Topic: [CFNP] BestChange Signature Campaign | Sr Member+ - page 33. (Read 133477 times)

Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/logitechmouse-1143164
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 117
BTC Address: 32j3copG1zXB4UnK6aSPkfQCJfitC2NHDA

Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/zlantann-3371296
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 72
BTC Address: bc1q0yph26fn77h9ykwht5mqcuk8psqs6xechdmjuq

Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bencodie-404695
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 222
BTC Address: bc1qdvte83zurkerwpvf07fve068h2j4t7x3q8h8sf

Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/leonair-917822
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 37
BTC Address: bc1qnnewxdyuj2pwnv4097py0y7d7mue0fqyze9sv9

Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/yatsan-857883
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 14
BTC Address: bc1q9455uk53ugj53vkqcey24e3dwl7kj0vznxzn4q

Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/inthelongrun-950786
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 67
BTC Address: bc1q5yh037dhpk6av2zcsf62lx5wud55ucj02unll4

Bitcointalk Profile Link : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile
Amount of merits earned in last 120 days : 84
BTC Address: 35qJCK1FADrfNFSnedfqsuZZZZn8pDnsv6

Bitcointalk Profile Link : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=2863343
Amount of merits earned in last 120 days : 26
BTC Address: bc1quhvgsc3g4vrtef0azp495s50dstygxttvemkn6

Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/majestic-milf-3454941
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 49
BTC Address: bc1q0fxxq772gpvrj0t5w8w7hqnzp5ery23jaytsc4

Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/cls63-1124954
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 425
BTC Address: bc1qvv6vshep3azvlwjxuaql6e8dwx8x4hu2tjfc7m

Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ajiz138-364455
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 185
BTC Address: bc1qffhfvvrx9cjau9pqfns38l84k0qhq5y68kw8mk

Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/themepen-3470490
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 117
BTC Address: bc1qyh0esfp3fstwgmy5s9hke7p52d545ds35xa9a4

Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/usekevin-130251
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 12
BTC Address: bc1qgh7nguqkk95n2yw00thevqmklrmpj28fcz6yst

Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/davidvictorson-3344451
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 62
BTC Address: bc1q7tlqg8qfwnqcf9tanceuut6qhcgyvv5agzkslq

The payment for week 168 has been sent: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/8481ddd4fd447f8b3d4355873321569b436ead5dc78948dc2c7c781a54250bc6

The bonus went to:

• The Cryptovator
• Upgrade00
• lovesmayfamilis
• adaseb
• Adbitco

Thanks!

------------------------------
We apologize for not answering to each one personally, there are a lot of messages, but we have read them all.

Thank you all for your questions, suggestions, praise and even criticism. We appreciate that you care about the future of this campaign and that many of you share our values.

Below we will answer the most popular questions.

As for the campaign rate, for us it is still a significant item in the total advertising costs. No, we will not reduce the rate or reduce the number of participants, but we are not planning to significantly increase costs. It is no secret that projects with a dubious reputation that are related to money laundering or gambling earn much more than us, so they can easily spend much more than us, with our honest business this race will be lost in advance. Therefore, we are not going to compete with other companies. If your ethical standards allow you to advertise them, well, we do not keep you, although we will miss you.

If we talk about our advantages, where we can compete with other signature campaigns is our stability and purity of intentions. The ethics of our project is not tarnished by flirting with gambling addiction or helping scammers. Yes, not all mixer users and casino players are lost persons, but let's be honest with each other, this is not a business to be proud of promoting. Will you earn more? Most likely, although not by much. But will you get moral satisfaction from promoting such products? Everything here is very individual. We do not impose our vision on you, but personally we would not be so pleased to promote a business built on the exploitation of human vices. Although we have nothing against those who are ready to do this. Everyone has their own system of values, there is no one more correct.

The mission of our company is to help you find the best deals. Yes, there will certainly be a group of haters who will find an evil plot of a monopolist in our activities, but our conscience is clear. We do not deceive anyone, we are not involved in politics, in money laundering and we do not sell our reputation for bribes. We are proud of our almost 16-year-old business! We hope that you also feel your involvement in doing something useful for the entire crypto industry with us. We are certainly very happy that you are doing this together with our team, we really appreciate it.

Returning to the issue of the rate, if we are talking about a possible indexation adjusted for global inflation, this is quite a fair request. The campaign has been around for more than 3 years and it might be time to adjust the rate. We promise that we will raise this issue with management and will try to adjust prices in the coming weeks if our budget allows such an increase, so that it does not affect the long-term stability of the campaign. We hope to be here soon with good news.

If we talk about rewards for those who have been with us since the start of the campaign, we will try to celebrate it on the next anniversary, or at least on the 5th anniversary of the campaign. We want to somehow reward those who trusted us and became a pioneer, despite all the attacks from the community that accompanied the first weeks of our campaign. We will think about how to do this, at the same time, we do not want to deprive those who for some reason joined the campaign later, so we need more time to think over the most fair reward system. Perhaps it will not be directly related to money, but we will definitely come up with something!

Summing up the message for those who do not want to read all this text:

1. We can't compete on prices with highly profitable projects like casinos or mixers.
2. But we are ready to compete with them with our durability, pure intentions, and reputation.
3. We will try to adjust the rates for inflation, the issue has already been raised.
4. In the future, we will definitely come up with a reward for those who stay with us for several years.

------------------------------


On a different note, we are informing you that we now have one vacant slot for Senior+ participants. Please apply in reply!

It has been over 2 years that I have joined Bestchange signature campaign, but I am joining another one already now. If I should be sincere, I am just short of words, but the good thing Bestchange has done for me will I ever remember. I hope you people know how tough it is we are unemployed and underemployed in Nigeria, Bestchange helped me in so many areas of life.

Although this is not to encourage anyone to depend on this forum in making money, we should not. But indeed, Bestchange really helped me is just the reality. Bestchange! Thank you very much, I so much appreciated your presence on Bitcointalk.

In few minutes time, I will remove Bestchange signature and avatar.

I wont argue too much but I would say over the last decade of campaigns Ive observed the most important factor would be consistency.   Theres other factors and personal preference but the understated point I would underline is being on a campaign you can rely on not to alter too much; this is valuable.

I thank everyone who responded to my posts and commented on them. It's always good to hear alternative points of view. I can't leave them unattended and therefore I must answer.  

I don't think at all that the use of the word "should" is applicable in this case.

I am not saying a word that the reward SHOULD be increased, but I suggest REVIEW the terms of the reward, if it is POSSIBLE.

This is not out of the question. I wrote about this, that if I made a mistake somewhere, then please correct me.

I don't understand the question. Whom and why to exclud from the campaign? It seems that the discussion of this is definitely not in my competence.

Thanks for the hint with the argument, in the form of inflation.


Thank you for your valuable advice, but it seems to me that these obvious things are already clear to any participant in signature campaigns.


Should I cover my ass self too by saying it was a joke? I have had these questions before. It just so happened that I voiced them right now. Although, perhaps, Royse777's April Fool's joke pushed me to this step. From part.

We can't know the inner kitchen of projects, and therefore, we don't know how changes in rates will affect them.

Also, it is impossible for everyone to be top posters. Such users are unique in this, that there are only a few of them. But that's another topic for discussion.

But this is an interesting proposal with an increase in the limit of posts. As you can see, the discussion allows to generate interesting ideas.


To be honest, I have similar feelings and I hesitated for a long time whether to raise this issue. But in any case, I said what I wanted to say, without even knowing if it was a manifestation of courage or stupidity.

I, and only I, have to apologize to the Bestchange. It was my initiative and therefore I apologize for bringing this topic up for public discussion.

Asking of such question is not bad because you have to speak up you mind. And you have done that to have peace in your mind. The forum in these days is in a very serious competition of signature campaign advertisement, with that everyone campaign launched newly increase their fees to lure reputable users that is why people plus reputable users are not stable in one campaign for moving from one campaign to another. What you are saying is the unequal distribution of fees which every liberal scholar must ask one day to is boss, why his salary is small compared to what he is doing to promote the company growth. Those who ask such questions are progressivist while those who stay put with the company's hold payment method are conservativist.
What I will say is that every private company has a specific budget for the year so they can spend more than that once they do they will run into bankruptcy so to maintain that they have to stand on their ground which affect some active workers as well. It is good to voice it out so that they can if possible increase the pay rate for the participants in their next budgets even not this one.
As a good citizen must speak the truth so also to you. $100 is going to be a normal stand of payout in the forum from look of things these days.

All I know is that we have Chipmixer before, it pays $300 weekly, while Bestchange pays $100 weekly. There have been many Bestchange participants that are good posters they left Bestchange for Chipmixer. Bestchange did not increase their money, because Bestchange is still achieving his goals.

After Chipmixer, $100 campaigns are still the highest paying ones on this forum, Bestchange is paying $100 and still have one of the best good posters.

Let me put it like this: Assuming you are working in a company, you do not have to discuss about your salary with the owner of the company. If you get another job which is high paying as a result of excellent recommendation by your boss, the owner of the company (let say your boss) will either not want to lose you, or he could congratulates you about the new job that you got and wish you well. Take Bestchange like that, you do not need to stay here if you see better offer, either Bestchange offer you high pay if something like that happens or he will wish you well for getting to a higher paying organizations (campaign).

To be sincere, I do not expect we should be talking about this. It is not right, it is just like saying Bestchange does not know what he is doing, and that is so wrong.

Sorry if this hurts anyone.

Sorry Bestchange for us bringing this up, you have been here since the days of Chipmixer. Although, if you increased the weekly pay, we would all be happy about it, but pay rate discussion supposed to remain to you and your team, not us.