Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 684. (Read 2347641 times)

legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
Thank you , very productive explanation , I appreciate it Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1004
I still can't understand the benefit of those double miners. My point is that if you want to separate the hashpower on each rig , you can do it by managing which cards will mine CoinA , and which - CoinB..
What am I missing here ...

The idea is to mine one primary algo and at the same time mine another algo for different crypto coin.

The primary algo, would have more or less the same output as in single mining mode.

The secondary algo, would utilise wasted capacity on the GPU (980 or 970 or 960 or 950 or 750), it would have lower hash output.

This boosts the daily productivity of your GPU and also gives greater accumulation in two different cryptos.

The developer, would get daily fee of 1% or 2% of daily hash output for ongoing technical support and reward them for spending their precious waking hours doing all that crazy coding.

This is copied from the Legendary AMD software developer called Claymore Smiley

Claymore, recoded the Ethereum mining software for AMD GPUs, raising the hash output by 5%, but Claymore also recycled the unused GPU output to mine a second algo (Decred).

This meant, AMD GPU owners got a 5% boost on the main algo (Dagger used to mine Ethereum) and 14% extra profit each day from the Decred algo.

For this software, Claymore designed a pay as you go system, 1% developer fee for single mining mode and 2% developer fee for dual mining mode.

Every hour, the Claymore AMD miner will disconnect from your pool and will mine Ethereum's Dagger algo to Calymore's wallet address.

Total daily single mining mode fee: 14 minutes 24 seconds.

Total daily dual mining mode fee:28 minutes 28 seconds.

This is 36 seconds in single mining mode and 72 seconds in dual mining mode each hour.

In terms of Decred, their is no fee on the Decred hash output on AMD Claymore miner, which saved Claymore a huge headache in coding and finding pools for second algo.

Essentially, AMD GPU owners made an extra 19% and gave Claymore 2% of those profits back for doing all that hard work for them!

There is nothing like it for Nvidia GPUs and SP_ is trying to ride to the rescue of Nvidia GPUs owners Grin



  
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
I still can't understand the benefit of those double miners. My point is that if you want to separate the hashpower on each rig , you can do it by managing which cards will mine CoinA , and which - CoinB..
What am I missing here ...
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
I am busy writing the dual/tripple miner. Good for everybody with NVIDIA cards. and 1% etherum +1% of each of the other algos in fee.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Heck ya lol
Do you want sp5...I'm thinking of it.

Well I don't have tons of rigs like you. Just one 970 Smiley

Come to think of it, never mind. Maybe SP will be nice and give me it since I didn't take it lol
No I have very little very little sp has tons.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
Heck ya lol
Do you want sp5...I'm thinking of it.

Well I don't have tons of rigs like you. Just one 970 Smiley

Come to think of it, never mind. Maybe SP will be nice and give me it since I didn't take it lol
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1072
Where do you get your potential numbers from if no one has done it?

Wolfo said so, and then another guy tried and reached 5mega, wolfo actually said 4.6mega
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1004
is someone working on the sib optimization algo? i could pay 0.1 for that

ethereum in comparison is unprofitable...

I'm not sure where you're getting that.

Eth is roughly 80% more profitable than Sib after electricity on the 970s (20.5 and 2.06 Mh/s).

not with he possible optimization, which would put a single 970 to hash 5m on that algo, which is 800k-900k satoshi, vs etehreum which is only 500k-600k now because of the recent mini pump...

Where do you get your potential numbers from if no one has done it?

960 does about 10-11 MH/s in ETH.

And the 950 does about the same with lower power, but slower in dual mining.

Give it to me SP.

I agree with SP_  Smiley

I have one 950 and it is better for gaming than mining crypto Grin
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
is someone working on the sib optimization algo? i could pay 0.1 for that

ethereum in comparison is unprofitable...

I'm not sure where you're getting that.

Eth is roughly 80% more profitable than Sib after electricity on the 970s (20.5 and 2.06 Mh/s).

not with he possible optimization, which would put a single 970 to hash 5m on that algo, which is 800k-900k satoshi, vs etehreum which is only 500k-600k now because of the recent mini pump...

Where do you get your potential numbers from if no one has done it?

960 does about 10-11 MH/s in ETH.

And the 950 does about the same with lower power, but slower in dual mining.

Give it to me SP.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
960 does about 10-11 MH/s in ETH.

And the 950 does about the same with lower power, but slower in dual mining.
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1072
is someone working on the sib optimization algo? i could pay 0.1 for that

ethereum in comparison is unprofitable...

I'm not sure where you're getting that.

Eth is roughly 80% more profitable than Sib after electricity on the 970s (20.5 and 2.06 Mh/s).

not with the possible optimization, which would put a single 970 to hash 5m on that algo, which is 800k-900k satoshi, vs etehreum which is only 500k-600k now because of the recent mini pump...
legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
is someone working on the sib optimization algo? i could pay 0.1 for that

ethereum in comparison is unprofitable...

I'm not sure where you're getting that.

Eth is roughly 80% more profitable than Sib after electricity on the 970s (20.5 and 2.06 Mh/s).
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1072
is someone working on the sib optimization algo? i could pay 0.1 for that

ethereum in comparison is unprofitable...
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
You know SP I'm not against having my PSUs explode or poor performance on my antiquated systems... Some of us have good PSUs and decent processors. You can always release more versions. >>
sr. member
Activity: 438
Merit: 250
Are there any differencies in mining between GTX 960 with 2GB GDDR and GTX 960 4GB GDDR?
Is it worth to add few more bucks to have 4GB version?
How is 960 working in ETH?
TIA
 

If ETH dag size makes it to 2GB before the change to PoS, any 2GB card will be useless for mining. Other than that there is no difference. 960 does about 10-11 MH/s in ETH.
full member
Activity: 247
Merit: 100
Are there any differencies in mining between GTX 960 with 2GB GDDR and GTX 960 4GB GDDR?
Is it worth to add few more bucks to have 4GB version?
How is 960 working in ETH?
TIA
 
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
My miners are ready SP...
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Hehe.

You need to wait another week. The new miner uses more power, and some 970 cards are trottleing .Resulting in a lower hashreate. I also have rigs with too weak PSU, and then the rigs are crashing.. Betatesting can sometimes be frustrating. Bether to wait for a working product.


Sounds like there is some utilization happening there... I like it!
legendary
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
I know its offtopic... but what is worth mining with 750 atm?
No dagger-hashimoto (speed sucks), decred diff went sky high.... any hints?
Jump to: