A centralized entity claiming to "never" require KYC should be taken with doubt, cynicism, and distrust. Because in actuality, centralized entities/casinos, if they are legitimate, have already accepted the trade-offs that they do indeed should require KYC on their users to comply with anti-money laundering laws. No service can go around it, except if they build their casinos on top of the Bitcoin blockchain like DirectBet did.
These were glorious times when no one asked you to take a picture of your face with a piece of paper with today's date or keep some kind of your document next to your face. And take pictures like that too. All this is actually just a damn theater of the absurd, invented by the banking lobby of American bankers. Bankers who put the whole world on shitty loans and mortgages. And now they are watching the owners of cryptocurrencies. Of course, legislators require the introduction of KYC from large online casinos. And they, of course, are law-abiding citizens and cannot refuse. Even though these casinos are losing most of their customers - players who cannot or do not want to lose their anonymity. And there can be many reasons to remain anonymous in gambling. From problems in the family to problems at work. And even with the tax authorities. And by the way, players from a number of countries cannot play calmly when they are required to KYC.
And you have to play in those casinos where KYC is not required. And everyone is happy. And the number of scams is not increasing.
So deceit and blatant lies are all anti-money laundering.
Post a list that contains those casinos that, have a thread of their own in BitcoinTalk, that have the trust of the community, and that clearly indicates in their TOS that they won't ask for KYC.
I believe all of the most trusted casinos in the forum will ask many users for KYC after a period of time. It's merely a trade-off accepted because it's a requirment from the government.