Author

Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 216. (Read 2145059 times)

donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
February 23, 2015, 02:47:52 AM
Claymore: can you build v9.2 for Linux?

Not right now, but I will do it.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
February 22, 2015, 03:37:55 PM
Claymore: can you build v9.2 for Linux?
member
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
February 14, 2015, 11:36:56 PM
in my core i5 4th generation i get about 186+ h/s ...


but the speed is not constant 186+ ... most of the time it goes down to 100+ ...


is there any way i can make it constant speed of 180+ ??


please tell me Cheesy
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
February 02, 2015, 02:46:00 AM
v9.2 is available:

- Improved stability in some cases.
- Added 285 card native support.
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
February 02, 2015, 02:44:57 AM
Claymore, i remember very often updates of your miner, what causes of stopping ? No potential of improving ?

Currently I don't see any ways to improve performance. But I promised to release a minor update, I'm uploading it right now.
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
February 01, 2015, 03:54:29 PM
I think Claymore has milked the last bit from his excellent miner.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
February 01, 2015, 02:41:30 PM
Claymore, i remember very often updates of your miner, what causes of stopping ? No potential of improving ?
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
hi  Claymore
can You  extend the mining tool?

Support others CryptoNote  coin ?
some other coin just like  Red Wind?
you can switch the hashrate to XMR pool Per hour for Charge a fee 2.5%

Main mining on one pool and mining devfee on another pool is possible, but it will require some efforts to implement it correctly; in my opinion, currently it is waste of time.
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
hi  Claymore
can You  extend the mining tool?

Support others CryptoNote  coin ?
some other coin just like  Red Wind?
you can switch the hashrate to XMR pool Per hour for Charge a fee 2.5%
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
i have catalyst 13.12

But for some reason you use miner for Catalyst 14.7 and miner shows it, you can see it in your screenshot.
Use miner for Catalyst 13.12 if you use Catalyst 13.12.
member
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
Does anyone run the Linux version?
I get segmentation fault at start.  Any ideas?


Don't run pimp in remote desktop. Use putty/ssh etc.
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
Hi, I am new to mining. I'm pretty sure i understand enough about this to set it up on my own,for the most but, but im getting stuck. i get this http://s4.postimg.org/pmjc4afft/monero.jpg http://s3.postimg.org/dnhc98r7z/monero2.jpg

I am running
one Sapphire R9 280x dual-x
amd fx-6200
6gb ram

i have catalyst 13.12
i have set GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
i have disabled overclocking
i have set virtual memory to 18 gb and above
i have cleared system environment of all anything gpu related

help please, im stuck. I've had slight success with my mining with my processor
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
The program does not work with the R9 285 - startup error occurs driver. Win 8 64 bit driver 14.9
The developer will be able to fix it?

If driver crashes, try less HashCnt for this card instead of 896 that you can see in the log (GPU #0: HashCnt = 896), refer to "-h" parameter description. For example, "-h 500,0,0,0,0". Try several values to find best speed.

Stable results:
GPU 0: HashCnt = 864, time = 1652 ms, hashrate = 523 h/s
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
The program does not work with the R9 285 - startup error occurs driver. Win 8 64 bit driver 14.9
The developer will be able to fix it?

If driver crashes, try less HashCnt for this card instead of 896 that you can see in the log (GPU #0: HashCnt = 896), refer to "-h" parameter description. For example, "-h 500,0,0,0,0". Try several values to find best speed.
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
The program does not work with the R9 285 - startup error occurs driver. Win 8 64 bit driver 14.9
The developer will be able to fix it?


13:29:24:941   9d8   
13:29:24:941   9d8   ЙHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH»
13:29:24:941   9d8   є            Claymore CryptoNote GPU Miner  v9.1 Beta            є
13:29:24:941   9d8   ИHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHj
13:29:26:832   9d8   
Cards available: 5
13:29:26:832   9d8   GPU #0: name: Tonga, 2048 MB available, 28 units
13:29:26:832   9d8   GPU #1: name: Pitcairn, 2048 MB available, 20 units
13:29:26:848   9d8   GPU #2: name: Pitcairn, 2048 MB available, 20 units
13:29:26:848   9d8   GPU #3: name: Pitcairn, 2048 MB available, 20 units
13:29:26:848   9d8   GPU #4: name: Pitcairn, 2048 MB available, 20 units
13:29:26:848   9d8   Total cards: 5
13:29:26:848   9d8   Initializing...

13:29:26:848   9d8   card 0, m1 2048, m2 1791 w 224
13:29:26:848   9d8   0 m = 2
13:29:26:863   9d8   GPU #0: HashCnt = 896
13:29:26:863   9d8   GPU #1 recognized as Radeon 270/270X 2GB
13:29:26:863   9d8   card 1, m1 2048, m2 1791 w 160
13:29:26:863   9d8   1 m = 2
13:29:26:863   9d8   GPU #1: HashCnt = 512
13:29:26:863   9d8   GPU #2 recognized as Radeon 270/270X 2GB
13:29:26:863   9d8   card 2, m1 2048, m2 1791 w 160
13:29:26:879   9d8   2 m = 2
13:29:26:879   9d8   GPU #2: HashCnt = 512
13:29:26:879   9d8   GPU #3 recognized as Radeon 270/270X 2GB
13:29:26:879   9d8   card 3, m1 2048, m2 1791 w 160
13:29:26:879   9d8   3 m = 2
13:29:26:879   9d8   GPU #3: HashCnt = 512
13:29:26:879   9d8   GPU #4 recognized as Radeon 270/270X 2GB
13:29:26:879   9d8   card 4, m1 2048, m2 1791 w 160
13:29:26:895   9d8   4 m = 2
13:29:26:895   9d8   GPU #4: HashCnt = 512
13:29:26:895   9d8   POOL version
13:29:26:895   9d8   b130
13:29:31:738   9d8   GPU #0: -a 1 mode selected
13:29:31:738   9d8   GPU #1: -a 1 mode selected
13:29:31:738   9d8   GPU #2: -a 1 mode selected
13:29:31:738   9d8   GPU #3: -a 1 mode selected
13:29:31:738   9d8   GPU #4: -a 1 mode selected
13:29:31:785   9d8   8 pools specified.
13:29:31:801   9d8   Press "m" key for tune mode.
13:29:31:801   9d0   Stratum - connecting to 'xmr-eu.dwarfpool.com' <198.27.70.156> port 8100
13:29:31:801   900   Stratum - connecting to 'xmr-eu.dwarfpool.com' <198.27.70.156> port 8100
13:29:32:020   9d0   Stratum - Connected
13:29:32:270   9d0   got 303 bytes
13:29:32:270   9d0   buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"883185146492905","job":{"blob":"0100b6fc9da5058219a8754dc9a12bd95c645c288b99361f863b6470f878c429efdd9bcdaedbee0 00000002280e51a4f39b7071160d4fc5a562beaf9befad39c89ad6df74018d7c31fd31103","job_id":"807511666300706","target":"b88d0600"},"status":"OK"}}

13:29:32:270   9d0   parse packet: 303
13:29:32:270   9d0   new buf size: 0
13:29:32:270   9d0   Pool Diff 10000
13:29:32:270   9d0   df has same pool, skip
13:29:32:348   1394   Round
13:29:32:395   1064   Round
13:29:32:395   112c   Round
13:29:32:395   778   Round
13:29:33:535   12dc   GPU 1: HashCnt = 512, time = 1171 ms, hashrate = 437 h/s
13:29:33:551   12dc   Round
13:29:33:598   11ec   GPU 3: HashCnt = 512, time = 1207 ms, hashrate = 424 h/s
13:29:33:613   11ec   Round
13:29:33:629   137c   GPU 2: HashCnt = 512, time = 1218 ms, hashrate = 420 h/s
13:29:33:629   137c   Round
13:29:33:691   414   GPU 4: HashCnt = 512, time = 1312 ms, hashrate = 390 h/s
13:29:33:707   414   Round
13:29:34:707   778   GPU 1: HashCnt = 512, time = 1132 ms, hashrate = 452 h/s
13:29:34:707   778   Round
13:29:34:816   105c   GPU 3: HashCnt = 512, time = 1185 ms, hashrate = 432 h/s
13:29:34:816   105c   Round
13:29:34:848   12e4   GPU 2: HashCnt = 512, time = 1199 ms, hashrate = 427 h/s
13:29:34:863   12e4   round found 1 shares
13:29:34:863   12e4   Round
13:29:34:879   9d0   01/03/15-13:29:34 - SHARE FOUND (target 10000) - (GPU 2 of 5)
13:29:34:988   1394   GPU 4: HashCnt = 512, time = 1272 ms, hashrate = 402 h/s
13:29:35:004   1394   Round
13:29:35:176   9d0   got 63 bytes
13:29:35:176   9d0   buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"status":"OK"}}

13:29:35:176   9d0   parse packet: 63
13:29:35:176   9d0   Share accepted
13:29:35:176   9d0   new buf size: 0
13:29:35:863   12dc   GPU 1: HashCnt = 512, time = 1131 ms, hashrate = 452 h/s
13:29:35:863   12dc   Round
13:29:36:004   11ec   GPU 3: HashCnt = 512, time = 1169 ms, hashrate = 437 h/s
13:29:36:020   11ec   Round
13:29:36:066   137c   GPU 2: HashCnt = 512, time = 1181 ms, hashrate = 433 h/s
13:29:36:066   137c   Round
13:29:36:301   414   GPU 4: HashCnt = 512, time = 1272 ms, hashrate = 402 h/s
13:29:36:316   414   Round
13:29:37:066   778   GPU 1: HashCnt = 512, time = 1174 ms, hashrate = 436 h/s
13:29:37:145   778   Round
13:29:37:254   105c   GPU 3: HashCnt = 512, time = 1221 ms, hashrate = 419 h/s
13:29:37:270   105c   Round
13:29:37:285   12e4   GPU 2: HashCnt = 512, time = 1193 ms, hashrate = 429 h/s
13:29:37:285   12e4   Round
13:29:37:707   1394   GPU 4: HashCnt = 512, time = 1377 ms, hashrate = 371 h/s
13:29:38:379   1394   Round
13:29:38:457   12dc   GPU 1: HashCnt = 512, time = 1285 ms, hashrate = 398 h/s
13:29:43:160   137c   GPU 2: HashCnt = 512, time = 5748 ms, hashrate = 89 h/s
13:29:44:348   12dc   Round
13:29:43:160   11ec   GPU 3: HashCnt = 512, time = 5774 ms, hashrate = 88 h/s
13:29:46:910   414   Round
13:29:47:051   11ec   Round
13:29:47:941   12dc   GPU 1: HashCnt = 512, time = 3523 ms, hashrate = 145 h/s
13:29:47:957   12dc   Round
13:29:48:020   12e4   GPU 2: HashCnt = 512, time = 1837 ms, hashrate = 278 h/s
13:29:48:051   12e4   Round
13:29:48:176   105c   GPU 3: HashCnt = 512, time = 1236 ms, hashrate = 414 h/s
13:29:48:176   105c   Round
13:29:48:270   1394   GPU 4: HashCnt = 512, time = 1382 ms, hashrate = 370 h/s
13:29:48:285   1394   Round
13:29:49:129   778   GPU 1: HashCnt = 512, time = 1152 ms, hashrate = 444 h/s
13:29:49:129   778   Round
13:29:49:238   137c   GPU 2: HashCnt = 512, time = 1179 ms, hashrate = 434 h/s
13:29:49:254   137c   Round
13:29:49:363   11ec   GPU 3: HashCnt = 512, time = 1168 ms, hashrate = 438 h/s
13:29:49:379   11ec   Round
13:29:49:566   414   GPU 4: HashCnt = 512, time = 1271 ms, hashrate = 402 h/s
13:29:49:582   414   Round
13:29:50:285   12dc   GPU 1: HashCnt = 512, time = 1130 ms, hashrate = 453 h/s
13:29:50:285   12dc   Round
13:29:50:457   12e4   GPU 2: HashCnt = 512, time = 1185 ms, hashrate = 432 h/s
13:29:50:457   12e4   Round
13:29:50:566   105c   GPU 3: HashCnt = 512, time = 1168 ms, hashrate = 438 h/s
13:29:50:582   105c   Round
13:29:50:879   1394   GPU 4: HashCnt = 512, time = 1271 ms, hashrate = 402 h/s
13:29:50:879   1394   Round
13:29:51:441   778   GPU 1: HashCnt = 512, time = 1130 ms, hashrate = 453 h/s
13:29:51:457   778   Round
13:29:51:660   137c   GPU 2: HashCnt = 512, time = 1182 ms, hashrate = 433 h/s
13:29:51:676   137c   Round
13:29:51:754   11ec   GPU 3: HashCnt = 512, time = 1168 ms, hashrate = 438 h/s
13:29:51:770   11ec   Round
13:29:52:176   414   GPU 4: HashCnt = 512, time = 1272 ms, hashrate = 402 h/s
13:29:52:191   414   Round
13:29:52:598   12dc   GPU 1: HashCnt = 512, time = 1131 ms, hashrate = 452 h/s
13:29:52:613   12dc   Round
13:29:52:832   900   Stratum - Cannot connect  to xmr-eu.dwarfpool.com port 8100
13:29:52:832   900   DevFee: Stratum - Failed to connect, retry in 20 sec...
13:29:52:879   12e4   GPU 2: HashCnt = 512, time = 1181 ms, hashrate = 433 h/s
13:29:52:895   12e4   Round
13:29:52:957   105c   GPU 3: HashCnt = 512, time = 1168 ms, hashrate = 438 h/s
13:29:52:973   105c   Round
sr. member
Activity: 245
Merit: 256
December 30, 2014, 12:11:59 AM
Oh, sorry. Inadvertently read as "gdb" and therefore missed the description of the parameter. Thanks a lot.
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
December 29, 2014, 08:45:02 AM
Is it possible to disable writing logs at txt-file?
I have a ReadOnly flash with overlay and no need logs.

Yes, check "Readme!!!.txt" file:

...
"-dbg -1" - no log file and no debug messages.
...
sr. member
Activity: 245
Merit: 256
December 29, 2014, 06:35:07 AM
Is it possible to disable writing logs at txt-file?
I have a ReadOnly flash with overlay and no need logs.
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
December 18, 2014, 01:03:55 PM
Little question:

I just switched from Catalyst 14.9 to latest 14.12 and now i am getting 1350 h/s instead of 700 h/s but unfortunatly it is not stable (Lowdifficultyshare error).
Whats going on there? Is this speed increase possible or is it just a bug?

Previous page:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9808012
full member
Activity: 124
Merit: 100
December 18, 2014, 12:27:22 PM
Little question:

I just switched from Catalyst 14.9 to latest 14.12 and now i am getting 1350 h/s instead of 700 h/s but unfortunatly it is not stable (Lowdifficultyshare error).
Whats going on there? Is this speed increase possible or is it just a bug?
Jump to: