Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 857. (Read 2347659 times)

hero member
Activity: 687
Merit: 502

Top rig just prepared for some 980:s that hopefully arrive tomorrow.

Notice the single 750Ti left alone in the second frame. That card only run without problems when mining single in a frame. If i run other cards in the same frame it will make the rig shutdown like 3-4 times every day. Something is really strange with that card. I have spent many hours trying to figure out what the heck was going on before i sorted that card out. When the replacement fans arrive for it i will sell it.

Right now my plan is to fill up the top frame and the second frame with 980 cards and then put two more 750Ti:s in the third one.
Not sure why the hell i am doing it when the earnings is like crap, but someone need to go full retard i guess.

Sorry for offtopic.
legendary
Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001
does anyone have a good launch configuration or intensity setting for plain Scrypt algo for the 750ti?  I use a config file to launch ccminer and neither "launch-config" nor "intensity" seem to be doing anything.

the cards always default to auto-tune, it always sets to T30x16 and i get "result does not validate on CPU" errors.

If memory serves me right, -l T5x24 is what you're looking for.
Good chance I don't remember this properly though, you know, old fart and all  Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 427
Merit: 250
does anyone have a good launch configuration or intensity setting for plain Scrypt algo for the 750ti?  I use a config file to launch ccminer and neither "launch-config" nor "intensity" seem to be doing anything.

the cards always default to auto-tune, it always sets to T30x16 and i get "result does not validate on CPU" errors.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
is this miners complete? it can mine every altcoin out there no limit?
if not which one are missed?

There are so many around it's a very though question to answer. Let's say most of the popular coins are supported, except for example scrypt-Jane ones.
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 1022
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
is this miners complete? it can mine every altcoin out there no limit?
if not which one are missed?
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
What are the default intensities for x11 on a 980 ti??
Thanks
Is it the same as lyraRev2?

22 for 5.0+ cards across the board and 19.5 for older cards if I'm not mistaken:

Quote from: x11.cu
uint32_t intensity = (device_sm[device_map[thr_id]] > 500) ? 256 * 256 * 22 : 256 * 128 * 39;

It'd be nice though if ccminer would show the instensity upon launch even if the -i parameter isn't used.

Thanks for the info-
displaying the default intensity would be great

thats if you use the -i parameter ... i use the -X parameter and that seems to push a little more for some reason ... sp could probably explain that ...

on the gigabyte 750ti oc lp cards - the parameter is -X 29 here without overclock ...

#crysx
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---

I have a motherboard that has five PCI slots (two PCI's are the small version). It didn't like four 750 Ti's, but was fine with three 750 Ti's and 960. Do you think this is a Windows thing out of curiosity?
Did you plug in all cards in at the same time ?
When using windows i always start installing the cards in the pci-e port nearest the cpu. And then adding more cards one by one as long as they get detected by windows. Sometimes it can be a real hazzle before windows find all cards, i even have to move cards around on the pci-e ports to get all cards going. So, plugging all four cards in there and installing the graphics driver will probably not work right away.

Make sure you use a powered riser in the x1 slot if the 750ti doesn't have an external power connector.

this is all good advice for troubleshooting windows based issues ...

if you try your hand at linux - let me know ... it has almost no issues recognizing cards - but the drawback is you dont have the flexibility for overclocking that you do with windows ...

but then again - linux is free too ... no matter how many machines or how many times you install ... Wink ...

i use fedora 22 x64 with cuda 7.5 ... compiling ccminer-spmod is a breeze in linux and is reporting the same ( and sometimes better ) hashrates than cuda 6.5 ...

if windows is still your base - then a lot of veterans here can help ( and have already answered this question ) ...

#crysx
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
What are the default intensities for x11 on a 980 ti??
Thanks
Is it the same as lyraRev2?

22 for 5.0+ cards across the board and 19.5 for older cards if I'm not mistaken:

Quote from: x11.cu
uint32_t intensity = (device_sm[device_map[thr_id]] > 500) ? 256 * 256 * 22 : 256 * 128 * 39;

It'd be nice though if ccminer would show the instensity upon launch even if the -i parameter isn't used.

Thanks for the info-
displaying the default intensity would be great
legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
What are the default intensities for x11 on a 980 ti??
Thanks
Is it the same as lyraRev2?

22 for 5.0+ cards across the board and 19.5 for older cards if I'm not mistaken:

Quote from: x11.cu
uint32_t intensity = (device_sm[device_map[thr_id]] > 500) ? 256 * 256 * 22 : 256 * 128 * 39;

It'd be nice though if ccminer would show the instensity upon launch even if the -i parameter isn't used.
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
What are the default intensities for x11 on a 980 ti??
Thanks
Is it the same as lyraRev2?
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114

I have a motherboard that has five PCI slots (two PCI's are the small version). It didn't like four 750 Ti's, but was fine with three 750 Ti's and 960. Do you think this is a Windows thing out of curiosity?
Did you plug in all cards in at the same time ?
When using windows i always start installing the cards in the pci-e port nearest the cpu. And then adding more cards one by one as long as they get detected by windows. Sometimes it can be a real hazzle before windows find all cards, i even have to move cards around on the pci-e ports to get all cards going. So, plugging all four cards in there and installing the graphics driver will probably not work right away.

Make sure you use a powered riser in the x1 slot if the 750ti doesn't have an external power connector.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
Keep rebooting windows, at some point it usually finds all cards. If it sees 960 it should find 750 too.
Are you sure your pcie settings in bios are what they should be? Usually you need to do some tweaking there when running more than two GPU.

Which leads to my question... someone here running skylake (Z170) based mining rig with more than two nvidia cards? How did you do it? Spent 12 hours last night trying to figure it out...
hero member
Activity: 687
Merit: 502
So perhaps this is a bit off topic, but you guys seem like a knowledge group. Are the 750 ti's the most power efficient of the of the Maxwell cards? Thanks.

It greatly depends on where you live; for me the 970s are the best choice by far even if I only go for 4 x 970 per rig, but of course I also add 2 x 750 Ti.
While a 6 card 750 Ti rig looks great on paper, you can't really disregard the price of the whole PC itself (mb+cpu+memory+hdd+psu) which all adds up, disrupting the efficiency/ROI of a 6x750Ti rig. But of course YMMV.

ill be building a 6 x gigabyte 980ti g1 miner very shortly ( when the funds allow ) and will have the results in comparison to the 6 x gigabyte 750ti oc lp miner ...

this should give an indication ( hashrate also ) of how efficient these two machines are ... admittedly - ccminer-spmod - it will be a huge hashrate difference - but power efficiency will be the question with this - not hashrate ...

i am actually hardpressed to believe that the 6 x gigabyte 750ti oc lp miner would not be more efficient than the 6 x gigabyte 980ti g1 system ... even if all the computer power consumption is taken into effect ...

obviously this is not using the 970 as you specified - but i dont think thefarm will be upgraded to the 970 card - so i couldnt test that anyway ...

#crysx

I have a motherboard that has five PCI slots (two PCI's are the small version). It didn't like four 750 Ti's, but was fine with three 750 Ti's and 960. Do you think this is a Windows thing out of curiosity?
Did you plug in all cards in at the same time ?
When using windows i always start installing the cards in the pci-e port nearest the cpu. And then adding more cards one by one as long as they get detected by windows. Sometimes it can be a real hazzle before windows find all cards, i even have to move cards around on the pci-e ports to get all cards going. So, plugging all four cards in there and installing the graphics driver will probably not work right away.
newbie
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
So perhaps this is a bit off topic, but you guys seem like a knowledge group. Are the 750 ti's the most power efficient of the of the Maxwell cards? Thanks.

It greatly depends on where you live; for me the 970s are the best choice by far even if I only go for 4 x 970 per rig, but of course I also add 2 x 750 Ti.
While a 6 card 750 Ti rig looks great on paper, you can't really disregard the price of the whole PC itself (mb+cpu+memory+hdd+psu) which all adds up, disrupting the efficiency/ROI of a 6x750Ti rig. But of course YMMV.

ill be building a 6 x gigabyte 980ti g1 miner very shortly ( when the funds allow ) and will have the results in comparison to the 6 x gigabyte 750ti oc lp miner ...

this should give an indication ( hashrate also ) of how efficient these two machines are ... admittedly - ccminer-spmod - it will be a huge hashrate difference - but power efficiency will be the question with this - not hashrate ...

i am actually hardpressed to believe that the 6 x gigabyte 750ti oc lp miner would not be more efficient than the 6 x gigabyte 980ti g1 system ... even if all the computer power consumption is taken into effect ...

obviously this is not using the 970 as you specified - but i dont think thefarm will be upgraded to the 970 card - so i couldnt test that anyway ...

#crysx

I have a motherboard that has five PCI slots (two PCI's are the small version). It didn't like four 750 Ti's, but was fine with three 750 Ti's and 960. Do you think this is a Windows thing out of curiosity?
hero member
Activity: 687
Merit: 502
I have been thinking about buying some server psu:s many times but always ended up giving it up when i pictured one psu having a meltdown and taking like 10-15 gpu:s with it.
I think they are more suited for use with asics really.
legendary
Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001
[...] Though, I'm curious if anyone ever used server grade high capacity PSUs for mining.

Just about everyone that has an old enough history of using ASIC miners.  Smiley
Here's one random such reference:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ibm-2880w-psubreakout-boards-new-package-deals-for-t9s9-a7-966135
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
So perhaps this is a bit off topic, but you guys seem like a knowledge group. Are the 750 ti's the most power efficient of the of the Maxwell cards? Thanks.

It greatly depends on where you live; for me the 970s are the best choice by far even if I only go for 4 x 970 per rig, but of course I also add 2 x 750 Ti.
While a 6 card 750 Ti rig looks great on paper, you can't really disregard the price of the whole PC itself (mb+cpu+memory+hdd+psu) which all adds up, disrupting the efficiency/ROI of a 6x750Ti rig. But of course YMMV.

ill be building a 6 x gigabyte 980ti g1 miner very shortly ( when the funds allow ) and will have the results in comparison to the 6 x gigabyte 750ti oc lp miner ...

this should give an indication ( hashrate also ) of how efficient these two machines are ... admittedly - ccminer-spmod - it will be a huge hashrate difference - but power efficiency will be the question with this - not hashrate ...

i am actually hardpressed to believe that the 6 x gigabyte 750ti oc lp miner would not be more efficient than the 6 x gigabyte 980ti g1 system ... even if all the computer power consumption is taken into effect ...

obviously this is not using the 970 as you specified - but i dont think thefarm will be upgraded to the 970 card - so i couldnt test that anyway ...

#crysx

As I said it depends on how much you can get your hands on certain cards. To me for example a 980 Ti rig (or even just a 980 non-Ti rig) would be suicidal. And then again putting 6 of those cards into one rig would require a very pricey PSU unless you don't care about RMA time or resell value, or don't mind using two PSUs which I personally refuse to do.

In my personal case 960s are sligthly more efficient than 970s and 750 Ti's but I decided to only use 2 types of cards in order to simplify things so I'm only buying 970s and 750 Ti's until Pascal comes along which allows me to know the efficiency of the cards depending on the algo without having to calculate it. More cards would just complicate things.

understood ...

the psu count IS a pain in the backside - especially due to the fact that not is it more power - but a lot more space required to run them ...

thefarm itself being upgraded to the 980ti g1 is highly unlikely ... ONE miner for testing and high level hashing - possibly ...

i too am waiting on the pascal chips / architecture to hit the market - but even then - the cost would be iitially a great deal until they settle in the market and drop to a price for general use ...

so you think the 960 cards are better value? ... ill look into this and see what we can get them for here in australia ...

tanx bathrobehero ...

btw - i have not ever really looked heavily into the resale value of any of the cards - as you can never really get back anywhere near what was originally paid for them ... i usually average it out at less than half of the original cost for resale - IF i ever resell them ...

#crysx

Resell value is important to me since I realised how much the 780 Ti's dropped when Maxwell arrived and how much of a stigma is associated with GPUs used for mining (mostly because of careless AMD miners) which I always disclose.
I built up a reputable seller status on a couple of sites and I always take good care of my cards (low temp target, no +voltage, no max fan speeds, regular maintenance, etc) so if things rapidly change I can get rid of all my cards fairly easily.

Using 2 PSUs with USB powered risers + http://www.aliexpress.com/item/Add2PSU-Multiple-Power-Supply-Adapter/1743678544.html?spm=2114.01020208.3.2.oKvSMv&ws_ab_test=searchweb201556_2_79_78_77_80,searchweb201644_5,searchweb201560_9 is very simple and secure in my eyes.

I've been using this setup for something like half year.

I just don't feel comfortable using two PSUs with one rig even if it's reportedly mostly safe. In fact I tend to spend way too much on high quality PSUs but they tend to keep their value pretty well so it's not that much of a loss long term (especially if you get a beast with 10 years of warranty).
I'm planning to look into some server grade PSUs since even high capacity ones are dirt cheap comperatively (just take a look at ebay for example). A friend of mine with an oscilloscope already offered to check them out for their power delivery quality but I'm at the limit of what I can currently draw so it'll have to wait. Though, I'm curious if anyone ever used server grade high capacity PSUs for mining.

i tend to agree with you on the resale value of good quality maintained stock ... i am the same with taking care of the cards - especially with maintenance ... anyone that knows me knows how i am with the servicing and maintenance of the equipment i have ... though people here wouldnt for obvious reasons Smiley ... between the high end servers and thefarm - i am equipped to run a mid size corporate ... im not even joking in the slightest ... so i do understand and appreciate where you are coming from ...

i just dont care too much for resale when it comes to these things ... as they lose value regardless of how they are maintained - its just a matter of how much they will lose in value when they are being resold - if they are resold ...

in anycase - i hope that pans for you in the long term ... its a good way to keep upgrading and staying ontop of the current technologies ...

as for the psu setup ... ALL of farmamd required dual psu systems ... ALL of systems have been running non-stop for at least two years ... only now did i require to pull farmamd down for warranty repairs - only to find most of the cards are not warranted any longer ...

so the setup itself didnt kill the cards - infact quite the opposite - farmamd has been running really well for most of this time ... it was always the external issue - like power outages and heat and actual failures in the fan systems gigabyte have ...

i should be back online with the amd cards as soon as i get them back ... in a few weeks ...

#crysx
legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
So perhaps this is a bit off topic, but you guys seem like a knowledge group. Are the 750 ti's the most power efficient of the of the Maxwell cards? Thanks.

It greatly depends on where you live; for me the 970s are the best choice by far even if I only go for 4 x 970 per rig, but of course I also add 2 x 750 Ti.
While a 6 card 750 Ti rig looks great on paper, you can't really disregard the price of the whole PC itself (mb+cpu+memory+hdd+psu) which all adds up, disrupting the efficiency/ROI of a 6x750Ti rig. But of course YMMV.

ill be building a 6 x gigabyte 980ti g1 miner very shortly ( when the funds allow ) and will have the results in comparison to the 6 x gigabyte 750ti oc lp miner ...

this should give an indication ( hashrate also ) of how efficient these two machines are ... admittedly - ccminer-spmod - it will be a huge hashrate difference - but power efficiency will be the question with this - not hashrate ...

i am actually hardpressed to believe that the 6 x gigabyte 750ti oc lp miner would not be more efficient than the 6 x gigabyte 980ti g1 system ... even if all the computer power consumption is taken into effect ...

obviously this is not using the 970 as you specified - but i dont think thefarm will be upgraded to the 970 card - so i couldnt test that anyway ...

#crysx

As I said it depends on how much you can get your hands on certain cards. To me for example a 980 Ti rig (or even just a 980 non-Ti rig) would be suicidal. And then again putting 6 of those cards into one rig would require a very pricey PSU unless you don't care about RMA time or resell value, or don't mind using two PSUs which I personally refuse to do.

In my personal case 960s are sligthly more efficient than 970s and 750 Ti's but I decided to only use 2 types of cards in order to simplify things so I'm only buying 970s and 750 Ti's until Pascal comes along which allows me to know the efficiency of the cards depending on the algo without having to calculate it. More cards would just complicate things.

understood ...

the psu count IS a pain in the backside - especially due to the fact that not is it more power - but a lot more space required to run them ...

thefarm itself being upgraded to the 980ti g1 is highly unlikely ... ONE miner for testing and high level hashing - possibly ...

i too am waiting on the pascal chips / architecture to hit the market - but even then - the cost would be iitially a great deal until they settle in the market and drop to a price for general use ...

so you think the 960 cards are better value? ... ill look into this and see what we can get them for here in australia ...

tanx bathrobehero ...

btw - i have not ever really looked heavily into the resale value of any of the cards - as you can never really get back anywhere near what was originally paid for them ... i usually average it out at less than half of the original cost for resale - IF i ever resell them ...

#crysx

Resell value is important to me since I realised how much the 780 Ti's dropped when Maxwell arrived and how much of a stigma is associated with GPUs used for mining (mostly because of careless AMD miners) which I always disclose.
I built up a reputable seller status on a couple of sites and I always take good care of my cards (low temp target, no +voltage, no max fan speeds, regular maintenance, etc) so if things rapidly change I can get rid of all my cards fairly easily.

Using 2 PSUs with USB powered risers + http://www.aliexpress.com/item/Add2PSU-Multiple-Power-Supply-Adapter/1743678544.html?spm=2114.01020208.3.2.oKvSMv&ws_ab_test=searchweb201556_2_79_78_77_80,searchweb201644_5,searchweb201560_9 is very simple and secure in my eyes.

I've been using this setup for something like half year.

I just don't feel comfortable using two PSUs with one rig even if it's reportedly mostly safe. In fact I tend to spend way too much on high quality PSUs but they tend to keep their value pretty well so it's not that much of a loss long term (especially if you get a beast with 10 years of warranty).
I'm planning to look into some server grade PSUs since even high capacity ones are dirt cheap comperatively (just take a look at ebay for example). A friend of mine with an oscilloscope already offered to check them out for their power delivery quality but I'm at the limit of what I can currently draw so it'll have to wait. Though, I'm curious if anyone ever used server grade high capacity PSUs for mining.
full member
Activity: 201
Merit: 100

As I said it depends on how much you can get your hands on certain cards. To me for example a 980 Ti rig (or even just a 980 non-Ti rig) would be suicidal. And then again putting 6 of those cards into one rig would require a very pricey PSU unless you don't care about RMA time or resell value, or don't mind using two PSUs which I personally refuse to do.

In my personal case 960s are sligthly more efficient than 970s and 750 Ti's but I decided to only use 2 types of cards in order to simplify things so I'm only buying 970s and 750 Ti's until Pascal comes along which allows me to know the efficiency of the cards depending on the algo without having to calculate it. More cards would just complicate things.

Using 2 PSUs with USB powered risers + http://www.aliexpress.com/item/Add2PSU-Multiple-Power-Supply-Adapter/1743678544.html?spm=2114.01020208.3.2.oKvSMv&ws_ab_test=searchweb201556_2_79_78_77_80,searchweb201644_5,searchweb201560_9 is very simple and secure in my eyes.

I've been using this setup for something like half year.



Jump to: