my sia preview is almost ready, but for now only for suprnova... 1GH/s on 970
Will it work on solo , also 
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 613. (Read 2347641 times)
The 3.5GB partition has been known for a couple years now. It hasn't ever effected mining. However there has never been a algo that has filled 4GB of memory on these cards, so Ethereum will probably be the first if there is one... But considering they aren't super amazing in Eth to begin with and Eth going PoS in a couple months, it's not going to ever happen.
Some algos like Neoscrypt/scrypt-jane and at least a couple others can fill 4GB and then some if you increase the intensity.
oh? wonder if the 8GB GTX 10 series might be able to make good use of tat. AFAIK they are good, but not mindblowing, at neoscrypt. definitely not as profitable as lbry/lyra2/lyra2r2
my sia preview is almost ready, but for now only for suprnova... 1GH/s on 970
Yeah... Scrypt... Yeah.... >>
Neoscrypt you never mine at those intensities as it causes crashing.
In other news, ANYONE working on a Steem GPU miner? Hit me up with a message and I'll buy in on it for a 'preview' build, similar to Epsylons.
Neoscrypt you never mine at those intensities as it causes crashing.
In other news, ANYONE working on a Steem GPU miner? Hit me up with a message and I'll buy in on it for a 'preview' build, similar to Epsylons.
The 3.5GB partition has been known for a couple years now. It hasn't ever effected mining. However there has never been a algo that has filled 4GB of memory on these cards, so Ethereum will probably be the first if there is one... But considering they aren't super amazing in Eth to begin with and Eth going PoS in a couple months, it's not going to ever happen.
Some algos like Neoscrypt/scrypt-jane and at least a couple others can fill 4GB and then some if you increase the intensity.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/4vn1ax/another_class_action_lawsuit_980/
and had one for the 970
Anybody know why plz? On the 970. thx
and had one for the 970
Anybody know why plz? On the 970. thx
From the same thread:
Reasons:
Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that the GTX 970 devices were sold based on misleading representations that the devices:
1. Operate with a full 4 gigabytes (“GB”) of video access memory (“VRAM”) instead of the actual 3.5 GB of VRAM and a “less performant” and decoupled 0.5 GB spillover segment that operates as slow as one seventh the speed of the 3.5 GB pool once the device is required to access more than 3.5 GB of memory
2. have 64 render output processors (“ROPs”), as opposed to 56 ROPs
3. have an L2 cache capacity of 2,048 kilobytes (“KB”), as opposed to 1,792 KB, and omitted material facts to the contrary.
4. Defendants have denied these allegations and asserted numerous defenses.
So this could lead to instabilities?
I have 2 980ti and 2 970gtx. Wonder if I can get $ for that?
I have no idea on any of those fronts. I never had any issues with my WF3OC 970's for mining or gaming. Not even when using more than 3.5 GB memory.
I basically love everything about these cards.
I hate these cards clocks locked at 1400 and just loves to crash.
Tomorrow going to try to set the clocks to where their supposed to be see if that helps.
The 3.5GB partition has been known for a couple years now. It hasn't ever effected mining. However there has never been a algo that has filled 4GB of memory on these cards, so Ethereum will probably be the first if there is one... But considering they aren't super amazing in Eth to begin with and Eth going PoS in a couple months, it's not going to ever happen.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/4vn1ax/another_class_action_lawsuit_980/
and had one for the 970
Anybody know why plz? On the 970. thx
and had one for the 970
Anybody know why plz? On the 970. thx
From the same thread:
Reasons:
Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that the GTX 970 devices were sold based on misleading representations that the devices:
1. Operate with a full 4 gigabytes (“GB”) of video access memory (“VRAM”) instead of the actual 3.5 GB of VRAM and a “less performant” and decoupled 0.5 GB spillover segment that operates as slow as one seventh the speed of the 3.5 GB pool once the device is required to access more than 3.5 GB of memory
2. have 64 render output processors (“ROPs”), as opposed to 56 ROPs
3. have an L2 cache capacity of 2,048 kilobytes (“KB”), as opposed to 1,792 KB, and omitted material facts to the contrary.
4. Defendants have denied these allegations and asserted numerous defenses.
So this could lead to instabilities?
I have 2 980ti and 2 970gtx. Wonder if I can get $ for that?
I have no idea on any of those fronts. I never had any issues with my WF3OC 970's for mining or gaming. Not even when using more than 3.5 GB memory.
I basically love everything about these cards.
I hate these cards clocks locked at 1400 and just loves to crash.
Tomorrow going to try to set the clocks to where their supposed to be see if that helps.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/4vn1ax/another_class_action_lawsuit_980/
and had one for the 970
Anybody know why plz? On the 970. thx
and had one for the 970
Anybody know why plz? On the 970. thx
From the same thread:
Reasons:
Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that the GTX 970 devices were sold based on misleading representations that the devices:
1. Operate with a full 4 gigabytes (“GB”) of video access memory (“VRAM”) instead of the actual 3.5 GB of VRAM and a “less performant” and decoupled 0.5 GB spillover segment that operates as slow as one seventh the speed of the 3.5 GB pool once the device is required to access more than 3.5 GB of memory
2. have 64 render output processors (“ROPs”), as opposed to 56 ROPs
3. have an L2 cache capacity of 2,048 kilobytes (“KB”), as opposed to 1,792 KB, and omitted material facts to the contrary.
4. Defendants have denied these allegations and asserted numerous defenses.
So this could lead to instabilities?
I have 2 980ti and 2 970gtx. Wonder if I can get $ for that?
I have no idea on any of those fronts. I never had any issues with my WF3OC 970's for mining or gaming. Not even when using more than 3.5 GB memory.
I basically love everything about these cards.
Hi pallas
For some reason ccminer (all versions) does not seems to detect the new driver i get:
For some reason ccminer (all versions) does not seems to detect the new driver i get:
Can you confirm you are actually using the new proprietary nvidia driver and not the open source nouveau?
Did you install from the repository or use the run file?
I have Linux Mint based on Ubuntu 14.4 so I'm very interested in this issue.
In mint there is a driver manager with one click switching to the proprietary driver. It still shows the
old 352 version as recommended and I haven't found 367 packaged for Ubuntu 14.4 yet.
The driver IS working properly, I also had parts of older drivers 349 and 352, that i had to weed out
i can see the card specific status, i can set power target limit.
i installed using repositories (ppa:graphics-drivers) so far it seems to be the only way to install from repo, since the driver is in beta.
also to get cuda 8 i had to register as a developer in nvidia
it seems that this driver requires CUDA 8, I thought that maybe i can test first with cuda 7.5 and then install cuda 8 and see the difference, but no, this driver requires cuda 8 to work, so right now i'm installing it (it takes like an hour or so install it on a flash drive) I'll post results later
I am doing great at yiimp testing another pool then back to yiimp. 
last half day yiimp lbry lucky very pretty
That's because Bensam left. He was holding the pool back.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/4vn1ax/another_class_action_lawsuit_980/
and had one for the 970
Anybody know why plz? On the 970. thx
and had one for the 970
Anybody know why plz? On the 970. thx
From the same thread:
Reasons:
Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that the GTX 970 devices were sold based on misleading representations that the devices:
1. Operate with a full 4 gigabytes (“GB”) of video access memory (“VRAM”) instead of the actual 3.5 GB of VRAM and a “less performant” and decoupled 0.5 GB spillover segment that operates as slow as one seventh the speed of the 3.5 GB pool once the device is required to access more than 3.5 GB of memory
2. have 64 render output processors (“ROPs”), as opposed to 56 ROPs
3. have an L2 cache capacity of 2,048 kilobytes (“KB”), as opposed to 1,792 KB, and omitted material facts to the contrary.
4. Defendants have denied these allegations and asserted numerous defenses.
So this could lead to instabilities?
I have 2 980ti and 2 970gtx. Wonder if I can get $ for that?
https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/4vn1ax/another_class_action_lawsuit_980/
and had one for the 970
Anybody know why plz? On the 970. thx
and had one for the 970
Anybody know why plz? On the 970. thx
From the same thread:
Reasons:
Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that the GTX 970 devices were sold based on misleading representations that the devices:
1. Operate with a full 4 gigabytes (“GB”) of video access memory (“VRAM”) instead of the actual 3.5 GB of VRAM and a “less performant” and decoupled 0.5 GB spillover segment that operates as slow as one seventh the speed of the 3.5 GB pool once the device is required to access more than 3.5 GB of memory
2. have 64 render output processors (“ROPs”), as opposed to 56 ROPs
3. have an L2 cache capacity of 2,048 kilobytes (“KB”), as opposed to 1,792 KB, and omitted material facts to the contrary.
4. Defendants have denied these allegations and asserted numerous defenses.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/4vn1ax/another_class_action_lawsuit_980/
and had one for the 970
Anybody know why plz? On the 970. thx
and had one for the 970
Anybody know why plz? On the 970. thx
Hi pallas
For some reason ccminer (all versions) does not seems to detect the new driver i get:
For some reason ccminer (all versions) does not seems to detect the new driver i get:
Can you confirm you are actually using the new proprietary nvidia driver and not the open source nouveau?
Did you install from the repository or use the run file?
I have Linux Mint based on Ubuntu 14.4 so I'm very interested in this issue.
In mint there is a driver manager with one click switching to the proprietary driver. It still shows the
old 352 version as recommended and I haven't found 367 packaged for Ubuntu 14.4 yet.
using the run file for months and didn't have any issue.
of course you must reinstall it every time a new kernel version is booted.
Hi pallas
For some reason ccminer (all versions) does not seems to detect the new driver i get:
For some reason ccminer (all versions) does not seems to detect the new driver i get:
Can you confirm you are actually using the new proprietary nvidia driver and not the open source nouveau?
Did you install from the repository or use the run file?
I have Linux Mint based on Ubuntu 14.4 so I'm very interested in this issue.
In mint there is a driver manager with one click switching to the proprietary driver. It still shows the
old 352 version as recommended and I haven't found 367 packaged for Ubuntu 14.4 yet.
Hi pallas
For some reason ccminer (all versions) does not seems to detect the new driver i get:
ccminer --version
lsmod | grep nvidia
nvcc --version
nvidia-smi
is a ccminer issue, a driver issue, i will try to install ethminer to see if it detects the card.
For some reason ccminer (all versions) does not seems to detect the new driver i get:
ccminer --version
Code:
SP-Mod 1.5.79
Compiled with GCC 4.8 using Nvidia CUDA Toolkit 7.5
Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
Includes optimizations implemented by sp, klaust, tpruvot and tsiv.
[2016-08-01 16:15:05] Unable to query number of CUDA devices! Is an nVidia driver installed?
Compiled with GCC 4.8 using Nvidia CUDA Toolkit 7.5
Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
Includes optimizations implemented by sp, klaust, tpruvot and tsiv.
[2016-08-01 16:15:05] Unable to query number of CUDA devices! Is an nVidia driver installed?
lsmod | grep nvidia
Code:
nvidia_uvm 642693 0
nvidia_drm 14412 0
nvidia_modeset 764277 1 nvidia_drm
drm 303102 1 nvidia_drm
nvidia 11245276 2 nvidia_modeset,nvidia_uvm
nvidia_drm 14412 0
nvidia_modeset 764277 1 nvidia_drm
drm 303102 1 nvidia_drm
nvidia 11245276 2 nvidia_modeset,nvidia_uvm
nvcc --version
Code:
nvcc: NVIDIA (R) Cuda compiler driver
Copyright (c) 2005-2015 NVIDIA Corporation
Built on Tue_Aug_11_14:27:32_CDT_2015
Cuda compilation tools, release 7.5, V7.5.17
Copyright (c) 2005-2015 NVIDIA Corporation
Built on Tue_Aug_11_14:27:32_CDT_2015
Cuda compilation tools, release 7.5, V7.5.17
nvidia-smi
Code:
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 367.35 Driver Version: 367.35 |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
| 0 GeForce GTX 1070 Off | 0000:01:00.0 Off | N/A |
| 0% 28C P0 35W / 180W | 0MiB / 8113MiB | 0% Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes: GPU Memory |
| GPU PID Type Process name Usage |
|=============================================================================|
| No running processes found |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 367.35 Driver Version: 367.35 |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
| 0 GeForce GTX 1070 Off | 0000:01:00.0 Off | N/A |
| 0% 28C P0 35W / 180W | 0MiB / 8113MiB | 0% Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes: GPU Memory |
| GPU PID Type Process name Usage |
|=============================================================================|
| No running processes found |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
is a ccminer issue, a driver issue, i will try to install ethminer to see if it detects the card.
Hello
as anyone be able to use ccminer with the GTX 1070 ?, i installed the new drivers 367 (xubuntu 14.04 x64) nvidia-smi works perfectly and I can set power target, but ccminer won't load.
i tried sp's ccminer, tpruvot's ccminer and same, it won't load.
i'm still with CUDA 7.5 (i have cuda 8 ready but i didn't install it yet because i wanted to test how it went first with 7.5 but it does not load.
both compiled from source after the driver install.
was anyone able to make it work under linux?
as anyone be able to use ccminer with the GTX 1070 ?, i installed the new drivers 367 (xubuntu 14.04 x64) nvidia-smi works perfectly and I can set power target, but ccminer won't load.
i tried sp's ccminer, tpruvot's ccminer and same, it won't load.
i'm still with CUDA 7.5 (i have cuda 8 ready but i didn't install it yet because i wanted to test how it went first with 7.5 but it does not load.
both compiled from source after the driver install.
was anyone able to make it work under linux?
Yes it worked right away for me.
I just updated the driver for pascal support.
Even the old binaries worked without recompile.
Nothing different.
Hello
as anyone be able to use ccminer with the GTX 1070 ?, i installed the new drivers 367 (xubuntu 14.04 x64) nvidia-smi works perfectly and I can set power target, but ccminer won't load.
i tried sp's ccminer, tpruvot's ccminer and same, it won't load.
i'm still with CUDA 7.5 (i have cuda 8 ready but i didn't install it yet because i wanted to test how it went first with 7.5 but it does not load.
both compiled from source after the driver install.
was anyone able to make it work under linux?
as anyone be able to use ccminer with the GTX 1070 ?, i installed the new drivers 367 (xubuntu 14.04 x64) nvidia-smi works perfectly and I can set power target, but ccminer won't load.
i tried sp's ccminer, tpruvot's ccminer and same, it won't load.
i'm still with CUDA 7.5 (i have cuda 8 ready but i didn't install it yet because i wanted to test how it went first with 7.5 but it does not load.
both compiled from source after the driver install.
was anyone able to make it work under linux?
There is one realllly big miner that I've seen hop on and off of Lbry the past couple days. Somewhere around 300GH. I think there is another one around 200GH that is constantly on the coin I saw pop off once.
Jump to: