Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 232.

nsimmons

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: Black_Adder on September 19, 2014, 04:57:25 AM

I cannot see any different in speed between 7.0 and 6.1 for windows in fact the new one is slower

is there's any reason for this or does the new one has different settings?

My profits were literally cut in half with 7.0, ive noticed the dev fee is now hard coded so miner proxy doesnt work, but 5% doesnt explain the massive drop. Im running 20khs so the difficulty is rather high and i only find a share every few minutes. I suspect when it switched back to my pool im hashing old work.
With 6.1 the pools estimated hash rate is 17-18kh/s, with 7.1 its around 8-10. I gave it 2 days.

Ive switched back to 6.1, I mined over 300 xmr with the dev fee on, thats plenty.

seljak

member

Activity: 101

Merit: 10

Quote from: infofront on September 19, 2014, 02:48:40 PM

Quote from: seljak on September 19, 2014, 02:08:43 PM

r9 270
13.12 = 370h/s
14.6 = 220h/s

?

Are you using the correctly corresponding driver and miner versions?

Driver ver. 14.7, miner 7.0 14.6

OrientA

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: bensam123 on September 20, 2014, 12:15:53 AM

Is work being done to improve speeds on elpedia memory? Most people are stuck with this... a 20% difference is pretty huge.

You can search litecoin forum to find the mod bios.

bensam123

sr. member

Activity: 423

Merit: 250

Is work being done to improve speeds on elpedia memory? Most people are stuck with this... a 20% difference is pretty huge.

infofront

legendary

Activity: 2646

Merit: 2842

Shitcoin Minimalist

Quote from: seljak on September 19, 2014, 02:08:43 PM

r9 270
13.12 = 370h/s
14.6 = 220h/s

?

Are you using the correctly corresponding driver and miner versions?

seljak

member

Activity: 101

Merit: 10

r9 270
13.12 = 370h/s
14.6 = 220h/s

?

anatolikostis

legendary

Activity: 2026

Merit: 1005

PowerColor hd7950-dhv5 with Elpida GDDR5 @1080/1500
non optimized bios - 376h/s
optimized bios - 426h/s Shocked

(hd7950-dhv2 with Hynix GDDR5 @1080/1500 pulls over 456h/s)
the speed diference between v6.1 & v7.0 is apsent

DemocraticRepublicOfDave

member

Activity: 77

Merit: 10

Ah cool.

Up and running and hashing away. Grin

Cheers

Dave

DemocraticRepublicOfDave

member

Activity: 77

Merit: 10

Quote from: bonosurgut on September 19, 2014, 09:00:36 AM

Quote from: DemocraticRepublicOfDave on September 19, 2014, 08:52:27 AM

Hi all,

Any idea where I can download the catalyst 13.12 linux 64 bit drivers. AMD website keeps throwing me to the latest 14.x version (grrr).

Cheers

Dave

http://support.amd.com/en-us/download/desktop/previous/detail?os=Linux%20x86_64&rev=13.12

Many thanks.

Dave

bonosurgut

hero member

Activity: 520

Merit: 500

Quote from: DemocraticRepublicOfDave on September 19, 2014, 08:52:27 AM

Hi all,

Any idea where I can download the catalyst 13.12 linux 64 bit drivers. AMD website keeps throwing me to the latest 14.x version (grrr).

Cheers

Dave

http://support.amd.com/en-us/download/desktop/previous/detail?os=Linux%20x86_64&rev=13.12

DemocraticRepublicOfDave

member

Activity: 77

Merit: 10

Hi all,

Any idea where I can download the catalyst 13.12 linux 64 bit drivers. AMD website keeps throwing me to the latest 14.x version (grrr).

Cheers

Dave

OrientA

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: Black_Adder on September 19, 2014, 04:57:25 AM

I cannot see any different in speed between 7.0 and 6.1 for windows in fact the new one is slower

is there's any reason for this or does the new one has different settings?

Claymore said it was just the fan control in the 7.0. So I did not upgrade.

Black_Adder

newbie

Activity: 53

Merit: 0

I cannot see any different in speed between 7.0 and 6.1 for windows in fact the new one is slower

is there's any reason for this or does the new one has different settings?

moroz

newbie

Activity: 26

Merit: 0

Quote from: OrientA on September 18, 2014, 12:30:55 PM

Quote from: moroz on September 18, 2014, 12:24:52 PM

Thanks for Linux miner!

OS Ubuntu 14.04, catalyst 14.4, GPU Miner v7.0 Beta catalyst 14.6
Host 1: Sempron 140 2GB RAM, dual R9 290 @ 947MHz 1280h/s
Host 2: Xeon E5-2665 4GB RAM, dual R 290 @ 1040MHz, 1390h/s
Host 3: Celeron G1820 4GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s
Host 4: Dual Xeon E5-2665 16GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s

Flying good for the last 24 hours, no crashes.
I don't have any issues regarding virtual memory. Actually i don't have any virtual mem since Ubuntu is PXE booted into RAM (squashfs image) and uses approx 1.1 gigs, which leaves 900 megs free for the first machine.
Are hashrates normal for these cards?
The only thing that stops me from booting the entire farm with this miner is no way to monitor it. With c(s)gminer it's easy using the API and anubis. Any way to monitor Claymore's miner?

The 7970 speed is quite low. for 925MHz, should be around 460h/s. Yours is about 355h/s. Maybe your memory speed is lower than 1250MHz or they are not Hynix.

I use Windows.

Yeah, you are right, Elpida memory... I found other 7970 cards with Hynix, they do much better

OrientA

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: OrientA on September 19, 2014, 01:25:02 AM

Boolberry's miner is not sensitive to memory speed. But it is not profitable to mine either.

Uh... yes it is. If you mean, worth more than power costs, it is.

I use btc-mike's AMD miner. The hash rate is the same for 750 or 1250MHz memory frequency.

OrientA

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: infofront on September 18, 2014, 08:40:42 PM

Quote from: OrientA on September 18, 2014, 12:30:55 PM

Quote from: moroz on September 18, 2014, 12:24:52 PM

Thanks for Linux miner!

OS Ubuntu 14.04, catalyst 14.4, GPU Miner v7.0 Beta catalyst 14.6
Host 1: Sempron 140 2GB RAM, dual R9 290 @ 947MHz 1280h/s
Host 2: Xeon E5-2665 4GB RAM, dual R 290 @ 1040MHz, 1390h/s
Host 3: Celeron G1820 4GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s
Host 4: Dual Xeon E5-2665 16GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s

Flying good for the last 24 hours, no crashes.
I don't have any issues regarding virtual memory. Actually i don't have any virtual mem since Ubuntu is PXE booted into RAM (squashfs image) and uses approx 1.1 gigs, which leaves 900 megs free for the first machine.
Are hashrates normal for these cards?
The only thing that stops me from booting the entire farm with this miner is no way to monitor it. With c(s)gminer it's easy using the API and anubis. Any way to monitor Claymore's miner?

The 7970 speed is quite low. for 925MHz, should be around 460h/s. Yours is about 355h/s. Maybe your memory speed is lower than 1250MHz or they are not Hynix.

I use Windows.

My 7950s get awful rates as well. I'm thinking they probably have Elpida memory.

Boolberry's miner is not sensitive to memory speed. But it is not profitable to mine either.

infofront

legendary

Activity: 2646

Merit: 2842

Shitcoin Minimalist

Quote from: OrientA on September 18, 2014, 12:30:55 PM

Quote from: moroz on September 18, 2014, 12:24:52 PM

Thanks for Linux miner!

OS Ubuntu 14.04, catalyst 14.4, GPU Miner v7.0 Beta catalyst 14.6
Host 1: Sempron 140 2GB RAM, dual R9 290 @ 947MHz 1280h/s
Host 2: Xeon E5-2665 4GB RAM, dual R 290 @ 1040MHz, 1390h/s
Host 3: Celeron G1820 4GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s
Host 4: Dual Xeon E5-2665 16GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s

Flying good for the last 24 hours, no crashes.
I don't have any issues regarding virtual memory. Actually i don't have any virtual mem since Ubuntu is PXE booted into RAM (squashfs image) and uses approx 1.1 gigs, which leaves 900 megs free for the first machine.
Are hashrates normal for these cards?
The only thing that stops me from booting the entire farm with this miner is no way to monitor it. With c(s)gminer it's easy using the API and anubis. Any way to monitor Claymore's miner?

The 7970 speed is quite low. for 925MHz, should be around 460h/s. Yours is about 355h/s. Maybe your memory speed is lower than 1250MHz or they are not Hynix.

I use Windows.

My 7950s get awful rates as well. I'm thinking they probably have Elpida memory.

goofy73

member

Activity: 65

Merit: 10

Quote from: OrientA on September 18, 2014, 06:36:56 AM

I do not understand.

Quote from: CrashOD on September 18, 2014, 09:42:55 AM

Your screenshot shows a Primecoin (XPM) miner and CPD is "Coins per Day " which is the hashrate equivalent for XPM. This thread is for the CryptoNote miner which is completely different from the XPM miner you are talking about. I believe you are looking for this thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/claymores-xpm-primecoin-gpu-miner-v132-693680

Sorry guys, you are right! Im little confused.. By the way, nice to hear that cryptonote miner have speed potential, thanks Claymore fo your work. Maybe you look at xpm miner and 7950 cards?!

OrientA

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: moroz on September 18, 2014, 12:24:52 PM

Thanks for Linux miner!

OS Ubuntu 14.04, catalyst 14.4, GPU Miner v7.0 Beta catalyst 14.6
Host 1: Sempron 140 2GB RAM, dual R9 290 @ 947MHz 1280h/s
Host 2: Xeon E5-2665 4GB RAM, dual R 290 @ 1040MHz, 1390h/s
Host 3: Celeron G1820 4GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s
Host 4: Dual Xeon E5-2665 16GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s

Flying good for the last 24 hours, no crashes.
I don't have any issues regarding virtual memory. Actually i don't have any virtual mem since Ubuntu is PXE booted into RAM (squashfs image) and uses approx 1.1 gigs, which leaves 900 megs free for the first machine.
Are hashrates normal for these cards?
The only thing that stops me from booting the entire farm with this miner is no way to monitor it. With c(s)gminer it's easy using the API and anubis. Any way to monitor Claymore's miner?

The 7970 speed is quite low. for 925MHz, should be around 460h/s. Yours is about 355h/s. Maybe your memory speed is lower than 1250MHz or they are not Hynix.

I use Windows.

moroz

newbie

Activity: 26

Merit: 0

Thanks for Linux miner!

OS Ubuntu 14.04, catalyst 14.4, GPU Miner v7.0 Beta catalyst 14.6
Host 1: Sempron 140 2GB RAM, dual R9 290 @ 947MHz 1280h/s
Host 2: Xeon E5-2665 4GB RAM, dual R 290 @ 1040MHz, 1390h/s
Host 3: Celeron G1820 4GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s
Host 4: Dual Xeon E5-2665 16GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s

Flying good for the last 24 hours, no crashes.
I don't have any issues regarding virtual memory. Actually i don't have any virtual mem since Ubuntu is PXE booted into RAM (squashfs image) and uses approx 1.1 gigs, which leaves 900 megs free for the first machine.
Are hashrates normal for these cards?
The only thing that stops me from booting the entire farm with this miner is no way to monitor it. With c(s)gminer it's easy using the API and anubis. Any way to monitor Claymore's miner?

Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 232. (Read 2145062 times)