Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 794. (Read 2347664 times)

legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
decred is 14 rounds of blake. So the correct launch parameter in ccminer would be ccminer -a blake ...

But if the block header has changed, a code change is needed.

And that is a fact. A code change will be needed.

ok ... tanx ...

i was asking out of curiosity more than anything ...

im not completely up to scratch with what they are planning - but i think its going to go full PoS anyway ...

tanx again ...

#crysx
full member
Activity: 229
Merit: 100
decred is 14 rounds of blake. So the correct launch parameter in ccminer would be ccminer -a blake ...

But if the block header has changed, a code change is needed.

And that is a fact. A code change will be needed.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
decred is 14 rounds of blake. So the correct launch parameter in ccminer would be ccminer -a blake ...

But if the block header has changed, a code change is needed.
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
@sp - what is your blake-256 8 round doing on the 750ti, 960, 970 these days?

Release 78 is doing 945MHASH. (ccminer -a blakecoin --benchmark)

which is the algo parameter for decred? ...

#crysx
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
@sp - what is your blake-256 8 round doing on the 750ti, 960, 970 these days?

Release 78 is doing 945MHASH. (ccminer -a blakecoin --benchmark)
legendary
Activity: 1504
Merit: 1002
@sp - what is your blake-256 8 round doing on the 750ti, 960, 970 these days?
sr. member
Activity: 506
Merit: 252
The thoughts that went into developing ethash:

https://github.com/LeastAuthority/ethereum-analyses/blob/master/PoW.md

such a shame it goes pos
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
@Slava_K +1, heck i will even run with more % at times of new releases if there is a switch for that.

i have the dev donation links with various algos to mine as a donation through the dbm project - yet not many have used it - and that goes directly through nicehash to the devs account ...

if more and more people used this kind of donation by mining - then we can all amalgamate our hasrates and make for a good donation to the devs ...

my project page - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/a-chainworks-industries-cwi-project-donate-by-mining-dbm-1089744 ...

it all needs updating and a less 'messy' op - but the info is all there ... including tnelson and stratehm donation links ...

all the links run through the stratehm stratum proxies - so not a single hash is lost through the proxy if the miner is set correctly ...

nicehash themselves have kindly whitelisted ALL the server ips so that ALL servers stay online to the nicehash system ...

give it a go and let me know if it is a system that will amalgamate / unite miners for a single cause or not ...

there is also a rotational server that donates to most of the devs on the list - but i have not made that public yet ... rotates donation time through the devs btc addresses on a 24hour basis ...

#crysx
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
@Slava_K +1, heck i will even run with more % at times of new releases if there is a switch for that.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
@all devs

decred devs only have a cgminer for both AMD & nvidia, please contact them to talk about bounty for ccminer fork for decred. They said it has a different "block header" so some changes will be needed. Here is a post on their forums

https://forum.decred.org/threads/protocol-specification.33/#post-1367

Quote
The kernel may work, but I ended up just writing my own. They don't have our block header specifications, so that miner will not work. It may give you a reasonable estimation of hash rate for the chain.
hero member
Activity: 677
Merit: 500
[...] WHO on the forums actually does release their miner with conditions and prices that are clearly disclosed in advance? [...]

I did, not so long ago. Works out pretty well as far as I can tell, but would likely get very messy if said miner was being sold to a large number of people. I don't know of any other examples, but I'd imagine other people have done the same.

Side note 1: Being public about the terms of the deal, and changing them after-the-fact, is utter bullshit. I'd say that's much worse than not being public about the terms but sticking to them no matter what.

Side note 2: I understand people are around here with a miner's mindset, and ROI is king. But, if you folks care for the potential of cryptocurrencies at all, maybe someday, try to pick some altcoin that you like, mine it even at a loss, grow a bag, help that community, participate, develop some service, some utility. Much more fun, and oddly enough, big profits on occasion...

I agree...  ROI is king... It's hard to open your wallet for donations when there are cobwebs at the bottom (I'm currently negative last month because of Cryptsy)... Right now a 970 makes about $1.20 mining Eth without taking out cost for power.
but then you understand, we may be reluctant to release new miners in these conditions...
I mean you can't really expect us to release for free because the conditions are bad (because it would just be bad for us as well...) hence what is expected is that we find a middle ground or a compromise which would make happy everyone. 
 
and in that case dev fee isn't either a good solution, because miners won't wait for us before dumping on a coin... (and there are a lot more miners than devs)

Not sure what you mean about a dev fee... A % based miner will be constantly mining whatever you have at your proxy setup for X algorithm. 98 shares for the miner, 2 shares for the dev.

Maybe we've always been on a different page when it comes to a miner fee? You have a miner submit 98 shares for whatever pool they're connected to and then two shares to whatever pool you want for the algorithm it's operating on. That would be a 2% fee, relatively speaking.

Or you could do it based on time... 72secs every hour.

Also not entirely certain what you mean by 'bad conditions for developers'. If you say sold your Neoscrypt miner for .1 a pop three months ago things would be quite a bit different or even right now. Kernel developers basically help set the conditions for miners. I can look at SPs miner right now and go 'hey it's not going to ROI, but I have a option of a 5% faster miner in the future for .1'. And of course SP will be improving it so it turns into a better option into the future. So something like x11 will be about 5% faster. Still not profitable, but could be.

Honestly though a % based miner is just the best solution. It rewards developers for making faster kernels constantly and gives miners big and small a chance to compete. You keep updating your miner and the amount of money you make keeps growing too. It's win-win
the problem with the dev fee, is that it collects an altcoin, and technically there are a lot more chance that people dump the coin before a dev has any chance to do it, making it a rather bad deal for the dev.
2 shares from 100 use to point on nicehash... ☺
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
[...] WHO on the forums actually does release their miner with conditions and prices that are clearly disclosed in advance? [...]

I did, not so long ago. Works out pretty well as far as I can tell, but would likely get very messy if said miner was being sold to a large number of people. I don't know of any other examples, but I'd imagine other people have done the same.

Side note 1: Being public about the terms of the deal, and changing them after-the-fact, is utter bullshit. I'd say that's much worse than not being public about the terms but sticking to them no matter what.

Side note 2: I understand people are around here with a miner's mindset, and ROI is king. But, if you folks care for the potential of cryptocurrencies at all, maybe someday, try to pick some altcoin that you like, mine it even at a loss, grow a bag, help that community, participate, develop some service, some utility. Much more fun, and oddly enough, big profits on occasion...

I agree...  ROI is king... It's hard to open your wallet for donations when there are cobwebs at the bottom (I'm currently negative last month because of Cryptsy)... Right now a 970 makes about $1.20 mining Eth without taking out cost for power.
but then you understand, we may be reluctant to release new miners in these conditions...
I mean you can't really expect us to release for free because the conditions are bad (because it would just be bad for us as well...) hence what is expected is that we find a middle ground or a compromise which would make happy everyone. 
 
and in that case dev fee isn't either a good solution, because miners won't wait for us before dumping on a coin... (and there are a lot more miners than devs)

Not sure what you mean about a dev fee... A % based miner will be constantly mining whatever you have at your proxy setup for X algorithm. 98 shares for the miner, 2 shares for the dev.

Maybe we've always been on a different page when it comes to a miner fee? You have a miner submit 98 shares for whatever pool they're connected to and then two shares to whatever pool you want for the algorithm it's operating on. That would be a 2% fee, relatively speaking.

Or you could do it based on time... 72secs every hour.

Also not entirely certain what you mean by 'bad conditions for developers'. If you say sold your Neoscrypt miner for .1 a pop three months ago things would be quite a bit different or even right now. Kernel developers basically help set the conditions for miners. I can look at SPs miner right now and go 'hey it's not going to ROI, but I have a option of a 5% faster miner in the future for .1'. And of course SP will be improving it so it turns into a better option into the future. So something like x11 will be about 5% faster. Still not profitable, but could be.

Honestly though a % based miner is just the best solution. It rewards developers for making faster kernels constantly and gives miners big and small a chance to compete. You keep updating your miner and the amount of money you make keeps growing too. It's win-win
the problem with the dev fee, is that it collects an altcoin, and technically there are a lot more chance that people dump the coin before a dev has any chance to do it, making it a rather bad deal for the dev.
full member
Activity: 279
Merit: 104

Let's do a profit calculation..

The nano can do 20MHASH of x11

0.020GHASH * 0.15 (Nicehash payment for 1 GHASH) = 0,003 BTC /DAY

500$ = 1,32BTC

1.32/0.003 = 440

It will take the Nano 440 days TO ROI with FREE POWER. And in these 440 days we have pascal and the 14NM chips comming..

So it seems like the Nano is a better buy that the GTX 980 then...
Even if the 980 could do 20 MH of X11.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
[...] WHO on the forums actually does release their miner with conditions and prices that are clearly disclosed in advance? [...]

I did, not so long ago. Works out pretty well as far as I can tell, but would likely get very messy if said miner was being sold to a large number of people. I don't know of any other examples, but I'd imagine other people have done the same.

Side note 1: Being public about the terms of the deal, and changing them after-the-fact, is utter bullshit. I'd say that's much worse than not being public about the terms but sticking to them no matter what.

Side note 2: I understand people are around here with a miner's mindset, and ROI is king. But, if you folks care for the potential of cryptocurrencies at all, maybe someday, try to pick some altcoin that you like, mine it even at a loss, grow a bag, help that community, participate, develop some service, some utility. Much more fun, and oddly enough, big profits on occasion...

I agree...  ROI is king... It's hard to open your wallet for donations when there are cobwebs at the bottom (I'm currently negative last month because of Cryptsy)... Right now a 970 makes about $1.20 mining Eth without taking out cost for power.
but then you understand, we may be reluctant to release new miners in these conditions...
I mean you can't really expect us to release for free because the conditions are bad (because it would just be bad for us as well...) hence what is expected is that we find a middle ground or a compromise which would make happy everyone.  
  
and in that case dev fee isn't either a good solution, because miners won't wait for us before dumping on a coin... (and there are a lot more miners than devs)

Not sure what you mean about a dev fee... A % based miner will be constantly mining whatever you have at your proxy setup for X algorithm. 98 shares for the miner, 2 shares for the dev.

Maybe we've always been on a different page when it comes to a miner fee? You have a miner submit 98 shares for whatever pool they're connected to and then two shares to whatever pool you want for the algorithm it's operating on. That would be a 2% fee, relatively speaking.

Or you could do it based on time... 72secs every hour.

Also not entirely certain what you mean by 'bad conditions for developers'. If you say sold your Neoscrypt miner for .1 a pop three months ago things would be quite a bit different or even right now. Kernel developers basically help set the conditions for miners. I can look at SPs miner right now and go 'hey it's not going to ROI, but I have a option of a 5% faster miner in the future for .1'. And of course SP will be improving it so it turns into a better option into the future. So something like x11 will be about 5% faster. Still not profitable, but could be.

Honestly though a % based miner is just the best solution. It rewards developers for making faster kernels constantly and gives miners big and small a chance to compete. You keep updating your miner and the amount of money you make keeps growing too. It's win-win
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
I have added another 100Khash in the lyra2v2 algo on the gtx 960, +300khash in the 980ti.

Will be included in private #3

private #3 also include a quark boost. 18.4MHASH on the 970 g1 gaming default clocks.!
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
Solution? : EZ ... Sell more by selling less.
0.1 BTC with 2 GTX 970 take 1 month ... (Not everyone have 10K mining hardware  Cry )
Not worth the value of those optimized miner (Even if SP and other developper work hard)
Sell it 0.01 BTC and 10X more people would buy it. Wink

Win-win situation  Cool
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
[...] WHO on the forums actually does release their miner with conditions and prices that are clearly disclosed in advance? [...]

I did, not so long ago. Works out pretty well as far as I can tell, but would likely get very messy if said miner was being sold to a large number of people. I don't know of any other examples, but I'd imagine other people have done the same.

Side note 1: Being public about the terms of the deal, and changing them after-the-fact, is utter bullshit. I'd say that's much worse than not being public about the terms but sticking to them no matter what.

Side note 2: I understand people are around here with a miner's mindset, and ROI is king. But, if you folks care for the potential of cryptocurrencies at all, maybe someday, try to pick some altcoin that you like, mine it even at a loss, grow a bag, help that community, participate, develop some service, some utility. Much more fun, and oddly enough, big profits on occasion...

I agree...  ROI is king... It's hard to open your wallet for donations when there are cobwebs at the bottom (I'm currently negative last month because of Cryptsy)... Right now a 970 makes about $1.20 mining Eth without taking out cost for power.
but then you understand, we may be reluctant to release new miners in these conditions...
I mean you can't really expect us to release for free because the conditions are bad (because it would just be bad for us as well...) hence what is expected is that we find a middle ground or a compromise which would make happy everyone.  
  
and in that case dev fee isn't either a good solution, because miners won't wait for us before dumping on a coin... (and there are a lot more miners than devs)
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
[...] WHO on the forums actually does release their miner with conditions and prices that are clearly disclosed in advance? [...]

I did, not so long ago. Works out pretty well as far as I can tell, but would likely get very messy if said miner was being sold to a large number of people. I don't know of any other examples, but I'd imagine other people have done the same.

Side note 1: Being public about the terms of the deal, and changing them after-the-fact, is utter bullshit. I'd say that's much worse than not being public about the terms but sticking to them no matter what.

Side note 2: I understand people are around here with a miner's mindset, and ROI is king. But, if you folks care for the potential of cryptocurrencies at all, maybe someday, try to pick some altcoin that you like, mine it even at a loss, grow a bag, help that community, participate, develop some service, some utility. Much more fun, and oddly enough, big profits on occasion...

I agree...  ROI is king... It's hard to open your wallet for donations when there are cobwebs at the bottom (I'm currently negative last month because of Cryptsy)... Right now a 970 makes about $1.20 mining Eth without taking out cost for power.
legendary
Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001
[...] WHO on the forums actually does release their miner with conditions and prices that are clearly disclosed in advance? [...]

I did, not so long ago. Works out pretty well as far as I can tell, but would likely get very messy if said miner was being sold to a large number of people. I don't know of any other examples, but I'd imagine other people have done the same.

Side note 1: Being public about the terms of the deal, and changing them after-the-fact, is utter bullshit. I'd say that's much worse than not being public about the terms but sticking to them no matter what.

Side note 2: I understand people are around here with a miner's mindset, and ROI is king. But, if you folks care for the potential of cryptocurrencies at all, maybe someday, try to pick some altcoin that you like, mine it even at a loss, grow a bag, help that community, participate, develop some service, some utility. Much more fun, and oddly enough, big profits on occasion...
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
On my 970 rig, I've found out that lowering TDP may bring a less-than-expected hashrate reduction.

Example: TDP set at 150, hashrate -5%, power -12%
Cards in P2, algo is NON memory intensive, power at the wall.

Possible causes: chips work more efficiently at lower temperature, fans turn slower.
Ok thx pallas.
Jump to: