Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 791. (Read 2347664 times)

On linux the clocks will be displayed in the output. On windows NVIDIA decided to drop the x86 API support. Use gpuz...

Where do I find the documentation that describes gpu-clock and memclock settings? Only parameter I find even close by running ./ccminer --help is intensity. Nothing in the build directory.

Let the cray do protein folding

I've seen a video of a mainframe mining btc.    It was slow hashing but hey, it was a proof of concept to show it could be done.   
I'd like to see a modern super computer, like a cray, do coin mining.

It isn't new nor secret that Wolf0 has been working for quite some time on a new miners (he might be able to make more accurate statement if he passes by), things like that are more often discussed on #ccminer.

I always respect the work of other people so if someone include a gpl licensing, and I happen to use that piece of code, then I keep it as I found it with the licensing. (also as you don't seem to know, even though I repeat it all the time, I don't release private really often... so 98.5% of the time, when I release something it is directly on github wirh proper licensing and the other time, the code is even given with the binaries).

And again it isn't about what other may or may not understand  (which I don't really care) it is just the way it should be done.
I want people to deal with my code the proper way, so don't expect me to deal with other people code differently.

Fill it in here SP

MiningComparison

Sendt version 4 of the sp-mod private miner to the donators. This time with more Quark and lyra2v2. Most on the 750ti.

On the asus strix 750ti standard clocks. (vs release 74)
lyra2v2: +6.26%
quark: +2.1%

compared to release 3
lyra2v2: +0,46%
 quark:  +0.3%

Yuh, he's doing it now? How do you know what's recoded? Just saying something isn't the same as doing it, putting that aside he's been selling private miners that violate GPL for close to two years.

Pretty sure you don't care about licensing right now either, it just so happens that this coincides with your argument so you're using it as a easy way out. You'd probably understand thoroughly what you're talking about as well as you'd take time to look it all up.

Most people would understand if you made a private miner without source to keep normal miners in the game that can't afford to hire their own private developers (who probably also do not care about licensing).

No one is going to sue anyone, people just don't care and if they do to the point of hiring a lawyer you just stop distributing your miner till you get it figured out. Generally the way things go. You have to get a product out the door first before you start worrying about the world caving in around you.

lol djm34 why did you laughed ? is it ironic ?

really ?

sorry no plan to release either privately or publicly lyra2rev2 kernel for the moment.

it's been longtime since last release
im waiting for the next

I submitted a small speedup in the quark algo and lyra2v2 to github. Have a nice weekend linux users

I managed to increase by 30-40khash on the 750ti.  In the upcoming release private #4. The gtx 970 is up 100Khash as well

PRIVATE MINER RELEASE #3--

I have been watching my GTX 960 SC mine with the newest release from sp_.  It is my only Windows miner, and when not tasked to do something more important, it mines for me using my auto-switch batch file.  I was just watching it mine Quark algo, and it is achieving 11.535MH/s.  This is about the same as earlier releases, but it appears to stay at top performance more steadily than with earlier releases.

The miner has been switching between Neoscrypt and Quark, also X11.  These algos have been rotating up as top-paying on the HashPower pool.  Lyra2v2 has come up occasionally, but not frequently.  The miner mines Lyra2v2 as well as with earlier releases, about 6.5MH/s, but I haven't been watching closely enough to see any real percentage difference.

I am hoping that our developers begin merging the improved code into the open source code, so that my Linux rigs can also run at optimal speed.  Not everyone can afford to donate 0.1 BTC, or $40-50 US.  I pay that much for a 1-year license on commercial software.  It took me several weeks to earn my first LiteCoin, when it was worth $20, mining on 1 or 2 cards.  I donated so that the code keeps improving, and that eventually all the miners can use it.

Thanks to sp_ and the other talented devs that profess their opinions in this thread.       --scryptr

EDIT:  When left undisturbed, my GTX 960 SC occasionally tops 11.6MH/s:


2GB EVGA GTX 960 SC at peak performance of 11.6MH/s mining Quark.

--scryptr

The boost clock on the EVGA is 1240mhz

Release 70: 4793Khash
sp-priv:      5002Khash (+209khash (4.26%))

The lyra2v2 kernal is using less power than the quark kernal. around 40 watt, vs 60watt for quark

You don't care about licensing, I do (and probably others). It is important that any piece of software get a proper licensing to protect ourselves and other devs.
I understand that crypto is the wild west, but it won't stay this way forever. Hence it is important to do proper licensing (GPL might not be the best one in that case, I agree, but for now there is no time to change the term of the licensing. I think only
Wolf0 so far has started to recode his miner to get rid of all the gpl licensing and I don't think he has finished yet.
Actually I don't even know what that implies to get rid of all the licensing, when you consider stuff at the level of accessing the data through the server and JSON protocol.

Thanks Sp and Pallas, Thanks for calculation but there s also system consumption,mb,cpu and etc alsa psu efficiency another parameter.I guess that you see 41TDp via smi tool, What's the boost clock of this Evga 750 ti Sc cards. I check my rigs and see that at 1440 coreclock with your miner v66 on lyra2v2 it reaches 5265Khash , i wonder is it worth to buy your private miner.

And @DJM do you have a private miner for sale for me?if you have, pls pm me.

Hi, sorry for offtop,  anybody knows, what benefit to use stratum-proxy than simple direct connection to pool during mining eth?

The last optimalizations works best on compute 5.2 Devices.