CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 648.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: Amph on June 16, 2016, 12:44:55 AM

assuming you increased some algo to 10-20%, the same will happen for the 1080, so add 20% more on top of that hashrate...

This is not the case. I have a few that has tested the "public" private bins, and they are sometimes slower than the opensource.

My buyable private Spreadcoin #9 is up 0.6MHASH on the 1070 and 1MHASH on the 1080 compared to the opensource.

1070: 6000 -> 6600
1080: 7500 -> 8500

crysx

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 260

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

Quote from: sp_ on June 15, 2016, 01:37:21 AM

Quote from: crysx on June 15, 2016, 01:11:21 AM

i have mate - and nothing in there ...

I just sendt you an email without an attachment.. (let's continue the conversation on PM)

ok - kool ...

im just checking everything now ...

tanx ...

#crysx

restless

legendary

Activity: 1151

Merit: 1001

This will add to power consumption too.
Remember, no free launch.
X11 used to be the coolest algo for AMD cards, but with Wolf's bins, there was 5x speed increase and 2x power consumption

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

well sp they don't have your "private" kernel for a reason, how they can have a private kernel without paying you?....

also you should compare your private work on a 980ti, with your private work on a 1080

assuming you increased some algo to 10-20%, the same will happen for the 1080, so add 20% more on top of that hashrate...

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

And they compare with low clocked reference 970/980ti cards running on opensource kernals.

Phew.. My private kernals are still faster on the pimped 980ti:)

Quark:

decred:

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

you can lower the tdp at 60% and not losing anything i think, like i can do the same with my 970

they didn't try this apparently, so the consumption could be lower

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

1080 tests with power consumption here:

http://cryptomining-blog.com

Etherum,neoscrypt,lyra2re is slow, the rest is fast. Some algos consume 180w( default tdp of the card)

Longsnowsm

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 517

Personally speaking on the 1070/1080 thing it appears patience is a virtue. All the data I have seen so far does not appear to be an immediate increase in performance over the existing cards in actual hash rates. It does sound like it is a little more efficient with electricity which is obviously very desirable, but at what cost?

The reference cards that are shipping are a no go for me. I will wait for the 3rd party market to offer cards that have adequate cooling, quiet, and are better designed than the reference cards. Until then it would appear that hanging tight to see what happens isn't bad advise. I have a couple of reference cards now that I would love to upgrade from as they run hotter, LOUDER, and generally are just not as good at hashing as my other cards. So I will certainly avoid any reference design cards going forward.

And lastly I am watching for the brilliant guys like SP_, Wolf, Genoil, and our resident coding gurus to say... Hey, looky here! It won't be that long and possibly will line up with the release of the new AMD cards so we can compare performance. In the mean time mine away! Good time to be GPU mining!

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: sp_ on June 15, 2016, 02:04:47 PM

100watt mining etherum @ 23mhash. The gtx 970 can do 22mhash.

But for quark@25 mhash it uses more.
I was told Lyra2v2 does around 32.5-34mhash on the 1070 and around 25mhash for quark.

it's 27 mining etheruem, but like i said, i don't buy a gpu because of one algo, this is not asic, there are other good algo at the moment, not only etheruem

34MH on lyra is good, but i'm fairly certain that you can optimize it to reach 40MH, like you did in the past with 970

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

100watt mining etherum @ 23mhash. The gtx 970 can do 22mhash.

But for quark@25 mhash it uses more.
I was told Lyra2v2 does around 32.5-34mhash on the 1070 and around 25mhash for quark.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

don't look at the tdp, tdp is telling you nothing, it is known already that a 970 consume 150w, with the lowest power limit, without losing hashrate

the 1070 consume only 90-100w, we have a screen with that guy doing test

i'm sure the 1070 can be pushed to 80-100% more hash than a 1070, right now without any tweaking it's already 40-50% more

at 100% more hash rate with only 100w, it's worth even $450+ easily, no brain actually

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

A reference gtx 970 had a tdp of 145watt
The reference 1070 has a tdp of 150watt

A reference 1080 has a tdp of 185w
A reference 980ti has a tdp of 250w

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: joblo on June 15, 2016, 11:14:25 AM

Quote from: Amph on June 15, 2016, 10:33:33 AM

Quote from: sp_ on June 15, 2016, 06:49:56 AM

I'm not sure I will do the pascal sp-mod. I think I will move to AMD and 512bit bus. 1070/1080 is not attractive when it comes to price/vs hashrate.

unless you are talking about new amd, current amd line up can not compete on any algo minus etheruem with 1070, not to mention that the 1070 can be improved further and reach a nice 2x hashrate on any algo comapred to 970, eth excluded,

but who care eth is not the only profitable coin...

Current Pascal price/performance seems to be inline with Maxwell for most algos so there's not much incentive
to upgrade yet.

actually no, a 1070 consume only 100w or less and have 50% more hash in any algo(ok no etheruem but i don't care i don't mine for one coin) versus a 970, and this without any tweak i'm sure it can be pushed to 100%

a easy math is telling me that mining now with a 970 instead of a 1070, will only make you lose 40-50 euro a month, for each gpu, this counting the 50% more performance and less consumption, even with cheap energy still around 30 euro are lost each month

so buying a 1070 now for 500 euro, or buying it in 4 months for 380 euro is the same thing....

AzzAz

legendary

Activity: 1030

Merit: 1006

Quote from: sp_ on June 15, 2016, 01:11:40 AM

Quote from: thevictimofuktyranny on June 09, 2016, 09:00:23 AM

Quote from: sp_ on June 09, 2016, 08:52:01 AM

Quote from: fenomenhaa on June 09, 2016, 08:46:43 AM

Spmod #7 lyra2v2 results peakedi
970 (1500 boost core clock) 24500 (evga ssc gaming elpida)
750ti (1430 boost core clock) 7800 (zotac samsung)

Nice. Thanks for testing.

Peak hash difference 750TI extra 300Khs compared to Nicehash miner.

Peak hash difference GTX 950 extra 700Khs compared to Nicehash miner.

Peak hash difference GTX 960 extra 800Khs compared to Nicehash miner.

Across the Nvidia's cards SPMOD is best at LYRA2V2 Grin

Buy it Quick

I need more tests on the gtx 970,980 and 980ti. And please compare to the nicehashminer. Anyone?

Factory clocks:
Giga 960 ixoc: 13000 Nice vs 14100 _sp
Giga 970G1 Gaming 21600 Nice vs 23000 _sp
Giga 980Ti Extreme 36200 Nice vs 38800 _sp
With oc : more powerfull card goes more hash %
each + 100 GPU: 15000, 23000, 41000 @ _sp...

joblo

legendary

Activity: 1470

Merit: 1114

Pascal avaiability is also an issue. I bought a 980 off the shelf the day of release, same store won't get 1070s
until July 1, and that's only for preorders.

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

Quote from: sp_ on June 15, 2016, 06:49:56 AM

I'm not sure I will do the pascal sp-mod. I think I will move to AMD and 512bit bus. 1070/1080 is not attractive when it comes to price/vs hashrate.

Not sure this is going to be a good move either. The 480 has a 256bit bus with gddr5 according to released stats. It might be hampered as well as Nvidia cards this time around. Everyone went with a smaller bus and memory hard algos love their buses.

Vega might be better, but that's 2-3 months away.

Looks like this is turning into a crapshoot. Unfortunately with availability problems it makes it all the harder for devs (or miners) to get their hands on these cards.

Weird, we might end up with a split between algos... Some are better to mine on older cards and some on new cards. Upgrading right now isn't a straight away answer.

Epsylon3

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1082

ccminer/cpuminer developer

yep and you can find very good offers, i seen the 980Ti at 469€ here :p, and the 970 at 260€

http://www.rueducommerce.fr/Composants/Carte-Graphique/Carte-Graphique-NVIDIA/KFA2/4947091-Carte-Graphique-KFA2-NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-980-Ti-OC-Black-edition.htm (439 € in fact) :p

joblo

legendary

Activity: 1470

Merit: 1114

Quote from: Amph on June 15, 2016, 10:33:33 AM

Quote from: sp_ on June 15, 2016, 06:49:56 AM

I'm not sure I will do the pascal sp-mod. I think I will move to AMD and 512bit bus. 1070/1080 is not attractive when it comes to price/vs hashrate.

unless you are talking about new amd, current amd line up can not compete on any algo minus etheruem with 1070, not to mention that the 1070 can be improved further and reach a nice 2x hashrate on any algo comapred to 970, eth excluded,

but who care eth is not the only profitable coin...

Current Pascal price/performance seems to be inline with Maxwell for most algos so there's not much incentive
to upgrade yet.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: sp_ on June 15, 2016, 06:49:56 AM

I'm not sure I will do the pascal sp-mod. I think I will move to AMD and 512bit bus. 1070/1080 is not attractive when it comes to price/vs hashrate.

unless you are talking about new amd, current amd line up can not compete on any algo minus etheruem with 1070, not to mention that the 1070 can be improved further and reach a nice 2x hashrate on any algo comapred to 970, eth excluded,

but who care eth is not the only profitable coin...

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Quote from: sp_ on June 15, 2016, 06:49:56 AM

I'm not sure I will do the pascal sp-mod. I think I will move to AMD and 512bit bus. 1070/1080 is not attractive when it comes to price/vs hashrate.

Depends on the algo.
The ones I usually work on do not use RAM: the 1080/1070 do shine on that.

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 648. (Read 2347641 times)