MCAP etherum: $789,507,931
MCAP etherum classic: $ 219,019,007
Miners are moving to etherum classic for more profit.
Etherum classic also have 50% more trades on the exchanges and the price is climbing.
ETC will never go POS, and it can become a goldmine for the miners for years to come.
Decentralized, and not controlled by any government, bill gates or the rest of the clowns.
Code is Law.
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 612. (Read 2347641 times)
and another one which bought a boat... with user's money. Personally i never used this exchange, not even linked in yiimp code ;p
RIP Bitfinex...
i dont think it was for me, right bensam ? :p but yep your affirmations had no sense.... can be understood differently by each person 
Very bad today , with 4x gtx 1070 and 1 ghs power 
:
[...]
:[...]
All pools have good days and bad days. Some do seem to have more bad days than most, but that is definitely not the case for Yiimp! My personal experience on Yiimp, is that it performs much better than most other pools that support the same coins.
Deposit stats are the worst place to look for your recent mining performance though. You should look at the pool stats instead.
What if the pool had some downtime? What if you had some internet issues? What if your rig has a couple of crashed cards? Note, I'm not saying that one of these was the case for the past 24h, just that looking at exchange deposits is really the worst way to go about measuring performance...
Cheers!
Yeah, that was up till a day ago. Now it seems to be doing perpetually bad and isn't showing any sign of improving. I think I'll be moving my hashrate off. When you have 10% network hashrate, things usually balance out. Should be earning about 30% more then it is.
BTW Suprnova's pool luck is at ~75% and Coinmines is at 75%. That either means Yiimp is having a reallllllly bad day due to the amount of hashrate it has or something is broken on the pool. Either way, 36 hours is too long to be losing out on 30% of my hashrate.
And you're a idiot if you believe that RNG will go the opposite direction in some extreme form because it has a 'correction' coming. RNG is RNG, if a pool is doing bad, it doesn't mean it'll do really good after it. There is no order to 'luck'.
Also you know absolutely nothing about statistics, in this case the law of large numbers. More data points minimizes variance. I pointed out two possible causes, one is possible skimming, the other was the pool was having issues. One more possible then the other as I pointed out in later posts, which you didn't even bother reading before quoting a post from two days ago.
If you're going to act like a douche at least use a bit of logic, a bit of research about what you're talking about, and points to back up what you're saying. Now go excuse yourself and remove your foot from your mouth. <3
Anyway noobs were getting to me that day so seeing what I saw as an insulting post to epsolyn by someone who contributes nothing but asks for everything I kinda snapped, normally would have ignored your whiny posts like usual. See bro we're cool
Welp... Lbry is just about burnt out. Contemplating going back to Ethereum. Not sure where that promised '1070 Windows fix' is on the 2nd, but it's the 3rd and it's still not here... Once again why I don't listen to Amph.
Hopefully we can figure something about before Lbry fizzles out.
Hopefully we can figure something about before Lbry fizzles out.
I think its internal throttling, some pauses between ops, but i'm not sure
Does anyone know how the TDP reduction works on the new cards?
On the GTX1070 works fantastically well. (at least in linux)Not sure why this would be any different in Windows...
BTW glad Nix never has any problems...
I have a watt meter so i can see that it works well. I was wondering what exactly it is doing. Automatically optimizing voltages for memory? I see that the core clock goes down quite a bit.
Does anyone know how the TDP reduction works on the new cards?
On the GTX1070 works fantastically well. (at least in linux)Not sure why this would be any different in Windows...
BTW glad Nix never has any problems...
Hello
Sorry for keep hammering this but I can't make CUDA work with the GTX 1070.
I was able to mine using OpenCL with ethminer (-G (opencl)) but with (-U (cuda)) no luck, with ccminer i have the exact same error.
Driver is 367.35, CUDA 8 installed.
nvidia --version reports cuda 8
$LD_LIBRARY_PATH points to cuda 8
The driver is working otherwise it would be impossible to mine with OpenCL which i am doing now.
the error still is the same:
CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version
any idea what can cause this?, anyone has found this issue?
running xubuntu 14.04 x64.
thanks!
indkt
Sorry for keep hammering this but I can't make CUDA work with the GTX 1070.
I was able to mine using OpenCL with ethminer (-G (opencl)) but with (-U (cuda)) no luck, with ccminer i have the exact same error.
Driver is 367.35, CUDA 8 installed.
nvidia --version reports cuda 8
$LD_LIBRARY_PATH points to cuda 8
The driver is working otherwise it would be impossible to mine with OpenCL which i am doing now.
the error still is the same:
CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version
any idea what can cause this?, anyone has found this issue?
running xubuntu 14.04 x64.
thanks!
indkt
A few of your previous comments come to mind:
Quote
Hi
The driver IS working properly, I also had parts of older drivers 349 and 352, that i had to weed out Grin
i can see the card specific status, i can set power target limit.
i installed using repositories (ppa:graphics-drivers) so far it seems to be the only way to install from repo, since the driver is in beta.
also to get cuda 8 i had to register as a developer in nvidia Shocked
it seems that this driver requires CUDA 8, I thought that maybe i can test first with cuda 7.5 and then install cuda 8 and see the difference, but no, this driver requires cuda 8 to work, so right now i'm installing it (it takes like an hour or so install it on a flash drive) I'll post results later
The driver IS working properly, I also had parts of older drivers 349 and 352, that i had to weed out Grin
i can see the card specific status, i can set power target limit.
i installed using repositories (ppa:graphics-drivers) so far it seems to be the only way to install from repo, since the driver is in beta.
also to get cuda 8 i had to register as a developer in nvidia Shocked
it seems that this driver requires CUDA 8, I thought that maybe i can test first with cuda 7.5 and then install cuda 8 and see the difference, but no, this driver requires cuda 8 to work, so right now i'm installing it (it takes like an hour or so install it on a flash drive) I'll post results later
It seems very unusual that a new driver would break compatibility with all currently released cuda versions. The error message
contradicts this stating the driver doesn't yet support cuda 8.
This combined with your comment about parts of old drivers being present suggests some of those old parts are still present and
still in use. An "insufficnet driver for cuda version" is likely caused by an old driver with a new cuda.
I don't know how you got multiple driver versions installed but that may provide a clue how to fix it
Hello
Sorry for keep hammering this but I can't make CUDA work with the GTX 1070.
I was able to mine using OpenCL with ethminer (-G (opencl)) but with (-U (cuda)) no luck, with ccminer i have the exact same error.
Driver is 367.35, CUDA 8 installed.
nvidia --version reports cuda 8
$LD_LIBRARY_PATH points to cuda 8
The driver is working otherwise it would be impossible to mine with OpenCL which i am doing now.
the error still is the same:
CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version
any idea what can cause this?, anyone has found this issue?
running xubuntu 14.04 x64.
thanks!
indkt
Sorry for keep hammering this but I can't make CUDA work with the GTX 1070.
I was able to mine using OpenCL with ethminer (-G (opencl)) but with (-U (cuda)) no luck, with ccminer i have the exact same error.
Driver is 367.35, CUDA 8 installed.
nvidia --version reports cuda 8
$LD_LIBRARY_PATH points to cuda 8
The driver is working otherwise it would be impossible to mine with OpenCL which i am doing now.
the error still is the same:
CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version
any idea what can cause this?, anyone has found this issue?
running xubuntu 14.04 x64.
thanks!
indkt
All I can say is that, I'm running running fine both, ethminer and ccminer with 367.27 drivers and CUDA8.
Your problem is really strange. Maybe try to install this driver, and when you compiling try to point straight to cuda8 directory.
Hello
Sorry for keep hammering this but I can't make CUDA work with the GTX 1070.
I was able to mine using OpenCL with ethminer (-G (opencl)) but with (-U (cuda)) no luck, with ccminer i have the exact same error.
Driver is 367.35, CUDA 8 installed.
nvidia --version reports cuda 8
$LD_LIBRARY_PATH points to cuda 8
The driver is working otherwise it would be impossible to mine with OpenCL which i am doing now.
the error still is the same:
CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version
any idea what can cause this?, anyone has found this issue?
running xubuntu 14.04 x64.
thanks!
indkt
Sorry for keep hammering this but I can't make CUDA work with the GTX 1070.
I was able to mine using OpenCL with ethminer (-G (opencl)) but with (-U (cuda)) no luck, with ccminer i have the exact same error.
Driver is 367.35, CUDA 8 installed.
nvidia --version reports cuda 8
$LD_LIBRARY_PATH points to cuda 8
The driver is working otherwise it would be impossible to mine with OpenCL which i am doing now.
the error still is the same:
CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version
any idea what can cause this?, anyone has found this issue?
running xubuntu 14.04 x64.
thanks!
indkt
Does anyone know how the TDP reduction works on the new cards?
On the GTX1070 works fantastically well. (at least in linux) 
The 3.5GB partition has been known for a couple years now. It hasn't ever effected mining. However there has never been a algo that has filled 4GB of memory on these cards, so Ethereum will probably be the first if there is one... But considering they aren't super amazing in Eth to begin with and Eth going PoS in a couple months, it's not going to ever happen.
Some algos like Neoscrypt/scrypt-jane and at least a couple others can fill 4GB and then some if you increase the intensity.
Does anyone know how the TDP reduction works on the new cards?
Very bad today , with 4x gtx 1070 and 1 ghs power :
[...]
:[...]
All pools have good days and bad days. Some do seem to have more bad days than most, but that is definitely not the case for Yiimp! My personal experience on Yiimp, is that it performs much better than most other pools that support the same coins.
Deposit stats are the worst place to look for your recent mining performance though. You should look at the pool stats instead.
What if the pool had some downtime? What if you had some internet issues? What if your rig has a couple of crashed cards? Note, I'm not saying that one of these was the case for the past 24h, just that looking at exchange deposits is really the worst way to go about measuring performance...
Cheers!
Yeah, that was up till a day ago. Now it seems to be doing perpetually bad and isn't showing any sign of improving. I think I'll be moving my hashrate off. When you have 10% network hashrate, things usually balance out. Should be earning about 30% more then it is.
BTW Suprnova's pool luck is at ~75% and Coinmines is at 75%. That either means Yiimp is having a reallllllly bad day due to the amount of hashrate it has or something is broken on the pool. Either way, 36 hours is too long to be losing out on 30% of my hashrate.
And you're a idiot if you believe that RNG will go the opposite direction in some extreme form because it has a 'correction' coming. RNG is RNG, if a pool is doing bad, it doesn't mean it'll do really good after it. There is no order to 'luck'.
Also you know absolutely nothing about statistics, in this case the law of large numbers. More data points minimizes variance. I pointed out two possible causes, one is possible skimming, the other was the pool was having issues. One more possible then the other as I pointed out in later posts, which you didn't even bother reading before quoting a post from two days ago.
If you're going to act like a douche at least use a bit of logic, a bit of research about what you're talking about, and points to back up what you're saying. Now go excuse yourself and remove your foot from your mouth. <3
Very bad today , with 4x gtx 1070 and 1 ghs power :
[...]
:[...]
All pools have good days and bad days. Some do seem to have more bad days than most, but that is definitely not the case for Yiimp! My personal experience on Yiimp, is that it performs much better than most other pools that support the same coins.
Deposit stats are the worst place to look for your recent mining performance though. You should look at the pool stats instead.
What if the pool had some downtime? What if you had some internet issues? What if your rig has a couple of crashed cards? Note, I'm not saying that one of these was the case for the past 24h, just that looking at exchange deposits is really the worst way to go about measuring performance...
Cheers!
Yeah, that was up till a day ago. Now it seems to be doing perpetually bad and isn't showing any sign of improving. I think I'll be moving my hashrate off. When you have 10% network hashrate, things usually balance out. Should be earning about 30% more then it is.
BTW Suprnova's pool luck is at ~75% and Coinmines is at 75%. That either means Yiimp is having a reallllllly bad day due to the amount of hashrate it has or something is broken on the pool. Either way, 36 hours is too long to be losing out on 30% of my hashrate.
ccminer is not a pool, sia will never be on yiimp, crappy rpc, worst than eth
my sia preview is almost ready, but for now only for suprnova... 1GH/s on 970
So a 12% improvement over the GO miner?
When you do stuff like this, you should push your personal pool so you can get a small percentage back and maybe make something more for yourself. Everyone pays pool fees already by mining on other pools.
no, not standard, dont want crap in ccminer code, its already a mess with reusable code. When you see suprnova finding one block per day... you can see its fully useless also
Jump to: