Topic: chinese bookmakers with tf gaming platform NO KYC - page 6. (Read 3296 times)

it would be even better if you want to bet on online gambling it's better to do KYC earlier than having to ask for KYC when you want to withdraw big wins and it will usually take a very long time.
It doesn't matter if the casino is part of China or not for sure online casino is now popular with KYC and better do it earlier than we have problems in the future

Choosing the best casino recommended on the forum will be better, although we have to do KYC verification in the end. At least, we hope these best casinos can maintain customer data properly and not abuse it. Using the best casino, we won't worry about anything because the best casinos can provide the best for their customers. That way, as long as we play and withdraw the winning money, there won't be any problems.

We can conclude that there is no casino that does not require KYC even though it is not stated in the terms and conditions, so any non-KYC gambler is not guaranteed anonymous because they will be asked for KYC at any time even if the casino is not licensed, the purpose of the casino is to require KYC because gamblers will make withdrawals From winning on slots, gamblers have no guarantee of being able to withdraw funds because the casino will not verify the KYC provided, so it is better to switch to choosing a top casino that has been recommended in forums.

Yes you are right that mate as a gambler we need to look for a good casino, a casino that trusted enough, the casino that truly recommend from forums cause it will make as our Identity secure if they will ask KYC because most of all casino here in forum or outside of the forum ask KYC for withdrawals and even in deposit. Also  the surprise of other casino is there ad we all know that some casino not endecate in thier terms of condition about KYC but when you are going to withdraw they will ask you.

We can conclude that there is no casino that does not require KYC even though it is not stated in the terms and conditions, so any non-KYC gambler is not guaranteed anonymous because they will be asked for KYC at any time even if the casino is not licensed, the purpose of the casino is to require KYC because gamblers will make withdrawals From winning on slots, gamblers have no guarantee of being able to withdraw funds because the casino will not verify the KYC provided, so it is better to switch to choosing a top casino that has been recommended in forums.

Personally I think that the Chinese casino platforms attract my attention, because I know that the Chinese have a lot of development, they always look for ways to keep entertainment, and the games that are local, the ones that they have as traditional, I have always liked, despite the fact that I don't understand them, I don't see that they are very interesting, I would like a caisnio that is clearly part of that Chinese culture, I would like to have more of these ocpineos, we are used to entering casinos where they offer us roulette wheels, slot machines, dice, another one would be excellent way to be able to play with games of Chinese culture, I don't know if at that level the problem would also be exacerbated with KYC?

When the KYC is done to withdraw a specific amount, be it a little or a lot, they achieve what they want, the Chinese have many things that are prohibited, it does not seem strange to me that they have prohibited casinos or that they demand strong KYC, it is said that In China there is everything, and there should be casinos that are without KYC, but it is like looking for the gold in a pagjar, you should do it, but they can be treated as fraudulent sites where you cannot trust, some fraudulent sites do not survive in bitcointalk, because there are experts who verify that a casino is legal and always pays and does not steal from its players.

agree with you.
better to do KYC now than promise no KYC in fact be asked for KYC after the platform grows bigger.
there are many cases like this when the casino is still new giving very definite promises not caring about KYC but after the casino has been running for a long time and has become a little big, they forget about the initial agreement and after that ask all gamblers to do KYC in every withdrawal in small or large amounts.

Second the motion as we all know there are many casino who offer or saying that they don't have any KYC but in the end when you are going to withdraw your winning then they start asking KYC so its not a good practice promising that they don't have KYC as we all know that promises are ment to be broken. Its better to say that KYC is a must rather than catching the attention of a gambler using lie it because they promise that theres no KYC.

agree with you.
better to do KYC now than promise no KYC in fact be asked for KYC after the platform grows bigger.
there are many cases like this when the casino is still new giving very definite promises not caring about KYC but after the casino has been running for a long time and has become a little big, they forget about the initial agreement and after that ask all gamblers to do KYC in every withdrawal in small or large amounts.

If you provide KYC data to the wrong casino, there is no guarantee that your data will be safe, like you join a new project but you don't do any research before submitting KYC data. So make sure you provide KYC data for reputable, licensed and trusted casinos.

The implementation of KYC requirements at each casino is due to licensing regulations, so you must understand about the statement and not because the factor of the development of casinos will add KYC requirements in the future.

It is better to not make promises which are impossible to fulfill, maybe when a casino is small they can get away with this, but as soon as you begin to manage a high volume of money through your casino then you will get the attention of the regulators which will basically give you two options, to follow the rules or shutdown, and if you have to confront that situation I would expect for you to follow the regulations put in place and ask for all kind of identifying documents from gamblers from that point on.

The casino will also not use data on KYC to commit a crime because if they manage the casino properly they can get huge profits so it is impossible to commit a crime by utilizing user data from KYC.
As crypto casinos develop, I am also sure that each of these casinos will also impose KYC requirements on each of their customers in the future.

For me personally, as long as the casino has a credible and trustworthy reputation i have no problem with KYC. because after all, gradually all casinos will enforce KYC as one of the requirements. like it or not, one must be willing to fulfill KYC requirements which in the end, gradually everyone will get used to KYC.

It is better to not make promises which are impossible to fulfill, maybe when a casino is small they can get away with this, but as soon as you begin to manage a high volume of money through your casino then you will get the attention of the regulators which will basically give you two options, to follow the rules or shutdown, and if you have to confront that situation I would expect for you to follow the regulations put in place and ask for all kind of identifying documents from gamblers from that point on.

I continue to think and argue that when payments during gambling are made using cryptocurrencies, then the KYC procedure is a damn evil, an invention by the American banking lobby and reflected in the US legislation.  
And then it was spread around the world because all local legislators and governments look with their mouths open and give in to these American alleged "masters of the world" because they are issuers of paper money, and now even simpler numbers in a computer in the form of newly created dollars.  Everyone knows that the US authorities went crazy on the question of how to rip off their people with taxes and fines, if they filled out something wrong in the declaration.  So they came up with this KYC of their own.  Fortunately, not all countries are subject to the Americans. There are also countries who spit on their demands.  And their territories may well host crypto casinos where no KYC is needed and players can easily play without this stupid verification.  And besides, there are many more scammers in the simple dollar payments sector, and not in the cryptocurrency sector.  And all these are fairy tales and legends that cryptocurrency is only for money laundering and for scammers.  It is the banking lobbies that spread such advertising, scaring ordinary people.  
And it's understandable why.  To get more loans and mortgages.  And, accordingly, more income for bankers.

We are close to launch and we are going to accept players from anywhere and no KYC ever !

I see at BTC365.com that they are licensed from Montenegro. That immediately reminds me of the Cloudbet platform, but I don't think this is a Cloudbet project. I also don't know if this site is reliable. They don't have an ANN on Bitcointalk and I can't find a lot of info about them either. Founded in 2020 so it seems, so still fairly new on the market. That doesn't always mean much. You will have to look and judge based on reviews from other players whether or not you are going to play here. I wouldn't put any money into it right now.

maybe someone knows such bookmakers as https://www.zhb77.com/ or btc365.com (5 month ago) who have tf gaming or other chinese platform without KYC

would be very grateful if you could share these