be a certain age or postcount first
Here is my GTX1080 and a XEON E5 1650V3 at mining lbry :-D
how to get the inline picture?
how to get the inline picture?
My test card is this one:
http://www.inno3d.com/products_detail.php?refid=248
The opensource does 245MHASH on the default clock wich is around 1830
In the latest mod I have increased that to 260 MHASH on the same clock, but then the card start to trottle and the speed decline. Normally overvolting / increase TDP will fix this, but the single 8 pin connector on the card is the bottleneck. The pascal kernel is still in development. New hardware, new possibilities.
http://www.inno3d.com/products_detail.php?refid=248
The opensource does 245MHASH on the default clock wich is around 1830
In the latest mod I have increased that to 260 MHASH on the same clock, but then the card start to trottle and the speed decline. Normally overvolting / increase TDP will fix this, but the single 8 pin connector on the card is the bottleneck. The pascal kernel is still in development. New hardware, new possibilities.
Looking forward to it, thank you
@bensam: indeed, but regarding profitability, as you can see tonight it's a real pain to guarantee something. Good for us
@amph: I've got 30 of them so I can talk due facts, and statistics. On average 265 it's even an high standard for an overclocked 1070
Proof (Open source 1.8.1 from tpruvot)
My test card is this one:
http://www.inno3d.com/products_detail.php?refid=248
The opensource does 245MHASH on the default clock wich is around 1830
In the latest mod I have increased that to 260 MHASH on the same clock, but then the card start to trottle and the speed decline. Normally overvolting / increase TDP will fix this, but the single 8 pin connector on the card is the bottleneck. The pascal kernel is still in development. New hardware, new possibilities.
http://www.inno3d.com/products_detail.php?refid=248
The opensource does 245MHASH on the default clock wich is around 1830
In the latest mod I have increased that to 260 MHASH on the same clock, but then the card start to trottle and the speed decline. Normally overvolting / increase TDP will fix this, but the single 8 pin connector on the card is the bottleneck. The pascal kernel is still in development. New hardware, new possibilities.
I know all 1070 are different by my rig of Gainward phoenix with 1x8pin 1070 doing 135w by card on TDP and clock of ~1900mhz with 255Mhs and power limit set to 85% (power limit on same cards undervolts as mine 1070 works on 0.92v and 0.88V on 78% powerlimit)
If you lover volts to GPU you can reach more frequency on same TDP, only problem is if card boost to +1950 then it will crash driver on 0.88v and boost 3.0 is that way, would like to limit max boost which would help
MSI behave as power limit does not drop voltage
C is about to change lbry mining markets if you ask me.
LBRY +75% tonight
0.00034044 BTC (75.51%)
I know, 1 btc for that email would be 1.75 now. Too bad I was painting my mancave back then...
-edit- I'm not after btc, most of the the time it is just unwanted middleman to me. And a cashcow å)
Still mining to earn 0.1 BTC..1 week already lol.
From XCN to MNM and back to DASH and DCR :-D
From XCN to MNM and back to DASH and DCR :-D
Jump to: