Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 790. (Read 2347664 times)

legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
False positives guys.. Compile for youself and check. Sgminer and ccminer are being used by botnets. Antivirus software doesn't like mining software.
yes I compile for myself your release, and get these alert.
Strangely when I compile my version, I don't get them, so there must be something doing it
so it is something in your code which does that

Because the botnets doesn't use your version because it is slow. Antivirus software is scanning patterns in exe files right?..
have no idea what it is scanning...
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
False positives guys.. Compile for youself and check. Sgminer and ccminer are being used by botnets. Antivirus software doesn't like mining software.
yes I compile for myself your release, and get these alert.
Strangely when I compile my version, I don't get them, so there must be something doing it
so it is something in your code which does that

Because the botnets doesn't use your version because it is slow. Antivirus software is scanning patterns in exe files right?..
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
False positives guys.. Compile for youself and check. Sgminer and ccminer are being used by botnets. Antivirus software doesn't like mining software.

yes I compile for myself your release, and get these alert.
Strangely when I compile my version, I don't get them, so there must be something doing it

so it is something in your code which does that
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
False positives guys.. Compile for youself and check. Sgminer and ccminer are being used by botnets. Antivirus software doesn't like mining software.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
by the way your standard public release triggers an alert from malwarebyte. Can you tell exactly what you did (rel 74 too) ?
I don't get that kind of shit with mine, are editing register or things like that for some reason ?

ps: I am pretty sure it is benign, but none of the other release does that

yes back with ver 64 i had a major problem but in 65 it went away. it showed back up in .74 and is still a problem. the program is running bitcoinminer.exe in the back ground, as per Malwarebyte
I don't think it is really running a bitcoinminer, but I don't like to release something (since I have to use it for the neoscrypt release, and the exe I compile from the source gets flagged by malwarebyte...) which is flagged by virus scanners... so it would be good that sp_ correct that asap
full member
Activity: 231
Merit: 150
kind of sounds like what I suspected since I seen a loss in coins rather than a gain, perhaps he has impaled it to mine part of our hash to his own wallet?
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
by the way your standard public release triggers an alert from malwarebyte. Can you tell exactly what you did (rel 74 too) ?
I don't get that kind of shit with mine, are editing register or things like that for some reason ?

ps: I am pretty sure it is benign, but none of the other release does that

yes back with ver 64 i had a major problem but in 65 it went away. it showed back up in .74 and is still a problem. the program is running bitcoinminer.exe in the back ground, as per Malwarebyte
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
by the way your standard public release triggers an alert from malwarebyte. Can you tell exactly what you did (rel 74 too) ?
I don't get that kind of shit with mine, are editing register or things like that for some reason ?

ps: I am pretty sure it is benign, but none of the other release does that
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
From release 2 to 3 quark was improved. The other improvements was on compute 5.2 devices. Release private 4 has been released with more quark and lyra2v2 on the 750ti.


On the asus strix 750ti standard clocks. (vs release 74)
lyra2v2: +6.26%
quark: +2.1%

compared to release 3
lyra2v2: +0,46%
 quark:  +0.3%

In sp private #4 the gigabyte windforce g1 970 is peaking at 10.7 MHASH on factory clocks. This is around what the original djm34 kernal did on the gtx 980. My code turns your gtx 970 into a gtx 980..
0.46% means nothing (except that people buying into that are bad in maths...)

actually you always claim increase by either comparing to your old stuff (or mine) while there is no difference between your various private release
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
From release 2 to 3 quark was improved. The other improvements was on compute 5.2 devices. Release private 4 has been released with more quark and lyra2v2 on the 750ti.


On the asus strix 750ti standard clocks. (vs release 74)
lyra2v2: +6.26%
quark: +2.1%

compared to release 3
lyra2v2: +0,46%
 quark:  +0.3%

In sp private #4 the gigabyte windforce g1 970 is peaking at 10.7 MHASH on factory clocks. This is around what the original djm34 kernal did on the gtx 980. My code turns your gtx 970 into a gtx 980..
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
here an independent analysis (not by me) of all these new private releases: http://postimg.org/image/kt84x7jav/

(I let people draw their own conclusion, here mine: there is no difference between the 1st private release and the last  Grin)
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---

I am hoping that our developers begin merging the improved code into the open source code, so that my Linux rigs can also run at optimal speed.  Not everyone can afford to donate 0.1 BTC, or $40-50 US.

I submitted a small speedup in the quark algo and lyra2v2 to github. Have a nice weekend linux users Smiley

we are having a nice weekend ... as will those that have the funds to outrun ANY optimizations that you make via windows sp ...

when you provoke - we react ...

i can ( and WILL ) upgrade to the level that thefarm outdoes any of the optimizations that your private miner does - simply by adding ONE extra card ...

why am i saying this now? ...

i have been moving house for the last couple of days - and finishing tomorrow ... in two months - thefarm gets relocated as well as my next house move ... this time to a more permanent location with options to extend thefarm to more than three locations ... which means i can focus a lot more on thefarm - the code - the coins - the miners - and the infrastructure that binds these miners together ( im working on the setup and distribution of miners to the system and the ease at which they can be created and destroyed - going back to my 'grid' roots ) ...

the point im making here is a simple one ... for miners like me - who are 'starting' to become larger farms - and the large farms themselves - its not an issue to grow to 'keep up' or surpass those around us ... even at the cost of a ( so called ) 'loss' of a small optimization on the windows private miners ... i donate to you and other devs ANYWAY ... no matter how small or big the donation may be ...

but to taunt us into submission by dangling the proverbial carrot of 'optimization by windows' - is basically excluding us as well as our donations in future and more importantly - our interest ... something which leaves a foul distaste in my mouth - let alone others in the game ...

this also means that the smaller miner is disadvantaged a great deal - as they not only have to come up with the money for the computer AND the cards AND the os ( windows is FAR from free - you pay for it when you buy the machine ... and to those who are using a pirated version - tut tut ) - but also the miner itself ... setting them up for a HUGE outlay before a single portion of btc is mined ...

no matter what respect i / we have for you and other devs ( and i / we do have a lot of respect ) - this course of planning will lead to more and more internalization of funds AND lack of donations in a massive way ... not the OTHER way that we have all been searching for - which is a GOOD way of donation to devs and a sustainable one ...

i have tried running windows miners in fedora 23 x64 - and they mostly fail ... and if they do work - whatever optimization you make in the miner is drowned out by the conversion of coding wine has to do - and it does degrade the hashrate ...

i would mine for you for 3months at a time at a percentage of the total mining hash using the optimized miners - as long as i got to compile it from source on MY machines ... this would be a hell of a lot more than 0.1btc or 0.5btc on thefarm ( all nvidia ) than small donations ... but you would rather internalize your optimizations and grow your own farm ... well - good for you ... and its your right ...

but to taunt linux users? ...

guess who will come out on top when the optimizations are crushed by internal coding done by the 'big' farms ... the devs here? ...

i applaud your entrepreneurial direction ... but no ...

there needs to be a better way ... and we need to find it ...

#crysx
sr. member
Activity: 248
Merit: 250

Thanks Sp and Pallas, Thanks for calculation but there s also system consumption,mb,cpu and etc alsa psu efficiency another parameter.I guess that you see 41TDp via smi tool, What's the boost clock of this Evga 750 ti Sc cards. I check my rigs and see that at 1440 coreclock with your miner v66 on lyra2v2 it reaches 5265Khash , i wonder is it worth to buy your private miner.


The boost clock on the EVGA is 1240mhz

Release 70: 4793Khash
sp-priv:      5002Khash (+209khash (4.26%))

The lyra2v2 kernal is using less power than the quark kernal. around 40 watt, vs 60watt for quark

I managed to increase by 30-40khash on the 750ti.  In the upcoming release private #4. The gtx 970 is up 100Khash as well
If i send u 0.1btc could you send me this realase also better to ask will u share with new relases with donators.? Smiley)

Yes. The 0.1BTC donators are recieving updates. I have sendt 4 releases already.

Donation on the way Smiley)
 b47b477081b023bd7565191cbab44d7a281411aec3bce5879dd9950951242e08-000
Cheers.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer

Thanks Sp and Pallas, Thanks for calculation but there s also system consumption,mb,cpu and etc alsa psu efficiency another parameter.I guess that you see 41TDp via smi tool, What's the boost clock of this Evga 750 ti Sc cards. I check my rigs and see that at 1440 coreclock with your miner v66 on lyra2v2 it reaches 5265Khash , i wonder is it worth to buy your private miner.


The boost clock on the EVGA is 1240mhz

Release 70: 4793Khash
sp-priv:      5002Khash (+209khash (4.26%))

The lyra2v2 kernal is using less power than the quark kernal. around 40 watt, vs 60watt for quark

I managed to increase by 30-40khash on the 750ti.  In the upcoming release private #4. The gtx 970 is up 100Khash as well
If i send u 0.1btc could you send me this realase also better to ask will u share with new relases with donators.? Smiley)

Yes. The 0.1BTC donators are recieving updates. I have sendt 4 releases already.
sr. member
Activity: 248
Merit: 250

Thanks Sp and Pallas, Thanks for calculation but there s also system consumption,mb,cpu and etc alsa psu efficiency another parameter.I guess that you see 41TDp via smi tool, What's the boost clock of this Evga 750 ti Sc cards. I check my rigs and see that at 1440 coreclock with your miner v66 on lyra2v2 it reaches 5265Khash , i wonder is it worth to buy your private miner.


The boost clock on the EVGA is 1240mhz

Release 70: 4793Khash
sp-priv:      5002Khash (+209khash (4.26%))

The lyra2v2 kernal is using less power than the quark kernal. around 40 watt, vs 60watt for quark

I managed to increase by 30-40khash on the 750ti.  In the upcoming release private #4. The gtx 970 is up 100Khash as well
If i send u 0.1btc could you send me this realase also better to ask will u share with new relases with donators.? Smiley)
sr. member
Activity: 248
Merit: 250
Hi Folks,

I switced off most of my rigs some time agoand didn't checked. what's going on.My elec. cost is 0.15 cent.Is there anything worth to min?.,any new algo,coins or miners for both amd and nv cards. ? Thanks for help Smiley)

Lyra2v2 With my buyable private miner v3 (0.1BTC) does 5MHASH on the EVGA 750ti SC standard clocks. (and it only pulls 41 Watt)

Profit per card(nicehash 0.15BTC/GHASH): $0.315
Power cost: ($0.15*(24*41/1000)) =$0.144


Profit after Power per day($0.15/kwh): $0.171  per 750ti

At $0.33/KWh  the powercost is 100% of the Revenue. (no profit)
At $0.15/KWh the powercost is 45% of the Revenue.
At $0.10/KWh the powercost is 30% of the Revenue.
At $0.05/KWh the powercost is 15% of the Revenue.


Thanks Sp and Pallas, Thanks for calculation but there s also system consumption,mb,cpu and etc alsa psu efficiency another parameter.I guess that you see 41TDp via smi tool, What's the boost clock of this Evga 750 ti Sc cards. I check my rigs and see that at 1440 coreclock with your miner v66 on lyra2v2 it reaches 5265Khash , i wonder is it worth to buy your private miner.

And @DJM do you have a private miner for sale for me?if you have, pls pm me.
sorry no plan to release either privately or publicly lyra2rev2 kernel for the moment.
Ok, If oneday you'll sell ,pls inform be about private kernels,it doesn't matter which algo,if it's worth,i wanna buy it .. Smiley)
sr. member
Activity: 346
Merit: 250
Never heard of it. I'll look into it now, Thanks!

Edit: NICE! Looks like -ac is the option I'm looking for. Thank you!
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
use the nvidia-smi tool to set the clocks on linux
sr. member
Activity: 346
Merit: 250
Where do I find the documentation that describes gpu-clock and memclock settings? Only parameter I find even close by running ./ccminer --help is intensity. Nothing in the build directory.

On linux the clocks will be displayed in the output. On windows NVIDIA decided to drop the x86 API support. Use gpuz...
So on Linux no way to set them manually?

BTW I found my problem with the low acceptance mining locally. Pools set the var-diff. Local does not. Had to set -f 256. Now the acceptance rate is back up to ~97.5%
Jump to: