0.1 with fee is insane for the 1070 owner, unless you can pull off a crazy 20% or something, and i really doubt you can it's not optimizable anymore, pallas wolfo and epsylon all agree on this...
Because 20% is crazier then 15%. "I know nothing about coding, but I'm going to flat out say you can't improve this algo." You're dumb.
you are surely retarded, 20% was just an example, and no i actually coded something in the past, if 3 dev tell you that it cannot be improved anymore, that's it
1-2% of improvement it's not what i call a real improvement it's a joke
And 15% is actual.
1-2% improvement wasn't listed anywhere, you're just regurgitating random shit you found in the thread instead of what SP is saying and other members who own a copy of the miner.
Not sure if I should even bother correcting you on using assumptions and hypothesizes as fact anymore, as you seem pretty happy being ignorant, but when it comes time to have a actual meaningful discussion about something of merit you'll have to take it else where.
You are late to the party with LBRY. And what kind of boosts are we going to see? One percent? Two percent?
Speed improvements where verified by one of the 0.1 donator.s (go6ooo1212)
Spmod #1 980ti 1467 core clock +12%
go6ooo1212 also got his 970 to mine @ 160MHASH. My kernal could be clocked higher than the opensource, and stable.
Yes got same result with go6ooo1212
980 ti g1 gaming
Sp_ please ditch the 0.1 fee, we subscribed a few times for that amount for different miners but you always come up with something else we should subscribe to.
I am curently testing the donation code in the LBRY sp-mod #1.
I plan to release Optimized Pascal lyra2v2,skein,pentablake,x17 etc.. as well. free for the the donators in the past(but with a donation %). The sp-mod ultimate.
Sorry, so in the new versions whoever paid you (0.1, and stop) will have a new version with a new 3.3% fee on it?
I plan to release a pascal version of the other algos and include a fee.
Thanks for the clarification, I was wondering about the pascal improvements. There's surely more space of manouver than this, unfortunately it seems not in dagger hashimoto.
Fact check, he posted that three pages ago.
Fack checking:
1 tpruvot coded a faster kernel before the release of the optimized 1.8.1
2 wolf0 did the same on amd, with wonderful results
I don't like the tone of these discussions, so please keep a civil manner. I would like to discuss just about tech, not colliding with others.
You're right about sp, and it's a good thing that he's still here, but you also know that there have been many discussions in the past months regarding intensity settings, and the ownership of the kernels, especially between tpruvot and sp.
Sp have just responded you about the new pascal version, including all the other algos (pretty interesting, indeed).
You tried to lump... Man, you should relax. Take a break from pc's, it was just an example to all the others (that might not consider these factors)
Peace
1 tpruvot coded a faster kernel before the release of the optimized 1.8.1
2 wolf0 did the same on amd, with wonderful results
I don't like the tone of these discussions, so please keep a civil manner. I would like to discuss just about tech, not colliding with others.
You're right about sp, and it's a good thing that he's still here, but you also know that there have been many discussions in the past months regarding intensity settings, and the ownership of the kernels, especially between tpruvot and sp.
Sp have just responded you about the new pascal version, including all the other algos (pretty interesting, indeed).
You tried to lump... Man, you should relax. Take a break from pc's, it was just an example to all the others (that might not consider these factors)
Peace
You don't need to like my tone passive-aggressive condescending smiley face guy.
Yes, and this is a thread about Nvidia hardware... Pretty much everyone here is running Nvidia hardware, we aren't even remotely talking about AMD miners as Wolf0 is not going to just magically come in here and plop down a super amazing Nvidia miner on a regular basis. It doesn't matter what he does with AMD hardware.
Yup 1.8.1 was a faster then build before... but now he's not improving it anymore. He also has the option of adding a dev fee or charging people a flat fee for his miner, and he did for his preview builds. That's his business model. I also noted that he made headway with Lbry, but now he's off doing something else.
You are late to the party with LBRY. And what kind of boosts are we going to see? One percent? Two percent?
Speed improvements where verified by one of the 0.1 donator.s (go6ooo1212)
Spmod #1 980ti 1467 core clock +12%
go6ooo1212 also got his 970 to mine @ 160MHASH. My kernal could be clocked higher than the opensource, and stable.
...on an old card. Not impressed.
Before you waddled out of Ethereum, people like us have been around mining on 'old' hardware and still are eth baby. Three months ago it was top of the line. It's not uncommon and you don't need to be impressed.
, im very curious to know the hashrate for gtx 1060 3gb , in game is very similar with 6gb . 
