having issues with your private decred miner sp
supanova
more rejects and more unstable on getwork
loads of rejects with stratum.. to the point that the worker gets disabled
tpruvot works fine with getwork
pool MN
about the same rejects as supa on getwork but lower reported hash
low rejects on stratum but reported hash rate always under reading. 3445mh/s local 2800mh/s pool side
back to tpruvots miner for now.
disappointed sp..
tried for many hours on pool Mn to get the hashrate to read the same as local, running one instance per worker then two and three.. no difference. also tried multiplying and dividing diff locally with no joy. hashrate barely ever touching 3000mh/s.
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 746. (Read 2347659 times)
@Sp with your private decred miner one of the card perform half,(5-6 card rigs)How possible to fix it? With tpruvot miner no problem occurs.
Genoli - Can't find your BTC address.
1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW thanks
Sp-mod decred private 1 is doing 600mhash @1405 core. (750ti)1.7.4 opensource is doing 550 on the same card and clock. Both compiled with cuda 7.5.
Only 0.1 btc guys
Sp what do you get at 1345 oc ? I may contribute to your release. Only 0.1 btc guys
Sp-mod decred private 1 is doing 600mhash @1405 core. 1.7.4 opensource is doing 550 on the same card and clock. Both compiled with cuda 7.5.
Only 0.1 btc guys
Only 0.1 btc guys
I get 1405 Mh/s per 970 and 495 Mh/s per 750 Ti with 1.7.4 with OC. I have no idea how others get 550.
If I was mining Decred I might buy it but I'm not. Eth is much more profitable and uses about 15-20% less electricity.
Thanks, tried that and I figured it out that I can get close to 500 Mh/s (still not over, with OC) if I only run 1 card.
With more cards I assume I run into some kind of CPU bottleneck with a dualcore pentium even though it's only at about 27%.
I forgot.... add this --cpu-priority 3 if I go to --cpu-priority 5 I can't connect to my rig.
I'm getting 3,100 mh/s total.
Sp-mod decred private 1 is doing 600mhash @1405 core. 1.7.4 opensource is doing 550 on the same card and clock. Both compiled with cuda 7.5.
Only 0.1 btc guys
Only 0.1 btc guys
I get 1405 Mh/s per 970 and 495 Mh/s per 750 Ti with 1.7.4 with OC. I have no idea how others get 550.
If I was mining Decred I might buy it but I'm not. Eth is much more profitable and uses about 15-20% less electricity.
Thanks, tried that and I figured it out that I can get close to 500 Mh/s (still not over, with OC) if I only run 1 card.
With more cards I assume I run into some kind of CPU bottleneck with a dualcore pentium even though it's only at about 27%.
Sp-mod decred private 1 is doing 600mhash @1405 core. 1.7.4 opensource is doing 550 on the same card and clock. Both compiled with cuda 7.5.
Only 0.1 btc guys
Only 0.1 btc guys
I get 1405 Mh/s per 970 and 495 Mh/s per 750 Ti with 1.7.4 with OC. I have no idea how others get 550.
If I was mining Decred I might buy it but I'm not. Eth is much more profitable and uses about 15-20% less electricity.
how to mine blake2s?
tpruvot's CPUMiner-multi has it implemented, though it says it is untested in the read me.i mean with gpu, it's pointless with cpu if you don't have a cpu farm and none has it
Anyone mining ETH on W10 getting any good hash, not sure if SP's miner solved the problem?
CCMINER DOES NOT MINE ETH--
Genoil's miner, a CUDA coded miner, mines ETH. If you search CryptoMining-Blog.com, you will find the latest release. Genoil and sp_ have collaborated, but the CUDA Ethminer is Genoil's.
Win 10 is reportedly bad for Ethminer performance on nVidia cards. One miner keeps touting a specific nVidia driver for Ethminer and Win 10, but he may be trolling.
I have no Win 10 rigs. --scryptr
Alright, thanks buddy.
how to mine blake2s?
tpruvot's CPUMiner-multi has it implemented, though it says it is untested in the read me.
how to mine blake2s?
For all who keeps asking about ETH and mining try the miner from here since ccminer does not support it: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ethminer-0941-genoil-11-1368785
Also have a look at Genoil's thread where you can get answers for it and how to use: http://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/2227/cuda-miner
You'll probably get more answers quicker. Don't forget to donate to Genoil for his work.
Also have a look at Genoil's thread where you can get answers for it and how to use: http://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/2227/cuda-miner
You'll probably get more answers quicker. Don't forget to donate to Genoil for his work.
Sp-mod decred private 1 is doing 600mhash @1405 core. (750ti)1.7.4 opensource is doing 550 on the same card and clock. Both compiled with cuda 7.5.
Only 0.1 btc guys
Only 0.1 btc guys
donation sent
TxId: 007dd358dfb784822898c9e0e23df11eb45381f752d4b1c970c66766332d0bfe
looking forward to testing this and the coming updates
980ti is bad on ethereum, buying a card only for decred it's bad overall, with 970ti you can mine every coin out there with a good ratio between consumption and hashrate
Yes true.. I only get 22 mh/s eth without oc mem clocks. Sp-mod decred private 1 is doing 600mhash @1405 core. (750ti)1.7.4 opensource is doing 550 on the same card and clock. Both compiled with cuda 7.5.
Only 0.1 btc guys
Donation have been sent.Only 0.1 btc guys
d367184616de5d755b511dd485a89c73c5a0a376fa07ff34639efe927ecef5c2-000
Dwarfpool has now got over 50% of the etherum hashrate.
560337 MHASH out of 980349 MHASH
57% of the network.. Skipping support for stratum was a big mistake. Miners are loosing 20%, and they will always choose stratum. Etherum is ready for a 50% attack. (the 43% of the remaining hash can be rejected))
Modern blockchains like the DASH chain needs 90% of the masternodes and 50% of the hash.
560337 MHASH out of 980349 MHASH
57% of the network.. Skipping support for stratum was a big mistake. Miners are loosing 20%, and they will always choose stratum. Etherum is ready for a 50% attack. (the 43% of the remaining hash can be rejected))
Modern blockchains like the DASH chain needs 90% of the masternodes and 50% of the hash.
it would be better if you do it open source in front of a donation from many members, maybe increase it to 0.5, but in this way a newbie that want this miner need to pay 0.1, which is too much for him
My work on blake-256 is already opensource. Remember that the first version (tvpruvot) did 220MHASH on the 750ti. I doubled the speed in the sp-mod.
Move precalctables to the instruction cache and unroll:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/9c8976ec8ec4f880a9420176c287008f0d91fe1c
Byteperm is faster than rotations:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/60426259b061d5428609e622ca63d225ab70bdaa
The first round of blake can be precalculated with the cpu:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/c149fdc74b5f3b9036e01391661adb43b636d0c6
etc. etc.
Only a small rewrite is needed to get the boost in decred.
With max OC(1500 core) my modded kernal can do 640MHASH. That is almost 300% faster than the unmodifed SPH implementation of blake-256.
does ccminer work for AMD cards ? Can any one tell me how many hashes a R9 280/7950 performs in Decred ? And what about Gtx 970 ?
no it does not , you need wolfo sgminer, 280x should be around the same level as one 970 but with more power, they all mine at around 1.4giga with oc
Ok thanks for the reply. R9 280x hashes better than Gtx 970 for mining ethereum ??
does ccminer work for AMD cards ? Can any one tell me how many hashes a R9 280/7950 performs in Decred ? And what about Gtx 970 ?
no it does not , you need wolfo sgminer, 280x should be around the same level as one 970 but with more power, they all mine at around 1.4giga with oc
does ccminer work for AMD cards ? Can any one tell me how many hashes a R9 280/7950 performs in Decred ? And what about Gtx 970 ?
Jump to: