Why don't you explain how him buying bitcoin to pay you would be fair?
Alright. Charlie agreed to sell the physical coins. He created the impression that they were an easy sell and that he had buyers lined up. Yet, months down the line bracek has not been paid for the sale. It is fair for bracek to get paid. How Charlie obtains the funds to pay is not that relevant.
Would you please explain how it is fair that bracek doesn't have his physical coins and didn't get paid for them either?
If barcek were to have the physical coins in his possession then all he could do with them is hold them as if he were to spend the bitcoin in the coins they would lost the majority of their value
Your understanding of the stituation appears to be very poor. There, one more post for you to reply to on your signature spam run. Mind you, this is the last one I'm giving you.