Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 686. (Read 2347641 times)

I must disagree... Decred has around 7TH at the moment.
r9 390 with claymore dual miner makes a little bit more eth than any other miner(even after dev fee) + around 0.5DCR per day.
Basically the ~0.75$/day from dcr covers the power consumption.
In other terms the dcr increases the profit for 23% with actual mining stats.

Assuming you're thirty and started when you were a toddler, I'm 31 and been using since I was 6 with dos on a Tandy... But I guess comparing epeens doesn't have that much meaning does it? Cause if I disagree with nix being good for everything I must be inexperienced and never have used it or any sort of CLI.

I know what I'm talking about. You can stop the useless talk as well dude. Just ordering someone doesn't mean they'll do it.


Hallelujah.

At this point consider the option of FTC/DCR or ETH/DCR. ETH/FTC? Right now FTC is worth more then mining Eth, but it seems to switch.

Curiously you seem to get less then half the hashrate while split mining? Or is that in addition to normal rates in Eth?

I personally wouldn't mind a 2% fee for split mining. That's definitely within reason.


All profits are down across the board. Just mining Dcr right now isn't that horrible compared to other algos... without a dual miner. Profits being down isn't solely because increase in hashrates though, the market for Ethereum fell through and took all the other altcoins with it.

they are getting nothing because the diff killed the profit now, so it's the same as before, but since nvidia is out of dual mining play, then you might be slightly right about an overall increase in profit for amd

It's Tera not Giga

To me it looks more like FCPGA has found where the profit is.

Decred has 9.38GHS on it right now, and before Claymore it was 5.1GHS, when it was only mined by Nvidia card holders!

That gives you a really good idea, just how much Claymore been getting through his dual mining software.

BENEFITS of a 2% DUAL MINER--

1) Bensam1231 will be able to depart this life as a happy man.
2) CryptoMining-Blog will have another winning post.
3) If 50 miners use it, using 1 card each, it will be like an invisible card is mining for sp_.
4) CryptoMiniing-Blog might make more than one post about it.
5) I'll be able to use it on my Windows box.
6) Our programmer might release all previous work for free and retire.
7) If 1000 miners use it....

I hope that I will be able to use it on my Linux boxes.       --scryptr

Also, Claymore was very successful with his software because he picked two alt cryptos that are very attractive, which miners would like to keep as an investment e.g. Decred (peak price 0.0055BTC) and Ethereum (peak price 0.033BTC)?

Obviously, Ethereum is still a good keep alt, but what sort of alts would you have on the second algo?

congrats! what kind of "license" do you plan to release it with?

LOST AT SEA--

Our prodigious programmer has been reported adrift in the sunny Mediterranean, floating on a makeshift raft made of empty wine bottles and fishnets....

Should we take out traveler's insurance on him?       --scryptr

I have 2.7GHASH poolside now, and still no decline in etherum.. I have a winner

I see a code marathon comming.

yup ...

interested in a dual miner ...

#crysx

Sounds good, pay as you go arrangement and judging by Claymore success, it will also be a success. The Claymore is on his 9 software release for the last 17 days and he must be making decent return on his/her time investment for this software release!
 
I'm sure it will be very popular!

And, a nice earner for SP, which is only fair for all his hard work on CCminer

interesting development!

Look's like a dual miner is possible on NVIDIA as well. I have 1GHASH  2GHASH of blakecoin for free while mining etherum. (980ti). Probobly higher rates with more tweaking. In Blakecoin only mode  I get 5GHASH.
I should wrap it up in a 2% miner like claymore. And add some other algos as well. Skein,vcash,pentablake,keccak.

Who is interested?

I disagree with almost everything you are saying.
I'm using both GUIs and CLIs for 30 years (20 professionally, as my main job), tens of different operating systems, programming languages and platforms.
I know what I'm saying. Now, stop this useless talk.

Except it doesn't. Just because you can type faster does not mean it brings up all the associated dialogues and tools for you to use. It's great from a power user perspective as in you can change just about anything (although you can do that with BASH and Powershell was good for that originally as well), I would definitely disagree about the speed part. Try using a graph in CLI.

A couple clicks isn't worth hundreds of hours worth of time investment for a OS that doesn't even work better for what most people use it for... which is the whole reason almost no consumers use it, even for mining. Even then you often times have to pamper it by downloading specialized packages and tools you have to hunt for online which is a PITA... and also a waste of time.

You can't make a argument for CLI being faster. You can make a argument for Nix being better because it's more stable (depending on what you're doing) and you have more control (excluding Windows power user apps), but that once again doesn't apply in this situation... or usually... almost all of the time.

I perfectly understand what we're talking about, you just aren't looking at what I'm saying in response to you saying 'it's better'. Which is, 'it's not and this is why...'.

again, you are on another wavelenght:

"Considering you don't need the CLI in Windows that doesn't account for anything? Time doesn't account for anything?"

not having the cli makes you waste time. once you learn the cli, you run a lot of tasks faster and better. invest your time learning, in order to do things on a higher level.
that's the part you don't understand, and what all this talk is about.

let's end this offtopic now, please.

Considering you don't need the CLI in Windows that doesn't account for anything? Time doesn't account for anything?

Just about everything better in this case is running internet backbone applications like databases that demand 99.999999% uptime.

Specifically in the case of mining, that doesn't matter... When scrypt was around you could irk a tiny bit more speed out of rigs by running nix (10%), which is when I ran it. Now days it doesn't with the exception of some niche cases like 750ti on Eth. The difference is moot.

Performance wise, there are better OCing tools, better monitoring tools, and better mining tools on Windows allowing you to further take advantage of your hardware.

From a stability standpoint, I've not had any problems with Windows stability. Stability because of mining software or OCing is different. Neither of that is Windows fault. Switching to nix would not fix either of those issues.

So why would anyone spend a ridiculous amount of time learning a OS which gives no apparent benefits?

Oh and BASH and/or Powershell.


Anyways... mining profits are now down under $2 a 970, which is what I predicted two months ago when things started climbing. Not sure if they'll keep falling, there is about 5x as much GPU hash on cryptocoins as there was back then... Almost all of it is still on Eth. I think coin investors are trying to rally and push BTC in front of the halving that's going to happen. Pretty sure it wont be a huge adjustment though... maybe a extra $100 if we're lucky. The last one already got dumped on.

yup - all good ...

i think with a selection as broad as that - all manner of mining and setups can be done ... that can only be a good thing ...

but the question i raised earlier - is the ultimate miner goign to be released soon mate? ...

#crysx