Author

Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 229. (Read 2145076 times)

sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 252
September 29, 2014, 06:52:52 PM
work fine with 14.9 drivers?
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
September 29, 2014, 06:46:57 PM
Claymore v8.0
Windows 7 Pro w/ 14.6 beta-may 23
Sapphire HD7950 Dual-X 87% ASIC
GPU 900 / Memory 1250 / 0.925 mV

Getting 453 h/s after 1 hour with all default settings.

Do you use -a 3 or 4?

I didn't add anything, so the default is -a 0. My pool.bat is just "NsGpuCNMiner.exe -u _____ -p ______"

http://i59.tinypic.com/xopi0i.png
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
September 29, 2014, 06:27:28 PM
Cards available: 1
GPU #0: name: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 units
Total cards: 1
GPU #0: HashCnt = 896
POOL version
GPU #0: -a 4 mode selected



Speed: 429 h/s, TotalHashes: 126K, DevHashes: 5K Mining time: 00:05    @ 64c     150watts*


Version 6.1 was getting 396 h/s @ 67c  170watts*

*Power readings taken from back of PSU LED display

I haven't hit tune mode or anything, going to leave it running 24 hours and see what happens.


Which card, what is your frequency?

Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 280X VAPOR-X  (Elpida memory)

GPU 1030/1500 memory..

I'm remote to the location so I would need to talk someone through flashing it, the trixx program doesn't let me bring the voltage down any further, could get more out of it tbh.

sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
September 29, 2014, 06:22:49 PM
Claymore v8.0
Windows 7 Pro w/ 14.6 beta-may 23
Sapphire HD7950 Dual-X 87% ASIC
GPU 900 / Memory 1250 / 0.925 mV

Getting 453 h/s after 1 hour with all default settings.

Do you use -a 3 or 4?
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
September 29, 2014, 06:13:27 PM
Cards available: 1
GPU #0: name: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 units
Total cards: 1
GPU #0: HashCnt = 896
POOL version
GPU #0: -a 4 mode selected



Speed: 429 h/s, TotalHashes: 126K, DevHashes: 5K Mining time: 00:05    @ 64c     150watts*


Version 6.1 was getting 396 h/s @ 67c  170watts*

*Power readings taken from back of PSU LED display

I haven't hit tune mode or anything, going to leave it running 24 hours and see what happens.


Which card, what is your frequency?
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
September 29, 2014, 05:48:39 PM
Claymore v8.0
Windows 7 Pro w/ 14.6 beta-may 23
Sapphire HD7950 Dual-X 87% ASIC
GPU 900 / Memory 1250 / 0.925 mV

Getting 453 h/s after 1 hour with all default settings.
hero member
Activity: 543
Merit: 500
September 29, 2014, 05:40:55 PM
claymore 6.1 works better than 8.0 on windows 8.1. speed decreased for me a lot, also looks like temps are lower too.

edit: after I restarted my machines it works better!
-a3 works almost the same as -a4(~3% difference) on 270x, naturally it consumes  less power, and less heat.

claymore 8.0
270x -a3 375hs @ 1030/1000
270x -a4 383hs @ 1030/1000

claymore 6.1
270x -a3 315hs @ 1030/1000
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
September 29, 2014, 05:36:31 PM
Cards available: 1
GPU #0: name: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 units
Total cards: 1
GPU #0: HashCnt = 896
POOL version
GPU #0: -a 4 mode selected



Speed: 429 h/s, TotalHashes: 126K, DevHashes: 5K Mining time: 00:05    @ 64c     150watts*


Version 6.1 was getting 396 h/s @ 67c  170watts*



*Power readings taken from back of PSU LED display


I haven't hit tune mode or anything, going to leave it running 24 hours and see what happens.
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
September 29, 2014, 03:29:20 PM
The size of the memory is not playing seems to be no difference between

You need to set HashCnt > 512 to see the difference, but you cannot do it because of 1GB. Therefore, no speedup for 1GB cards.

I tried to 2Gb cards all possible values of the parameter h. And compared with 1Gb cards only in the negative (or 0 difference)

I don't have such cards here so I cannot investigate it deeply, but if you have 2GB and it does not help - it means that card cannot use entire memory bandwith, too few computing units for that. If so, it's useless to use "-h" parameter, miner will select optimal value automatically.
member
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
September 29, 2014, 02:54:58 PM
The size of the memory is not playing seems to be no difference between

You need to set HashCnt > 512 to see the difference, but you cannot do it because of 1GB. Therefore, no speedup for 1GB cards.

I tried to 2Gb cards all possible values of the parameter h. And compared with 1Gb cards only in the negative (or 0 difference)

20:22:58:140   e20   parse packet: 303
20:22:58:148   e20   new buf size: 0
20:22:58:173   e20   Pool Diff 10000
20:22:58:178   e20   df has same pool, skip
20:22:58:283   da0   Round
20:22:58:302   2ec   Round
20:23:00:605   c08   GPU 1: HashCnt = 448, time = 2258 ms, hashrate = 198 h/s
20:23:00:619   da0   GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 2228 ms, hashrate = 201 h/s
20:23:00:628   c08   Round
20:23:00:639   da0   Round
20:23:00:651   f60   GPU 3: HashCnt = 448, time = 2265 ms, hashrate = 197 h/s
20:23:00:661   f60   Round
20:23:02:441   cd8   GPU 2: HashCnt = 768, time = 4047 ms, hashrate = 189 h/s
20:23:02:470   cd8   Round
20:23:02:617   77c   GPU 4: HashCnt = 800, time = 4200 ms, hashrate = 190 h/s
20:23:02:650   77c   Round
20:23:02:825   4d0   GPU 1: HashCnt = 448, time = 2166 ms, hashrate = 206 h/s
20:23:02:848   4d0   Round
20:23:02:864   ee4   Round
20:23:02:907   2ec   GPU 3: HashCnt = 448, time = 2206 ms, hashrate = 203 h/s
20:23:02:919   2ec   Round
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
September 29, 2014, 02:51:12 PM
On 7790(260x) not speedup.   Huh Cry

Miner does not set optimal "-h" and "-a" options for many cards. It's because I don't have all cards here. Post first 20-30 log lines here so I can see how many compute units your card has and what's its name. Use "m" key to adjust "-h" value, or try to change "-h" values directly if OpenCL crashes.
This version requires some time to find optimal settings.
Everyone can post optimal "-h" and "-a" values for your cards here (and also card name as it is displayed and number of compute units), I will use this data to improve miner. Right now it knows only 290x,280x,270x and 6950 cards.

Same card, can you enhance its output or it has reached its maximum?

Try "-a 4".
NOTE: 1GB cards cannot show good results anyway and in most cases you will not see any improvements.

I got some good results on my 6950 1GB with -h 512 -a 4 sorry -h 480 -a 3 (win 7). It's  266 H\s (8.0) vs 146 H\s (6.1) before! And even for 5870 1GB 210 H\s vs 115 H\s.

But for 6770 1GB and win 8.1 i have no luck Sad

Btw i also have no luck with R9 290 on Win 8.1, so i think it's some sort of OS problem, cause every rigs with win 7 increasing hashrate (R9 270, 7850, 6950, 5870 and very little on 7950)
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
September 29, 2014, 02:49:33 PM
The size of the memory is not playing seems to be no difference between

You need to set HashCnt > 512 to see the difference, but you cannot do it because of 1GB. Therefore, no speedup for 1GB cards.
member
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
September 29, 2014, 02:39:40 PM
The size of the memory is not playing seems to be no difference between


20:30:21:388   cac   
20:30:21:391   cac   ЙHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH»
20:30:21:397   cac   є            Claymore CryptoNote GPU Miner  v8.0 Beta            є
20:30:21:406   cac   ИHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHj
20:30:23:331   cac   
Cards available: 5
20:30:23:334   cac   GPU #0: name: Bonaire, 1024 MB available, 14 units
20:30:23:336   cac   GPU #1: name: Bonaire, 1024 MB available, 14 units
20:30:23:339   cac   GPU #2: name: Bonaire, 2048 MB available, 14 units
20:30:23:343   cac   GPU #3: name: Bonaire, 1024 MB available, 14 units
20:30:23:346   cac   GPU #4: name: Bonaire, 2048 MB available, 14 units
20:30:23:349   cac   Total cards: 5
20:30:23:353   cac   Initializing...

20:30:23:356   cac   card 0, m1 1024, m2 767 w 112
20:30:23:359   cac   0 m = 2
20:30:23:363   cac   GPU #0: HashCnt = 448
20:30:23:367   cac   card 1, m1 1024, m2 767 w 112
20:30:23:370   cac   1 m = 2
20:30:23:373   cac   GPU #1: HashCnt = 448
20:30:23:377   cac   card 2, m1 2048, m2 1791 w 112
20:30:23:381   cac   2 m = 2
20:30:23:384   cac   GPU #2: HashCnt = 352
20:30:23:388   cac   card 3, m1 1024, m2 767 w 112
20:30:23:391   cac   3 m = 2
20:30:23:394   cac   GPU #3: HashCnt = 352
20:30:23:398   cac   card 4, m1 2048, m2 1791 w 112
20:30:23:402   cac   4 m = 2
20:30:23:405   cac   GPU #4: HashCnt = 352
20:30:23:409   cac   POOL version
20:30:23:412   cac   b120
20:30:27:441   cac   GPU #0: -a 4 mode selected
20:30:27:444   cac   GPU #1: -a 4 mode selected
20:30:27:448   cac   GPU #2: -a 4 mode selected
20:30:27:452   cac   GPU #3: -a 4 mode selected
20:30:27:455   cac   GPU #4: -a 4 mode selected
20:30:27:524   cac   5 pools specified.
20:30:27:527   cac   Press "m" key for tune mode.
20:30:27:536   150   Stratum - connecting to '127.0.0.1' <127.0.0.1> port 7777
20:30:27:541   150   Stratum - Connected
20:30:27:902   150   got 303 bytes
20:30:27:911   150   buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"855023117759265","job":{"blob":"010097aea6a105ebadd274073c38e1439db6ec9c364abb290771a1d65fbc693bace032cef192b60 00000001bab80585414b68aa00f746c91ee23a98465b8a5a186aef9a5c6a689694c095701","job_id":"721662361826747","target":"b88d0600"},"status":"OK"}}

20:30:27:921   150   parse packet: 303
20:30:27:931   150   new buf size: 0
20:30:27:942   150   Pool Diff 10000
20:30:27:951   150   df has same pool, skip
20:30:28:033   c50   Round
20:30:28:043   cd8   Round
20:30:28:049   d88   Round
20:30:28:054   cc8   Round
20:30:29:884   4d0   GPU 3: HashCnt = 352, time = 1806 ms, hashrate = 194 h/s
20:30:29:907   4d0   round found 1 shares
20:30:29:919   4d0   Round
20:30:29:935   f98   GPU 2: HashCnt = 352, time = 1849 ms, hashrate = 190 h/s
20:30:29:945   f98   Round
20:30:30:006   150   got 63 bytes
20:30:30:016   150   buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"status":"OK"}}

20:30:30:026   150   parse packet: 63
20:30:30:036   150   Share accepted
20:30:30:046   150   new buf size: 0
20:30:30:328   d88   GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 2216 ms, hashrate = 202 h/s
20:30:30:351   d88   Round
20:30:31:686   cd8   GPU 3: HashCnt = 352, time = 1755 ms, hashrate = 200 h/s
20:30:31:708   cd8   Round
20:30:31:739   77c   GPU 4: HashCnt = 352, time = 1783 ms, hashrate = 197 h/s
20:30:31:746   2d4   GPU 2: HashCnt = 352, time = 1768 ms, hashrate = 199 h/s
20:30:31:758   2d4   Round
20:30:32:548   cc8   GPU 1: HashCnt = 448, time = 2168 ms, hashrate = 206 h/s
20:30:32:569   dd8   Round
20:30:33:487   4d0   GPU 3: HashCnt = 352, time = 1755 ms, hashrate = 200 h/s
20:30:33:510   4d0   Round
20:30:33:550   7e4   GPU 4: HashCnt = 352, time = 1768 ms, hashrate = 199 h/s
20:30:33:561   f98   GPU 2: HashCnt = 352, time = 1767 ms, hashrate = 199 h/s
20:30:33:573   f98   Round
20:30:34:793   d88   GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 2168 ms, hashrate = 206 h/s
20:30:34:818   cc8   Round
20:30:35:289   cd8   GPU 3: HashCnt = 352, time = 1755 ms, hashrate = 200 h/s
20:30:35:312   cd8   round found 1 shares
20:30:35:322   cd8   Round
20:30:35:362   77c   GPU 4: HashCnt = 352, time = 1769 ms, hashrate = 198 h/s
20:30:35:372   2d4   GPU 2: HashCnt = 352, time = 1768 ms, hashrate = 199 h/s
20:30:35:385   2d4   Round
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
September 29, 2014, 02:31:44 PM
On 7790(260x) not speedup.   Huh Cry

Miner does not set optimal "-h" and "-a" options for many cards. It's because I don't have all cards here. Post first 20-30 log lines here so I can see how many compute units your card has and what's its name. Use "m" key to adjust "-h" value, or try to change "-h" values directly if OpenCL crashes.
This version requires some time to find optimal settings.
Everyone can post optimal "-h" and "-a" values for your cards here (and also card name as it is displayed and number of compute units), I will use this data to improve miner. Right now it knows only 290x,280x,270x and 6950 cards.

Same card, can you enhance its output or it has reached its maximum?

Try "-a 4".
NOTE: 1GB cards cannot show good results anyway and in most cases you will not see any improvements.
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
September 29, 2014, 01:23:20 PM
On 7790(260x) not speedup.   Huh Cry

Miner does not set optimal "-h" and "-a" options for many cards. It's because I don't have all cards here. Post first 20-30 log lines here so I can see how many compute units your card has and what's its name. Use "m" key to adjust "-h" value, or try to change "-h" values directly if OpenCL crashes.
This version requires some time to find optimal settings.
Everyone can post optimal "-h" and "-a" values for your cards here (and also card name as it is displayed and number of compute units), I will use this data to improve miner. Right now it knows only 290x,280x,270x and 6950 cards.

Same card, can you enhance its output or it has reached its maximum? 
Quote
20:12:01:806   de8   
Cards available: 1
20:12:01:806   de8   GPU #0: name: Bonaire, 1024 MB available, 14 units
20:12:01:806   de8   Total cards: 1
20:12:01:806   de8   Initializing...

20:12:01:822   de8   card 0, m1 1024, m2 767 w 112
20:12:01:822   de8   0 m = 2
20:12:01:822   de8   GPU #0: HashCnt = 448
20:12:01:822   de8   POOL version
20:12:01:822   de8   b120
20:12:02:570   de8   GPU #0: -a 3 mode selected
20:12:02:570   de8   LOW INTENSITY MODE ENABLED
20:12:02:586   de8   5 pools specified.
20:12:02:586   de8   Press "m" key for tune mode.
20:12:02:602   11c8   Stratum - connecting to 'xmr.hashinvest.net' <62.210.84.160> port 1111
20:12:02:617   700   Stratum - connecting to 'xmr.hashinvest.net' <62.210.84.160> port 1111
20:12:02:992   11c8   Stratum - Connected
20:12:03:023   700   Stratum - Connected
20:12:03:444   11c8   got 303 bytes
20:12:03:444   11c8   buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"477921936335042","job":{"blob":"0100f6c0a6a105c91bdeb4d89210f6081785a8317da308976f0250a485a4959414204e36b6ded20 0000000c439f38aaaa84f27d1803c04749df790b18fc5dc67e18bed5b84c73df04d92be01","job_id":"773878962569870","target":"169f0200"},"status":"OK"}}

20:12:03:444   11c8   parse packet: 303
20:12:03:444   11c8   new buf size: 0
20:12:03:444   11c8   DevFee: Pool Diff 25000.1
20:12:03:569   10e0   Round
20:12:07:126   a98   GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3479 ms, hashrate = 128 h/s
20:12:07:126   a98   Round
20:12:10:589   10e0   GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3399 ms, hashrate = 131 h/s
20:12:10:604   10e0   Round
20:12:14:021   a98   GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3353 ms, hashrate = 133 h/s
20:12:14:036   a98   Round
20:12:17:484   10e0   GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3376 ms, hashrate = 132 h/s
20:12:17:484   10e0   Round
20:12:20:947   a98   GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3387 ms, hashrate = 132 h/s
20:12:20:947   a98   Round
20:12:24:488   10e0   GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3461 ms, hashrate = 129 h/s
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
September 29, 2014, 12:02:25 PM
280x - 485 h/s Hynix
270x - 406 h/s

Very strange that I can't get more on 280x



I also cannot get more on 7970. I am using -a 3. That is most efficient for me. If I use -a 4, there is about 5% increase, but the power also increase 5%.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
September 29, 2014, 11:17:30 AM
Stock 7850 2GB 330 h/s -> 370 h/s  Shocked
Powercolor HD7850 2Gb

GPU #0: name: Pitcairn, 2048 MB available, 16 units

385 h/s @ 1050/1250 -a 4 -h 512

-li 1 makes windows smooth.. speed still the same ^^
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
September 29, 2014, 11:05:51 AM
280x - 485 h/s Hynix
270x - 406 h/s

Very strange that I can't get more on 280x


Start miner for 1-2 minutes and PM me the log file.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
September 29, 2014, 10:39:13 AM
280x - 485 h/s Hynix
270x - 406 h/s

Very strange that I can't get more on 280x

donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
September 29, 2014, 10:04:48 AM
On 7790(260x) not speedup.   Huh Cry

Miner does not set optimal "-h" and "-a" options for many cards. It's because I don't have all cards here. Post first 20-30 log lines here so I can see how many compute units your card has and what's its name. Use "m" key to adjust "-h" value, or try to change "-h" values directly if OpenCL crashes.
This version requires some time to find optimal settings.
Everyone can post optimal "-h" and "-a" values for your cards here (and also card name as it is displayed and number of compute units), I will use this data to improve miner. Right now it knows only 290x,280x,270x and 6950 cards.
Jump to: