Topic: chinese bookmakers with tf gaming platform NO KYC - page 7. (Read 3291 times)

But I continue to think and argue that when payments during gambling are made using cryptocurrencies, then the KYC procedure is a damn evil, an invention by the American banking lobby and reflected in the US legislation. 
And then it was spread around the world because all local legislators and governments look with their mouths open and give in to these American alleged "masters of the world" because they are issuers of paper money, and now even simpler numbers in a computer in the form of newly created dollars.  Everyone knows that the US authorities went crazy on the question of how to rip off their people with taxes and fines, if they filled out something wrong in the declaration.  So they came up with this KYC of their own.  Fortunately, not all countries are subject to the Americans. There are also countries who spit on their demands.  And their territories may well host crypto casinos where no KYC is needed and players can easily play without this stupid verification.  And besides, there are many more scammers in the simple dollar payments sector, and not in the cryptocurrency sector.  And all these are fairy tales and legends that cryptocurrency is only for money laundering and for scammers.  It is the banking lobbies that spread such advertising, scaring ordinary people. 
And it's understandable why.  To get more loans and mortgages.  And, accordingly, more income for bankers.

actually KYC is just compliance we have to do to qualify from the casino and it really isn't that bad. very true what you said, all the top casinos all have terms and conditions to do KYC and I think all that because the gambling is also licensed.
so there is no doubt that if online casino gambling has a license and has a good reputation, surely they will have rules or conditions for carrying out KYC before betting.

Yes, it's like I said, personally I don't have much to say if I have to provide KYC documentation, but there are some really very strict sites, and no, a lot of effort is already made when a KYC is going to be given, but be aware that it is You must have more documentation or even worse, leave everything and do not verify it because the documents do not seem clear enough, that is already something that not even a bank would bother to do, besides that I am a lazy person, that I don't like that they are bothering me for documents or something like that, so that partly bothers me, that's what happened to me with some casinos and exchanges.

What you say is justifiable. but in truth, the KYC function is not what you say. maybe in the case that you say, KYC can be very useful in recovering the ownership of his gambling account. At present, almost all gambling sites require KYC as a regulatory and license requirement, especially the casinos that we have in our community. especially casinos that have big names, even though the implementation of KYC in each casino varies according to needs or a certain level.

For me personally, as long as the casino has a credible and trustworthy reputation i have no problem with KYC. because after all, gradually all casinos will enforce KYC as one of the requirements. like it or not, one must be willing to fulfill KYC requirements which in the end, gradually everyone will get used to KYC.

I think that gradually all casinos will be divided into two large groups. 
The first group will be clearly law-abiding and will introduce strict KYC, as required by the American authorities and, after them, jurisdictions that are very afraid of the Americans and will also force casinos to introduce KYC.  Otherwise, the authorities will apply repression up to the ban on the operation of this casino in the country.  Of course, there are many such countries that are afraid of Americans like fire, more than half of those that sit in the UN.  Even, perhaps more than 3/4. 
But fortunately , there are countries that would not care about the global usa dictatorship.  And they don’t give a damn about this damn KYC invented by American bankers.  And of course, in such jurisdictions, casinos will be able to work with players without KYC.  Especially when the amounts are really small.  And this will be the second group of casinos.  By the way, I think that millions of gamblers prefer to remain anonymous. 
And this huge number of people certainly need online casino sites without any personal identification, such as KYC.

I mean that teenagers can easily visit any site, including gambling sites, even though the gambling sites have KYC procedures that are difficult to pass. They can easily borrow an adult's identity to pass KYC to play gambling like adults. Especially if the teenager finds a crypto-based gambling site that doesn't strictly enforce KYC, they can skip it and start gambling. And with crypto, they can also get crypto to use for gambling. So with the convenience of today's technology, it is not difficult for teenagers to play gambling and pass KYC. Maybe that's why KYC is implemented in some casinos to protect youths and adults from KYC abuse.

Yes, going to another casino would be the best solution, especially if it involves completing KYC using more complete documents so that our accounts are verified. And with so many casinos asking us to do KYC, it seems that in the future, we will find it difficult to avoid this KYC, but hopefully, the casinos will understand that there are gamblers who play with small money and don't want KYC. And hopefully, there are still casinos that aren't too strict, so we can still play gambling without having to do KYC.

How would it be possible to claim against the casino or site - not that is not difficult even in big and KYC compliant sites - if there is no KYC. You basically are creating a contract without one of the basic elements of it: identification of the parts that intervene in the contract. It is not valid in any jurisdiction whatsoever... user 7774LLO is not a legal entity so cannot have rights recognise?

It was the bonus actually is the thing that many gamblers focus at then the next thing would be security or other features such as games and, costumer support and the sites design. Convenience and security are contradicting and should not come together because when we say convenient, this should mean that the site don't have KYC and other hassles like 2fa.

Most casinos are using email addresses for logging in so even if we lost our phones, it is still possible to access our accounts. If ever it was a phone number that is required to login then we still can try emailing them and ask for a help about this matter. There might still be a way to recover it even without a KYC.

So which websites use same platform as btc365.com? KYC or no KYC

Come to mind off that before this crypto market in gambling industry had existed, we had been dealing with centralized things already with fiat based online casinos which these are things not to be shocking anymore since people had already that experience in dealing it on the past.Crypto gambling did really just become that popular or known because of the accessibility and the anonymity on which a certain
gambler would able to make on unlike when we do make use of our credit/debit cards on those usual fiat casino sites.Its true that this isnt something you dont like for it to happen where these anonymous
things do happen and then suddenly make those changes and asking out for some verification as we do go ahead on future years to come.Laws and regulations becomes even more tighter
which it isnt really  that surprising anymore.

I think most gamblers only focus on the convenience and security of the gambling platform and the reputation of the casino from the community's assessment, I do not exclude KYC requests but almost all the top casinos have added KYC to the terms and conditions. In another case, the user has lost his mobile and he has lost access to all data and gambling accounts stored on the mobile, he cannot recover the gambling account and the casino platform team also cannot recover the user's account ownership without saving the KYC of the previous main user, so KYC is not too bad for proof of account ownership but only for trusted and top reputed casinos.

There are numerous website that do this. It's a little tricky especially if you are not fond of reading. If you are one of most players that do not really read the terms of service because it's just too long, then most probably you are not aware that some casinos run like this.

Some casinos do not really require KYC in the beginning at the very least. This is because they are well-aware that not all gamblers are in favor with it. Which is the reason why some of them came up with a solution of just asking it whenever they deem necessary. In most cases, KYC are often asked when there's unusual activity on your account and when you plan to withdraw your winnings whether it may be big or small.

Most gambling sites now require KYC upfront and on the latter part. The gambling world is becoming more and more centralized. I don't know if it's a positive thing or not. But I guess it will depend on how we will view it according to our situation.

Most of them doesnt require KYC on the time that you would really be making up some registration but into those terms and conditions that you agreed upon do state that they have the rights on asking out later
on the time that they would be seeing some suspicious actions made by your account and the worst whenever you do win big then this is the time that they would be asking up some questions which is something
not really that surprising for them to do so. This is why if we do speak about DEX then it would be particularly be pertaining on 3.0 but honestly people should really be that accepting on what we are currently
been using up today.Laws and regulations are something inevitable for us to be able to experience it out and as long these platforms are centralized then they are really that been following regulations.

Better it could not have been said, when we comply with the KYC requirements we can forget about some inconveniences that may arise, all the casinos that I have been entering have seen that they have many KYC requirements, and requirements that are quite serious, I have fulfilled some KYC that are called first level, there are other levels of KYC where they demand a lot for the documents and sometimes the documents are not in very good condition and that is the only reason they are rejected and that becomes a problem, that has happened to me many times and you When they get into things like that, I always go to another casino, it's the best solution.

I have already written here on BTT several times that I am a strong opponent of passing kyc identification when it comes to payments in cryptocurrencies. 
I am such a convinced opponent and remain.  However, your argument that teenagers can use gambling sites where there is no KYC procedure puzzled me.  Indeed, there is a danger that such children and adolescents may become addicted to gambling.  And even become addicted to gambling, which of course is very bad.  And it should be taken into account that young people and teenagers are very well versed in information technology and can easily find ways to bypass various blockages.  Perhaps protecting children and teenagers from gambling sites that are intended for adults, people of legal age with the help of KYC is the only case where I myself would also support the introduction of this identification. 

Otherwise, in the cryptocurrency market, KYC is a damn evil that needs to be fought.

Such as which please?

And now you've seen several cases where parents need to pay more attention to how their children grow and develop because they are busier with their own businesses. Their children are starting to get busy with their own world by using the devices given to them by their parents to the point that they don't pay attention to their own lives. And this is what triggers many cases of teenagers who are misdirected in socializing and some who end up committing juvenile crimes. This should not be allowed to happen to our children, especially if we care so much about their lives. After all, their life in the future will also depend on how we can educate them.

And once they find gambling can be an outlet for what is happening in their life, they will use it continuously, and it will trigger other problems where they can experience gambling addiction. And nowadays, they can get many gambling sites that will never ask them to do KYC. These sites come from countries from the west and the east that have started developing their gambling business.

There are some gambling sites with no KYC and that you can gamble and they are still reputable, but I have not done that beyond this forum, only on this forum that I see that. Aside the gambling sites on this forum, if I want to choose a gambling site, I will just go for KYC gambling sites. But what is most important is not KYC, it is obtaining a license and how old a gambling site is. Some people do not even care much about license, what they care about is a casino has been existing for a long time without unsolved cases of customers that compalined about the casino of fraud and inability to withdraw.

Any other website with same odds platform as btc365.com?