C is about to change lbry mining markets if you ask me.
LBRY +75% tonight
0.00034044 BTC (75.51%)
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 588. (Read 2347641 times)
LBRY +75% tonight
0.00034044 BTC (75.51%)
Nice I have the Zotac AMP GTX1080 with 2x8pin :-D
For which algo the hashrates are? Can't see or maybe missed it?
Is it possible to test your decred ccminer ?
For which algo the hashrates are? Can't see or maybe missed it?
Is it possible to test your decred ccminer ?
The algo is LBRY. You can test it if you donate 0.1 BTC. You will also be added to the subscription list with updates and future speed improvements for free. The miner has a 3.3% fee and work best on Maxwell cards. (compute 5.2)
I don't know if anyone is interested but 970 to do 150MH I need to limit power to 120 watts (70% tdp), 160MH needs 140 watts (82% tdp).
Max these 8-pin cards can consume is 196 watts at 120% tdp.
Max these 8-pin cards can consume is 196 watts at 120% tdp.
Still more efficient then AMD... Still not bad, it's last gen hardware and costs half as much as a 1070. XD
170-200€ against 460-500€ here. Second hand/ open box under warranty. F..., if I needed some lbry power right now I need to buy back my maxwells.
C is about to change lbry mining markets if you ask me.
Nice I have the Zotac AMP GTX1080 with 2x8pin :-D
For which algo the hashrates are? Can't see or maybe missed it?
Is it possible to test your decred ccminer ?
For which algo the hashrates are? Can't see or maybe missed it?
Is it possible to test your decred ccminer ?
My test card is this one:
http://www.inno3d.com/products_detail.php?refid=248
The opensource does 245MHASH on the default clock wich is around 1830
In the latest mod I have increased that to 260 MHASH on the same clock, but then the card start to trottle and the speed decline. Normally overvolting / increase TDP will fix this, but the single 8 pin connector on the card is the bottleneck. The pascal kernel is still in development. New hardware, new possibilities.
http://www.inno3d.com/products_detail.php?refid=248
The opensource does 245MHASH on the default clock wich is around 1830
In the latest mod I have increased that to 260 MHASH on the same clock, but then the card start to trottle and the speed decline. Normally overvolting / increase TDP will fix this, but the single 8 pin connector on the card is the bottleneck. The pascal kernel is still in development. New hardware, new possibilities.
EDIT: Thats with open - source miner...
What do you get with the sp-mod #2 on the 1080? did you try higher intensities? like -i 29 ?
sp can you post screen about 1070 +5% boost, which would put a 1070 around 300 already
265 *1.05 = 278.25
(on average, not considering too high settings, that are simply useless in a multigpu environment given the absence of rock solid stability)@bensam: you're not the only one with a "decent" amount invested in cryptos, but there's also a thing callededucation and mutual respect. I understand your frustration in such discussions, but it should be better if you both ignore each others; it's a nonsense to continue like this in every thread you both collide.
@sp: would you be so kind to post hashrates with a human, achievable, frequency? A common 1070, even custom, barely reaches 2000MHz in stability without thermal and power throttling (in a multigpu setup obviously, due thermal complications). Interesting findings about the memory controller btw. Have you measured the difference between the reference values (TDP 150) and TDP to 170 + forced p0 state? Such tests would be much more interesting with watt measures. What's you model of 1070?
Thanks
no that is wrong, you need to check the maximum which is 290MH done by a guy here and with 5% is above 300MH
just see few posts back, and anyway i'm at 280 with mine also, which would put me at around 295....
There is no 'maximum' we should all be doing the same speed on the same kernels at the same clocks as long as we aren't limited by TDP. This is why your logic is bat shit insane, you don't even have any idea how mining actually works. There is no way for someone to do faster with the same hardware unless their clocks/tdp/drivers/OS are different and in weird cases memory types (such as with Ethereum). Most cases Windows 7/8 are all the same, occasionally W10, but usually it's just slower.
Which is why on the last page rednow corrected himself and fell inline with speeds everyone else is getting. The only other thing that could possible effect it is intensity, but default intensity is almost always spot on.
This completely puts aside that you're comparing apples to oranges. rednoW isn't magically going to get the same speed as another guy on the other page running at 290Mhs, nor is it magically going to be 5% higher unless everything I posted above is the same, but it isn't... Mentioning hashrate without clocks or other information is dumb... even more so when people try to 'pad' their scores.
I don't know if anyone is interested but 970 to do 150MH I need to limit power to 120 watts (70% tdp), 160MH needs 140 watts (82% tdp).
Max these 8-pin cards can consume is 196 watts at 120% tdp.
Max these 8-pin cards can consume is 196 watts at 120% tdp.
Still more efficient then AMD... Still not bad, it's last gen hardware and costs half as much as a 1070. XD
Here is my score with 1070 and 1080 Palit SJS 3 + 3 on a single rig
EDIT: Thats with open - source miner...
EDIT: Thats with open - source miner...
Nice to see a 1080 getting somewhere around where it should be.
Here is my score with 1070 and 1080 Palit SJS 3 + 3 on a single rig:
EDIT: Thats with open - source miner...
EDIT: Thats with open - source miner...
This is my result with ccminer-rel1.8.1-vc2013
.
.
hmm, I see, your first card is doing 240MHs and second one 280MHs,
are both cards clocked at 1733/3402?
I don't know if anyone is interested but 970 to do 150MH I need to limit power to 120 watts (70% tdp), 160MH needs 140 watts (82% tdp).
Max these 8-pin cards can consume is 196 watts at 120% tdp.
Which exact model you are talking about, mate?Max these 8-pin cards can consume is 196 watts at 120% tdp.
Asus strix 970. Samsung/ Elpida memory.
I don't know if anyone is interested but 970 to do 150MH I need to limit power to 120 watts (70% tdp), 160MH needs 140 watts (82% tdp).
Max these 8-pin cards can consume is 196 watts at 120% tdp.
Which exact model you are talking about, mate? Max these 8-pin cards can consume is 196 watts at 120% tdp.
I don't know if anyone is interested but 970 to do 150MH I need to limit power to 120 watts (70% tdp), 160MH needs 140 watts (82% tdp).
Max these 8-pin cards can consume is 196 watts at 120% tdp.
Max these 8-pin cards can consume is 196 watts at 120% tdp.
sp can you post screen about 1070 +5% boost, which would put a 1070 around 300 already
265 *1.05 = 278.25
(on average, not considering too high settings, that are simply useless in a multigpu environment given the absence of rock solid stability)@bensam: you're not the only one with a "decent" amount invested in cryptos, but there's also a thing callededucation and mutual respect. I understand your frustration in such discussions, but it should be better if you both ignore each others; it's a nonsense to continue like this in every thread you both collide.
@sp: would you be so kind to post hashrates with a human, achievable, frequency? A common 1070, even custom, barely reaches 2000MHz in stability without thermal and power throttling (in a multigpu setup obviously, due thermal complications). Interesting findings about the memory controller btw. Have you measured the difference between the reference values (TDP 150) and TDP to 170 + forced p0 state? Such tests would be much more interesting with watt measures. What's you model of 1070?
Thanks
no that is wrong, you need to check the maximum which is 290MH done by a guy here and with 5% is above 300MH
just see few posts back, and anyway i'm at 280 with mine also, which would put me at around 295....
This is my result with ccminer-rel1.8.1-vc2013
.
.
sp can you post screen about 1070 +5% boost, which would put a 1070 around 300 already
265 *1.05 = 278.25
(on average, not considering too high settings, that are simply useless in a multigpu environment given the absence of rock solid stability)@bensam: you're not the only one with a "decent" amount invested in cryptos, but there's also a thing callededucation and mutual respect. I understand your frustration in such discussions, but it should be better if you both ignore each others; it's a nonsense to continue like this in every thread you both collide.
@sp: would you be so kind to post hashrates with a human, achievable, frequency? A common 1070, even custom, barely reaches 2000MHz in stability without thermal and power throttling (in a multigpu setup obviously, due thermal complications). Interesting findings about the memory controller btw. Have you measured the difference between the reference values (TDP 150) and TDP to 170 + forced p0 state? Such tests would be much more interesting with watt measures. What's you model of 1070?
Thanks
Yeah, you have to act remotely intelligent to get respect, Amph acts intelligent and then just posts something you instantly corrected him on. That was what he 'regurgitated' from the guy a couple pages back posting his 280Mh/s 'normal' hashrates for Lbry, which all of us know is complete bullshit. If I could get 280Mh/s per card, I'd love that. Only way you get that is with a 2070Mhz overclock... which is extremely rare. Even my high end cards don't get that if I want to remain stable for 8+ hours.
I already put him on ignore, I had to take him off because he keeps posting misinformation like the above in threads. It derails the topic and spreads bullshit all around people end up believing 'cause the one guy in the thread said it'. Not only does it look bad for SP when he tries to sell his miner, it gives people a false impression of how much they can earn by mining Lbry for instance. That means he's LOSING PEOPLE MONEY. I don't know how lax you are with pissing away your money, but generally speaking... this is bad juju.
I don't know if he's intentionally being ignorant and a troll with malicious intent, but I can only assume so based on his behavior so I'm treating him that way.
My card is trottleing at high speeds I only have a 8pin connector and no powered riser.
My kernal #2 does 293 at a 2100 core and -1000 on the memory (1400)(with nvidia inspector). Tdp changed with the nvidia-smi tool to 170 (limited in the bios) and p0 state.
Anybody know a good tool to reduce the memclock to 500 on the 1070?
Open source can do 190 with 2060 core. So your mod didn't do any better on pascal yet ...My kernal #2 does 293 at a 2100 core and -1000 on the memory (1400)(with nvidia inspector). Tdp changed with the nvidia-smi tool to 170 (limited in the bios) and p0 state.
Anybody know a good tool to reduce the memclock to 500 on the 1070?
You can increase TDP of your any 150 watt card if you flash bios with 170 watt (palit superjetstream bios for example).
Then with +114% in afterburner you'll get 190 watt. But I'm not sure that any other cards except zotac and palit have proper cooling for this.
That's incorrect, I have two cards that run at 2063 doing 276Mhs... They have a TDP of 120 and never hit it to start throttling.
It's possible to flash your card to another manufacturers bios, I would definitely not suggest it though due to differences in fans and memory types.
I'm curious why everyone is quoting really high GPU speeds? Something say like 1950 is much more common. Fast overclocks are fast, almost no one will be able to hit them though.
@rednoW,
you mean 290MH @2060MHz with Palit 1070 SJS , right ?
Sorry, I was wrong, just rechecked. It needs 2080-2090mhz to make 290mhs.you mean 290MH @2060MHz with Palit 1070 SJS , right ?
EDIT: Temperature 58-62 C degrees @ these settings
@rednoW,
you mean 290MH @2060MHz with Palit 1070 SJS , right ?
Sorry, I was wrong, just rechecked. It needs 2080-2090mhz to make 290mhs. you mean 290MH @2060MHz with Palit 1070 SJS , right ?
@rednoW,
you mean 290MH @2060MHz with Palit 1070 SJS , right ?
you mean 290MH @2060MHz with Palit 1070 SJS , right ?
My card is trottleing at high speeds I only have a 8pin connector and no powered riser.
My kernal #2 does 293 at a 2100 core and -1000 on the memory (1400)(with nvidia inspector). Tdp changed with the nvidia-smi tool to 170 (limited in the bios) and p0 state.
Anybody know a good tool to reduce the memclock to 500 on the 1070?
Open source can do 190 with 2060 core. So your mod didn't do any better on pascal yet ...My kernal #2 does 293 at a 2100 core and -1000 on the memory (1400)(with nvidia inspector). Tdp changed with the nvidia-smi tool to 170 (limited in the bios) and p0 state.
Anybody know a good tool to reduce the memclock to 500 on the 1070?
You can increase TDP of your any 150 watt card if you flash bios with 170 watt (palit superjetstream bios for example).
Then with +114% in afterburner you'll get 190 watt. But I'm not sure that any other cards except zotac and palit have proper cooling for this.
More boost for 970 cards with LBRY sp-mod release #2
This is standard clocks on the
Galax GTX 970 HOF
This is standard clocks on the
Galax GTX 970 HOF
Release #3 is up 3-4 MHASH(+2% from #2) and more stable output on the gtx 970 HOF standard clocks
Jump to: