Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 212. (Read 2145059 times)

In "Fury X mining performance" thread on your screenshot I see "lowdifficult" error, so it is not real speed. For example, 290X shows 1400h/s if you use miner for Catalyst 13.12 on Catalyst 15.x, but you will get "lowdifficult" errors for all shares. So the only way to test Fury X right now is to use miner for Catalyst 15.x on Windows. Moreover, for Fury X it is necessary to change HashCnt parameter to find best speed.

I would like to test on my Fury's, but as there is no recent Linux version, i'm unable to.

older version doesn't work.


Greetings


Edit: tested on the latest Linux version.

here are some results.

19:20:12:151    23fff700        GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 792 ms, hashrate = 1292 h/s
19:20:12:164    237fe700        GPU 2: HashCnt = 1024, time = 795 ms, hashrate = 1288 h/s
19:20:12:167    23fff700        Round
19:20:12:174    237fe700        Round
19:20:12:217    29ea5700        GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 815 ms, hashrate = 1256 h/s
19:20:12:235    29ea5700        Round
19:20:12:960    28ea3700        GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 791 ms, hashrate = 1294 h/s
19:20:12:978    22ffd700        GPU 2: HashCnt = 1024, time = 795 ms, hashrate = 1288 h/s
19:20:12:978    28ea3700        Round
19:20:12:990    22ffd700        Round
19:20:13:051    296a4700        GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 816 ms, hashrate = 1254 h/s
19:20:13:067    296a4700        Round
19:20:13:770    23fff700        GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 792 ms, hashrate = 1292 h/s
19:20:13:787    23fff700        Round
19:20:13:793    237fe700        GPU 2: HashCnt = 1024, time = 796 ms, hashrate = 1286 h/s
19:20:13:804    237fe700        round found 3 shares
19:20:13:804    237fe700        Round
19:20:13:804    227fc700        07/24/15-19:20:13 - SHARE FOUND (target 2500) - (GPU 2 of 3)
19:20:13:805    227fc700        07/24/15-19:20:13 - SHARE FOUND (target 2500) - (GPU 2 of 3)

So i guess around 1300 h/s on 1 Fury, complete rig was doing around 490 Watt, That's nothing..

Is it ok that I post here wishing the opposite?  For once let me hoard some coins with my nvidias 

And one more time about AEON, I wish the same 

Well...same request as above,about AEON ..to be possible to mine it after hard fork with Claymore miner...thx:)

i make the same request, AEON will not be amd gpu mineable after the hard fork without modification of your miner Claymore.

here the official announce of the hard fork:

thanks!

Hi Claymore

I've been using v9.3 beta on Windows to mine AEON for a while, but they are changing their PoW from CryptoNight to CryptoNight Lite  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11881396

Any chance you could incorporate this into your GPU miner?

Cheers
Bosco

You know I don't like Linux a bit May be later, not right now.

anyone tried a fury card yet?

Please, pretty please post this!

No Linux version ? ;-)

What hashes are you pulling with the R9 380? how much wattage too if you cant check.

Appears to work great, thank you!

Thank you for the awesomely quick turn around! I will test it and provide feedback.

v9.3 for Catalyst 15.x are available for downloading. In my first tests (290X cards only) it has same performance as for Catalyst 14.x.

Thank you good sir!

Ok, I will release version for Catalyst 15.x within 24 hours.

Anyone had any luck getting their MSI AMD R9 380 to work with 9.3 version of the miner?

Mine keeps getting "LowDifficultyShare" which seems to be because of the catalyst 15.1 drivers (I've tired all of the -a options and the h option).

Sadly the 14.7 drivers don't support the card as its newish.

Thanks!

CN algo requires fast memory. Some of "Fury" cards will have new memory, it must improve mining speed, so let's wait when they are available to test them.

Is this also true for the upcoming fury cards?