Author

Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 202. (Read 2145059 times)

hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
September 03, 2016, 11:03:50 AM
Great miner thanks Claymore

Im really liking the lower power consumption over Ethash and all my gpus are running much cooler. Cool  The high profit of this coin is vanishing rapidly though.

If I had to throw un uneducated number I would say this miner uses 20% less electricity over EThash.
hero member
Activity: 895
Merit: 504
September 03, 2016, 10:51:53 AM
I am getting this message on dwarfpul when trying to see worker stat

"You cannot mine to eny exchange without payment_id !
Please add it like here:
47sghzufGhJJDQEbScMCwVBimTuq6L5JiRixD8VeGbpjCTA12noXmi4ZyBZLc99e66NtnKff34fHsGR oyZk3ES1s1V4QVcB.xxxxxxxxxx"

My .bat is

"NsGpuCNMiner.exe -o stratum+tcp://xmr-usa.dwarfpool.com:8050 -u 47sghzufGhJJDQEbScMCwVBimTuq6L5JiRixD8VeGbpjCTA12noXmi4ZyBZLc99e66NtnKff34fHsGR oyZk3ES1s1V4QVcB.13fe7a076b9e105df7dfeb32c5a959d7de3e09a32cf84499cd6ad201a787ad 4b.1 -p x -o stratum+tcp://xmr-eu.dwarfpool.com:8050 -u 47sghzufGhJJDQEbScMCwVBimTuq6L5JiRixD8VeGbpjCTA12noXmi4ZyB.....paymentID.1 -p x"

What am I doing wrong?

Thanks.
newbie
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
September 03, 2016, 10:47:22 AM
We need a monitor same ETHman ....
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
September 03, 2016, 10:36:31 AM
MH/s as i wrote..but in my pool i'm the slowest with just one GTX1080 and on Xeon E5-1650V3 making 3.4MH/s
Currently GTX | Xeon
accepted: 772/773 (99.87%), 373.40 MH/s yes! | accepted: 92/92 (100%), 134.48 MH, 3356.60 kH/s yes!

XMR just 450H/s with the old CUDA miner..so I don't mine XMR - XCN/DECRED/LBRY I mine.
Atm I make 4 LBRY per hour. While the top performer in my pool does 5800 o.O 3.5 BTC..gosh
legendary
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
September 03, 2016, 10:34:25 AM
gtx1070 does more then 600h/s - but this is not good too
sr. member
Activity: 711
Merit: 270
September 03, 2016, 10:32:00 AM
No scores since there is no current miner for XMR and NVIDIA cards.
So nothing to compare the old miner (tsiv) i used form 09/2014 and CUDA5.5 gave me 450MH/s for XMR.

Currently mining Lbry and having 370-500 MH/s depending on the diff ..in decred I have also ~3800MH/s

3800H/s or 3800MH/s ?
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
September 03, 2016, 10:10:14 AM
No scores since there is no current miner for XMR and NVIDIA cards.
So nothing to compare the old miner (tsiv) i used form 09/2014 and CUDA5.5 gave me 450H/s for XMR.

Currently mining Lbry and having 370-500 MH/s depending on the diff ..in decred I have also ~3800MH/s
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
September 03, 2016, 10:08:15 AM
It's a pretty poor show when a 750ti gets around 850 h/s using less than 150w but a 280x gets a measly 470 h/s using near 220w! The 280x is the more powerful card...... Huh
are you sure a GTX 750 ti can reach 800h/s ?: I think one is under 300h/s...

250-280 with default settings, 50-60 watts.

Which are the recent scores on 970,980/ti and the Pascals ?

970 does 470-500 with tsiv's opensource miner, no idea about 980/ti but I'm guessing 500-550 and 550-600. Amph said that 1070 does currently only 350.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
September 03, 2016, 10:00:41 AM
It's a pretty poor show when a 750ti gets around 850 h/s using less than 150w but a 280x gets a measly 470 h/s using near 220w! The 280x is the more powerful card...... Huh
are you sure a GTX 750 ti can reach 800h/s ?: I think one is under 300h/s...

250-280 with default settings, 50-60 watts.

Which are the recent scores on 970,980/ti and the Pascals ?
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
September 03, 2016, 07:53:50 AM
Claymore, any change of updating the linux client?

Not right now, sorry, I explained why already.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
September 03, 2016, 07:50:14 AM
Claymore, any change of updating the linux client?
hero member
Activity: 525
Merit: 500
September 03, 2016, 07:44:37 AM
I'm taking info from whattomine.com, I have 280x's and what they report my cards get within 5%
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
September 03, 2016, 07:33:07 AM
It's a pretty poor show when a 750ti gets around 850 h/s using less than 150w but a 280x gets a measly 470 h/s using near 220w! The 280x is the more powerful card...... Huh
are you sure a GTX 750 ti can reach 800h/s ?: I think one is under 300h/s...

250-280 with default settings, 50-60 watts.
sr. member
Activity: 445
Merit: 255
September 03, 2016, 07:23:28 AM
It's a pretty poor show when a 750ti gets around 850 h/s using less than 150w but a 280x gets a measly 470 h/s using near 220w! The 280x is the more powerful card...... Huh
are you sure a GTX 750 ti can reach 800h/s ?: I think one is under 300h/s...
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
September 03, 2016, 07:21:50 AM
It's a pretty poor show when a 750ti gets around 850 h/s using less than 150w but a 280x gets a measly 470 h/s using near 220w! The 280x is the more powerful card...... Huh

Its the way they are coded that determines the speed.
hero member
Activity: 525
Merit: 500
September 03, 2016, 06:57:58 AM
It's a pretty poor show when a 750ti gets around 850 h/s using less than 150w but a 280x gets a measly 470 h/s using near 220w! The 280x is the more powerful card...... Huh
legendary
Activity: 3444
Merit: 1061
September 03, 2016, 06:57:18 AM
mr. claymore, this cryptonight algo can be dual mined?
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
September 03, 2016, 06:24:47 AM
I think its a bug. My 6990 is hashing at 700h/s and the GPU load is 0% while the temps are up.
hero member
Activity: 848
Merit: 500
September 03, 2016, 04:49:56 AM
1. For Monero, if gpu load is not 100% it does not mean that you can mine faster.
Maybe GCN?
How to turn off temp/fan control? -tt 0?
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
September 03, 2016, 03:46:20 AM
1. For Monero, if gpu load is not 100% it does not mean that you can mine faster.
2. Power consumption: when possible, use "-a 2" option value, check readme:

"-a 2" low power consumption mode for 290/290x cards. A bit less speed (1%) but less power consumption (10-15%).
Jump to: