Author

Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 215. (Read 2145059 times)

donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
Are mined now Monero on Claymore GPU Miner 9.2 beta. So it is not clear how to set the frequency. One rig working 947-1250, and the second 1100-1250 (based on CPU info). Accordingly, various profits. Which team is responsible for setting the frequency? -gpu-engine 1000 -gpu-memclock 1500 - the program gives that does not know the command.

Miner does not support overclocking. You can use MSI AfterBurner for that. Or "GPUs Control Utility v1.1" that you can download by link in OP of this topic:  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/claymores-xpm-primecoin-gpu-miner-v132-693680
sr. member
Activity: 411
Merit: 250
Are mined now Monero on Claymore GPU Miner 9.2 beta. So it is not clear how to set the frequency. One rig working 947-1250, and the second 1100-1250 (based on CPU info). Accordingly, various profits. Which team is responsible for setting the frequency? -gpu-engine 1000 -gpu-memclock 1500 - the program gives that does not know the command.
member
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
Try to increase size of physical RAM, for 4 290 cards at least 4GB is necessary, 5 cards may require even more. You can also try to increase size of virtual memory.

I came home to the rig only showing 4 cards and the 5th's fan spinning at 100%.  moved the 5th card in to a different pci slot, increased virtual mem to 18GB:

5x Sapphire R9 290 Tri X @ 1000/1250

Speed: 3731 h/s, TotalHashes: 503585K, DevHashes: 12588K Mining time: 38:14

10:07:25:440   99c   GPU 0: HashCnt = 1280, time = 1698 ms, hashrate = 753 h/s
10:07:25:480   99c   Round
10:07:25:880   594   GPU 4: HashCnt = 1280, time = 1702 ms, hashrate = 752 h/s
10:07:25:905   594   Round
10:07:26:035   eb0   GPU 1: HashCnt = 1280, time = 1697 ms, hashrate = 754 h/s
10:07:26:070   eb0   Round
10:07:26:100   890   GPU 3: HashCnt = 1280, time = 1696 ms, hashrate = 754 h/s
10:07:26:115   890   Round
10:07:26:705   77c   GPU 2: HashCnt = 1280, time = 1746 ms, hashrate = 733 h/s
10:07:26:740   77c   Round

Looking good.
member
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
For 7790(260x) managed to obtain the best values in the config: -h 256-a 4.
Here's what happened:
Quote
09:42:03:659   bc8   GPU 4: HashCnt = 256, time = 1102 ms, hashrate = 232 h/s
09:42:03:674   580   GPU 3: HashCnt = 256, time = 1101 ms, hashrate = 232 h/s
09:42:03:694   bc8   Round
09:42:03:704   7ec   GPU 2: HashCnt = 256, time = 1121 ms, hashrate = 228 h/s
09:42:03:709   580   Round
09:42:03:719   d10   GPU 1: HashCnt = 256, time = 1122 ms, hashrate = 228 h/s
09:42:03:744   d10   Round
09:42:03:754   730   GPU 0: HashCnt = 256, time = 1117 ms, hashrate = 229 h/s
09:42:03:764   730   Round
09:42:04:769   bcc   GPU 4: HashCnt = 256, time = 1075 ms, hashrate = 238 h/s
09:42:04:779   bcc   Round
09:42:04:804   d54   GPU 3: HashCnt = 256, time = 1079 ms, hashrate = 237 h/s
09:42:04:809   d54   Round
09:42:04:814   c90   GPU 2: HashCnt = 256, time = 1074 ms, hashrate = 238 h/s
09:42:04:824   c90   Round
09:42:04:839   398   GPU 1: HashCnt = 256, time = 1077 ms, hashrate = 237 h/s
09:42:04:849   398   Round
09:42:04:854   aa4   GPU 0: HashCnt = 256, time = 1074 ms, hashrate = 238 h/s
09:42:04:864   aa4   Round
09:42:05:869   bc8   GPU 4: HashCnt = 256, time = 1072 ms, hashrate = 238 h/s
09:42:05:894   bc8   Round
09:42:05:909   580   GPU 3: HashCnt = 256, time = 1079 ms, hashrate = 237 h/s
09:42:05:919   7ec   GPU 2: HashCnt = 256, time = 1075 ms, hashrate = 238 h/s
member
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
Thanks for the reply, I've got 8GB in the system, will try increasing the virtual memory.
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
Any idea what could be causing this:

09:29:03:320   f9c   buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"124601006298325","job":{"blob":"0100beffc9a80519953029eb35686e6603c415a5ce146464a18fc5d4a2ba148c54fce948f82f4e0 0000000e347b57b530720a0174765f22dd11afec72266a4aca2468563cb9692cc5c52ee03","job_id":"148032830562442","target":"7b5e0400"},"status":"OK"}}

09:29:03:320   f9c   parse packet: 303
09:29:03:325   f9c   new buf size: 0
09:29:03:325   f9c   DevFee: Pool Diff 15000
09:29:04:244   f64   GPU 2, GpuMiner k1a failed -4
09:29:04:246   6ec   GPU 3, GpuMiner k1a failed -4
09:29:04:249   f64   GPU memory allocation failed. Try to set at least 16 GB of Virtual Memory: Computer Properties / Advanced System Settings / Performance / Advanced / Virtual Memory

5x 290 rig, I have virtual memory set to 16GB, no overclock, I've actually set memory down to 1250 from stock 1300.

Thanks.

Edit: using 13.12 drivers with 9.2 13.12.

Try to increase size of physical RAM, for 4 290 cards at least 4GB is necessary, 5 cards may require even more. You can also try to increase size of virtual memory.
member
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
Any idea what could be causing this:

09:29:03:320   f9c   buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"124601006298325","job":{"blob":"0100beffc9a80519953029eb35686e6603c415a5ce146464a18fc5d4a2ba148c54fce948f82f4e0 0000000e347b57b530720a0174765f22dd11afec72266a4aca2468563cb9692cc5c52ee03","job_id":"148032830562442","target":"7b5e0400"},"status":"OK"}}

09:29:03:320   f9c   parse packet: 303
09:29:03:325   f9c   new buf size: 0
09:29:03:325   f9c   DevFee: Pool Diff 15000
09:29:04:244   f64   GPU 2, GpuMiner k1a failed -4
09:29:04:246   6ec   GPU 3, GpuMiner k1a failed -4
09:29:04:249   f64   GPU memory allocation failed. Try to set at least 16 GB of Virtual Memory: Computer Properties / Advanced System Settings / Performance / Advanced / Virtual Memory

5x 290 rig, I have virtual memory set to 16GB, no overclock, I've actually set memory down to 1250 from stock 1300.

Thanks.

Edit: using 13.12 drivers with 9.2 13.12.
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
Ran into another issue. Every few 20-30 mins or so I keep getting this

Any idea how to find out which thread 7 is?


Make sure you use v9.2. If so, GPU_id = Thread_id / 2. So it's GPU #3 (i.e. 4th card).
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
Ran into another issue. Every few 20-30 mins or so I keep getting this

Quote
02:58:02:697   974   watchdog - thread 0, hb time 1060
02:58:02:697   974   watchdog - thread 1, hb time 2714
02:58:02:697   974   watchdog - thread 2, hb time 1731
02:58:02:697   974   watchdog - thread 3, hb time 686
02:58:02:697   974   watchdog - thread 4, hb time 1809
02:58:02:697   974   watchdog - thread 5, hb time 624
02:58:02:697   974   watchdog - thread 6, hb time 62
02:58:02:697   974   watchdog - thread 7, hb time 66986
02:58:02:697   974   WATCHDOG: Thread 7 hangs in OpenCL call, you need to restart miner Sad
02:58:02:697   974   WATCHDOG: GPU memory error, you need to restart miner Sad
02:58:02:697   974   Restarting OK, exit...


02:58:02:787   854   Job changed, drop current round


Any idea how to find out which thread 7 is?

legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
I added an old 6870 GPU to one of my Pitcarin rigs. And for some reason it keeps disconnecting from the pool and getting errors such as "Low Difficulty Share".

My 6990 doesn't have any issues and my R9 270X alone don't run into any of these issues.

Any ideas?

1. Make sure that you use Catalyst 14.6 or older.
2. Make sure that you use "-a 3" for 5xxx/6xxx cards.
3. For tests make sure that you don't overclock GPUs and PSU can handle all GPUs.

Ahh thanks


a -3 seems to have fixed the issue, before it was on a -4 for that older 6870 card.


donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
I added an old 6870 GPU to one of my Pitcarin rigs. And for some reason it keeps disconnecting from the pool and getting errors such as "Low Difficulty Share".

My 6990 doesn't have any issues and my R9 270X alone don't run into any of these issues.

Any ideas?

1. Make sure that you use Catalyst 14.6 or older.
2. Make sure that you use "-a 3" for 5xxx/6xxx cards.
3. For tests make sure that you don't overclock GPUs and PSU can handle all GPUs.
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
I added an old 6870 GPU to one of my Pitcarin rigs. And for some reason it keeps disconnecting from the pool and getting errors such as "Low Difficulty Share".

My 6990 doesn't have any issues and my R9 270X alone don't run into any of these issues.


Any ideas?
full member
Activity: 186
Merit: 100
Will there be an update for some performance improvement or a little fee decrease after the rise of the price?
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
Nice specs Wink
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
What are the li options? Just "1"? I would like to lower the intensity further as it seems to interfere with my 2d renders. I've tried "0" and "2" with no success.
This is not clear at all.
Quote
-li   Low intensity mode. Specify "-li 1" if you don't want Windows to freeze.

Any values that are not specified in readme file are not supported. Same for all options. So either don't specify "-li" option, or use "-li 1".

Also both of these setting say Fastest for R9-270/x, which is it or are the equal?
Quote
"-a 1" fastest mining mode for 290/290x and 270/270x cards.
"-a 4" fastest mining for recent cards (280x, 270/270x etc).

This is because for some cards some modes have very similar speed.

no command (auto mode) == 472 - 473 h/s <<-- alot of variance so I cannot tell what mode was chosen

Miner always reports what mode was chosen, like this:  "GPU #0: -a 1 mode selected".


OK so It's li 1 or nothing, got it. THX
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
What are the li options? Just "1"? I would like to lower the intensity further as it seems to interfere with my 2d renders. I've tried "0" and "2" with no success.
This is not clear at all.
Quote
-li   Low intensity mode. Specify "-li 1" if you don't want Windows to freeze.

Any values that are not specified in readme file are not supported. Same for all options. So either don't specify "-li" option, or use "-li 1".

Also both of these setting say Fastest for R9-270/x, which is it or are the equal?
Quote
"-a 1" fastest mining mode for 290/290x and 270/270x cards.
"-a 4" fastest mining for recent cards (280x, 270/270x etc).

This is because for some cards some modes have very similar speed.

no command (auto mode) == 472 - 473 h/s <<-- alot of variance so I cannot tell what mode was chosen

Miner always reports what mode was chosen, like this:  "GPU #0: -a 1 mode selected".


legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
What are the li options? Just "1"? I would like to lower the intensity further as it seems to interfere with my 2d renders. I've tried "0" and "2" with no success.
This is not clear at all.
Quote
-li   Low intensity mode. Specify "-li 1" if you don't want Windows to freeze.

Also both of these setting say Fastest for R9-270/x, which is it or are the equal?
Quote
"-a 1" fastest mining mode for 290/290x and 270/270x cards.
"-a 4" fastest mining for recent cards (280x, 270/270x etc).

HD7950 Tahiti (basically 280 right?)

To see your current hashrate remember to hit "m" key and then you have to select the GPU number usually "0" on single card systems.

-h 832 does work best

-a parameter rates (these are with low intensity -li 1)

no command (auto mode) == 472 - 473 h/s <<-- alot of variance so I cannot tell what mode was chosen
-a 0 == 474 h/s
-a 1 == 466 h/s
-a 2 == 455 h/s
-a 3 == 448 h/s
-a 4 == 472 h/s

Using this command line for anyone that wants to try it and might be having issues with the syntax (getting unrecognized command errors).

NsGpuCNMiner.exe -o stratum+tcp://xmr.crypto-pool.fr:6666 -a 1 -tt 80 -h 832 -li 1 -di 0 -wd 1 -u 44VYnAXVVH2bRvpC2vSYuZPpdXUpsVyc8WkSymZuPQNKSD3485C8PKPGPMbT53mRNBS7y2q9FkQCS1N 1zmt5YLWMQ8es9gH -p x

The line is so long sometimes things like wordwrap in notepad will ad a carriage return after the space character before the wallet address so make sure there is only one space between every parameter.

hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
one for one and 1 2 3
February 26, 2015, 03:41:06 AM
Hello dear,

I will testing this next month,in my opinion currently it is waste of time.  Sad
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
full member
Activity: 248
Merit: 100
I'm not real
February 25, 2015, 11:09:25 PM
ESET detects a virus in the latest download zip from mega.
Jump to: