Topic: [CFNP] BestChange Signature Campaign | Sr Member+ - page 34. (Read 133465 times)

You compromised yourself when you published this post on April 1st. Maybe it's a coincidence, but Royse777 posted his jokes on April 1st.

If the project spends more money on advertising, then it will close faster. I think that most signature mixer campaigns will close in 1-3 months.

If you want to get the maximum payout, then become a famous poster like Ratimov.

If campaign members want to get a bigger payout, then you need to make an offer to increase the number of posts, for example, 30 or 35 paid posts instead of 25. Then maybe this will be beneficial for BestChange management.

If you dont like how much BestChange pays you for signature campaign spot simply quit and change it for something else.
There are higher and lower paying campaigns that come and go, but bestchange has been stable for years.
Payment rates could be higher for all campaigns and we are looking for someone to step up as a clear leader.

I believe there is no competition here regarding which campaign pays the most. if we look at the type of business, BestChange has no direct competition in the signature promotion. I would say that you have a wrong interpretation of why the payout in the campaign should be increased.


You didn't notice this either, because I saw several members of the BestChange campaign who applied in other signature campaigns. I don't want to waste my time looking for them and possibly deleted application posts. (but if you are curious and detailed, you might go through the currently highest-paid campaign and all those who applied.)


considering that this is based on completely incorrect facts, should those (those who applied in another campaign) members be excluded from the campaign by using this reward method?


the only possible reason for raising payment rates in signature campaigns is to match the inflation rate.

It's not just about yesterday's comic announcement.

When I first started as a member of the BestChange signature campaign, BestChange was in first place in terms of weekly payment among all signature campaigns existing at that time (with the exception of chipmixer, which we will consider as an exception, because the conditions there were clearly exceptional for the entire forum). BestChange was paying 100$ per week, while the rest had a maximum of around 80$ (correct me if I'm wrong). Now, paying 100$ is common and I counted 6 campaigns (I can list) that have the same bids. Add to this that some campaigns still have an avatar campaign, which, as a result, allows you to get about the same 100$ per week. In addition, many have added a bonus for the best posters following the example of the Betnomi.

That is, I want to say that 100$ has become a kind of payment standard on the forum (although there are campaigns with a smaller amount, I don't argue). If BestChange used to stand out in terms of payment ratings (and of course not only), now it has practically identical pay rates with the top-priced campaigns. Maybe it's time to go back to the roots and once again show that BestChange is head and shoulders above the rest? Demonstrate level and distinctiveness, so to speak.

I expressed my opinion. To support it or not, everyone's business. But I'm sure that every participant in the depths of his soul, at least, will be happy if the pay is increased, even if he doesn't publicly admit it.

Of course it is. Everything is in the power of the project team, and we are just discussing.

My words are not a call, not a request to raise the rate or something like that. I'm just bringing this matter to the attention of the campaign manager and participants. How to relate to what has been said is a personal matter for everyone.


No one claims that 4$ is a bad pay rate. It just becomes commonplace among other campaigns. I'm talking about the fact that BestChange stood out with its pay rates from the very beginning, which is now fading away.


Who's talking about April Pay Rates?

In my opinion, BestChange Campaign is one of the best on the forum and I am honored to wear this signature. It's undeniable, imho.

Why are we still talking about raising wages to April Fools pay rates? 

BestChange is one of the best campaigns still running if not the best - Ample participant size, 2nd longest duration, and not falling into the mixer/gambling category do wonders to attract people who otherwise do not feel comfortable with other campaigns.

ChipMixer was paying a shitload of money, because it had had $40 million dollars worth of bitcoin in the back (and who knows what else that we might never find out).

$4 per post is considered good pay rate, but what's even better is that it has lasted for 168 weeks. One of the best signature campaigns by far.

When I joined this forum and know about signature campaign, the highest paying signature campaign was chipmixer, followed by Best_Change and so is considered the quality of the posters. Many chipmixer participants came from Best_Change.
But competitors are not so much getting ahead, rather they are leveling up to Best_Change standard. It is only the recent mixer campaign launched by Hhampuz that is paying more than Best_Change.
What happened yesterday was mere April fool drama.

Besides, it seems that majority of us being Best_Change campaign participants care more about longevity and sustainability than higher pay and that is why we do not jump campaigns easily.

Meanwhile, Best_Change is active in this forum and they know the Best Change to make or not for the prestigious standard of the green family.

Well if you must know there's no way a manager can just make changes of payment without the entire team putting heads together to make the changes, besides it's a thing of choice to stay with the campaign or not. In as much we are carving for the increment of payment that doesn't mean we shouldn't put the campaign first to get the required visibilities and exposure here on the forum.

However, those campaign currently are all mixers, meaning they are in higher competition to get utmost exposure among themselves since Chipmixer the number one have been seized. Please don't see me as the bad egg here but truth must be told, I am not against any payment increase.

You not make nice follow up post to @m2017. You admire of the campaign and you don't admire BestChange to review it 
This not honest. Just to quote on it.

For my little period of being here I have enjoyed so much love and oneness, this is to show we love bestchange and i will never change my signature code for another despite any amount being offered, for long I have been admiring to join the green color in the house.
I wish bestchange a supernatural speed to position them at the forefront among every other exchange out there.

Hello Best_Change campaign manager.

I would like to ask very sensitive questions.

For almost a year I have been a member of the BestChange signature campaign (which I hope will not change after this post ) and I would like to celebrate this event in the ranks of BestChange (which should happen soon).

As many have noticed, changes are taking place on this forum: some signature campaigns cease to exist, others begin to occupy their niche here. Life doesn't stand still and this is normal. I understand that different projects can allocate different budgets for promotion, but new campaigns offer fairly solid rewards to their participants, which noticeably distinguishes them from the background of long-term and firmly established projects on bitcointalk. In particular, they lure the most active users from one project to another and there are serious rearrangements among the participants.

Also, I noticed that not a single participant (correct if this is not so) of the BestChange signature campaign applied for new projects, despite a noticeable increase in remuneration. It seems to me that this is a strong indicator of the devotion of the participants. Is there any way to reward them for this? I guess for them (us) it's more than just participation for a fee (I think the atmosphere in the campaign plays a role here). If it was only a reward, then some would have changed their signatures long ago.

This signature campaign has existed for more than 3 years. This is a fairly long period and undoubtedly deserves respect and is an indicator of stability, but the reward for all these years has remained unchanged. Maybe it's time to change the stakes? Oh no, just not down.

What do I want to say? Has the BestChange project administration ever considered the possibility of increasing remuneration for its participants? BestChange has long been one of the highest paying signature campaigns, but competitors are starting to get ahead.

I apologize if this post is embarrassing, but I wanted to ask these questions anyway.

P.S. I hope I don't get lynched for being impudent stupid to ask such a thing.

The payment for week 167 has been sent: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/8dd2a5841f4613d85b25b97ddb2b919e0eee52793b7c2bd9368d1d2449139201

The bonus went to:

• Darker45
• hugeblack
• Charles-Tim
• Mpamaegbu
• Nrcewker

Thank you, everyone! Let's keep on rocking!

We have paid for week 166: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/377387689d02eb26cb92369b93892272a5ee58aeb3db232042bc8d9a46813b6f

The following users got a bonus:

• GreatArkansas
• GeorgeJohn
• KingsDen
• m2017
• Adbitco

Thank you, guys, for your inspiration!

The payment for week 165 has been sent: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/b319e03b64e778c5345f0a8899015276856118c049f82a715d7ad170722bc6ec

The bonus went to:

• Darker45
• cryptoaddictchie
• hugeblack
• adaseb
• Mpamaegbu

Many thanks, guys!

The payment for week 164 was sent yesterday: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/de5ccaf54a085ac3f0ded973f37c98461e25bbea1168cbd33c2160923ab333d9

The bonus went to:

• examplens
• GeorgeJohn
• KingsDen
• Nrcewker
• _BlackStar

Thank you, guys, for your input!

The payment for week 163 has been sent: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/e54e884455a9a13d3b815c44765747a46ece0a0c856496736b0551aff4b38293

The bonus went to:

• hugeblack
• Charles-Tim
• GeorgeJohn
• m2017
• Adbitco

Cheers, everyone!

The payment for week 162 has been sent: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/a98e6bfbb7d5dfeb313987715c1de85a335564a7669ba790d21eb806b43f9019

The bonus went to:

• cryptoaddictchie
• Bitcoin_Arena
• lovesmayfamilis
• adaseb
• Charles-Tim

Thank you, everyone, for your great input!

The payment for week 161 has been sent: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/2c178242dd25d05fff8649fa67f48daa66f7a6ae7f5d4e27ae5aaa177f69f5b1

The bonus went to:

• examplens
• Darker45
• cryptoaddictchie
• hugeblack
• Adbitco

Thank you, everyone!

The payment for week 160 has been sent: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/971f9c9157c6ed2b5c4df21adf6d3d150ccdf1286939b70ecdd14aead3ab121d

The bonus went to:

• Darker45
• cryptoaddictchie
• Upgrade00
• Bitcoin_Arena
• Charles-Tim

Cheers!