i am grateful for epsylon for his work,
learned much using his pool statistics and graphs
thank you really mate
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 614. (Read 2347641 times)
yep we got some :p... 4 consecutive blocks in 3mn by different users.. Thing which should be almost impossible with the chain block time... But when that happens the net diff go very high (was at block 21118)
its more than luck at this level
more a lottery winner. we are over estimated rewards today
its more than luck at this level
more a lottery winner. we are over estimated rewards todayI still don't believe that... The more data points you have, with the more hashrate you have, the more 'luck' will normalize. Variance decreases when the amount of data points increases. That's why people generally stick to larger pools, it minimizes variance and 'bad days'.
yep we got some :p... 4 consecutive blocks in 3mn by different users.. Thing which should be almost impossible with the chain block time... But when that happens the net diff go very high (was at block 21118)
its more than luck at this level more a lottery winner. we are over estimated rewards today
its more than luck at this level
more a lottery winner. we are over estimated rewards today i will no more answer to your pitty cries, there is no buttons on the pool to improve miners luck, sorry.
the wallet works very well, since beginning... never had to touch it
note: sorry to be rude, i answer in your language
the wallet works very well, since beginning... never had to touch it
note: sorry to be rude, i answer in your language
Stats on pools can be manipulated. That aside, it's entirely possible for pools to be buggy and not find blocks or have something wrong with it. In this case due to the change in luck on the two pools I mentioned, with exactly the same lucky (roughly), it probably means something is up with yiimp.
Just like mining software can be buggy and flake out. Just because something exists doesn't mean it's working perfectly.
Some pools have funky stats reporting also. I can't make sense of Coinmine having well over 60% of the hashrate, finds about 50% of the blocks, and still it somehow manages to estimate that it had 60% luck finding recent blocks (when it actually consistently has about 100% or worse). So yeah, something must be wrong with Yiimp
Still better then MNpool and Suprnova. Tried out Coinmine and got pretty much what was estimated on average on the pool page over 24hr.
last half day yiimp lbry lucky very pretty
That's because Bensam left. He was holding the pool back.
Apparently... Or Epsylon turned off his skimmer. XD
Some pools have funky stats reporting also. I can't make sense of Coinmine having well over 60% of the hashrate, finds about 50% of the blocks, and still it somehow manages to estimate that it had 60% luck finding recent blocks (when it actually consistently has about 100% or worse). So yeah, something must be wrong with Yiimp
One of the things I've always liked about yaamp/yiimp is it has the most transparent stats of any pool. When one is able
to see more of the process there is a chance one will see some things they either don't understand or don't like but
have always existed.
TROUBLE COMPILING CPU-OPT IN LINUX--
I'll shift this question to your thread in order to stay on topic. Usually the "build.sh" script ( I think it was written by tpruvot) just runs, maybe with an adjustment to Makefile.am in ccminer. I can't get cpu-opt to compile in Lubunto 14.04.4, and I have the standard setup to compile ccminer.
Like I said, Ill post the same question in your CPU-OPT thread, we can figure it out there. --scryptr
Some pools have funky stats reporting also. I can't make sense of Coinmine having well over 60% of the hashrate, finds about 50% of the blocks, and still it somehow manages to estimate that it had 60% luck finding recent blocks (when it actually consistently has about 100% or worse). So yeah, something must be wrong with Yiimp
One of the things I've always liked about yaamp/yiimp is it has the most transparent stats of any pool. When one is able
to see more of the process there is a chance one will see some things they either don't understand or don't like but
have always existed.
last half day yiimp lbry lucky very pretty
That's because Bensam left. He was holding the pool back.
last half day yiimp lbry lucky very pretty
i will no more answer to your pitty cries, there is no buttons on the pool to improve miners luck, sorry.
the wallet works very well, since beginning... never had to touch it
note: sorry to be rude, i answer in your language
the wallet works very well, since beginning... never had to touch it
note: sorry to be rude, i answer in your language
Stats on pools can be manipulated. That aside, it's entirely possible for pools to be buggy and not find blocks or have something wrong with it. In this case due to the change in luck on the two pools I mentioned, with exactly the same lucky (roughly), it probably means something is up with yiimp.
Just like mining software can be buggy and flake out. Just because something exists doesn't mean it's working perfectly.
Some pools have funky stats reporting also. I can't make sense of Coinmine having well over 60% of the hashrate, finds about 50% of the blocks, and still it somehow manages to estimate that it had 60% luck finding recent blocks (when it actually consistently has about 100% or worse). So yeah, something must be wrong with Yiimp
no, good sample is decred, each block reward can be different ... same in all cryptos due to the tx fees
And Orphans just reset the amount to 0, there was none here
Almost sure you already tried to solo mine... its the same at pool level, 2x more cards give more than 2x more blocks in general
And Orphans just reset the amount to 0, there was none here
Almost sure you already tried to solo mine... its the same at pool level, 2x more cards give more than 2x more blocks in general
i will no more answer to your pitty cries, there is no buttons on the pool to improve miners luck, sorry.
the wallet works very well, since beginning... never had to touch it
note: sorry to be rude, i answer in your language
the wallet works very well, since beginning... never had to touch it
note: sorry to be rude, i answer in your language
Stats on pools can be manipulated. That aside, it's entirely possible for pools to be buggy and not find blocks or have something wrong with it. In this case due to the change in luck on the two pools I mentioned, with exactly the same lucky (roughly), it probably means something is up with yiimp.
Just like mining software can be buggy and flake out. Just because something exists doesn't mean it's working perfectly.
no matter what pool you mine, there is always a certain % of loss, i suspect this has to do with how the block reward works here, the increment of 1 every 100 block...
i will no more answer to your pitty cries, there is no buttons on the pool to improve miners luck, sorry.
the wallet works very well, since beginning... never had to touch it
note: sorry to be rude, i answer in your language
the wallet works very well, since beginning... never had to touch it
note: sorry to be rude, i answer in your language
please move and shut up, sure its my fault if your miner dont find shares lol
It is if there is something wrong with the pool or are you're doing something dubious. Just really weird considering the amount of hashrate on the pool.
Lower hashrate pools (compared to the amount of net hashrate) will have problems with variance, you start getting away from that the more hashrate the pool has. It's less about luck and more about it being able to find more then enough blocks to supersede that.
Coinmine has about 80% of the coin hashrate, meaning it should almost always sit at around 100% luck. If it has 75% luck (and suprnova, which has less hash then yiimp), that either means there is something wrong with the blockchain or another pool that has a lot of hashrate is messing up and essentially giving away blocks to these pools.
It's simply called statistic, and gauss curve dispersion.
What have been achieved on yiimp it's not comparable to suprnova, at least from what I've seen personally. It's a very well made platform, stable and profitable. What I cannot understand it's the variance of the others. When I'll have some time to waste, I'll make a comparison between suprnova and yiimp, so the numbers will speak for themselves (with a complete analysis on luck, shares and blocks found)
What have been achieved on yiimp it's not comparable to suprnova, at least from what I've seen personally. It's a very well made platform, stable and profitable. What I cannot understand it's the variance of the others. When I'll have some time to waste, I'll make a comparison between suprnova and yiimp, so the numbers will speak for themselves (with a complete analysis on luck, shares and blocks found)
please move and shut up, sure its my fault if your miner dont find shares lol
Very bad today , with 4x gtx 1070 and 1 ghs power 
:
[...]
:[...]
All pools have good days and bad days. Some do seem to have more bad days than most, but that is definitely not the case for Yiimp! My personal experience on Yiimp, is that it performs much better than most other pools that support the same coins.
Deposit stats are the worst place to look for your recent mining performance though. You should look at the pool stats instead.
What if the pool had some downtime? What if you had some internet issues? What if your rig has a couple of crashed cards? Note, I'm not saying that one of these was the case for the past 24h, just that looking at exchange deposits is really the worst way to go about measuring performance...
Cheers!
Yeah, that was up till a day ago. Now it seems to be doing perpetually bad and isn't showing any sign of improving. I think I'll be moving my hashrate off. When you have 10% network hashrate, things usually balance out. Should be earning about 30% more then it is.
BTW Suprnova's pool luck is at ~75% and Coinmines is at 75%. That either means Yiimp is having a reallllllly bad day due to the amount of hashrate it has or something is broken on the pool. Either way, 36 hours is too long to be losing out on 30% of my hashrate.
Evening all - does anyone have a chart for the various algos on the gtx 1060, 1070, and 1080?
Very bad today , with 4x gtx 1070 and 1 ghs power :
[...]
:[...]
All pools have good days and bad days. Some do seem to have more bad days than most, but that is definitely not the case for Yiimp! My personal experience on Yiimp, is that it performs much better than most other pools that support the same coins.
Deposit stats are the worst place to look for your recent mining performance though. You should look at the pool stats instead.
What if the pool had some downtime? What if you had some internet issues? What if your rig has a couple of crashed cards? Note, I'm not saying that one of these was the case for the past 24h, just that looking at exchange deposits is really the worst way to go about measuring performance...
Cheers!
Very bad today , with 4x gtx 1070 and 1 ghs power :
.
:.
Jump to: