Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 710. (Read 2347641 times)

member
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
You are right. Vanilla sp-mod #5 is only 8% faster than your 3rd attempt.. (cuda 7.5 x86 windows.)



My first attempt was mining at 3380MH/s at 1521MHz and, my last attempt is doing barely +1%, mining at 3405-3410MH/s @1521MHz.

How did you get that 15% in the first place, and now, with 1% improvement by my side, your improvement "fell" to 8% (which is actually [(3525/3292) - 1] = 0.071 or 7.1%)

Also, please, do everybody a favor and show the correct graphics clock. that 3527MH/s is nothing if you moved your graphic clock to 1570MHz.


full member
Activity: 253
Merit: 100
Decred #8 and vanilla #5 windows exe (cuda 7.5 32bit exe) sendt to the 0.2BTC donators.

Vanilla kernal sourcecode for sale for 0.4 BTC. (so you can run it on linux and learn from the 3lit3)


hey SP I bought your private spread miner does that count as 0.1 btc? if it was counted I would be a 0.2 btc donator including the decred miner. I just want the updated decred for now, what you think sp?
I will be interested in your all in one private miner when you release it  Smiley

sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
If you wonder why quark is +62% and x11 is only up 18%, it's because x11 need some more work and donations...


I just did a comparison between my buyable private miner (0.1BTC) and the latest 1.7.5 release.
I have written 0-10% faster, but I should have written 17-74% faster

Sp-Mod #5 default intensities hashrates in MHASH/s. (980ti 1290 coreclock/1650 memclock)

nist5: 43.80 (+17%)
quark: 27.85 (+61,91%)
lyra2v2 16.10 (+16.6%)
x11:   12.85 (+18%)
x13:   10.27 (+19.97)
x15:    8.83 (+18.52 )
neoscrypt: 0.99 (+73.68%)

1.7.5: (32bit windows build cuda 7.5) default intensities in MHASH/s (980ti 1290 coreclock/1650 memclock)

nist5: 37.45
quark: 17.20
lyra2v2: 13.81
x11: 10.88
x13: 8.56
x15: 7.45
neoscrypt: 0.57

1.7.5: (32bit windows build cuda 6.5) (980ti 1290 coreclock/1650 memclock)

nist5: 38.93
quark: 17.5
lyra2v2: 13.18
x11: 10.95
x13: 8.88
x15: 7.7
neoscrypt: 0.71
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
SP if i buy Decred+Vanilla miner, i want get only Decred8+vanilla5 miner, I don't want to buy for 0.2 even some algorithms unnecessary to me! I think that the majority of donators who bought a miner for a specific purpose I understand, and agree. Your tactics like luring BTC from the buyers

I want to collect all my kernals into one miner and increase the price.. Less admin. Easier for the miner.
And then I will quit. Let the young and promising do the pascal mod..

Happy hashing!
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Decred #8 and vanilla #5 windows exe (cuda 7.5 32bit exe) sendt to the 0.2BTC donators.

Vanilla kernal sourcecode for sale for 0.4 BTC. (so you can run it on linux and learn from the 3lit3)
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
You are right. Vanilla sp-mod #5 is only 8% faster than your 3rd attempt.. (cuda 7.5 x86 windows.)


member
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
is this with faster vcash and can mine decred?
Not faster. For a faster Vcash kernal. donate 0.2BTc. (15% faster than  the Provos Alexis kernal) And get decred #7 included. (25-30% faster than 1.7.5)
i can get 3000 mega on xvc with 1.7.4(1450 core) is your version faster?

I get

3150 on 1450
3300 on 1466

with decred private #4

what card? i get 3k mega on a 970 mining XVC not decred

Gigabyte g1 gaming coreclock 1366. No trottling

15% faster than the Provos Alexis kernal means that Provos Alexis kernal should report 2870 MH/s at 1466MHz on a 970

For some reason, on linux, the kernel reports 3.292Gh/s at 1466 and 3.405Gh/s at 1521Mhz on my 970
https://i.imgur.com/OMhh5U2.png
https://i.imgur.com/bBOhOVn.png

while conducting my tests. People reported the same percentage increase on similar cards (compute 5.2), and slightly less on compute5.0 (750ti).

Can you please be more specific on the hashrate you get? (because something looks really odd here)

Edit: the thread is here https://v.cash/forum/threads/ccminer-faster-8-round-blake-algo-1-16x.282/
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 1022
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
VCASH what is it? is that  x11gost algo ?

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/vcash/#markets

Very profitable @ 6GHASH. on a single card.

I am working on version #5(vanilla+decred#8) to the donators wich can do more than 6GHASH.

Doesn't look as good as Decred or Ethereum... What are you getting on a 970?

it's worse than etheruem but on par with decred, i'm getting 3k mega with 970 a bit more with the right intensity, of 30 or 31, so 6giga with one 980ti is not impressive imho
sr. member
Activity: 299
Merit: 250
SP if i buy Decred+Vanilla miner, i want get only Decred8+vanilla5 miner, I don't want to buy for 0.2 even some algorithms unnecessary to me! I think that the majority of donators who bought a miner for a specific purpose I understand, and agree. Your tactics like luring BTC from the buyers
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
VCASH what is it? is that  x11gost algo ?

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/vcash/#markets

Very profitable @ 6GHASH. on a single card.

I am working on version #5(vanilla+decred#8) to the donators wich can do more than 6GHASH.

Doesn't look as good as Decred or Ethereum... What are you getting on a 970?
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
The command line is fascinating and utterly powerful. It's interesting to study even for windows users, 'cause you will get a decent one soon (not that you couldn't before: I remember using a windows build of bash around '95).
Yes it is. Smiley

I have one more problem .. my new card 970 gtx gigabyte g1  fans should be off when not mining  like my 980ti gigabyte  is.
But the 970 fans are still turning not mining ..... I don't know why.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
The command line is fascinating and utterly powerful. It's interesting to study even for windows users, 'cause you will get a decent one soon (not that you couldn't before: I remember using a windows build of bash around '95).
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Ok I need some help please.
When I reboot, my 980ti and 970 gigabyte g1 need their clocks set.
Ok no problem on the 980ti... but when I give the cmd to see the 970's clocks, the readout scrolls off the screen. I mean I can't see the top of the screen where it has the time stamp.
With the 980ti I can see it but not when I cmd nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 1.
I can't scroll to the top of the cmd window.
Any help plz.
Thx


if you are on linux, just add "| less" to the end of the command line.
"less" is more "more" than "more"... it's a "pager"
if on windows, use "| more"
This may commands to get the clocks ... where do I add that pallas on windows 8.1  plz.

cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI
nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 1 | more

https://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/redirection.mspx?mfr=true
Thx  that worked Cheesy
EDIT: And the 970 gigabyte g1 has the same clocks as the 980ti.
Right now the fans are turning .... they should be off... not mining.
See what happens when I get it to the p0 state.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
Ok I need some help please.
When I reboot, my 980ti and 970 gigabyte g1 need their clocks set.
Ok no problem on the 980ti... but when I give the cmd to see the 970's clocks, the readout scrolls off the screen. I mean I can't see the top of the screen where it has the time stamp.
With the 980ti I can see it but not when I cmd nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 1.
I can't scroll to the top of the cmd window.
Any help plz.
Thx


if you are on linux, just add "| less" to the end of the command line.
"less" is more "more" than "more"... it's a "pager"
if on windows, use "| more"
This may commands to get the clocks ... where do I add that pallas on windows 8.1  plz.

cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI
nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 1 | more

https://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/redirection.mspx?mfr=true
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Ok I need some help please.
When I reboot, my 980ti and 970 gigabyte g1 need their clocks set.
Ok no problem on the 980ti... but when I give the cmd to see the 970's clocks, the readout scrolls off the screen. I mean I can't see the top of the screen where it has the time stamp.
With the 980ti I can see it but not when I cmd nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 1.
I can't scroll to the top of the cmd window.
Any help plz.
Thx


if you are on linux, just add "| less" to the end of the command line.
"less" is more "more" than "more"... it's a "pager"
if on windows, use "| more"
This is my commands to get the clocks ... where do I add that pallas on windows 8.1  plz.

cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI
nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 1 "| more"   is this correct ?
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Ok I need some help please.
When I reboot, my 980ti and 970 gigabyte g1 need their clocks set.
Ok no problem on the 980ti... but when I give the cmd to see the 970's clocks, the readout scrolls off the screen. I mean I can't see the top of the screen where it has the time stamp.
With the 980ti I can see it but not when I cmd nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 1.
I can't scroll to the top of the cmd window.
Any help plz.
Thx


Use MSI afterburner and you will have happiness.
Will that set the clocks to a p0 state automatically ?
I use nvidia inspector.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
Ok I need some help please.
When I reboot, my 980ti and 970 gigabyte g1 need their clocks set.
Ok no problem on the 980ti... but when I give the cmd to see the 970's clocks, the readout scrolls off the screen. I mean I can't see the top of the screen where it has the time stamp.
With the 980ti I can see it but not when I cmd nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 1.
I can't scroll to the top of the cmd window.
Any help plz.
Thx


if you are on linux, just add "| less" to the end of the command line.
"less" is more "more" than "more"... it's a "pager"
if on windows, use "| more"
full member
Activity: 348
Merit: 102
Ok I need some help please.
When I reboot, my 980ti and 970 gigabyte g1 need their clocks set.
Ok no problem on the 980ti... but when I give the cmd to see the 970's clocks, the readout scrolls off the screen. I mean I can't see the top of the screen where it has the time stamp.
With the 980ti I can see it but not when I cmd nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 1.
I can't scroll to the top of the cmd window.
Any help plz.
Thx


Use MSI afterburner and you will have happiness.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Ok I need some help please.
When I reboot, my 980ti and 970 gigabyte g1 need their clocks set.
Ok no problem on the 980ti... but when I give the cmd to see the 970's clocks, the readout scrolls off the screen. I mean I can't see the top of the screen where it has the time stamp.
With the 980ti I can see it but not when I cmd nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 1.
I can't scroll to the top of the cmd window.
Any help plz.
Thx
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
i'm having a problem when running more than one gpu, on a old algo like x15, the second gpu do not run at full speed, but it's not throttling, it simply sit there at low core speed, why this?
when i restart the machine for the first few seconds it begin to run at full speed, then the miner close and when i restart it once again it run at slow speed, tried also with the Yimp fork but nothing
Try this.
Make sure all cards are in the p0 state....then oc at NO MORE then 1340 core speed.... check that while mining they are in the p0 state..... if that doesn't work then something else is wrong.
My cards do the same thing because of oc to high for that card.
Do one thing at a time to fix the problem.

you're right, i tried now and it was the oc, no more stopping, apparently for some algo you can not overclock too much
I was watching the miner that crashes and noticed that when it switched to qubit or x15, is when it crashed the most. I backed off the oc and that smoothed it out. Wink
Jump to: