Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 611. (Read 2347641 times)

legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
try --cpu-priority 3 (or 4), i seen something weird like that on pascal, else the speed was fast only when i focused the command line window.... another weird new issue unrelated to ccminer code Wink


Well, else ive a SIA miner under work... it already works on suprnova and nanopool... waiting enough donations to release sources and finish it (aka implement the stratum protocol described on their forum), i just posted that on their forum...  970 1GH/s
hero member
Activity: 677
Merit: 500
Windows 10 x64 1607 have strange problem whith hashrates... main videocard go down in 50%, go up and go down... Avarage hashrate slower on 10 %. But i run 3 instances of lbry miners, and avarage numbers is good (counting all 3 instances). WTF? F***ing windows....
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
So is anyone willing to work on a Nvidia ETH dual miner for commission? It doesn't need to be a ground up rebuild of ETH.

It's silly we're six months in from when Claymore released his and we still don't have one.

CLAYMORE IS WORKING ON ONE--

He has said in his thread that he "had an agreement" not to code an nVidia miner, but that it expired.  When asked for an update last week, he said "1-or-2 weeks".  

He just released version 5.3 of his AMD miner, it remains to be seen if the very latest AMD drivers for RX 460, 470, and 480 will work well with his miner.  I do see on AMD's website that Ubuntu 14.04.4 now has a version of the drivers supporting the new line of cards.  The site only claims compatibility with Ubuntu 16.04.1, though, and these are beta drivers.       --scryptr

Appreciate the information. Obviously some huge farm paid him a LOT of money to specifically code it for AMD. How old is that post? 1-2 weeks out a couple days ago?

That aside, not sure why he would take time to code it. Besides the program not allowing it... Nvidia devices are OCL capable, so it really just needs to be 'flipped on' and allowed to work with Nvidia hardware, more or less.


BTW if you're into AMD hardware, 470s may be the brand new go to for Dagger mining. The 470 performs just about on par with the 480 for Dagger. The 460s have a smaller memory bus, so they might not be up to par... However it will be interesting to see what results they produce as well.

Or haven't you figured it out by now that none of the current Nvidia devs are interested in doing it.

Pretty sure they are not happy to spend the time to do it and get nothing in return for it.

Not sure why you'd assume they wouldn't get anything for doing it? I've mentioned before miner fee or paying for programs like this isn't far fetched. Out of everything they could be doing, that is something that people would most likely pay for. Dagger mining is not unheard of...

Whether or not they want to do it doesn't stop it from being in demand and does not stop it from being something that could earn them money.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
So is anyone willing to work on a Nvidia ETH dual miner for commission? It doesn't need to be a ground up rebuild of ETH.

It's silly we're six months in from when Claymore released his and we still don't have one.

CLAYMORE IS WORKING ON ONE--

He has said in his thread that he "had an agreement" not to code an nVidia miner, but that it expired.  When asked for an update last week, he said "1-or-2 weeks". 

He just released version 5.3 of his AMD miner, it remains to be seen if the very latest AMD drivers for RX 460, 470, and 480 will work well with his miner.  I do see on AMD's website that Ubuntu 14.04.4 now has a version of the drivers supporting the new line of cards.  The site only claims compatibility with Ubuntu 16.04.1, though, and these are beta drivers.       --scryptr

Appreciate the information. Obviously some huge farm paid him a LOT of money to specifically code it for AMD. How old is that post? 1-2 weeks out a couple days ago?

That aside, not sure why he would take time to code it. Besides the program not allowing it... Nvidia devices are OCL capable, so it really just needs to be 'flipped on' and allowed to work with Nvidia hardware, more or less.


BTW if you're into AMD hardware, 470s may be the brand new go to for Dagger mining. The 470 performs just about on par with the 480 for Dagger. The 460s have a smaller memory bus, so they might not be up to par... However it will be interesting to see what results they produce as well.

Or haven't you figured it out by now that none of the current Nvidia devs are interested in doing it.

Pretty sure they are not happy to spend the time to do it and get nothing in return for it.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
So is anyone willing to work on a Nvidia ETH dual miner for commission? It doesn't need to be a ground up rebuild of ETH.

It's silly we're six months in from when Claymore released his and we still don't have one.

CLAYMORE IS WORKING ON ONE--

He has said in his thread that he "had an agreement" not to code an nVidia miner, but that it expired.  When asked for an update last week, he said "1-or-2 weeks". 

He just released version 5.3 of his AMD miner, it remains to be seen if the very latest AMD drivers for RX 460, 470, and 480 will work well with his miner.  I do see on AMD's website that Ubuntu 14.04.4 now has a version of the drivers supporting the new line of cards.  The site only claims compatibility with Ubuntu 16.04.1, though, and these are beta drivers.       --scryptr

Appreciate the information. Obviously some huge farm paid him a LOT of money to specifically code it for AMD. How old is that post? 1-2 weeks out a couple days ago?

That aside, not sure why he would take time to code it. Besides the program not allowing it... Nvidia devices are OCL capable, so it really just needs to be 'flipped on' and allowed to work with Nvidia hardware, more or less.


BTW if you're into AMD hardware, 470s may be the brand new go to for Dagger mining. The 470 performs just about on par with the 480 for Dagger. The 460s have a smaller memory bus, so they might not be up to par... However it will be interesting to see what results they produce as well.
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
So is anyone willing to work on a Nvidia ETH dual miner for commission? It doesn't need to be a ground up rebuild of ETH.

It's silly we're six months in from when Claymore released his and we still don't have one.

CLAYMORE IS WORKING ON ONE--

He has said in his thread that he "had an agreement" not to code an nVidia miner, but that it expired.  When asked for an update last week, he said "1-or-2 weeks". 

He just released version 5.3 of his AMD miner, it remains to be seen if the very latest AMD drivers for RX 460, 470, and 480 will work well with his miner.  I do see on AMD's website that Ubuntu 14.04.4 now has a version of the drivers supporting the new line of cards.  The site only claims compatibility with Ubuntu 16.04.1, though, and these are beta drivers.       --scryptr
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
So is anyone willing to work on a Nvidia ETH dual miner for commission? It doesn't need to be a ground up rebuild of ETH.

It's silly we're six months in from when Claymore released his and we still don't have one.
full member
Activity: 180
Merit: 100
Can I get a link to SP's github so I can get the latest version.

I lost it when the computer crashed .
Updating the gpu drivers (non beta)  went south and scrambled the hard driver to where it finely went out.   



See page 1.

thanks.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Epsylon3 I sent you a pm  plz read.... thx  Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 292
Merit: 250
Can I get a link to SP's github so I can get the latest version.

I lost it when the computer crashed .
Updating the gpu drivers (non beta)  went south and scrambled the hard driver to where it finely went out.   



See page 1.
full member
Activity: 180
Merit: 100
Can I get a link to SP's github so I can get the latest version.

I lost it when the computer crashed .
Updating the gpu drivers (non beta)  went south and scrambled the hard driver to where it finely went out.   

legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Anyone working on a Steem miner? Definitely would be a great area to spread into for GPU miners.
legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
MCAP etherum: $789,507,931
MCAP etherum classic: $ 219,019,007

Miners are moving to etherum classic for more profit.
Etherum classic also have 50% more trades on the exchanges and the price is climbing.
ETC will never go POS, and it can become a goldmine for the miners for years to come.
Decentralized, and not controlled by any government, bill gates or the rest of the clowns.

Code is Law.

What about that "mining bomb"? I heard there's a block time explosion in a year.

Nope, that is not true at all!

In January 2017, the dag file will go over 2GB in size.

All this means, any GPU with 2GB will not be able to mine ETH.

But, 290's, 390s, Fury, Nanos, 480s all ship with 4GB or of more memory as standard.

Hardly worth mentioning, unless you own a huge stack of AMD GPUs that are 270s or 370s.



I think grrrgrrr meant this:

There's a difficulty bomb in place for Ethereum which means the difficulty keep increasing regardless of miners:

Difficulty adjustment scheme

A lot of you have been wondering how we would implement a switch from PoW to PoS in time for Serenity. This will be handled by the newly introduced difficulty adjustment scheme, which elegantly guarantees a hard-fork point in the next 16 months.

It works as follow: starting from block 200,000 the difficulty will undergo an exponential increase which will only become noticeable in about a year. At that point (just around the release of the Serenity milestone), we’ll see a significant increase in difficulty which will start pushing the block resolution time upwards.

So, a year on, the network will continue to be useful for roughly 3-4 months, but eventually will reach an ‘Ice Age’ of sorts: the difficulty will simply be too high for anyone to find a block. This will allow us to introduce PoS, perhaps via Casper, if it proves itself.

I guess it will be defused with a soft fork.
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1004
MCAP etherum: $789,507,931
MCAP etherum classic: $ 219,019,007

Miners are moving to etherum classic for more profit.
Etherum classic also have 50% more trades on the exchanges and the price is climbing.
ETC will never go POS, and it can become a goldmine for the miners for years to come.
Decentralized, and not controlled by any government, bill gates or the rest of the clowns.

Code is Law.

What about that "mining bomb"? I heard there's a block time explosion in a year.

Nope, that is not true at all!

In January 2017, the dag file will go over 2GB in size.

All this means, any GPU with 2GB will not be able to mine ETH.

But, 290's, 390s, Fury, Nanos, 480s all ship with 4GB or of more memory as standard.

Hardly worth mentioning, unless you own a huge stack of AMD GPUs that are 270s or 370s.

member
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
MCAP etherum: $789,507,931
MCAP etherum classic: $ 219,019,007

Miners are moving to etherum classic for more profit.
Etherum classic also have 50% more trades on the exchanges and the price is climbing.
ETC will never go POS, and it can become a goldmine for the miners for years to come.
Decentralized, and not controlled by any government, bill gates or the rest of the clowns.

Code is Law.

What about that "mining bomb"? I heard there's a block time explosion in a year.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
OMG
(etherum classic) ETC has passed $3 per coin and is traded on a $ 131 087 000 volume today. Bitcoin's volume (24 hours) is $354 480 000   

10 days ago ETC was worth $0


$0-$250 million in just 10 days.. Must be the biggest rally in the bitcoin history for any new altcoin... Funds seems to be moved from Etherum to Etherum classic.

People are selling etherum (-30%) to make a gain in ETC. (+10000%)

http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2016/08/01/the-great-digital-currency-debate-new-ethereum-vs-ethereum-classic/
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Very bad today , with 4x gtx 1070 and 1 ghs power  Sad :
[...]

All pools have good days and bad days. Some do seem to have more bad days than most, but that is definitely not the case for Yiimp! My personal experience on Yiimp, is that it performs much better than most other pools that support the same coins.

Deposit stats are the worst place to look for your recent mining performance though. You should look at the pool stats instead.
What if the pool had some downtime? What if you had some internet issues? What if your rig has a couple of crashed cards? Note, I'm not saying that one of these was the case for the past 24h, just that looking at exchange deposits is really the worst way to go about measuring performance...

Cheers!

Yeah, that was up till a day ago. Now it seems to be doing perpetually bad and isn't showing any sign of improving. I think I'll be moving my hashrate off. When you have 10% network hashrate, things usually balance out. Should be earning about 30% more then it is.

BTW Suprnova's pool luck is at ~75% and Coinmines is at 75%. That either means Yiimp is having a reallllllly bad day due to the amount of hashrate it has or something is broken on the pool. Either way, 36 hours is too long to be losing out on 30% of my hashrate.
You're a fucking idiot. If anything you'd jump on a pool with bad luck because it's "due" for a correction. Seriously if you can't tell the difference between bad luck and a pool operator robbing you it's time to find a new hobby

And you're a idiot if you believe that RNG will go the opposite direction in some extreme form because it has a 'correction' coming. RNG is RNG, if a pool is doing bad, it doesn't mean it'll do really good after it. There is no order to 'luck'.

Also you know absolutely nothing about statistics, in this case the law of large numbers. More data points minimizes variance. I pointed out two possible causes, one is possible skimming, the other was the pool was having issues. One more possible then the other as I pointed out in later posts, which you didn't even bother reading before quoting a post from two days ago.

If you're going to act like a douche at least use a bit of logic, a bit of research about what you're talking about, and points to back up what you're saying. Now go excuse yourself and remove your foot from your mouth. <3
hey internet tough guy, don't get your panties in a bunch. I was basically insulting you with the gamblers fallacy it's "due" because you just start accusing a trusted member that you wouldn't even be able to mine if he didn't contribute to the community of being a theif with absolutely zero supporting evidence. Bad luck isn't evidence of anything besides bad luck.
Anyway noobs were getting to me that day so seeing what I saw as an insulting post to epsolyn by someone who contributes nothing but asks for everything I kinda snapped, normally would have ignored your whiny posts like usual. See bro we're cool  Cool

Internet tough guy? I think that should be directed at yourself dude. I didn't come into the thread all huffing and puffing about a post then get immediately disproven and put out on the curb.

Once again, because you lack reader comprehension skills, for the third time, I suggested two different things could be happening, skimming, or more then likely pool issues... Which I suggested more so in later posts, once again which you didn't take any time to read. We even joked about the skimming...

Describing a fallacy isn't a insult, especially when we're discussing statistics. I don't even know why this would come up. I've mentioned numerous times that there is a lot of hashrate at Yiimp. It would be different if there were like 1-3% of the network hashrate there or even lower.

"Bad luck isn't evidence of anything besides bad luck."

You have no idea how stats work.

Contributing nothing? You once again have no idea what you're talking about and assume that I haven't donated... which if you've kept track of this thread, is untrue. Also just by mining on Yiimp I'm paying in 1%... which you could figure out with some easy lojik skilz that ur two 1337 4.

You're a idiot, go crawl into whatever hole you came out.

MCAP etherum: $789,507,931
MCAP etherum classic: $ 219,019,007

Miners are moving to etherum classic for more profit.
Etherum classic also have 50% more trades on the exchanges and the price is climbing.
ETC will never go POS, and it can become a goldmine for the miners for years to come.
Decentralized, and not controlled by any government, bill gates or the rest of the clowns.

Code is Law.

If they never actually go PoS, it'll probably actually garner larger interest. Right now the giant warning sign is ETH PoS... Support for ETC may actually hinge entirely on the fact that it's not going PoS. It still has a lot to climb before it reaches similiar prices of ETH. Also I'm pretty certain a lot of people don't know they can actually retrieve ETC coins if they had ETH coins when the fork happened. Once people start figuring that out I expect we'll see a lot more dumping.

All the other BS surrounding 'immutable' currency is just posturing and trying to make the coin seem more legitimate. It may even be being posed by the original DOW hackers.


In other news, a dual miner for ETH is very, very, very, much in demand for Nvidia...
sr. member
Activity: 445
Merit: 255
long live to eth clones, this will mean that nvidia users will live in a less crowded space Wink
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
MCAP etherum: $789,507,931
MCAP etherum classic: $ 219,019,007

Miners are moving to etherum classic for more profit.
Etherum classic also have 50% more trades on the exchanges and the price is climbing.
ETC will never go POS, and it can become a goldmine for the miners for years to come.
Decentralized, and not controlled by any government, bill gates or the rest of the clowns.

Code is Law.

this mean that asic will take it at some point, so not a good thing
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
$ 219,019,007.... of wind Wink isnt that the amount "lost" by bitfinex ?

if interrested by gas machines, you should focus on CETH Wink which could have some future
Jump to: